Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 260–265 | Cite as

A Contribution to the Prehistory of Domesticated Bottle Gourds in Asia: Rind Measurements from Jomon Japan and Neolithic Zhejiang, China1

  • Dorian Q Fuller
  • Leo Aoi Hosoya
  • Yunfei Zheng
  • Ling Qin
Notes on Economic Plants

Introduction

Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standley, the bottle gourd, has been of considerable archaeological interest in both hemispheres, as it is the only cultivated plant species that is unambiguously present in both Early Holocene America and Asia. This is true despite the evidence that true wild bottle gourds, like their congeneric relatives, are restricted to southern Africa (Decker-Walters et al. 2004). Finds from the Windover site in Florida were the first to be directly dated to 7290 B.P./ca. 6200–6100 B.C.E. (Doran et al. 1990), and since then bottle gourd seeds and rind fragments from several other sites have been directly dated (Erickson et al. 2005). Recent genetic studies, including ancient DNA from prehistoric American gourds, suggest that bottle gourds of the New World represent a subset of genetic variation derived from bottle gourds in Eastern Asia (Erickson et al. 2005). Early Holocene archaeological finds in both Mesoamerica and North America imply that this...

Keywords

Lagenaria siceraria archaeobotany domestication Neolithic Jomon Hemudu Liangzhu 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ms. Mikako Koshika (Aomori San’nai Maruyama Site) and Mr. Yasuhiro Okada (Aomori Prefecture Education Department) for access to the San’nai Maruyama samples, and Mr. Masanori Kushibe (Wakasa Museum of History and Ethnology) and Prof. Katsuhiko Amitani (Tsuruga Junior College) for arranging access to the Torihama samples. This research was carried out while the first author was in receipt of a fellowship from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science, and based at the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature with Professor Y.-I. Sato. We wish to thank Sun Guoping, the excavation director at Tianluoshan for making material from his site available for study, and the Zhejiang Provincial Institute for Archaeology and Cultural Relics for encouraging archaeobotanical research. We also thank Ding Jin-long for making archaeobotanical materials in the Suzhou Museum available for study, including seeds from Chenghu. Chinese materials were studied while the first author was in receipt of the Sino-British Trust grant from the British Academy.

Literature Cited

  1. Crawford, Gary. 1992. The Origins of Plant Domestication in East Asia. Pages 7–38 in Patty Jo Watson and C. Wesley Cowan, eds., Origins of Agriculture: An International Perspective. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Decker-Walters, D. S. 1999. Cucurbits, Sanskrit and the Indo-Aryans. Economic Botany 53(1):98–112.Google Scholar
  3. ———, M. Wilkins-Ellert, S.-M. Chung, and J. E. Staub. 2004. Discovery and Genetic Assessment of Wild Bottle Gourd (Lagenaria siceraria [Mol.] Standley; Cucurbitaceae) from Zimbabwe. Economic Botany 58:501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doran, G. H., D. N. Dickel, and L. A. Newsom. 1990. A 7,290-Year-Old Bottle Gourd from the Windover Site, Florida, American Antiquity 55:354–360.Google Scholar
  5. Erickson, David L., Bruce D. Smith, Andrew C. Clarke, Daniel H. Sandweiss, and Noreen Tuross. 2005. An Asian Origin for a 10,000-Year-Old Domesticated Plant in the Americas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 102:18315–18320.Google Scholar
  6. Fuller, Dorian Q, Emma Harvey, and Ling Qin. 2007. Presumed domestication? Evidence for wild rice cultivation and domestication in th fifth millennium BC of the Lower Yangtze region. Antiquity 81:316–331.Google Scholar
  7. Fuller, Dorian Q., Ling Qin, Yunfei Zheng, Zhijun Zhao, Xugao Chen, Leo Aoi Hosoya, and Guo-ping Sun. 2009. The Domestication Process and Domestication Rate in Rice: Spikelet Bases from the Lower Yangtze. Science 323:1607–1610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Habu, J. 2008. Growth and Decline in Complex Hunter-Gatherer Societies: A Case Study from the Jomon Period San’nai Maruyama Site, Japan. Antiquity 82:571–584.Google Scholar
  9. Heiser, Charles B., Jr. 1973. Variation in the Bottle Gourd. Pages 121–128 in B. J. Meggars, E. S. Ayensu, and W. D. Duckworth, eds., Tropical Forests Ecosystems in Africa and South America: A Comparative Review. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Liu, Changjiang and Gu Haibin 2007. The Plant Remains from Chengtoushan Site. Pages 98–106 in Hunan Provincial Institute of Archaeology and International Research Center for Japanese Studies, Kyoto, ed., Lixian Chengtoushan: Sino-Japanese Integrated Studies on Environmental Archaeology of Liyang Plain. Wenwu Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Matsui, A. and M. Kanehara. 2006. The Question of Prehistoric Plant Husbandry during the Jomon Period in Japan. World Archaeology 38:259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Minaki, Mutsuhiko, Seiichiro Tsuji, and Masakazu Sumita. 1998. San’nai Maruyama iseki dai 6 tetto Chiku Via, VIb so kara sanshutsu shita ogata shokubutsu itai (kaseki). (Macro Floral Remains Recovered from Layers VIa and VIb of the Sixth Transmission Tower Area of the San’nai Maruyama Site). Pages 35–51 in Cultural Affairs Section of the Agency of Education of Aomori Prefecture, ed., San’nai Maruyama Iseki IX dai 2 bunsatsu. (San’nai Maruyama Site, Vol. 9, Part 2). Aomori: Aimori-ken Kyoiku Iinkai. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Obata, H. 2008. Palaeoethnobotany of the Origins of Domesticated Plants of Jomon Period. In Far Eastern Prehistoric Ancient Crops 3 (JSPS Project Report 16320110). Faculty of Letters, Kumamoto University. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Okamoto, I. 1983. Torihama Kaizuk. (The Torihama Shell Mound). Fukui-Ken Kyōiku Iinkal, Fukui. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Teppner, Herwig. 2004. Notes on Lagenaria and Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae)—Review and New Contributions. Phyton 44(2):245–308.Google Scholar
  16. Ucko, Peter J. 1969. Penis Sheaths: A Comparative Study. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1968:24–67.Google Scholar
  17. Yen, Douglas E. 1977. Hoabinhian Horticulture? The Evidence and the Question from Northwest Thailand. Pages 567–599 in J. Allen, J. Golson, and R. Jones, eds., Sunda and Sahul: Prehistoric Studies in Southeast Asia, Melanesia and Australia. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  18. Zeder, M. 2006. Central Questions in the Domestication of Plants and Animals. Evolutionary Anthropology 15:105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhao Ye. 2007. New Archaeological Discoveries in Bianjiashan. Dong Fang Bo Wu (Cultural Relics of the East) 3:38–45. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Archaeology. 2003. Hemudu: Xinshiqi shidai yizhi kaogu fajue baogao. (Hemudu: An Excavation Report of the Neolithic Site). Wenwu Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2004. Kuahuqiao. Wenwu Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2007. Brief Report of the Excavation on a Neolithic Site at Tianluoshan Hill in Yuyao City, Zhejiang. Wenwu 2007–11:4–24. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorian Q Fuller
    • 1
  • Leo Aoi Hosoya
    • 2
  • Yunfei Zheng
    • 3
  • Ling Qin
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of ArchaeologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Research Institute for Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Archaeology and Cultural RelicsHangzhouChina
  4. 4.School of Archaeology and MuseologyPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations