Economic Botany

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 109–123

Origin and Domestication of Cole Crops (Brassica oleracea L.): Linguistic and Literary Considerations1

  • Lorenzo Maggioni
  • Roland von Bothmer
  • Gert Poulsen
  • Ferdinando Branca
Article

Abstract

Origin and Domestication of Cole Crops (Brassica oleraceaL.): Linguistic and Literary Considerations. Various attempts have been made to locate the area of domestication of Brassica oleracea crops (i.e., cole crops). Contrasting hypotheses suggest either a North Atlantic or a Mediterranean origin. In the absence of archaeological proof, linguistic and literary considerations can offer some insight into this issue. Expressions indicating a deep-rooted knowledge and use of these crops are present in early works of ancient Greek and Latin literature, while no trace of cole crops has been found in documents from ancient Egyptian or other Fertile Crescent civilizations. Most cole crop terminology used in modern European languages can etymologically be traced to ancient Latin or Greek roots, particularly those terms indicating the most obvious morphological feature of the primitive domesticated forms, i.e., the solid upright stem (kaulos, caulis). Celtic tradition is not documented earlier than the Christian era, other than in stone inscriptions, and there is no clear evidence of a “cole tradition” among the Celts. This paper gathers information from the linguistic, literary, and historical points of view that are compatible with the domestication of B. oleracea in the ancient Greek-speaking area of Central and East Mediterranean.

Key Words

Brassica oleracea cole crops leafy kales domestication linguistic 

Résumé

Origine e domesticazione dei cavoli (Brassica oleracea L.): considerazioni linguistiche e letterarie. Sono stati fatti diversi tentativi di localizzare l’area di domesticazione delle piante coltivate appartenenti alla specie Brassica oleracea (cavoli in senso lato). Sono state proposte ipotesi alternative che propongono un‘origine Nord Atlantica oppure Mediterranea. In mancanza di prove archeologiche, considerazioni linguistiche e letterarie possono offrire qualche indicazione a proposito. Le prime opere scritte delle letterature greca antica e latina contengono espressioni che fanno riferimento ad una consolidata conoscenza e ad un utilizzo ben radicato di queste colture. Viceversa, i documenti scritti lasciati dalle civiltà antiche dell’ Egitto e del Medio Oriente non hanno lasciato tracce riferibili alla presenza di cavoli. La terminologia utilizzata nelle lingue moderne europee per indicare i cavoli può essere fatta risalire etimologicamente a radici latine o greche, in particolare a quei termini che indicano la caratteristica morfologica più evidente che avevano le forme domestiche primitive, cioè il robusto fusto eretto (kaulos, caulis). La tradizione celtica non ha lasciato documenti scritti prima dell’era volgare, se non iscrizioni su pietra, e non e’ stata tramandata alcuna chiara evidenza di una tradizione celtica dell’utilizzo dei cavoli. Questo articolo raccoglie informazioni appartenenti alle sfere linguistica, letteraria e storica, tutte compatibili con una domesticazione di B. oleracea avvenuta nell’area di diffusione della antica lingua greca, cioè nel Mediterraneo Centrale ed Orientale.

Literature Cited

  1. Allender, C. J., J. Allainguillaume, J. Lynn, and G. J. King. 2007. Simple Sequence Repeats Reveal Uneven Distribution of Genetic Diversity in Chloroplast Genomes of Brassica oleracea L. and (n = 9) Wild Relatives. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114:609–618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 2009a. Gaulish language. http://www.webcitation.org/5juOpvcj6 (19 September 2009).
  3. ———. 2009b. Ogham. http://www.webcitation.org/5juPMH5w4 (19 September 2009).
  4. ———. 2009c. List of Proto-Indo-European Roots. http://www.webcitation.org/5gCyuPAd7 (21 April 2009).
  5. Aristotle. 1952. Historia Animalium, with an English Translation by M.A. Peck. Vol. II. Heinemann, London and Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Ateneo. 2001. I Deipnosofisti - i dotti a banchetto. Salerno editrice, Roma. Google Scholar
  7. Aufrère, S. 1987. Études de lexicologie et d’histoire naturelle XVIII–XXVI. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 87:21–44 (XXV:40–42).Google Scholar
  8. Bailey, L. H. 1922. The Cultivated Brassicas. Gentes Herbarium 1:53–108.Google Scholar
  9. von Bothmer, R., M. Gustafsson, and S. Snogerup. 1995. Brassica sect. Brassica (Brassicaceae). II. Inter- and Intraspecific Crosses with Cultivars of B. oleracea. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 42:165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breasted, J. H. 1906. Papyrus Harris. Ancient Records of Egypt, Vol. 4:87–139 (240).Google Scholar
  11. Canali, L. and E. Lelli. 2000. Catone il Censore. L’agricoltura, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore S.p.A. Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
  12. Carnoy, A. 1959. Dictionnaire étymologique des noms grecs des plantes. Publications Universitaires, Louvain, Belgium.Google Scholar
  13. Chantraine, P. 1968. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue Grecque. Klincksieck, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. De Candolle, A. 1885. Origin of cultivated plants. D. Appleton and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Ernout, A. and A. Meillet. 1932. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine, Histoire des mots. Klincksieck, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. Facciolati J., A. Forcellini, and J. Furlanetti, editors. 1864. Lexicon Totius Latinitatis. Patavii Typis Seminarii.Google Scholar
  17. Forster, E. S. 1936. Trees and Plants in Homer. The Classical Review 50:97–104.Google Scholar
  18. French, D. H. 1972. Excavations at Can Hasan III, 1969–1970. Page 187 in E. S. Higgs, ed., Papers in Economic Prehistory, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  19. Glinister, F., and S. Renton. 2006. Festus Lexicon Project. http://www.webcitation.org/5gD0YihpG (21 April 2009).
  20. Gomez-Campo, C. and S. Prakash. 1999. Origin and Domestication. Pages 33–58 in C. Gomez-Campo, ed., Biology of Brassica Coenospecies. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grenier, M. and M. Godron. 1848. Flore de France. J.-B. Baillière, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Haynes, C., E. Everhart, R. Jauron, D. Nelson, and J. Lenahan. 2009. Cole Crops. Iowa State University Extension. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1896.pdf (20 December 2009).
  23. Helbaek, H. 1964. First Impressions of the Çatal Hüyük Plant Husbandry. Anatolian Studies 14:122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 1970. Pages 197–198 and 233–234 in J. Mellaart, Excavations at Hacılar. Published for British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  25. Hervé, Y. 2003. Choux. Pages 222–234 in M. Pitrat and C. Foury, eds., Histoire de legumes. INRA Éditions, Paris. Google Scholar
  26. Hopf, M. 1983. Jericho Plant Remains. Pages. 576–621 in K. M. Keynon and T. A. Holland, eds., Excavations at Jericho, Vol. 5. British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem, London. Google Scholar
  27. Hyams, E. 1971. Cabbages and Kings. Pages 33–37 in Plants in the Service of Man. J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  28. Janssen, J. J. 1975. Commodity Prices from the Ramessid Period. E. J. Brill, Leiden, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Körber-Grohne, U. 1987. Nutzpflanzen in Deutschland. Konrad Theiss Verlag. Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  30. Leach, H. M. 1982. On the Origins of Kitchen Gardening in the Ancient Near East. Garden History 10(1):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liddell, H. G. and R. Scott. 1982. A Greek-English Lexicon, Eighth edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  32. Meineke, A. 1839–1857. Fragmenta Comicorum Graecorum, vols. 1–5. Berolini, Berlin.Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell, N. D. 1976. The Status of Brassica oleracea L. subsp. oleracea (Wild Cabbage) in the British Isles. Watsonia 11:97–103.Google Scholar
  34. Murray, M. A. 2000. Fruits, Vegetables, Pulses and Condiments. Pages 609–655 in P. T. Nicholson and I. Shaw, eds., Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  35. Perseus Digital Library. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cache/perscoll_Greco-Roman.html (29 November 2009).
  36. Pokorny, J. 1959. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Woerterbuch. Francke, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  37. Prakash, S. and K. Hinata. 1980. Taxonomy, Cytogenetics and Origin of Crop Brassicas, A Review. Opera Botanica 55:1–57.Google Scholar
  38. Schiemann, E. 1932. Brassica und andere Cruciferen. Pages 271–288 in Entstehung der Kulturpflanzen. Handbuch der Vererbungswissenschaft, Berlin.Google Scholar
  39. Schulz, O. E. 1936. Cruciferae. Pages 227–658 in A. Engler and H. Harms, eds., Die Natürlichgen Pflanzenfamilien. [S.N.], Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, L. B. and G. J. King. 2000. The Distribution of BoCAL-a Alleles in Brassica oleracea Is Consistent with a Genetic Model for Curd Development and Domestication of the Cauliflower. Molecular Breeding 6:603–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Snogerup, S. 1980. The Wild Forms of the Brassica oleracea group (2n=18) and Their Possible Relations to the Cultivated Ones. Pages 121–132 in S. Tsunoda, K. Hinata, and C. Gomez-Campo, eds., Brassica Crops and Wild Allies. Biology and Breeding. Scientific Society Press, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  42. ———, M. Gustafsson, and R. von Bothmer. 1990. Brassica sect. Brassica (Brassicaceae): I. Taxonomy and Variation. Willdenowia 19:271–365.Google Scholar
  43. Song, K., T. C. Osborn, and P. H. Williams. 1990. Brassica Taxonomy Based on Nuclear Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs). 3. Genome Relationship in Brassica and Related Genera and the Origin of B. oleracea and B. rapa (syn. campestris). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79:497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stephano, H. 1841. Thesaurus Graecae Linguae. Parisiis, excudebat Ambrosius Firmin Didot, Instituti Regii Franciae Typographus.Google Scholar
  45. The Latin Library. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/index.html (29 November 2009).
  46. Thesaurus. 1906–1912. Thesaurus Linguae Latinae. Editus Auctoritate et Consilio Academiarum Quinque Germanicarum. Lipsiae in Aedibus B.G. Teubneri.Google Scholar
  47. Toxopeus, H. 1974. Outlines of the Evolution of Turnips and Coles in Europe and the Origin of Winter Rape, Swede-Turnips and Rape Kales. Proceedings of Eucarpia “Cruciferae 1974,” Dundee, Scotland, 25–27 September 1974, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  48. Watson-Jones, S., N. Maxted, and B. Ford-Lloyd. 2005. Genetic Variation in Wild Brassicas in England and Wales. Crop Wild Relative 3:20–24.Google Scholar
  49. Wikisource. 2009. http://www.webcitation.org/5jvnCpCGg (20 September 2009).
  50. Wilson, C. A. 1991. Food and Drink in Britain. From the Stone Age to the 19th Century. Academy Chicago Publishers, Chicago.Google Scholar
  51. Zaitschek, D. V. 1980. Pages 223–227 in P. Bar-Adon, ed., The Cave of the Treasure. Israel Exploration Society, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  52. van Zeist, W. 1970. The Oriental Institute Excavations at Mureybit, Syria: Preliminary Report of the 1965 Campaign. Part III: The Palaeobotany. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 29:175.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 1972. Palaeobotanical Results of the 1970 Season at Çayönü, Turkey. Helinium 12:3–19.Google Scholar
  54. Zohary, D. and M. Hopf. 2000. Domestication of Plants in the Old World, 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Maggioni
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roland von Bothmer
    • 1
  • Gert Poulsen
    • 3
  • Ferdinando Branca
    • 4
  1. 1.Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesAlnarpSweden
  2. 2.Bioversity InternationalRomeItaly
  3. 3.Nordic Genetic Resource CentreAlnarpSweden
  4. 4.University of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations