Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 704–718 | Cite as

Characteristics of Extreme Meteorological Forcing and Water Levels in Mobile Bay, Alabama

  • Haihong Zhao
  • Qin Chen
Article

Abstract

The paper presents comprehensive statistical analyses of winds and water levels in Mobile Bay, Alabama, based on long-term meteorological and tidal observations at several locations. A procedure has been developed to select the most probable parent distribution function from a list of candidate distributions. The theoretical functions that fit the data best enable us to predict the extreme values of winds and water levels at different return periods. We have demonstrated the importance of dividing the winds into hurricane and nonhurricane seasons and separating astronomical tides from weather-driven water level changes. The statistical analysis suggests that the wind speed averaged over 8 min at Dauphin Island, Alabama, at the 100-year return period would be 48.9 m/s, which is equivalent to a sustained 1-min wind of 205 km/h, a very strong category 3 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson scale. The probability distribution models predict that the 100-year maximum water level would be 3.23 m above the mean lower low water (MLLW) level at the bay entrance and 3.41 m above the MLLW level near the head of the bay, respectively. Extremely low water levels important to navigation are also found. Application of the predicted extreme winds and surges is illustrated through the development of a storm wave atlas in the estuary. It is expected that the methodology and results presented in this paper will benefit the management and preservation of the ecosystems and habitats in Mobile Bay.

Keywords

Shallow estuary Physical forcing Extreme water levels Extreme winds Storm surge Wind waves Astronomical tides Statistical analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF Grant No. 0652859), the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the Alabama Center for Estuarine Studies (ACES). Discussion with Dr. Bin Wang was helpful. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF, FWS, or ACES.

Supplementary material

12237_2008_9062_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (834 kb)
ESM (PDF 834 kb)

References

  1. Blom, G. 1958. Statistical estimates and transformed beta-variables. New York: WileyChapter 12.Google Scholar
  2. Booij, N., R.C. Ris, and L.H. Holthuijsen. 1999. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions. Part 1, Model description and validation. Journal of Geophysical Research 104C4: 7649–7666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castanedo, S., F.J. Mendez, R. Medina, and A.J. Abascal. 2007. Long-term tidal level distribution using a wave-by-wave approach. Advances in Water Resources 3011: 2271–2282. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Q., H. Zhao, K. Hu, and S.L. Douglass. 2005. Prediction of wind waves in a shallow estuary. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering 1314: 137–148. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2005)131:4(137).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Q., L. Wang, H. Zhao, and S.L. Douglass. 2007. Predictions of storm surges and wind waves on coastal roadways in hurricane-prone areas. Journal of Coastal Research 23: 1304–1317. doi: 10.2112/05-0465.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunnane, C. 1978. Unbiased plotting positions—a review. Journal of Hydrology 37: 205–222. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(78)90017-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Onofrio, E.E., M.M.E. Fiore, and S.I. Romero. 1999. Return periods of extreme water levels estimated for some vulnerable areas of Buenos Aires. Continental Shelf Research 19: 1681–1693. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(98)00115-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2005. Final draft guidelines for coastal flood hazard analysis and mapping for the Pacific coast of the United States. Seattle: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, FEMA Study Contractor.Google Scholar
  9. Goda, Y. 1988. On the methodology of selecting design wave height. In: Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Coastal Engineering, 899–913.Google Scholar
  10. Goda, Y. 1992. Uncertainty of design parameters from viewpoint of extreme statistics. Journal of offshore mechanics and arctic engineering 1142: 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goda, Y. 2000. Random seas and design of maritime structures. Singapore: World Scientific, Chapter 11.Google Scholar
  12. Gringorten, I.I 1963. A plotting rule for extreme probability paper. Journal of Geophysical Research 683: 813–814. doi: 10.1029/JZ068i003p00813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, D.L. 1981. Tides and tidal datum in the United States. Special Report No. 7, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Belvoir, VA., U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO Stock No. 008-022-00161-1).Google Scholar
  14. Hsu, S.A. 1988. Coastal meteorology. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Kamphuis, J.W. 2000. Introduction to coastal engineering and management. 437. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  16. Mobile Bay National Estuary Program (MBNEP), 2002. Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. Volumes 1, 2 and 3.Google Scholar
  17. Noble, M.A., W.W. Schroeder, W.J. Wiseman, H.F. Ryan, and G Gelfenbaum. 1996. Subtidal circulation patterns in a shallow, highly stratified estuary: Mobile Bay, Alabama. Journal of Geophysical Research 101C11: 25689–25703. doi: 10.1029/96JC02506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park, K., C.-K. Kim, and W.W. Schroeder. 2007. Temporal variability in summertime bottom hypoxia in shallow areas of Mobile Bay, Alabama. Estuaries and Coasts 301: 54–65.Google Scholar
  19. Roland, R.M., and S.L. Douglass. 2005. Wave tolerance of Spartina alterniflora in coastal Alabama. Journal of Coastal Research 21: 453–463. doi: 10.2112/03-0079.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ross, R. 1999. Comparing linear regression and maximum likelihood methods to estimation Weibull distributions on limited datasets: Systematic and random errors. In: 1999 Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 170–173.Google Scholar
  21. Ryan, H.F., M.A. Noble, E.A. Williams, W.W. Schroeder, J.R. Pennock, and G. Gelfenbaum. 1997. Tidal current shear in a broad, shallow, river-dominated estuary. Continental Shelf Research 176: 665–689. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(96)00053-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schroeder, W.W. 1985. An analysis of the winds (1974–1984) and sea level elevations (1973–1983) in coastal Alabama. Technical report. Dauphin Island: Dauphin Island Sea Lab.Google Scholar
  23. Schroeder, W.W., S.P. Dinnel, and W.J. Wiseman. 1990. Salinity stratification in a river-dominated estuary. Estuaries 13: 145–154. doi: 10.2307/1351583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sobey, R.J. 2005. Extreme low and high water levels. Coastal Engineering 52: 63–77. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. US Army Corps of Engineers. 1984. Shore protection manual (SPM). Washington, D.C.: US Army Corps of Engineers (in two volumes).Google Scholar
  26. US Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. Coastal engineering manual (CEM). Engineer manual 1110–2–1100. Washington, D.C.: US Army Corps of Engineers(in 6 volumes).Google Scholar
  27. Walton, T.L. Jr. 2000. Distributions for storm surge extremes. Ocean Engineering 27: 1279–1293. doi: 10.1016/S0029-8018(99)00052-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weibull, W. 1939. A statistical theory of strength of materials. Ingeniörs Vetenskaps Akademien Handlingar, No. 151. Stockholm: Generalstabens Litografiska Anstalts Förlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations