Advertisement

Economic Botany

, 65:129 | Cite as

Diversity, Geographical, and Consumption Patterns of Traditional Vegetables in Sociolinguistic Communities in Benin: Implications for Domestication and Utilization1

  • Enoch Gbenato Achigan-DakoEmail author
  • Sognigbe N’Danikou
  • Francoise Assogba-Komlan
  • Bianca Ambrose-Oji
  • Adam Ahanchede
  • Margaret W. Pasquini
Article

Abstract

Diversity, Geographical, and Consumption Patterns of Traditional Vegetables in Sociolinguistic Communities in Benin: Implications for Domestication and Utilization. Traditional vegetables in many African rural areas are an important part of the daily diet and economy but have been poorly documented until recently. We undertook a survey in Benin on the diversity and patterns of use of traditional vegetables by 18 sociolinguistic groups in the three major phytogeographical regions. Major groups include the Yoruba–Nagot, Fon, Bariba, Adja, Cotafon, and Ditammari. Focus groups and field visits were conducted in 49 villages. Species richness at the country level and in phytogeographical regions was estimated using species accumulation curves. Our results indicated that 245 species belonging to 62 families are used as vegetable resources all over the country. The most frequently used families include Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Cucurbitaceae, and Leguminoseae. About 80% of collected vegetables are wild resources; only 19% were clearly under cultivation. Herbs were the most widely consumed life form. The Guinean and the Sudanian regions exhibit similar species richness while in the Sudano–Guinean region vegetable richness is higher. The use of a species as a vegetable depends not only on socio–cultural attributes but also on geographical occurrence. Based on this inventory, we identified needs for further research and activities for both the conservation and promotion of traditional vegetables.

Key Words

Benin diversity phytogeographical regions sociolinguistic groups traditional vegetable 

Résumé

Diversité, Distribution Géographiques, et Mode de Consommation des Légumes Traditionnels dans les Groupes Sociolinguistiques du Bénin: Implications pour la Domestication et l’Utilisation des Ressources. Les légumes traditionnels représentent une part importante dans le régime alimentaire quotidien et l’économie des communautés rurales en Afrique. Cependant, ils ont été négligés par la recherche jusqu’à récemment. Au Bénin, nous avons entrepris un inventaire de la diversité et des types d’usage des légumes traditionnels au niveau de 18 groupes sociolinguistiques, dans les trois grandes zones phytogéographiques du pays. Les groupes linguistiques enquêtés comprennent les Yoruba–Nagot, Fon, Bariba, Adja, Cotafon, et Ditammari. Des entretiens de groupes et visites de terrain ont été organisés dans 49 villages. La richesse spécifique au niveau national et au niveau des zones phytogéographiques a été estimée par la méthode de courbes d’accumulation spécifique. Nos résultats indiquent que 245 espèces appartenant à 62 familles de plantes sont exploitées comme légumes au niveau national. Les familles fréquemment utilisées sont les Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Cucurbitaceae, et les Leguminoseae. Environ 80% des légumes collectés sont des ressources sauvages et seulement 19% sont clairement cultivés. Les herbacées représentent la majeur partie des légumes. Les zones Guinéenne et Soudanienne présentent des richesses spécifiques similaires, tandis que la richesse spécifique de légumes est supérieure dans la zone Soudano–Guinéenne. L’utilisation d’une espèce comme légume dépend non seulement des attributs socioculturels mais aussi de la distribution géographique des especes. En se basant sur cet inventaire nous avons identifié les besoins de recherche et les actions de conservation et aussi de promotion des légumes traditionnels.

Notes

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the United Kingdom’s Darwin Initiative through project 15–003 to carry out this study. We thank H. Yedomonhan and A. C. Adomou from the National Herbarium of Benin for the identification and maintenance of specimen vouchers. We thank the following colleagues for their assistance during collecting missions and focus group discussions: Arlette Adjatin, Edgar Avohou, Alexandre Dansi, Ines Deleke Koko, Armel Mensah, Victoire Ahlé, Noel Ahononga, and Joel Azagba. The first author is grateful to Jun Li for guidance for comparison of species accumulation curves. We thank R. Voeks for the final editing of our manuscript.

Literature Cited

  1. Achigan–Dako, E. G., M. W. Pasquini, F. Assogba Komlan, S. N’Danikou, A. Dansi, and B. Ambrose–Oji. 2010. Traditional vegetables in Benin. Institut National des Recherches Agricoles du Bénin. Cotonou, Benin: Imprimeries du CENAP.Google Scholar
  2. Adebisi, A. A. 2004. Launaea taraxacifolia (Willd.) Amin ex C. Jeffrey. Pages 362–364 in G. J. H. Grubben and O. A. Denton, eds., Plant resources of Tropical Africa, Vol. 2: Vegetables, a PROTA Foundation (Wageningen Univeristy) series. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. Akoègninou, A., W. J. van der Burg, L. J. G. van der Maesen, V. Adjakidjè, J. P. Essou, B. Sinsin, and H. Yédomonhan. 2006. Flore du Bénin. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. Assogbadjo, A. E. 2006. Importance Socio–Economique et Etude de la Variabilité Ecologique, Morphologique, Génétique et Biochimique du Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) au Bénin. Thèse de Doctorat, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium.Google Scholar
  5. Baco, N. M., G. Biaou, and J.-P. Lescure. 2007. Complementarity between geographical and social patterns in the preservation of yam (Dioscorea sp.) diversity in Northern Benin. Economic Botany 61:385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batawila, K., S. Akpavi, K. Wala, M. Kanda, R. Vodouhe, and K. Akpagana. 2007. Diversité et Gestion des Légumes de Cueillette au Togo. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 7(3).Google Scholar
  7. Becker, D. C. and K. Ghimire. 2003. Synergy between traditional ecological knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Conservation Ecology 8(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol8/iss1/ (26 December 2010).
  8. Bierschenk, T., E. Thioleron, and N. Bako-Arifari. 2003. Benin. Development Policy Review 21:161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casas, A., A. Otero-Arnaiz, E. Perez-Negron, and A. Valiente-Banuet. 2007. In Situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Annals of Botany 100:1101–1115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chweya, J. A. and P. Eyzaguirre, eds. 1999. The biodiversity of traditional leafy vegetables. IPGRI, Rome.Google Scholar
  11. Colwell, R. K. 2006. Estimates: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8. User’s Guide and Application at http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/EstimateSPages/EstSUsersGuide/EstimateSUsersGuide.htm (26 December 2010).
  12. Dansi, A., A. Adjatin, H. Adoukonou-Sagbadja, V. Faladé, H. Yedomonhan, D. Odou, and B. Dossou. 2008. Traditional leafy vegetables and their use in the Benin Republic. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55:1239–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO. 1988. Traditional food plants. A resources book for promoting the exploitation and consumption of food plants in arid, semi–arid and sub–humid lands of Eastern Africa. Food and Nutrition Paper 42. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).Google Scholar
  14. Floquet, A. and E. van der Akker. 2000. Ethnic group and settlement patterns in Benin. Pages 255–258 in F. Graef, P. Lawrence, and M. Von Oppen, eds., Adapted farming in West Africa: Issues, potentials and perspectives. Verlag Ulrich E. Grauer, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  15. Fondoun, J. M. and K. T. Manga. 2000. Farmers indigenous practices for conserving Garcinia kola and Gnetum africanum in Southern Cameroon. Agroforestry Systems 48:289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaoue, O. G. and T. Ticktin. 2009. Fulani knowledge of the ecological impacts of Khaya Senegalensis (Meliaceae) foliage harvest in Benin and its implications for sustainable harvest. Economic Botany 63(3):256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghimire, K. S., D. McKey, and Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas. 2004. Heterogeneity in ethnoecological knowledge and management of medicinal plants in the Himalayas of Nepal: Implications for conservation. Ecology and Society 9(3):6.Google Scholar
  18. Grubben, G. J. H. and O. A. Denton. 2004. Plant resources of Tropical Africa, Vol. 2: Vegetables, a PROTA Foundation (Wageningen Univeristy) series. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  19. Ky, K. J. M. 2008. Vitex Doniana Sweet. Pages 578–581 in D. Louppe, A. A. Oteng-Amoako, and M. Brink, eds., Plant resources of Tropical Africa 7(1), a PROTA Foundation (Wageningen Univeristy) series. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  20. Lawrence, A., O. L. Phillips, A. R. Ismodes, M. Lopez, S. Rose, D. Wood, and A. J. Farfan. 2005. Local values for harvested forest plants in Madre De Dios, Peru: Towards a more contextualized interpretation of quantitative ethnobotanical data. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:45–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leakey, R. R. B., Z. Tchoundjeu, R. I. Smith, R. C. Munro, J.-M. Fondoun, J. Kengue, P. O. Anegbeh, A. R. Atangana, A. N. Wahuriu, E. Asaah, C. Usoro, and V. Ukafor. 2004. Evidence that subsistence farmers have domesticated indigenous fruits (Dacryodes edulis and Irvingia gabonensis) in Cameroon and Nigeria. Agroforestry Systems 60:101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maggioni, L. 2004. Conservation and use of vegetable genetic resources: A European perspective. Acta Horticulturae 637:13–30.Google Scholar
  23. Mao, C. X. and J. Li. 2009. Comparing species assemblages via species accumulation curves. Biometrics 65(4):1063–1067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maundu, P., E. G. Achigan-Dako, and Y. Morimoto. 2009. Biodiversity of African vegetables. Pages 65–104 in C. M. Shackleton, M. W. Pasquini, and A. W. Drescher, eds., African indigenous vegetables. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  25. N’Danikou, S. 2009. Diversity, management and conservation of wild edible plants in the Fon community of Agbohoutogon, South Benin. M.Sc. dissertation, School of the Environment, Natural Resources, Bangor University, Gwynedd, Wales, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  26. Njoroge, G. N. and M. N. Van Luijk. 2004. Momordica charantia L. Pages 385–390 in G. J. H. Grubben and O. A. Denton, eds., Plant resources of Tropical Africa, Vol 2: Vegetables, a PROTA Foundation (Wageningen Univeristy) series. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. Osoko, A. L., M. J. Balick, and D. C. Daly. 2007. Medicinal plants and cultural variations across Dominican rural urban, and transnational landscape. Pages 14–38 in A. Pieroni and I. Vandebroek, eds., Traveling cultures and plants: The ethnobiology and ethnopharmacy of migrations. Berghahn Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Pasquini, W. M. and E. M. Young. 2009. Preface. Pages xxi–xxvi. in C. M. Shackleton, M. W. Pasquini, and A. W. Drescher, eds., African indigenous vegetables. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  29. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org (10 December 2009).
  30. Rohlf, F. L. 2000. NTSYS–Pc Version 2.1: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. New York: Exeter Software.Google Scholar
  31. Schippers, R. R. 2004. Légumes Africains Indigènes: Présentation des Espèces Cultivées, a CTA publication. Margraf Publishers GmbH, Weikersheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  32. Shackleton, C. M., M. W. Pasquini, and A. W. Drescher. 2009. African indigenous vegetables. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  33. Simons, A. J. and R. R. B. Leakey. 2004. Tree domestication in tropical agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 61:167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, F. I. and P. Eyzaguirre. 2007. African leafy vegetables: Their role in The World Health Organization’s Global Fruit and Vegetables Initiative. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development 7(3).Google Scholar
  35. The World Bank Group. 2009. World development indicators database, April 2009. Country Benin. http://Ddp–Ext.Worldbank.Org/Ext/Ddpreports/ (7 December 2009).
  36. Ucheck Fomum, F., 2004. Vernonia Amygdalina Delile. Pages 543–546 in G. J. H. Grubben and O. A. Denton, eds., Plant resources of Tropical Africa 2. Vegetables, a PROTA Foundation (Wageningen Univeristy) series. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Vodouhe, G. F., O. Coulibaly, C. Greene, and B. Sinsin. 2009. Estimating local values of non–timber forest products to Pendjari Biosphere Reserve dwellers in Benin. Economic Botany 63(4):397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. White, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa. A descriptive memoire to accompany the UNESCO AETFAT/UNSO Vegetation Map of Africa. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  39. Yang, R.–Y. and G. B. Keding. 2009. Nutritional contributions of important African vegtables. Pages 105–143 in C. M. Shackleton, M. W. Pasquini, and A. W. Drescher, eds., African Indigenous Vegetables. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  40. Zeder, M. A. 2006. Central questions in the domestication of plants and animals. Evolutionary Anthropology 15:105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enoch Gbenato Achigan-Dako
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sognigbe N’Danikou
    • 1
  • Francoise Assogba-Komlan
    • 3
  • Bianca Ambrose-Oji
    • 4
  • Adam Ahanchede
    • 1
  • Margaret W. Pasquini
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of Agronomic Sciences (FSA)University of Abomey-CalaviCotonouBenin
  2. 2.Plant Resources of Tropical AfricaNairobiKenya
  3. 3.National Institute of Agricultural Research of Benin (INRAB)CotonouBenin
  4. 4.CAZS Natural ResourcesBangor UniversityGwyneddUK
  5. 5.Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios sobre DesarrolloUniversidad de los AndesBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations