Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 1163–1181 | Cite as

Carbon Sequestration and Sediment Accretion in San Francisco Bay Tidal Wetlands

  • John C. Callaway
  • Evyan L. Borgnis
  • R. Eugene Turner
  • Charles S. Milan
Article

Abstract

Tidal wetlands play an important role with respect to climate change because of both their sensitivity to sea-level rise and their ability to sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Policy-based interest in carbon sequestration has increased recently, and wetland restoration projects have potential for carbon credits through soil carbon sequestration. We measured sediment accretion, mineral and organic matter accumulation, and carbon sequestration rates using 137Cs and 210Pb downcore distributions at six natural tidal wetlands in the San Francisco Bay Estuary. The accretion rates were, in general, 0.2–0.5 cm year−1, indicating that local wetlands are keeping pace with recent rates of sea-level rise. Mineral accumulation rates were higher in salt marshes and at low-marsh stations within individual sites. The average carbon sequestration rate based on 210Pb dating was 79 g C m−2 year−1, with slightly higher rates based on 137Cs dating. There was little difference in the sequestration rates among sites or across stations within sites, indicating that a single carbon sequestration rate could be used for crediting tidal wetland restoration projects within the Estuary.

Keywords

Brackish marsh Carbon offsets Climate change Mineral matter accumulation Organic matter accumulation Salt marsh San Francisco Bay Estuary Sea-level rise Sedimentation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for financial support for this research project. Site access and other support were provided by the California Department of Fish and Game, California State Coastal Conservancy, California State Parks, Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, East Bay Regional Park District, San Francisco Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, and Solano Land Trust. Field and lab assistance was provided by Jennifer Gagnon, Mark Rosasco, and Andrea Torres. Valuable comments were provided on the manuscript by Steve Crooks, Judy Drexler, and two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Allen, J.R.L. 2000. Morphodynamics of Holocene salt marshes: a review sketch from the Atlantic and Southern North Sea coasts of Europe. Quaternary Science Reviews 19: 1155–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwater, B.F., S.G. Conard, J.N. Dowden, C.W. Hedel, R.L. MacDonald, and W. Savage. 1979. History, landforms, and vegetation of the estuary’s tidal marshes. In San Francisco Bay: the urbanized estuary, ed. T.J. Conomos, 347–385. San Francisco: Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D.F. 1964. Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareous soils. Journal of Soil Science 15: 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett, K.B., and R.C. Harriss. 1993. Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands. Chemosphere 26: 261–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckley, B.D., F.G. Lemoine, S.B. Luthcke, R.D. Ray, and N.P. Zelensky. 2007. A reassessment of global and regional mean sea level trends from TOPEX and Jason-1 altimetry based on revised reference frame and orbits. Geophysical Research Letters 34: Article no. L14608. doi:14610.11029/12007gl030002.
  6. Binford, M.W. 1990. Calculation and uncertainty analysis of 210Pb dates for PIRLA project lake sediment cores. Journal of Paleolimnology 3: 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridgham, S.D., J.P. Megonigal, J.K. Keller, N.B. Bliss, and C. Trettin. 2006. The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 26: 889–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne, R., B.L. Ingram, S. Starratt, F. Malamud-Roam, J.N. Collins, and M.E. Conrad. 2001. Carbon-isotope, diatom, and pollen evidence for Late Holocene salinity change in a brackish marsh in the San Francisco Estuary. Quaternary Research 55: 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callaway, J.C. 2001. Hydrology and substrate. In Handbook for restoring tidal wetlands, ed. J.B. Zedler, 89–117. Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
  10. Callaway, J.C., A.B. Borde, H.L. Diefenderfer, V.T. Parker, J.M. Rybcyzk, and R.M. Thom. 2012. Pacific Coast tidal wetlands. In Wetland habitats of North America: ecology and conservation concerns, eds. D. P. Batzer and A. H. Baldwin, 103–116. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Callaway, J.C., R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick Jr. 1996a. Chernobyl 137Cs used to determine sediment accretion rates at selected northern European coastal wetlands. Limnology and Oceanography 41: 444–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callaway, J.C., R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick Jr. 1997. Sediment accretion rates from four coastal wetlands along the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Coastal Research 13: 181–191.Google Scholar
  13. Callaway, J.C., J.A. Nyman, and R.D. DeLaune. 1996b. Sediment accretion in coastal wetlands: a review and a simulation model of processes. Current Topics in Wetland Biogeochemistry 2: 2–23.Google Scholar
  14. Cayan, D.R., P.D. Bromirski, K. Hayhoe, M. Tyree, M.D. Dettinger, and R.E. Flick. 2008. Climate change projections of sea level extremes along the California coast. Climatic Change 87: S57–S73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, Z.Y., J.F. Li, H.T. Shen, and Z.H. Wang. 2001. Yangtze River of China: historical analysis of discharge variability and sediment flux. Geomorphology 41: 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chmura, G.L., S.C. Anisfeld, D.R. Cahoon, and J.C. Lynch. 2003. Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17: Article no. 1111. doi:1110.1029/2002GB001917
  17. Connor, R.F., G.L. Chmura, and C.B. Beecher. 2001. Carbon accumulation in Bay of Fundy salt marshes: implications for restoration of reclaimed marshes. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15: 943–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Craft, C. 2007. Freshwater input structures soil properties, vertical accretion, and nutrient accumulation of Georgia and U.S. tidal marshes. Limnology and Oceanography 52: 1220–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craft, C.B., E.D. Seneca, and S.W. Broome. 1991. Loss on ignition and Kjeldahl digestion for estimating organic carbon and total nitrogen in estuarine marsh soils: calibration with dry combustion. Estuaries 14: 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crooks, S., S. Emmett-Mattox, and J. Findsen. 2010. Findings of the National Blue Ribbon Panel on the Development of a Greenhouse Gas Offset Protocol for Tidal Wetlands Restoration and Management: action plan to guide protocol development: Restore America’s Estuaries, Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd., and Science Applications International Corporation. http://estuaries.org/climate-change.html. Accessed 3 Feb 2012.
  21. Culberson, S.D., T.C. Foin, and J.N. Collins. 2004. The role of sedimentation in estuarine marsh development within the San Francisco Estuary, California, USA. Journal of Coastal Research 20: 970–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Darke, A.K., and J.P. Megonigal. 2003. Control of sediment deposition rates in two mid-Atlantic Coast tidal freshwater wetlands. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 57: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drexler, J.Z. 2011. Peat formation processes through the millennia in tidal marshes of the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 900–911. doi: 910.1007/s12237-12011-19393-12237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Drexler, J.Z., C.S. de Fontaine, and T.A. Brown. 2009. Peat accretion histories during the past 6,000 years in marshes of the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, CA, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 32: 871–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duarte, C.M., J.J. Middelburg, and N. Caraco. 2005. Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 2: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elsey-Quirk, T., D.M. Seliskar, C.K. Sommerfield, and J.L. Gallagher. 2011. Salt marsh carbon pool distribution in a Mid-Atlantic lagoon, USA: sea level rise implications. Wetlands 31: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emmett, R., R. Llanso, J. Newton, R. Thom, M. Hornberger, C. Morgan, C. Levings, A. Copping, and P. Fishman. 2000. Geographic signatures of North American West Coast estuaries. Estuaries 23: 765–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emmett-Mattox, S., S. Crooks, and J. Findsen. 2011. Gases and grasses: the restoration, conservation, or avoided loss of tidal wetlands carbon pools may help to mitigate climate change. The Environmental Forum 28: 30–35.Google Scholar
  29. Flick, R.E., J.F. Murray, and L.C. Ewing. 2003. Trends in United States tidal datum statistics and tide range. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 129: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freedman, B., G. Stinson, and P. Lacoul. 2009. Carbon credits and the conservation of natural areas. Environmental Reviews 17: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. French, J.R., T. Spencer, A.L. Murray, and N.S. Arnold. 1995. Geostatistical analysis of sediment deposition in two small tidal wetlands, Norfolk, U.K. Journal of Coastal Research 11: 308–321.Google Scholar
  32. Friedrichs, C.T., and J.E. Perry. 2001. Tidal salt marsh morphodynamics: a synthesis. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 27: 7–37.Google Scholar
  33. Ganju, N.K., and D.H. Schoellhamer. 2010. Decadal-timescale estuarine geomorphic change under future scenarios of climate and sediment supply. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gee, G.W., and J.W. Bauder. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In Methods of soil analysis: Part I: Physical and mineralogical methods, ed. A. Klute, 383–411. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
  35. Goman, M., and L. Wells. 2000. Trends in river flow affecting the northeastern reach of the San Francisco Bay estuary over the past 7000 years. Quaternary Research 54: 206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen, L.T. 2009. The viability of creating wetlands for the sale of carbon offsets. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 34: 350–365.Google Scholar
  37. Hargis, T.G., and R.R. Twilley. 1994. Improved coring device for measuring soil bulk density in a Louisiana deltaic marsh. Journal of Sedimentary Research Section A: Sedimentary Petrology and Processes 64: 681–683.Google Scholar
  38. Hatton, R.S., R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick Jr. 1983. Sedimentation, accretion, and subsidence in marshes of Barataria Basin, Louisiana. Limnology and Oceanography 28: 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Horowitz, A.J. 2010. A quarter century of declining suspended sediment fluxes in the Mississippi River and the effect of the 1993 flood. Hydrological Processes 24: 13–34.Google Scholar
  40. Hussein, A.H., M.C. Rabenhorst, and M.L. Tucker. 2004. Modeling of carbon sequestration in coastal marsh soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68: 1786–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ibàñez, C., N. Prat, and A. Canicio. 1996. Changes in the hydrology and sediment transport produced by large dams on the lower Ebro river and its estuary. Regulated Rivers—Research & Management 12: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ibàñez, C., P.J. Sharpe, J.W. Day, J.N. Day, and N. Prat. 2010. Vertical accretion and relative sea level rise in the Ebro Delta wetlands (Catalonia, Spain). Wetlands 30: 979–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis: summary for policymakers. www.ipcc.ch. Accessed 3 Feb 2012.
  44. Kayranli, B., M. Scholz, A. Mustafa, and A. Hedmark. 2010. Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands: a critical review. Wetlands 30: 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kirwan, M.L., G.R. Guntenspergen, A. D’Alpaos, J.T. Morris, S.M. Mudd, and S. Temmerman. 2010. Limits on the adaptability of coastal marshes to rising sea level. Geophysical Research Letters 37: Article no. L23401. doi:23410.21029/22010gl045489
  46. Laffoley, D., and G. Grimsditch (eds.). 2009. The management of natural coastal carbon sinks. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  47. Loomis, M.J., and C.B. Craft. 2010. Carbon sequestration and nutrient (nitrogen, phosphorus) accumulation in river-dominated tidal marshes, Georgia, USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal 74: 1028–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Magenheimer, J.F., T.R. Moore, G.L. Chmura, and R.J. Daoust. 1996. Methane and carbon dioxide flux from a macrotidal salt marsh, Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick. Estuaries 19: 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McLeod, E., G.L. Chmura, S. Bouillon, R. Salm, M. Björk, C.M. Duarte, C.E. Lovelock, W.H. Schlesinger, and B.R. Silliman. 2011. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9: 552–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Michener, W.K., E.R. Blood, K.L. Bildstein, M.M. Brinson, and L.R. Gardner. 1997. Climate change, hurricanes and tropical storms, and rising sea level in coastal wetlands. Ecological Applications 7: 770–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Milan, C.S., E.M. Swenson, R.E. Turner, and J.M. Lee. 1995. Assessment of the 137Cs method for estimating sediment accumulation rates: Louisiana salt marshes. Journal of Coastal Research 11: 296–307.Google Scholar
  52. Miller, R.L., and R. Fujii. 2010. Plant community, primary productivity, and environmental conditions following wetland re-establishment in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California. Wetlands Ecology and Management 18: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morris, J.T., P.V. Sundareshwar, C.T. Nietch, B. Kjerfve, and D.R. Cahoon. 2002. Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83: 2869–2877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mudd, S.M., S.M. Howell, and J.T. Morris. 2009. Impact of dynamic feedbacks between sedimentation, sea-level rise, and biomass production on near-surface marsh stratigraphy and carbon accumulation. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 82: 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neubauer, S.C. 2008. Contributions of mineral and organic components to tidal freshwater marsh accretion. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 78: 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nyman, J.A., R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick Jr. 1990. Wetland soil formation in the rapidly subsiding Mississippi River Deltaic Plain: mineral and organic matter relationships. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 31: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nyman, J.A., R.D. DeLaune, H.H. Roberts, and W.H. Patrick Jr. 1993. Relationship between vegetation and soil formation in a rapidly submerging coastal marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 96: 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oenema, O., and R.D. DeLaune. 1988. Accretion rates in salt marshes in the Eastern Scheldt, south-west Netherlands. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 26: 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Patrick Jr., W.H., and R.D. DeLaune. 1990. Subsidence, accretion, and sea level rise in south San Francisco Bay marshes. Limnology and Oceanography 35: 1389–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pethick, J.S. 1981. Long-term accretion rates on tidal salt marshes. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 51: 521–577.Google Scholar
  61. Poffenbarger, H., B. Needelman, and J. Megonigal. 2011. Salinity influence on methane emissions from tidal marshes. Wetlands 31: 831–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rahmstorf, S. 2007. A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science 315: 368–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reed, D.J. 2002. Understanding tidal marsh sedimentation in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 36: 605–611.Google Scholar
  64. Robbins, J.A., D.N. Edgington, and A.L.W. Kemp. 1978. Comparative 210Pb, 137Cs and pollen geochronologies of sediments from Lakes Ontario and Erie. Quaternary Research 10: 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rybcyzk, J.M., and J.C. Callaway. 2009. Surface elevation models. In Coastal wetlands: an integrated ecosystem approach, ed. G.M.E. Perillo, E. Wolanski, D.R. Cahoon, and M.M. Brinson, 835–854. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  66. Shoellhamer, D.H. 2011. Sudden clearing of estuarine waters upon crossing the threshold from transport to supply regulation of sediment transport as an erodible sediment pool is depleted: San Francisco Bay, 1999. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 885–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stevenson, J.C., L.G. Ward, and M.S. Kearney. 1986. Vertical accretion in marshes with varying rates of sea level rise. In Estuarine variability, ed. D.A. Wolfe, 241–259. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  68. SYSTAT Software Inc. 2007. SYSTAT 12. Chicago: SYSTAT Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  69. Temmerman, S., G. Govers, P. Meire, and S. Wartel. 2003. Modelling long-term tidal marsh growth under changing tidal conditions and suspended sediment concentrations, Scheldt estuary, Belgium. Marine Geology 193: 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Turner, R.E., C.S. Milan, and E.M. Swenson. 2006. Recent volumetric changes in salt marsh soils. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 69: 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Turner, R.E., E.M. Swenson, and C.S. Milan. 2000. Organic and inorganic contributions to vertical accretion in salt marsh sediments. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 583–595. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  72. Tweel, A.W., and R.E. Turner. 2012. Watershed land use and river engineering drive wetland formation and loss in the Mississippi River birdfoot delta. Limnology and Oceanography 57: 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vermeer, M., and S. Rahmstorf. 2009. Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 21527–21532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Watson, E.B. 2004. Changing elevation, accretion, and tidal marsh plant assemblages in a South San Francisco Bay tidal marsh. Estuaries 27: 684–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Watson, E.B. 2008. Marsh expansion at Calaveras Point Marsh, South San Francisco Bay, California. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 78: 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Więski, K., H.Y. Guo, C.B. Craft, and S.C. Pennings. 2010. Ecosystem functions of tidal fresh, brackish, and salt marshes on the Georgia Coast. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams, P.B., and P.M. Faber. 2001. Salt marsh restoration experience in the San Francisco Bay estuary. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 27: 203–211.Google Scholar
  78. Williams, P.B., and M.K. Orr. 2002. Physical evolution of restored breached levee salt marshes in the San Francisco Bay estuary. Restoration Ecology 10: 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wright, S.A., and D.H. Schoellhamer. 2004. Trends in the sediment yield of the Sacramento River, California, 1957–2001. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 2: Article 2. http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol2/iss2/art2. Accessed 3 Feb 2012.
  80. Wright, S.A., and D.H. Schoellhamer. 2005. Estimating sediment budgets at the interface between rivers and estuaries with application to the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta. Water Resources Research 41: W09428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zedler, J.B., J.C. Callaway, J.S. Desmond, G. Vivian-Smith, G.D. Williams, G. Sullivan, A.E. Brewster, and B.K. Bradshaw. 1999. Californian salt-marsh vegetation: an improved model of spatial pattern. Ecosystems 2: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Callaway
    • 1
  • Evyan L. Borgnis
    • 1
  • R. Eugene Turner
    • 2
  • Charles S. Milan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental ScienceUniversity of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Oceanography and Coastal SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations