Advertisement

International Review of Economics

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 409–430 | Cite as

Mapping patterns of well-being and quality of life in extended Europe

  • Jenny AssiEmail author
  • Mario Lucchini
  • Amedeo Spagnolo
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we have applied a powerful clustering procedure (the two-step cluster analysis or BIRCH algorithm) to a set of non-monetary indicators of well-being and quality of life taken from the first four waves of the European Social Survey. By employing this technique, we have identified nine clusters of people characterized by different forms of well-being and quality of life, while preserving as much as possible the multidimensional information contained in the preselected indicators. We then analyzed the distribution of the clusters among the various European countries, finding significant differences among the groups of Nordic countries, Continental European countries, Mediterranean European countries and Eastern European countries in the chances of belonging to the nine forms of well-being and quality of life previously identified. On average, citizens of the Nordic countries, but also those of Switzerland and Luxembourg, have a higher chance of belonging to cumulative clusters of well-being than countries in Continental Europe and Eastern Europe. In very concise terms, the former appear to be somewhat protected from the risk of incurring the more severe forms of material deprivation, distrust of others and of institutions, poor health and relational isolation. In contrast, Eastern Europeans are characterized by particularly pronounced levels of deprivation across multiple dimensions.

Keywords

Well-being Quality of life Two-step cluster analysis European social survey 

JEL Classification

I30 

References

  1. Alesina A, Di Tella R, McCulloch R (2002) Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different?. Mimeo, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  2. Allardt E (1976) Dimensions of welfare in a comparative Scandinavian study. Acta Sociol 19(3):227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews FM, Withey SB (1976) Social indicators of well-being. Americans perceptions of life quality. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyle M (1987) The psychology of happiness. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartolini S, Bilancini E, Pugno M (2008) Did the decline in social capital depress Americans’ happiness?. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, Siena University, Siena, p 540Google Scholar
  6. Berggren N, Jordahl H (2006) Free to trust: economic freedom and social capital. Kyklos 59(2):141–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradburn NM (1969) The structure of psychological well-being. Aldine Publishing, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruni L (2002) Felicità e scienza economica—Storia, problemi aperti e spunti teorici. Working papers 48, Department of Economics, University of Milano-BicoccaGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruni L (2004) The technology of happiness and the tradition of economic science. J Hist Econ Thought 26(01):19–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL (1976) The quality of American life. Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Cantril H (1965) The pattern of human concerns. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener E, Suh EM (1997) Measuring quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators. Soc Indic Res 40(1–2):189–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HE (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125:276–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? In: Paul AD, Melvin WR (eds) Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. Academic Press Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Easterlin RA (2003) Explaining happiness. PNAS 100(19):11176–11183Google Scholar
  16. Ekins P, Max-Neef M (1992) Real life economics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferro-Luzzi G, Flückiger Y, Weber S (2008) A cluster analysis of multidimensional poverty in Switzerland. In: Kakwani N, Silber J (eds) Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement. Palgrave MacMillan, London, pp 63–79Google Scholar
  18. Frey B, Stutzer A (2002) Happiness in economics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuentes N, Rojas M (2001) Economic theory and subjective well-being: Mexico. Soc Indic Res 53(3):289–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gasper D (2007) What is the capability approach? Its core, rationale, partners and dangers. J Socioecon 36(3):335–359Google Scholar
  21. Haller M, Hadler M (2006) How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis. Soc Indic Res 75:169–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inglehart R, Klingemann HD (2000) Genes, culture, democracy and happiness. In: Diener E, Suh E (eds) Culture and subjective well-being. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 165–183Google Scholar
  23. Inglehart R, Rabier JR (1986) Aspirations adapt to situations—but why are the Belgians much happier than the French? In: Andrews FM (eds) Research on the quality of life. ISR, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahneman D (2007) Economia della felicità. Il Sole 24 Ore, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahneman D, Krueger AB (2006) Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect 20:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (1999) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumlin S, Rothstein B (2005) Making and breaking social capital: the impact of welfare-state institutions. Comp Polit Stud 38:339–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucchini M, Pisati M, Schizzerotto A (2007) Stati di deprivazione e di benessere nell’Italia contemporanea: Un’analisi multidimensionale. In: Brandolini A, Saraceno C (eds) Povertà e benessere: Una geografia delle disuguaglianze in Italia. Il Mulino, Bologna, pp 271–303Google Scholar
  29. Michaelson J, Abdallah S, Steuer N, Thompson S, Marks N (2009) The national accounts of well-being. New Economics Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Nisbett RE, Ross L (1980) Human inference: strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, Pretice-HallGoogle Scholar
  31. Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pacek A, Radcliff B (2008) Assessing the welfare state: the politics of happiness. Perspect Polit 6:267–277Google Scholar
  33. Pichler F (2006) Subjective quality of life of young Europeans: feeling happy but who knows why? Soc Indic Res 75(3):419–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pisati M, Whelan C, Lucchini M, Maitre B (2010) Mapping patterns of multiple deprivation using self-organising maps: an application to EU-SILC data for Ireland. Soc Sci Res 39:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scitovsky T (1976) The joyless economy: an inquiry into human satisfaction and consumer dissatisfaction. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Sen AK (1980) Equality of what? In: Sterling MM (ed) The tanner lectures on human value. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 195–220Google Scholar
  37. Sen AK (1985) Commodities and capabilities. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Simon HA (1982) Models of bounded rationality, vol 2. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Somarriba N, Pena B (2009) Synthetic indicators of quality of life in Europe. Soc Indic Res 96:115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi JP (2009) Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. The commission: Paris http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm
  41. Torgerson WS (1952) Multidimensional scaling: theory and method. Psychometrika 17:401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Uslaner EM (2002) The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Veenhoven R (2002) Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Soc Indic Res 58(1–3):33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Veenhoven R (2010) Capability and happiness: conceptual difference and reality links. J Socio-Econ 39(3):344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2009) The spirit level, why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Woolcock M, Sweetser AT (2002) Bright ideas: social capital—the bonds that connect. ADB Rev 34(2):1–26Google Scholar
  47. Zhang T, Ramakrishnan R, Livny M (1996) BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases. Technical report, Computer Sciences Department, University of Winsconsin-MadisonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and Social Sciences (DSAS)University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI)MannoSwitzerland
  2. 2.Istituto per lo Sviluppo della Formazione Professionale dei Lavoratori (ISFOL)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations