Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 1432–1442 | Cite as

Vegetation Response to Prescribed Fire in Mid-Atlantic Brackish Marshes

  • Wesley A. Bickford
  • Brian A. NeedelmanEmail author
  • Raymond R. Weil
  • Andrew H. Baldwin
Article

Abstract

Prescribed fire management generally stimulates plant biomass production in coastal marsh systems. This study was conducted to understand the interactive effects of the mechanisms of fire on vegetation production. The effects of canopy removal and ash deposition on biomass production were investigated in two manipulative experiments at the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Dorchester County, MD. On non-burned sites, canopy removal increased biomass production above and belowground (40 and 260 %, respectively), while ash deposition showed no effect on production. On burned sites, post-burn canopy replacement decreased biomass production above and belowground (41 and 40 %, respectively). Production increased more in response to canopy removal at sites dominated by Schoenoplectus americanus than at sites dominated by Spartina patens and Distichlis spicata. Canopy removal was the dominant mechanism through which fire affected biomass production in this study. If increased biomass production is a desirable outcome, prescribed fire programs may benefit by maximizing canopy removal.

Keywords

Coastal tidal marsh Prescribed fire Biomass production Marsh management Schoenoplectus americanus Spartina patens Distichlis spicata 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Maryland Sea Grant for funding this project (Award Number NA10OAR4170072). We would also like to thank the staff at the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, especially Suzanne Baird, Bill Giese, Matt Whitbeck, Leticia Melendez, and Nate Carle, for their continuous suggestions, support, assistance, and collaboration on the study. We are appreciative of the field and lab work help received from members of the Soil and Water Geospatial Analysis Lab (SAWGAL) at the University of Maryland especially George Geatz, Michele Miller, Asia Vinnikova, Amanda Garzio-Hadzick, Emily Hutchins, Becca Mead, Miriam Meyers, and Joey Schlosnagle. We would also like to thank Pat Megonigal of Smithsonian Environmental Research Center and Don Cahoon, Glenn Guntenspergen, and Jim Lynch of USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center for collaborating and sharing data for comparison throughout the study.

References

  1. Allan, P.F. 1950. Ecological bases for land use planning in Gulf coast marshlands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 5(57–62): 85.Google Scholar
  2. Bickford, W.A. 2011. Plant productivity and competitive response to prescribed fire in Mid-Atlantic brackish marshes. M.S. Thesis. University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  3. Bickford, W.A., A.H. Baldwin, B.A. Needelman, and R.R. Weil. 2012. Canopy disturbance alters competitive outcomes between two brackish marsh plant species. Aquatic Botany. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.05.006.
  4. Broome, S.W., I.A. Mendelssohn, and K.L. McKee. 1995. Relative growth of Spartina patens (Ait.) Muhl. and Scirpus olneyi Gray occurring in a mixed stand as affected by salinity and flooding depth. Wetlands 15: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cahoon, D.R., P.F. Hensel, J. Rybczyk, K.L. McKee, C.E. Proffitt, and B.C. Perez. 2003. Mass tree mortality leads to mangrove peat collapse at Bay Islands, Honduras after Hurricane Mitch. Journal of Ecology 91: 1093–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahoon, D.R., M.A. Ford, and P.F. Hensel. 2004. Ecogeomorphology of Spartina patens-dominated tidal marshes: soil organic matter accumulation, marsh elevation dynamics, and disturbance. In The ecogeomorphology of tidal marshes, coastal estuarine studies, vol. 59, eds. S. Fagherazzi, M. Marani, and L.K. Blum, 247–266. American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
  7. Cahoon, D.R., G. Guntenspergen, S. Baird, J. Nagel, P. Hensel, J. Lynch, D. Bishara, P. Brennan, J. Jones, and C. Otto. 2010. Do annual prescribed fires enhance or slow the loss of coastal marsh habitat at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge? Final project report (JFSP Number: 06-2-1-35). March 31, 2010. Beltsville, MD.Google Scholar
  8. Cartwright, B.W. 1942. Regulated burning as a marsh management technique. Transcripts of the North American Wildlife Conference 7: 257–263.Google Scholar
  9. Chabreck, R.H. 1981. Effect of burn date on regrowth of Scirpus olneyi and Spartina patens. Proceedings of annual conference, Southeastern Association Fish Wildlife Agencies. 35: 201–210.Google Scholar
  10. de Kroon, H., and J. Knops. 1990. Habitat exploration through morphological plasticity in two chalk grassland perennials. Oikos 59: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Debano, L.F., and C.E. Conrad. 1978. The effect of fire on nutrients in a chaparral ecosystem. Ecology 59: 489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLucia, E.H., S.A. Heckathorn, and T.A. Day. 1992. Effects of soil temperature on growth, biomass allocation and resource acquisition of Andropogon gerardii Vitman. New Phytologist 120: 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faulkner, S.P., and A.A. de la Cruz. 1982. Nutrient mobilization following winter fires in an irregularly flooded marsh. Journal of Environmental Quality 11: 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flores, C., D.L. Bounds, and D.E. Ruby. 2011. Does prescribed fire benefit wetland vegetation? Wetlands 31: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flynn, K.M., I.A. Mendelssohn, and B.J. Wilsey. 1999. The effect of water level management on the soils and vegetation of two coastal Louisiana marshes. Wetlands Ecology and Management 7: 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford, M.A., and J.B. Grace. 1998. The interactive effects of fire and herbivory on a coastal marsh in Louisiana. Wetlands 18: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabrey, S.W., A.D. Afton, and B.C. Wilson. 2001. Effects of structural marsh management and winter burning on plant and bird communities during summer in the Gulf Coast Chenier Plain. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 218–231.Google Scholar
  18. Gallagher, J.L., P.L. Wolf, and W.J. Pfeiffer. 1984. Rhizome and root growth rates and cycles in protein and carbohydrate concentrations in Georgia Spartina alterniflora Loisel. plants. American Journal of Botany 71: 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geatz, G.W. 2012. Nutrient levels and organic matter decomposition in response to prescribed burns in Mid-Atlantic coastal marshes. M.S. Thesis. University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  20. Gray, D.M., and J. Dighton. 2006. Mineralization of forest litter nutrients by heat and combustion. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38: 1469–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hackney, C.T., and A.A. de la Cruz. 1981. Effects of fire on brackish marsh communities: management implications. Wetlands 1: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffpauer, C.M. 1968. Burning for coastal marsh management. In Proceedings of the marsh and estuary management symposium, ed. J.D. Newsom, 134–139. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
  23. Ikegami, M., D.F. Whigham, and M.J.A. Werger. 2007. Response of rhizome length and ramet production to resource availability in the clonal sedge Scirpus olneyi A. Gray. Plant Ecology 189: 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lovett Doust, L. 1981. Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens) I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 69: 743–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lynch, J.J. 1941. The place of burning in management of Gulf Coast wildlife refuges. Journal of Wildlife Management 5: 454–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKee, K.L., D.R. Cahoon, and I.C. Feller. 2007. Caribbean mangroves adjust to rising sea level through biotic controls on change in soil elevation. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nyman, J.A., and R.H. Chabreck. 1995. Fire in coastal marshes: history and recent concerns. In Proceedings of the 19 th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference—Fire in Wetlands: a management perspective, ed. S.I. Cerulean and R.T. Engstrom, 135–141. Tallahassee: Tall Timbers Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. O’Neil, T. 1949. The muskrat in the Louisiana coastal marshes. New Orleans: Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.Google Scholar
  29. Old, S.M. 1969. Microclimate, fire, and plant production in an Illinois prairie. Ecological Monographs 39: 355–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pendleton, E., and J.C. Stevenson. 1983. Investigating marsh losses at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge. Final Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Tidewater Administration of Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  31. Qian, Y., S.L. Miao, B. Gu, and Y.C. Li. 2009. Effects of burn temperature on ash nutrient forms and availability from cattail (Typha domingensis) and sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense) in the Florida Everglades. Journal of Environmental Quality 38: 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saunders, C.J., J.P. Megonigal, and J.F. Reynolds. 2006. Comparison of belowground biomass in C3- and C4-dominated mixed communities in a Chesapeake Bay brackish marsh. Plant and Soil 280: 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharrow, S.H., and H.A. Wright. 1977. Effects of fire, ash, and litter on soil nitrate, temperature, moisture and tobosagrass production in the Rolling Plains. Journal of Range Management 30: 266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sipple, W.S. 1979. A review of the biology, ecology, and management of Scirpus olneyi. Vol. II: a synthesis of selected references. Wetland Publication No. 4, 85 p. Annapolis: Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Administration, Wetlands Permit Division.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, D.W., and G.G. Bowes. 1974. Loss of some elements in fly-ash during old-field burns in southern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 54: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web soil survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/ accessed 11/06/2010
  37. Stevenson, J.C., M.S. Kearney, and E.C. Pendleton. 1985. Sedimentation and erosion in a Chesapeake Bay brackish marsh system. Marine Geology 67: 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stevenson, J.C., M.S. Kearney, and K.L. Sundburg. 2000. The health and long term stability of natural and restored marshes in the Chesapeake Bay. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 709–735. Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. USDA, NRCS. 2011. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 4 April 2011). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874–4490 USA.

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wesley A. Bickford
    • 1
  • Brian A. Needelman
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Raymond R. Weil
    • 1
  • Andrew H. Baldwin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and TechnologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations