Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 68–79 | Cite as

The Inclusion and Selection of Medicinal Plants in Traditional Pharmacopoeias—Evidence in Support of the Diversification Hypothesis

  • Nélson Leal Alencar
  • Thiago Antonio de Sousa Araújo
  • Elba Lúcia Cavalcanti de Amorim
  • Ulysses Paulino de AlbuquerqueEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Inclusion and Selection of Medicinal Plants in Traditional Pharmacopoeias—Evidence in Support of the Diversification Hypothesis. An ethnobotanical study with phytochemical analyses was undertaken to examine the medicinal plants used by residents of a small rural community in northeastern Brazil. The present work tested two ideas that attempt to explain the inclusion and selection of medicinal plants in a given culture: the diversification hypothesis and the concept of versatility. The study involved 101 people and used semistructured interviews. A total of 61 plants were selected, including 25 exotic and 36 native species. Plants were classified according to their habit and analyzed for their phytochemical components. In addition, the relative importance (RI) of these plants was calculated, and a chemical diversity index (CDI) was created and applied to each of the species. Exotic and native plants were found to have significantly different occurrences of certain classes of compounds; this result supports the diversification hypothesis. It was therefore concluded that exotic plants are included in traditional pharmacopoeias to fill therapeutic vacancies that native plants cannot satisfy.

Key Words

Ethnobotany Caatinga Secondary metabolites Seasonal dry forests Versatility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the community of Carão for their gracious welcome and receptivity, as well as the following researchers from the Laboratory of Applied Ethnobotany (LEA) for their support during the ethnobotanical surveys: Ernani Machado de Freitas Lins Neto, Flávia Santos Almeida, Joabe Gomes de Melo, Alyson Luiz de Almeida, Miguel de Santana Almeida, Luciana Gomes de Sousa, Viviany Teixeira do Nascimento, and Lucilene Lima dos Santos. We also thank Victoria Lacerda of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina for help during her internship at the LEA; the Municipality of Altinho, especially the Secretary of Agriculture, Sr. Miguel Andrade Júnior, for logistic support; the Community Health Agents’ Carão, Srs. Inaldo, and Alexandre; and the CNPq for their financial support (“Edital Universal”) and for the productivity grant to U.P. Albuquerque.

Literature cited

  1. Albuquerque, U. P. 2006. Re-examining Hypotheses Concerning the Use and Knowledge of Medicinal Plants: A Study in the Caatinga Vegetation of NE Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2:30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. ———, L. H. C. Andrade, and A. C. O. Silva. 2005. Use of Plant Resources in a Seasonal Dry Forest (Northeastern Brazil). Acta Botanica Brasilica 19(1):27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ——— and R. F. Oliveira. 2007. Is the Use-Impact on Native Caatinga Species in Brazil Reduced by the High Species Richness of Medicinal Plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113(1):156–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. ——— and R. F. P. Lucena. 2005. Can Apparency Affect the Use of Plants by Local People in Tropical Forests? Interciencia 30(8):506–510.Google Scholar
  5. ———, ———, and N. L. Alencar. 2008. Métodos e Técnicas na coleta de dados etnobotânicos. in U. P. Albuquerque, R. F. P. Lucena, and L. V. F. C. da Cunha, eds., Métodos e Técnicas na Pesquisa Etnobotânica, 2nd edition. NUPEEA/Comunigraf, Recife, Brazil.Google Scholar
  6. Alencar, N. L., T. A. S. Araújo, E. L. C. Amorim, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2009. Can the Apparency Hypothesis Explain the Selection of Medicinal Plants in an Area of Coatinga Vegetation? A Chemical Perspective. Acta Botanica Brasílica 23:910–911.Google Scholar
  7. Almeida, C. F. C. B. R., T. C. Lima e Silva, E. L. C. Amorim, M. B. S. Maia, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2005. Life Strategy and Chemical Composition as Predictors of the Selection of Medicinal Plants from the Caatinga (Northeast Brazil). Journal of Arid Environments 62(1):127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Araújo, E. L., C. C. Castro, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2007. Dynamics of Brazilian Caatinga: A Review Concerning the Plants, Environment and People. Functional Ecosystems and Communities 1(1):15–28.Google Scholar
  9. Araújo, T. A. S., N. L. Alencar, E. L. C. Amorim, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2008. A New Approach to Study Medicinal Plants with Tannins and Flavonoids Contents from the Local Knowledge. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 120:72–80.Google Scholar
  10. Ayres, M., M. J. Ayres, D. L. Ayres, and S. A. Santos. 2000. BioEstat 2.0: Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biológicas e médicas. Sociedade Civil Mamirauá, CNPq, Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
  11. Begon, M., J. L. Harper, and C. R. Townsend. 1988. Ecologia: Individuos. Poblaciones y Comunidades, Ediciones Omega, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  12. Begossi, A., N. Hanazaki, and J. Tamashiro. 2002. Medicinal Plants in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil): Knowledge, Use, and Conservation. Human Ecology 30:281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bennett, B. C. and G. T. Prance. 2000. Introduced Plants in the Indigenous Pharmacopeia of Northern South America. Economic Botany 54(1):90–102.Google Scholar
  14. Benz, B. F., J. E. Cevallos, F. M. Santana, J. A. Rosales, and S. M. Graf. 2000. Losing Knowledge about Plant Use in the Sierra de Manatlán Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Economic Botany 54(2):183–191.Google Scholar
  15. Caniago, I. and S. F. Siebert. 1998. Medicinal Plant Ecology, Knowledge and Conservation in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Economic Botany 52:229–50.Google Scholar
  16. Estomba, D., A. Ladio, and M. Lozada. 2006. Medicinal Wild Plant Knowledge and Gathering Patterns in a Mapuche Community from North-western Patagonia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 103(1):109–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Foster, G. M. 1974. Antropología aplicada. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D.F.Google Scholar
  18. Galeano, G. 2000. Forest Use at the Pacific Coast of Chocó, Colombia: A Quantitative Approach. Economic Botany 54:358–376.Google Scholar
  19. Hanazaki, N., J. Y. Tamashiro, H. F. Leitão-Filho, and A. Begossi. 2000. Diversity of Plant Uses in Two Caiçara Communities from the Atlantic Forest Coast, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harbone, J. B. 1998. Phytochemical Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  21. IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. http://www.ibge.gov.br/ (2007)
  22. Janni, K. D. and J. W. Bastien. 2004. Exotic Botanicals in the Kallawaya Pharmacopoeia. Economic Botany 58 (Supplement):S274–S279Google Scholar
  23. Lucena, R. F. P., E. L. Araújo, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2007a. Does the Local Availability of Woody Caatinga Plants (Northeastern Brazil) Explain Their Use Value? Economic Botany 61:347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———, U. P. Albuquerque, J. M. Monteiro, C. F. C. B. R. Almeida, A. T. N. Florentino, and J. S. F. Ferraz. 2007b. Useful Plants of the Semi-arid Northeastern Region of Brazil—A Look at their Conservation and Sustainable Use. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 125(1):281–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Matos, F. J. A. 1997. Introdução à Fitoquímica Experimental, 2nd edition. Editora UFC, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.Google Scholar
  26. Medeiros, P. M., A. L. S. Almeida, R. F. P. Lucena, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2008. Uso de estímulos visuais na pesquisa etnobotânica. in U. P. Albuquerque, R. F. P. Lucena, and L. V. F. C. da Cunha, eds., Métodos e Técnicas na Pesquisa Etnobotânica, 2nd edition. NUPEEA/Comunigraf, Recife, Brazil.Google Scholar
  27. Mori, A. S., L. A. M. Silva, and G. Lisboa. 1989. Manual de manejo do herbário fanerogâmico, 2nd edition. Centro de Pesquisa do Cacau, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.Google Scholar
  28. Müller-Schwarze, N. K. 2006. Antes and Hoy Día: Plant Knowledge and Categorization as Adaptations to Life in Panama in the Twenty-First Century. Economic Botany 60(4):321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Palmer, C. 2004. The Inclusion of Recently Introduced Plants in the Hawaiian Ethnopharmacopoeia. Economic Botany 58 (Supplement):S280–S293.Google Scholar
  30. Phillips, O. and A. H. Gentry. 1993. The Useful Plants of Tambopata. Peru: II. Additional Hypothesis Testing in Quantitative Ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47:33–43.Google Scholar
  31. Quinlan, M. B. and R. J. Quinlan. 2007. Modernization and Medicinal Plant Knowledge in a Caribbean Horticultural Village. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 21(2):169–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Reyes-García, V., E. Byron, R. Godoy, V. Vadez, L. Apaza, E. Pérez, W. Leonard, and D. Wilkie. 2004. Measuring Culture as Shared Knowledge: Do Data Collection Formats Matters? Cultural Knowledge of Plant Uses among the Tsimane’ Amerindians of Bolivia. Field Methods 16:135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sokal, R. R. and F. G. Rholf. 1995. Biometry. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Stepp, J. R. 2004. The Role of Weeds as Source of Pharmaceuticals. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 92(1):163–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. ——— and D. E. Moerman. 2001. The Importance of Weeds in Ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 75(1):25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ugent, D. 2000. Medicine, Myths and Magic: The Folk Healers of a Mexican Market. Economic Botany 54:27–438.Google Scholar
  37. Voeks, R. A. 1996. Tropical Forest Healers and Habitat Preference. Economic Botany 50(4):381–400.Google Scholar
  38. ——— 2004. Disturbance Pharmacopoeias: Medicine and Myth from the Humid Tropics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(4):868–888.Google Scholar
  39. ——— and A. Leony. 2004. Forgetting the Forest: Assessing a Medicinal Plant Erosion in Eastern Brazil. Economic Botany 58 (Supplement):S294–S306.Google Scholar
  40. Wagner, H. and S. Bladt. 1996. Plant Drug Analysis—A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas, 2nd edition. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  41. Zarger, R. K. and J. R. Stepp. 2004. Persistence of Botanical Knowledge among Tzeltal Maya Children. Current Anthropology 45(3):413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zent, S. 2001. Acculturation and Ethnobotanical Knowledge Loss among the Piaroa of Venezuela. In L. Maffi, On Biocultural Diversity—Linking, Knowledge, and the Environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nélson Leal Alencar
    • 1
  • Thiago Antonio de Sousa Araújo
    • 1
  • Elba Lúcia Cavalcanti de Amorim
    • 2
  • Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de Biologia, Área de Botânica, Laboratório de Etnobotânica AplicadaUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPernambucoBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciências FarmacêuticasUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da SaúdePernambucoBrazil

Personalised recommendations