International Review of Economics

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 195–214 | Cite as

Intra-competitiveness and inter-competitiveness among mutual banks: the case of Trento

  • Gian Paolo Barbetta
  • Luca Colombo
  • Stefano Colombo
  • Michele Grillo
Research Article
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

Cooperative banking entails a typical trade-off. The small size, specialization and high correlation of customers’ credit risks are often considered typical weaknesses of local mutual banks. Nonetheless, these banks appear to be largely non-substitutable providers of loans to local economies, given their comparative advantages in screening, monitoring and enforcement with respect to other banks. We explore the idea that the solution of this trade-off is affected by the interplay between banks’ ownership structures and the competitive conditions of the markets in which they operate. Focusing on the banking market of the Italian province of Trento, characterized by a significant presence of cooperative banks and a variety of different competitive environments at the local level, we find that a heightened competition among mutual banks is not socially beneficial with respect to market conditions in which a mutual bank only competes with non-mutual banks. We find that mutual banks competing with each other show a lower ability to transform local savings into local loans, as well as a worse risk allocation.

Keywords

Cooperative banks Mutual banks Competition Local credit market 

JEL Classification

G21 L41 R30 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to: Carlo Borzaga, Giovanni Ferri and Gilberto Turati for useful discussions and comments; two anonymous referees for their suggestions the helped improving the paper; the Editor Pier Luigi Porta for his support. We also wish to thank Euricse for funding the research and Federazione Trentina della cooperazione, Federazione Lombarda della Banche di credito cooperative and Federcasse for providing data and information.

Funding

This study was funded by EURICSE (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises) (RR: 005/12).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Nonetheless, authors Gian Paolo Barbetta and Michele Grillo are members of the Committee of the Centro di Ricerche sulla Cooperazione e il Nonprofit of the Catholic University of Milano. The Centre receives grants from Federcasse (the Italian Association of cooperative and mutual banks).

References

  1. Angelini P, Cetorelli N (2003) The effects of regulatory reform on competition in the banking industry. J Money Credit Bank 35(5):663–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelini P, Di Salvo R, Ferri G (1998) Availability and cost of credit for small businesses: customer relationships and credit cooperatives. J Bank Finance 22:925–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee A, Besley T, Guinnane T (1994) The neighbour’s keeping: the design of a credit cooperative with theory and test. Quart J Econ 109:491–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger A, Udell G (2002) Small business credit availability and relationship lending: the importance of bank organizational structure. Econ J 112:F32–F53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bofondi M, Gobbi G (2003) Bad loans and entry in local credit markets. Banca d’Italia, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonaccorsi di Patti E, Gobbi G (2001) The changing structure of local credit markets: Are small business special? J Bank Finance 25:2209–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonaccorsi di Patti E, Eramo G, Gobbi G (2005) Piccole e Grandi Banche nel Mercato del Credito in Italia dal 1996 al 2003. Banca Impresa Società 1:3–34Google Scholar
  8. Bongini P, Di Battista ML, Zavarrone E (2007) The value of relationship lending: small banks in an era of consolidation. Econ Notes Rev Bank Finance Monet Econ 36(3):209–230Google Scholar
  9. Boot AWA (2000) Relationship banking: What do we know? J Financ Intermed 9:7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clemente C (2002) Il confronto competitivo nelle banche locali—il caso delle Banche di Credito Cooperativo. Edizioni Metakom, VeneziaGoogle Scholar
  11. Degryse HA, Ongena S (2005) Distance, lending relationships, and competition. Journal of Finance 60:231–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Salvo R (2003) The governance of mutual and cooperative bank systems in Europe. Cooperative Studies, ECRA, RomaGoogle Scholar
  13. Di Salvo R (2011) I sistemi di banche cooperative in Europa. Governance, assetti strategici e tendenze evolutive. In Carretta A (ed.), Il Credito Cooperativo. Storia, diritto, economia, organizzazione, Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrary M (2003) Trust and social capital in the regulation of lending activities. The Journal of Socio-Economics 31:673–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferri G, Messori M (2000) Bank–firm relationships and allocative efficiency in Northeastern and Central Italy and in the South. J Bank Finance 24:1067–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grillo M (2013) Competition rules and the cooperative firm. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity 2(1):36–53Google Scholar
  17. Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2004) Does Local Financial Development Matter? Q J Econ 119:929–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansmann H (1996) Ownership of the Enterprise. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoff K, Stiglitz JE (1990) Introduction: Imperfect information and rural credit markets-Puzzles and policy perspectives. World Bank Economic Review 4:235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmström B (1982) Moral Hazard in Teams. The Bell Journal of Economics 13(2):324–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakamura LI (1993) Commercial bank information: Implications for the structure of banking. In: Klausner M, White LJ (eds) Structural Change in Banking. Irwin, Homewood, ILGoogle Scholar
  22. Pastor JM, Tortosa-Ausina E (2008) Social capital and bank performance: An international comparison for OECD countries. The Manchester School 76(2):223–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petersen M, Rajan R (2002) Does Distance Still Matter: The Information Revolution in Small Business Lending. Journal of Finance 57(6):2533–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Piersante F, Stefani ML (2013) Mutualismo e peer-monitoring nelle BCC Italiane. Working Paper N. 048| 13, EuricseGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith BD, Stutzer MJ (1990) Adverse selection and mutuality: The case of the farm credit system. Journal of Financial Intermediation 1:125–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stiglitz J (1990) Peer Monitoring and Credit Markets. World Bank Economic Review 4:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Paolo Barbetta
    • 1
  • Luca Colombo
    • 1
  • Stefano Colombo
    • 1
  • Michele Grillo
    • 1
  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations