Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 828–842 | Cite as

Modeling Sediment Suspensions in an Idealized Tidal Embayment: Importance of Tidal Asymmetry and Settling Lag

Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Suspended sediment transport processes in a short tidal embayment with a simple geometry are investigated using analytic and numerical models. On the basis of numerical results, the horizontal gradient of depth-averaged suspended sediment concentration can be parameterized with a combination of the first harmonic and mean. Using the parameterization, the solution of the analytic model is obtained. Evaluation of the major terms from the solution of the analytic model shows that a quarter-diurnal frequency is significant near the mouth while a semidiurnal component dominates the interior area. The settling lag consists of local and nonlocal components. The local phase lag is a function of the ratio between tidal period and settling time. The nonlocal phase lag is determined by the phase difference between tidal velocity and the horizontal gradient of sediment concentration and by the strength of erosion and horizontal advection.

Keywords

Sediment transport Tidal embayment Tidal asymmetry Settling lag 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen, G.P., J.C. Salomon, P. Bassoullet, Y. Du Penhoat, and C. De Grandpre. 1980. Effects of tides on mixing and suspended sediment transport in macrotidal estuaries. Sedimentary Geology 26: 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, S.J., J.N. Aldridge, I.N. McCave, and C.E. Vincent. 2002. Phase relationships between fine sediment suspensions and tidal currents in coastal seas. Journal of Geophysical Research 107C10: 3146. doi: 10.1029/2001JC001269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burchard, H., and H. Baumert. 1998. The formation of estuarine turbidity maxima due to density effects in the salt wedge: A hydrodynamic process study. Journal of Physical Oceanography 28: 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dronkers, J. 1986. Tidal asymmetry and estuarine morphology. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 20: 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyer, K.R. 1997. Estuaries: A physical introduction. 2Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Friedrichs, C.T., B.D. Armbrust, and H.E. De Swart. 1998. Hydrodynamics and equilibrium sediment dynamics of shallow, funnel-shaped tidal estuaries. In Physics of estuaries and coastal seas, eds. J. Dronkers, and M. Scheffers, 315–327. Amsterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
  7. Ganju, N.K., D.H. Schoelhamer, J.C. Warner, M.F. Barad, and S.G. Schladow. 2004. Tidal oscillation of sediment between a river and a bay: a conceptual model. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60: 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geyer, W.R. 1993. The importance of suppression of turbulence by stratification on the estuarine turbidity maximum. Estuaries 16: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Groen, P. 1967. On the residual transport of suspended matter by an alternating tidal current. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 3: 564–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ianniello, J.P. 1977. Tidally induced residual currents in estuaries of constant breath and depth. Journal of Marine Research 35: 755–786.Google Scholar
  11. Jay, D.A., and J.D. Musiak. 1994. Particle trapping in estuarine tidal flows. Journal of Geophysical Research 99: 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Postma, H. 1967. Sediment transport and sedimentation in the estuarine environment. In Estuaries, Publ. 83, ed. G. H. Lauff, 158–179. Washington, D. C.: Am. Assoc. for the Adv. of Sci.Google Scholar
  13. Prandle, D. 2004. Sediment trapping, turbidity maxima, and bathymetric stability in macrotidal estuaries. Journal of Geophysical Research 109: C08001. doi: 10.1029/2004JC002271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pritchard, D. 2005. Suspended sediment transport along an idealized tidal embayment: settling lag, residual transport and the interpretation of tidal signals. Ocean Dynamics 55: 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ridderinkhof, H. 1997. The effect of tidal asymmetries on the net transport of sediments in the Ems Dollard Estuary. Journal of Coastal Research 25: 41–48. (Special Issue).Google Scholar
  16. Sanford, L.P., and M.-L. Chang. 1997. The bottom boundary condition for suspended sediment deposition. Journal of Coastal Research 25: 3–17.Google Scholar
  17. Schubel, J.R. 1968. The turbidity maximum of the Chesapeake Bay. Science 161: 1013–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schuttelaars, H.M., and H.E. De Swart. 1996. An idealized long-term morphodynamic model of a tidal embayment. European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 15: 55–80.Google Scholar
  19. Shchepetkin, A.F., and J.C. McWilliams. 2005. The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS): A split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following coordinates ocean model. Ocean Modelling 9: 347–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Speer, P.E., and G.G. Aubrey. 1985. A study of non-linear tidal propagation in shallow inlet/estuarine systems Part II: theory. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 21: 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Warner, J.C., C.R. Sherwood, H.G. Arango, and R.P. Signell. 2005. Performance of four turbulence closure models implemented using a generic length scale method. Ocean Modelling 8: 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weeks, A.R., J.H. Simpson, and D. Bowers. 1993. The relationship between concentrations of suspended particulate material and tidal processes in the Irish Sea. Continental Shelf Research 13: 1325–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Science Research CenterStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations