Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 519–532

Hydrologic Versus Biogeochemical Controls of Denitrification in Tidal Freshwater Wetlands

  • Scott Ensign
  • Kaylyn Siporin
  • Mike Piehler
  • Martin Doyle
  • Lynn Leonard


Tidal freshwater wetlands (TFW) alter nitrogen concentrations in river water, but the role of these processes on a river’s downstream nitrogen delivery is poorly understood. We examined spatial and temporal patterns in denitrification in TFW of four rivers in North Carolina, USA and evaluated the relative importance of denitrification rate and inundation on ecosystem-scale N2 efflux. An empirical model of TFW denitrification was developed to predict N2 efflux using a digital topographic model of the TFW, a time series of water level measurements, and a range of denitrification rates. Additionally, a magnitude-frequency analysis was performed to investigate the relative importance of storm events on decadal patterns in N2 efflux. Spatially, inundation patterns exerted more influence on N2 efflux than did the range of denitrification rate used. Temporal variability in N2 efflux was greatest in the lower half of the tidal rivers (near the saline estuary) where inundation dynamics exerted more influence on N2 efflux than denitrification rate. N2 efflux was highest in the upper half of the rivers following storm runoff, and under these conditions variation in denitrification rate had a larger effect on N2 efflux than variability in inundation. The frequency-magnitude analysis predicted that most N2 efflux occurred during low flow periods when tidal dynamics, not storm events, affected TFW inundation. Tidal hydrology and riparian topography are as important as denitrification rate in calculating nitrogen loss in TFW; we present a simple empirical model that links nitrogen transport in rivers with loss due to denitrification in TFW.


Tidal freshwater wetland Tidal forested wetland Tidal river Denitrification LIDAR Nitrogen cycling 


  1. Baldwin, A.H. 2007. Vegetation and seed bank studies of salt-pulsed swamps of the Nanticoke River, Chesapeake Bay. In Ecology of tidal freshwater forested wetlands of the Southeastern United States, ed. W.H. Connor, T.W. Doyle, and K.W. Krauss, 139–160. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowden, W.B., C.J. Vörösmarty, J.T. Morris, B.J. Peterson, J.E. Hobbie, P.A. Steudler, and B. Moore III. 1991. Transport and processing of nitrogen in a tidal freshwater wetland. Water Resources Research 27: 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyer, E.W., R.B. Alexander, W.J. Parton, C. Li, K. Butterbach-Bahl, S.D. Donner, R.W. Skaggs, and S.J. Del Grosso. 2006. Modeling denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems at regional scales. Ecological Applications 16: 2123–2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinson, M.M., H.D. Bradshaw, and E.S. Kane. 1984. Nutrient assimilative capacity of an alluvial floodplain swamp. Journal of Applied Ecology 21: 1041–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornwell, J.C., W.M. Kemp, and T.M. Kana. 1999. Denitrification in coastal ecosystems: methods, environmental controls, and ecosystem level controls, a review. Aquatic Ecology 33: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. FWS/OBS-79/31.Google Scholar
  7. Craft, C., J. Clough, J. Ehman, S. Joye, R. Park, S. Pennings, H. Guo, and M. Machmuller. 2009. Forecasting the effects of accelerated sea-level rise on tidal marsh ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalrymple, R.W., and K. Choi. 2007. Morphologic and facies trends through the fluvial-marine transition in tide-dominated depositional systems: A schematic framework for environmental and sequence-stratigraphic interpretation. Earth-Science Reviews 81: 135–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darke, A.K., and J.P. Megonigal. 2003. Control of sediment deposition rates in two mid-Atlantic Coast tidal freshwater wetlands. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, E.A., and S. Seitzinger. 2006. The enigma of progress in denitrification research. Ecological Applications 16: 2057–2063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diefenderfer, H., A. Coleman, A. Borde, and I. Sinks. 2008. Hydraulic geometry and microtopography of tidal freshwater forested wetlands and implications for restoration, Columbia River. U. S. A. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 8: 339–361.Google Scholar
  12. Doyle, M.W., E.H. Stanley, D.L. Strayer, R.B. Jacobson, and J.C. Schmidt. 2005. Effective discharge analysis of ecological processes in streams. Water Resources Research 41: W11411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ensign, S.H., M.F. Piehler, and M.W. Doyle. 2008. Riparian zone denitrification affects nitrogen flux through a tidal freshwater river. Biogeochemistry 91: 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gribsholt, B., E. Struyf, A. Tramper, M. Andersson, N. Brion, L. De Brabandere, S. van Damme, P. Meire, J. Middelburg, F. Dehairs, and H. Boschker. 2006. Ammonium transformation in a nitrogen-rich tidal freshwater marsh. Biogeochemistry 80: 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gribsholt, B., E. Struyf, A. Tramper, L. De Brabandere, N. Brion, S. van Damme, P. Meire, F. Dehairs, J.J. Middelburg, and H.T.S. Boschker. 2007. Nitrogen assimilation and short term retention in a nutrient-rich tidal freshwater marsh—a whole ecosystem 15 N enrichment study. Biogeosciences 4: 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groffman, P.M., K. Butterbach-Bahl, R.W. Fulweiler, A.J. Gold, J.L. Morse, E.K. Stander, C. Tague, C. Tonitto, and P. Vidon. 2009. Challenges to incorporating spatially and temporally explicit phenomena (hotspots and hot moments) in denitrification models. Biogeochemistry 93: 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hackney, C.T., G.B. Avery, L.A. Leonard, M. Posey, and T. Alphin. 2007. Biological, chemical, and physical characteristics of tidal freshwater swamp forests of the Lower Cape Fear River/Estuary, North Carolina. In Ecology of tidal freshwater forested wetlands of the Southeastern United States, ed. W.H. Connor, T.W. Doyle, and K.W. Krauss, 183–221. Springer: Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hopfensperger, K.N., S.S. Kaushal, S.E. Findlay, and J.C. Cornwell. 2009. Influence of Plant communities on denitrification in a tidal freshwater marsh of the Potomac River, United States. Journal of Environmental Quality 38: 618–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kulkarni, M.V., P.M. Groffman, and J.B. Yavitt. 2008. Solving the global nitrogen problem: it's a gas! Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Light, H.M., M.R. Darst, and R.A. Mattson. 2007. Ecological characteristics of tidal freshwater forests along the lower Suwannee River, Florida. In Ecology of tidal freshwater forested wetlands of the Southeastern United States, ed. W.H. Connor, T.W. Doyle, and K.W. Krauss, 291–320. Springer: Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2004. North Carolina bathymetry/topography sea level rise project: determination of sea level trends: NOAA Technical Resport NOS CO-OPS 041, Silver Spring MD.Google Scholar
  22. Neubauer, S.C., I.C. Anderson, J.A. Constantine, and S.A. Kuehl. 2002. Sediment deposition and accretion in a mid-Atlantic (U.S.A.) tidal freshwater marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 54: 713–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neubauer, S., I. Anderson, and B. Neikirk. 2005. Nitrogen cycling and ecosystem exchanges in a Virginia tidal freshwater marsh. Estuaries and Coasts 28: 909–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Noe, G.B., and C.R. Hupp. 2005. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus accumulation in floodplains of Atlantic coastal plain rivers, USA. Ecological Applications 15: 1178–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noe, G.B., and C.R. Hupp. 2007. Seasonal variation in nutrient retention during inundation of a short-hydroperiod floodplain. River Research and Applications 23: 1088–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noe, G.B., and C.R. Hupp. 2009. Retention of riverine sediment and nutrient loads by coastal plain floodplains. Ecosystems 12: 728–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. North Carolina Division of Emergency Management. 2004a. NC Floodplain Mapping: New River Basin; LIDAR Bare Earth Mass Points, Feb–Apr and Dec 2003. EarthData International of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  28. North Carolina Division of Emergency Management. 2004b. Cape Fear Basin NC, Bare Earth Lidar Data, 2004. EarthData International of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  29. North Carolina Division of Emergency Management (NCDEM). 2002. NC Floodplain Mapping: White Oak Basin; LIDAR Bare Earth Mass Points, Jan–Mar 2001. EarthData International of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  30. Pasternack, G. 2009. Hydogeomorphology and sedimentation in tidal freshwater wetlands. In tidal freshwater wetlands, ed. A. Barendregt, D.F. Whigham, and A.H. Baldwin, 31–40. Leiden: Backhuys.Google Scholar
  31. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.Google Scholar
  32. Rayburg, S., M. Thoms, and M. Neave. 2009. A comparison of digital elevation models generated from different data sources. Geomorphology 106: 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seitzinger, S.P. 1988. Denitrification in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: Ecological and geochemical significance. Limnology and Oceanography 33: 702–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seitzinger, S., J.A. Harrison, J.K. Böhlke, A.F. Bouwman, R. Lowrance, B. Peterson, C. Tobias, and G.V. Drecht. 2006. Denitrification across landscapes and waterscapes: A synthesis. Ecological Applications 16: 2064–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sweet, W.V., and J.W. Geratz. 2003. Bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships and recurrence intervals for North Carolina's coastal plain. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39: 861–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. National Wetlands Inventory. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  37. Verhoeven, J., D. Whigham, R. van Logtestijn, and J. O’Neill. 2001. A comparative study of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in tidal and non-tidal riverine wetlands. Wetlands 21: 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vörösmarty, C., and T. Loder. 1994. Spring-neap tidal contrasts and nutrient dynamics in a marsh-dominated estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 17: 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolman, M.G., and J.P. Miller. 1960. Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes. Journal of Geology 68: 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Ensign
    • 1
  • Kaylyn Siporin
    • 2
  • Mike Piehler
    • 2
  • Martin Doyle
    • 3
  • Lynn Leonard
    • 4
  1. 1.Curriculum for the Environment and EcologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillMorehead CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Department of Geography and GeologyUniversity of North Carolina at WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations