Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 44–65 | Cite as

“Made in Brazil”: Human Dispersal of the Brazil Nut (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae) in Ancient Amazonia1

  • Glenn H. ShepardJrEmail author
  • Henri Ramirez
Review

Abstract

“Made in Brazil”: Human Dispersal of the Brazil Nut (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae) in Ancient Amazonia. The Brazil nut, Bertholletia excelsa, is a colossal tree of terra firme forest whose seeds represent the most important non-timber forest product in Amazonia. Its peculiarly inefficient dispersal strategy and discontinuous distribution have led some to hypothesize anthropogenic origins, but evidence to date has been inconclusive. Here we present results of a multidisciplinary study addressing this question. A review of the geographic distribution of B. excelsa and comparison with that of similar Lecythis species suggest a number of anomalies that are consistent with a recent and wide colonization of Bertholletia. Published studies and field observations indicate that anthropogenic disturbance facilitates Brazil nut regeneration. Recent genetic studies showing no sequence diversity and no geographical structuring of within-population variability support a rapid and recent irradiation from an ancestral population. Historical linguistic analysis of indigenous terms for Brazil nut suggests a northern/eastern Amazonian origin for Bertholletia, with a concomitant spread of Brazil nut distribution or cultivation to the south and west. Such an expansion would have been particularly facilitated by the emergence of intensive bitter manioc cultivation and networks of interethnic trade beginning in the first millennium C.E. Together, ecological, phytogeographic, genetic, linguistic, and archeological data reinforce the hypothesis that ancient Amazonian peoples played a role in establishing this emblematic and economically important rainforest landscape.

Key Words

Amazonia non-timber forest products plant genetics landscape domestication historical ecology historical linguistics Amazonian archeology 

‘Made in Brasil’: A dispersão antrópica da castanha-do-Pará (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae) na antiga Amazônia. A castanha-do-Brasil, Bertholletia excelsa, é uma arvore enorme da terra firme cujas sementes representam o produto florestal não-madeireira mais importante da Amazônia. Alguns pesquisadores, observando sua estratégia ineficiente de dispersão e sua distribuição descontínua, propuseram a hipótese de que suas origens são antrópicas, mas as evidencias até a data são ambíguas. Aqui se apresentam resultados de um estudo multidisciplinar sobre essa questão. Uma revisão da distribuição geográfica de B. excelsa e uma comparação com as sapucaias (Lecythis spp.) sugerem várias anomalias compatíveis com uma recente colonização de Bertholletia pela Amazônia. Estudos publicados e observações em campo sugerem que a perturbação antrópica facilita a regeneração de castanhais. Estudos genéticos recentes demonstram nenhuma diversidade genética de seqüências de cpDNA e nenhuma estruturação geográfica da variabilidade intra-populacional, o qual sugere uma expansão rápida e recente. Estudos lingüísticos sugerem uma origem para Bertholletia no norte/leste da Amazônia, com uma expansão mais recente da distribuição ou cultivação para o sul e o oeste. Tal expansão teria sido facilitado pela emergência do cultivo intensivo de mandioca amarga e redes de contato inter-étnico especialmente a partir do primeiro milênio dC. Dados ecológicos, fitogeográficos, genéticos, lingüísticos, e arqueológicos reforçam a hipótese de que os povos amazônicos antigos tiveram um papel significante no estabelecimento dessa paisagem amazônica emblemática.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Rogerio Gribel and Maristerra Lemes for support and research collaboration in the early phases of this study. We also acknowledge Eduardo Góes Neves and the Museum of Archeology and Ethnology at University of São Paulo for support during a later phase of the research. We thank Manuel Arroyo-Kalin for many useful suggestions on a draft of the paper. We also thank Sylvain Desmoulière for kindly sharing unpublished geographical analyses of RADAM-Brasil inventory data on the Brazil nut. Thanks also to Carlos Peres for sharing data, observations, and photographs during various drafts. We thank Scott Mori and two anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of the manuscript and many helpful comments and revisions. We acknowledge Denny Moore for urging caution in our linguistic interpretations. Finally, we thank Joshua Birtchall for helpful comments on the final draft of some figures. Different phases of the research were supported by Brazil’s Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP).

Literature Cited

  1. Adelaar, W. F. H. 2000. Propuesta de un nuevo vínculo genético entre dos grupos lingüísticos indígenas de la Amazonía occidental: Harakmbut y Katukina. Pages 219–236 in L. M. Esquerre, ed., Actas del I Congreso de Lenguas Indígenas de Sudamérica, Vol. 2. Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima.Google Scholar
  2. Aikhenvald, A. Y. 1999. The Arawak language family. Pages 65–106 in R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald, eds., The Amazonian languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Arroyo-Kalin, M. 2008. Steps towards an ecology of landscape: A geoarchaeological approach to the study of anthropogenic dark earths in the central Amazon region, Brazil. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Archeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  4. Balée, W. 1989. The culture of Amazonian forests. Pages 1–21 in D. A. Posey and W. Ballee, eds., Resource management in Amazonia: Indigenous and folk strategies. New York Botanical Gardens, New York.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2000. Antiquity of traditional ethnobiological knowledge in Amazonia: The Tupi-Guarani family and time. Ethnohistory 47(2):399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ——— and D. Moore. 1991. Similarity and variation in plant names in five Tupi-Guarani languages (Eastern Amazonia). Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History: Biological Sciences 35(4):209–262.Google Scholar
  7. ——— and C. Erickson. 2006. Time and complexity in the Neotropical lowlands: Explorations in historical ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bellwood, P. 2001. Early agriculturalist population diasporas? Farming, languages and genes. Annual Review of Anthropology 30:181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ——— and C. Renfrew. 2002. Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. Cambridge, U.K.: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
  10. Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, C. H. 2006. Glottchronology and the chronology of maize in the Americas. Pages 647–663 in J. Staller, R. Tykot, and B. Benz, eds., Histories of maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Academic Press, Burlington.Google Scholar
  12. Buckley, D. P., D. M. O’Malley, V. Apsit, G. T. Prance, and K. S. Bawa. 1988. Genetics of Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa Humb. & Bonpl.: Lecythidaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76:923–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, L. 2002. What drives linguistic diversity and language spread? Pages 49–63 in P. Bellwood and C. Renfrew, eds., Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Chambers, J. Q., N. Higuchi, and J. P. Schimel. 1998. Ancient trees in Amazonia. Nature 391:135–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clay, J. W. 1997. Brazil nuts: The use of a keystone species for conservation and development. Pages 246–282 in C. H. Freese, ed., Harvesting wild species: Implications for biodiversity and conservation. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  16. Clement, C. R. 1990. Origin, domestication and genetic conservation of Amazonian fruit tree species. Pages 249–263 in D. A. Posey and W. Overall, eds., Ethnobiology: Implications and applications. Proceedings of the First International Congress of Ethnobiology. Museu Paraense Goeldi, Idi/CNPq, Belém, Para.Google Scholar
  17. Comrie, B. 2002. Farming dispersal in Europe and the spread of the Indo-European language family. Pages 409–419 in P. Bellwood and C. Renfrew, eds., Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Conklin, B. A. 1989. Images of health, illness and death among the Wari’ (Pakaas Novos) of Rondonia, Brazil. Ph.D. thesis, Medical Anthropology Program, University of California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2001. Consuming grief: Compassionate cannibalism in an Amazonian society. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cotta, J. N., K. A. Kainer, L. H. O. Wadt, and C. L. Staudhammer. 2008. Shifting cultivation effects on Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) regeneration. Forest Ecology and Management 256(1–2):28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Souza, M. L. 1984. Estudos de processos tecnológicos para obtenção de produtos da Castanha-do-Brasil (Bertholletia excelsa, H. B. K.). Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza.Google Scholar
  22. Desmoulière, S. J. M. n.d. -a. Castanha da Amazônia: Inventario padronizado. Unpublished GIS product (map) summarizing special data on Bertholletia from RADAM-Brasil (1973–1981) botanical inventories. GIS Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus.Google Scholar
  23. ———. n.d. -b. Castanha da Amazônia: No texto descritivo da parcela. Unpublished GIS product (map) summarizing special data on Bertholletia from RADAM-Brasil (1973–1981) botanical inventories. GIS Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus.Google Scholar
  24. Dixon, R. M. W. 1999. Introduction. Pages 1–22 in R. M. W. Dixon and A. Y. Aikhenvald, eds., The Amazonian languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Ducke, A. 1946. Plantas de cultura précolombiana na Amazônia brasileira. Boletin Técnico do Instituto Agronomico do Norte 8:2–24.Google Scholar
  26. Facundes, S. D. S. 2002. Historical linguistics and its contribution to improving the knowledge of Arawak. Pages 74–96 in J. D. Hill and F. Santos-Granero, eds., Comparative Arawakan histories: Rethinking language family and culture area in Amazonia. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  27. Fonseca, J. S. da. 1880–81. Viagem ao redor do Brasil, 1875–1878 (2 vols. ). Oficina tipográfica de Pinheiro, Faria & Companhia, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  28. Greenhall, A. M. 1965. Sapucaia nut dispersal by greater spear-nosed bats in Trinidad. Caribbean Journal of Science 6:167–171.Google Scholar
  29. Gribel, R., M. R. Lemes, L. G. Bernardes, A. E. Pinto, and G. H., Jr. Shepard. 2007. Page 281 Phylogeography of Brazil-nut tree (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae): Evidence of human influence on the species distribution. Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Morelia.Google Scholar
  30. Guix, J. C. 2005. Evidence of old anthropic effects in forests at the confluence of the Caurés and Negro Rivers–NW Amazonia: The role of Indians and Caboclos. Grupo de Estudos Ecologicos, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  31. Hamilton, M. B., J. M. Braverman, and D. F. Soria-Hernanz. 2003. Patterns and relative rates of nucleotide and insertion/deletion evolution at six chloroplast intergenic regions in new world species of the Lecythidaceae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20(10):1710–1721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heckenberger, M. J. 2002. Rethinking the Arawakan diaspora: Hierarchy, regionality and the Amazonian Formative. Pages 99–122 in J. D. Hill and F. Santos-Granero, eds., Comparative Arawakan histories: Rethinking language family and culture area in Amazonia. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2005. The ecology of power: Person, place, and culture in Southern Amazon, AD 1250–2000. New York: Routeledge.Google Scholar
  34. ———, E. G. Neves, and J. B. Petersen. 1998. De onde surgem os modelos? As origens e expansões Tupi na Amazônia Central. Revista de Antropologia 41(1):69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———, J. C. Russell, C. Fausto, J. R. Toney, M. J. Schmidt, E. Pereira, B. Franchetto, and A. Kuikuro. 2008. Pre-Columbian urbanism, anthropogenic landscapes, and the future of the Amazon. Science 29(321):1214–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hill, J. D. and F. Santos-Granero. 2002. Comparative Arawakan histories: Rethinking language family and culture area in Amazonia. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  37. Hornborg, A. 2005. Ethnogenesis, regional integration and ecology in prehistoric Amazonia: Toward a system perspective. Current Anthropology 46(4):589–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2004. Produção da extração vegetal e da silvicultura–2003. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2007. Produção da extração vegetal e da silvicultura–2006. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.Google Scholar
  40. Janzen, D. H. and P. S. Martin. 1982. Neotropical anachronisms: The fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science 215:19–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kanashiro, M., S. A. Harris, and A. Simons. 1997. RAPD diversity in Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa Humb. & Bonpl.: Lecythidaceae). Silvae Genetica 46(4):219–223.Google Scholar
  42. Kern, D., G. D’aquino, T. Rodrigues, F. Frazao, W. Sombroek, T. Myers, and E. Neves. 2004. Distribution of Amazonian dark earths in the Brazilian Amazon. Pages 51–75 in J. Lehmann, D. Kern, B. Glaser, and W. Wodos, eds., Amazonian dark earths. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lathrap, D. W. 1970. The Upper Amazon. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Magalhães, M. P. 2009. Evolução antropomorfa da Amazônia. Revista de História da Arte e Arqueologia 12:4–38.Google Scholar
  45. McCann, J. M., W. I. Woods, and D. W. Meyer. 2001. Organic matter and anthrosols in Amazonia: Interpreting the Amerindian legacy. in R. M. Rees, B. C. Ball, C. D. Campbell, and C. A. Watson, eds., Sustainable management of soil organic matter, pp 180–189. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  46. Meira, S. 2006. Cariban languages. Pages 199–204 in K. Brown, ed., Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition. Elsevier, Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. ——— and B. Franchetto. 2005. The Southern Cariban languages and the Cariban family. International Journal of American Linguistics 71(2):127–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Métraux, A. 1928. La civilisation matérielle des tribus Tupi-Guarani. Librairie Orientaliste, Paris.Google Scholar
  49. Miller, E. (ed.). 1992. Arqueologia dos empreendimentos da Eletronorte: Resultados preliminares. Brasilia: Eletronorte.Google Scholar
  50. Moore, D. and L. Storto. 2002. As línguas indígenas e a pré-história. Pages 73–92 in S. D. J. Pena, ed., Homo Brasilis. FUNPEC Editora, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  51. Morcote Ríos, G., S. Mora Camargo, and C. E. Franky Calvo. 2006. Pueblos y paisajes antiguos de la Selva Amazónica. Universidad Nacional deColombia/Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  52. Mori, S. A. (lead author) et al.; D. Swarthout (topic editor). 2007. Brazil nut family (Lecythidaceae) in the New World. In Encyclopedia of Earth, ed. C. J. Cleveland and D. Swarthout. Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  53. ——— and G. T. Prance. 1981. The “sapucaia” group of Lecythis (Lecythidaceae). Brittonia 33(1):70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ——— and ———. 1990a. Taxonomy, ecology and economic botany of the Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa Humb. & Bonpl.: Lecythidaceae). Advances in Economic Botany 8:130–150.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 1990b. Lecythidaceae—Part II. The zygomorphic-flowered New World genera (Couroupita, Corythophora, Bertholletia, Couratari, Eschweilera, & Lecythis). Flora Neotropica 21(2):1–376.Google Scholar
  56. Müller, C. H. 1981. Castanha-do-Brasil: Estudos agronômicos. EMBRAPA/Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Úmido, Belém, Pará.Google Scholar
  57. ———, I. A. Rodrigues, A. A. Müller, and N. R. M. Müller. 1980. Castanha-do-Brasil: Resultados de pesquisas. Belém, Pará: EMBRAPA/Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Úmido.Google Scholar
  58. Myers, G. P., A. C. Newton, and M. Melgarejo. 1996. The influence of canopy gap size on natural regeneration of Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) in Bolivia. Forest Ecology and Management 127(1–3):119–128.Google Scholar
  59. Neves, E. G. and J. B. Petersen. 2006. The political economy of pre-Columbian Amerindians: Landscape transformations in central Amazonia. Pages 279–310 in W. Balée and C. Erickson, eds., Time and complexity in the Neotropical lowlands: Explorations in historical Eecology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  60. ———, ———, R. N. Bartone, and C. A. da Silva. 2003. Historical and socio-cultural origins of Amazonian dark earths. In Amazonian dark earths: Origins, properties, management, ed. J. Lehmann, D. Kern, G. Glaser, and W. I. Woods, 29–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Nimuendajú, C. 1925. As tribus do alto Madeira. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris 17:166–172.Google Scholar
  62. Noble, G. K. 1965. Proto-Arawakan and its descendants. International Journal of American Linguistics 31(3):1–129.Google Scholar
  63. Ohl-Schacherer, J., G. H., Jr. Shepard, H. Kaplan, C. A. Peres, T. Levi, and D. W. Yu. 2007. The sustainability of subsistence hunting by Matsigenka native communities in Manu National Park, Peru. Conservation Biology 21(5):1174–1185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oliver, J. R. 1989. The archaeological, linguistic and ethnohistorical evidence for the expansion of Arawakan into northwest Venezuela and northeastern Colombia. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  65. Pärssinen, M., D. Schaan, and A. Ranzi. 2009. Pre-Columbian geometric earthworks in the upper Purús: A complex society in western Amazonia. Antiquity 83(322):1084–1095.Google Scholar
  66. Payne, D. L. 1991. A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions. Pages 355–499 in D. C. Derbyshire and G. K. Pullum, eds., Handbook of Amazonian languages. Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague.Google Scholar
  67. Peres, C. A. and C. Baider. 1997. Seed dispersal, spatial distribution and population structure of Brazilnut trees (Bertholettia excelsa) in southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. ———, L. C. Schiesari, and C. L. Dias-Leme. 1997. Vertebrate predation of Brazil-nuts, an agouti-dispersed Amazonian seed crop (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae): A test of the escape hypothesis. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. ———, C. Baider, P. A. Zuidema, L. H. O. Wadt, K. A. Kainer, D. A. P. Gomes-Silva, R. P. Salomão, L. L. Simões, E. R. N. Franciosi, F. Cornejo Valverde, R. Gribel, G. H. Shepard Jr., M. Kanashiro, P. Coventry, D. W. Yu, A. R. Watkinson, and R. P. Freckleton. 2003. Demographic threats to the sustainability of Brazil nut exploitation. Science 302:2112–2114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Piperno, D. and D. M. Pearsall. 1998. The origins of agriculture in the lowland Neotropics. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  71. Pires, J. M. 1984. The Amazonian forest. Pages 581–602 in H. Sioli, ed., The Amazon: Limnology and landscape ecology of a mighty tropical river and its basin. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
  72. Posey, D. A. 1985. Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: The case of the Kayapo Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems 3:139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. RADAM-Brasil. (1973–1981). Levantamento de recursos naturais: Geologia, geomorfologia, solos, vegetação, uso potencial da terra (22 volumes). Rio de Janeiro: Ministério de Minas e Energia, Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral.Google Scholar
  74. Ramirez, H. 2001. Línguas Arawak da Amazônia setentrional: Comparação e descrição. Universidade do Amazonas, Manaus.Google Scholar
  75. Ranzi, A., R. Feres, and F. Brown. 2007. Internet software programs aid in search for Amazonian geoglyphs. Eos 88(21):226–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rodrigues, A. D. 1964. A classificação do tronco lingüístico tupí. Revista de Antropologia 12(1–2):99–104.Google Scholar
  77. ———. 1985. Evidence for Tupi-Cariban relationship. In South American languages: Retrospect and prospect, ed. H. Klein and L. Stark, 371–404. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  78. ———. 1999. Tupí. In The Amazonian languages, ed. H. Klein and L. Stark, 107–124. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Roosevelt, A. C. 1980. Parmana: Prehistoric maize and manioc subsistence along the Amazon and Orinoco. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  80. ———. 1992. Arqueologia Amazônica. In História dos Índios no Brasil, ed. M. M. Carneiro da Cunha, 53–86. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  81. ———, M. Lima da Costa, C. Lopes Machado, M. Michab, N. Mercier, H. Valladas, J. Feathers, W. Barnett, M. Imazio da Silveira, A. Henderson, J. Sliva, B. Chernoff, D. S. Reese, J. A. Homan, N. Toth, and K. Schick. 1996. Paleoindian cave dwellers in the Amazon: The peopling of the Americas. Science 272:373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schmidt, M. 1917. Die Aruaken: Ein beitrag zum problem der kulturverbreitung. Universität Leipzig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  83. Shepard, G. H. Jr. 2001. Relatório preliminar sobre sítio arqueológico e cemitério indígena na Reserva Amanã. Report submitted to 1ª Superintendência Regional do IPHAN (Memo nº 0308/2001). Instituto de Patrimônio Histórico e Artístico Nacional (IPHAN), Brasilia, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
  84. ———. 2002. Estudos sobre a biologia reprodutiva de plantas Amazônicas e suas aplicações no uso, manejo e conservação dos recursos naturais. Manaus, AM, Brazil: Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq).Google Scholar
  85. ———, K. Rummenhoeller, J. Ohl, and D. W. Yu. 2010. Trouble in paradise: Indigenous populations, anthropological policies, and biodiversity conservation in Manu National Park, Peru. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 29:252–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Steinen, K. von den. 1894. Unter den naturvölkem Zentral-Brasiliens. Berlin.Google Scholar
  87. Stokstad, E. 2003. Too much crunching on rainforest nuts? Science 302:2049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tastevin, C. 1909/1920. Vocabulaires Katawishi. Unpublished vocabulary. Archives of Professor Paul Rivet, Musée de l’Homme, Paris.Google Scholar
  89. ———. 1920. Dialecte Marawa. Unpublished vocabulary. Archives of Professor Paul Rivet, Musée de l’Homme, Paris.Google Scholar
  90. Trivedi, M. R., F. H. Cornejo, and A. R. Watkinson. 2004. Seed predation on Brazil nuts (Bertholletia excelsa) by macaws (Psittacidae) in Madre de Dios, Peru. Biotropica 36(1):118–122.Google Scholar
  91. Tupiassú, A. and N. V. C. Oliveira. 1967. A castanha do Pará. Instituto de Desenvolvimento Econômico-Social do Pará, Belém, Pará.Google Scholar
  92. Urban, G. 1992. A história da cultura Brasileira segundo as linguas nativas. Pages 87–102 in M. M. Carneiro da Cunha, ed., Índios no Brasil. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  93. Villachica, H., J. E. Urano de Carvalho, C. H. Müller, S. C. Diaz, and M. Almanza. 1996. Frutales y hortalizas promisórios de la Amazonía. Tratado de Cooperación Amazónica/Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
  94. Wander, A. E., R. Gazzola, C. H. M. Coelho, J. Gazzola, and G. da Silva e Souza. 2008. Brazil nut almonds: Nutritional and market aspects. Tropentag 2008. Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Germany: Competition for Resources in a Changing World: New Drive for Rural Development.Google Scholar
  95. Witkowski, S. L. and C. H. Brown. 1983. Marking-reversals and cultural importance. Language 59(3):569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. AntropologiaMuseu Paraense Emilio GoeldiBelémBrazil
  2. 2.Dept. de Letras e PedagogiaUniversidade Federal de RondôniaGuajará-MirimBrazil

Personalised recommendations