Impacts of Hypoxia on Zooplankton Spatial Distributions in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
- 558 Downloads
The northern Gulf of Mexico (NGOMEX) was surveyed to examine the broad-scale spatial patterns and inter-relationships between hypoxia (<2 mg L−1 dissolved oxygen) and zooplankton biovolume. We used an undulating towed body equipped with sensors for conductivity, temperature, depth, oxygen, fluorescence, and an optical plankton counter to sample water column structure, oxygen, and zooplankton at high spatial resolution (1 m—vertical; 0.25–1 km—horizontal). We contrast the distribution of zooplankton during summer surveys with different freshwater input, stratification, and horizontal and vertical extent of bottom-water hypoxia. Bottom-water hypoxia did not appear to influence the total amount of zooplankton biomass present in the water column or the areal integration of zooplankton standing stock in the NGOMEX region surveyed. However, where there were hypoxic bottom waters, zooplankton shifted their vertical distribution to the upper water column during the day where they normally would reside in deeper and darker waters. When bottom waters were normoxic (>2 mg L−1 dissolved oxygen), the daytime median depth of the water column zooplankton was on average 7 m deeper than the median depth of zooplankton in water columns with hypoxic bottom waters. A reduction in larger zooplankton when there were hypoxic bottom waters suggests that if zooplankton cannot migrate to deeper, darker water under hypoxic conditions, they may be more susceptible to size-selective predation by visual predators. Thus, habitat compression in the northern Gulf of Mexico due to hypoxic bottom water may have implications for trophic transfer by increasing the contact between predators and prey.
KeywordsGulf of Mexico Hypoxia Spatial distributions Zooplankton
We thank M. Brooks, C. Derry, K. Hozyash, D. Kennedy, B. Loveland, A. Spear, and T. Wazniak for technical assistance and Nancy Rabalais for facilitating the research. We thank the captain and crew of the R/V Pelican. This work was supported by NOAA Awards NA06NOS4780148 and NA09N0S4780198. This is UMCES Contribution #4677 and NGOMEX Contribution #161.
- Aku, P.M., L.G. Rudstam, and W.M. Tonn. 1997. Impact of hypolimnetic oxygenation on the vertical distribution of cisco (Coregonus artedi) in Amisk Lake, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2182–2195.Google Scholar
- Breitburg, D.L., L. Pihl, and S.E. Kolesar. 2001. Effects of low dissolved oxygen on the behavior, ecology and harvest of fishes: a comparison of the Chesapeake and Baltic systems. In Coastal hypoxia: consequences for living resources and ecosystems, ed. N.N. Rabalais and R.E. Turner, 241–267. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Diaz, R.J., and R. Rosenberg. 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioral responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 33: 245–303.Google Scholar
- Elliott, D.T., J.J. Pierson, and M.R. Roman. 2012. Relationship between environmental conditions and zooplankton community structure during summer hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Plankton Research. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbs029.
- Howarth, R.W., D. Anderson, T. Church, H. Greening, C. Hopkinson, W. Huber, N. Marcus, R. Naiman, K. Segerson, A. Sharpley, and W. Wiseman. 2000. Clean coastal waters—understanding and reducing the effects of nutrient pollution. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. 405 pp.Google Scholar
- Kimmel, D.G., W.C. Boicourt, J.J. Pierson, M.R. Roman, and X. Zhang. 2009. A comparison of the mesozooplankton response to hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay and the northern Gulf of Mexico using the biomass size spectrum. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 381: S65–S73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ludsin, S.A., X. Zhang, S.B. Brandt, M.R. Roman, W.C. Boicourt, D.M. Mason, and M. Costantini. 2009. Hypoxia-avoidance by planktivorous fish in Chesapeake Bay: implications for food web interactions and fish recruitment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 381: S121–S131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mauchline, J. 1998. The biology of calanoid copepods. Advances in Marine Biology 23: 710.Google Scholar
- Nixon, S.W. 1990. Marine eutrophication—a growing international problem. Ambio 19: 101–101.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Commerce. 2008. Fisheries of the United States 2008. Current Fisheries Statistics, No. 2008, 103 pp.Google Scholar
- Yentsch, C.S., and D.W. Menzel. 1963. A method for the determination of phytoplankton chlorophyll-a and phaeophytin by fluorescence. Deep Sea Research 10: 21–231.Google Scholar
- Zhang, H., S.A. Ludsin, D.M. Mason, A.T. Adamack, S.B. Brandt, X. Zhang, D.G. Kimmel, M.R. Roman, and W.C. Boicourt. 2009. Hypoxia-driven changes in the behavior and spatial distribution of pelagic fish and zooplankton in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 381: S80–S91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar