How is the child allowance to be financed? By income tax or consumption tax?
- 199 Downloads
In economically developed countries, family support policies are undertaken by governments to raise fertility. Because of increased dependency ratios in many aging societies, governments must pay ever-increasing pension benefits. Those governments must somehow increase the number of younger people to make the pension system sustainable. This paper presents an examination of whether child allowances can raise fertility or not. This issue has been analyzed in numerous earlier studies, but this paper presents an examination of the means used to finance such a child allowance: income taxes and consumption taxes. The different means of taxation exert substantially different effects on fertility. The following results are presented herein. First, a child allowance financed by an income tax cannot always raise fertility. However, such an allowance financed by a consumption tax can always raise fertility. Second, this paper presents an examination of an optimal tax policy to maximize social welfare. An optimal child allowance and an optimal income transfer from younger people to older people differ according to whether they are financed by an income tax or by a consumption tax.
KeywordsChild allowance Endogenous fertility Pay-as-you-go pension Optimal taxation
JEL ClassificationD10 H55 J13 J14 J18 J26
- Galor O, Weil D (1996) The gender gap, fertility, and growth. Am Econ Rev 86(3):374–387Google Scholar
- Laroque G, Salanié B (2008) Does fertility respond to financial incentives? CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 2339, CESifo Group MunichGoogle Scholar
- Lissiotou P (2012) Is fertility affected by family policy? Evidence from the introduction of child benefits. In: Proceedings of 68th annual congress of the international institute of public financeGoogle Scholar
- Lutz W (1999) Will Europe be short of children?. In: Family observer, European observatory on family matters. European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 8–16Google Scholar
- Milligan K (2002) Quebec’s Baby bonus: can public policy raise fertility? Backgrounder. C. D, Home Institute, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
- Ono T (2003) Social security policy with public debt in an aging economy. J Popul Econ 16(2):363–387Google Scholar
- Oshio T (2001) Child-care \(\cdot\) reform in pension system and the fertility rate. Q Social Secur Res 36(4):535–546 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Oshio T, Yasuoka M (2009) Maximum size of social security in a model of endogenous fertility. Econ Bull 29(2):656–666Google Scholar
- Sleebos JE (2003) Low fertility rates in OECD countries: facts and policy responses. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 15Google Scholar
- Yasuoka M (2006) The relationship between the fertility rate and tax policy. Q Social Secur Res 42(1):80–90 (in Japanese)Google Scholar