You are not in my boat: common fate and discrimination against outgroup members
- 304 Downloads
Sharing a common fate with some people but not others may affect how economic agents behave in economic transactions, quite independently of strategic incentives. We present an experimental test of the effect of perceptions of common fate on the inducement of economic discrimination in bilateral settings. In settings where the bargaining power was all with one subject (the dictator game and a ‘unilateral power game’), about half of the subjects engaged in negative discrimination: insiders were not treated better relative to control sessions, but outsiders were treated worse. Discrimination may be induced by a more conflictual perception of the decision problem.
KeywordsDiscrimination Bargaining Dictator game
JEL ClassificationC72 C91
I wish to thank Abigail Barr, Daylain Cain, participants to the Teamwork conference held in Oxford in April 2003, the Economic Science Association meeting held in Pittsburgh in June 2003, the Oxford Experimental Economics Workshop, the Oxford Applied and Social Psychology Seminar, and seminars held in Bonn, Kent at Canterbury, Liverpool and Queen Mary (London) for advice and encouragement, and especially Margaret Foddy for drawing my attention to Stephen Crane’s text. Thanks are also due to Jonathan Tan and Jocelyn Payne for programming help and Jonathan Tan, Hao Wu, Serign Cham, Karen Croxson and Chinnawut Techanuvat for experimental assistance. Financial support under the ESRC Grant R/000/22/3852 is gratefully acknowledged.
- Bacharach M (2006) Beyond individual choice. Edited by Natalie Gold and Robert Sugden. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Brown R (2000) Group processes. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Crane S (1897) The open boat: a tale intended to be after the fact. Being the experience of four men from the sunk steamer “Commodore”. In: Stephen C (ed.) Open boat, and other tales of adventure. http://www.books.google.co.uk/books, pp 1–63
- Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Markman AB, Moreau CP (2001) Analogy and analogical comparison in choice. In: Gentner D, Holyoak KJ, Kokinov B (eds) The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 363–399Google Scholar
- Riechmann T, Weimann J (2004) Competition as a coordination device. University of Magdeburg Discussion PaperGoogle Scholar
- Tsutsui K, Zizzo DJ (2010) Group status, minorities and trust. University of East Anglia working paper, in preparationGoogle Scholar
- Zizzo DJ (2003) You are not in my boat: common fate and similarity attractors in bargaining settings. Oxford University Department of Economics Discussion Paper n. 167Google Scholar
- Zizzo DJ, JHW Tan (forthcoming) Game harmony: a behavioral approach to predicting cooperation in games. American Behavioral Scientist Google Scholar