A Review of Perceptual Distinctiveness in Landraces Including an Analysis of How Its Roles Have Been Overlooked in Plant Breeding for Low-Input Farming Systems
- 303 Downloads
A Review of Perceptual Distinctiveness in Landraces Including an Analysis of How Its Roles Have Been Overlooked in Plant Breeding for Low-Input Farming Systems. Traits providing perceptual distinctiveness (PD), which allow less commercial farmers in developing countries to recognize and name individual landraces, enable the creation and management of their diversity and the transfer of knowledge of each to other farmers and succeeding generations. Worldwide examples illustrate how PD traits on seeds and vegetative propagules help maintain genetic purity and provide markers at planting time, identifying landraces suitable for planting at particular locations and times and for future household and market needs. PD traits on the yield also enable household members and customers to identify and value landraces for different uses. To fulfill these roles, they are generally highly salient, restricted in number, environment-independent, qualitatively inherited, generally with expression based on one or a few genes, and often culturally significant. Even so, they are seldom mentioned as varietal selection criteria by farmers, who may be unaware of their importance, or in plant breeding programs and in situ conservation of plant genetic resources projects; the need for national variety release committees and policymakers in developing countries to include them is emphasized.
Key WordsIn situ conservation Diversity Climate change Varietal improvement Agromorphological trait Traditional variety Subsistence farmer
Richard Lamboll at NRI and David A. Cleveland at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and two unnamed reviewers provided valuable criticism.
- Anonymous. 2005. Africa’s Seed Laws: Red Carpet for the Corporations. Seedling July:28–35.Google Scholar
- Arias, L., J. Chavez, V. Cob, L. Burgos, and J. Canal. 1999. V. Agromorphological Characters and Farmer Perceptions: Data Collection and Analysis. Mexico. In D. Jarvis, B. Sthapit, and L. Sears, eds., Conserving Agricultural Biodiversity in Situ: A Scientific Basis for Sustainable Agriculture. IPGRI, Rome.Google Scholar
- Bellon, M. R. 1997. Understanding Farmer Seed and Variety Systems. On-farm Conservation as a Process: An Analysis of Its Components. In L. Sperling and M. Loevinsohn, eds., Using Diversity Enhancing and Maintaining Genetic Resources On-farm. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-9290–201–1-DO_TOPIC.html (IDRC Canada).
- ——— and S. B. Brush. 1994. Keepers of the Maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Economic Botany 48:193–209.Google Scholar
- ———. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Boko, M., I. Niang, A. Nyong, C. Vogel, A. Githeko, M. Medany, B. Osman-Elasha, R. Tabo, and P. Yanda. 2007. Africa. Pages 433–457 in M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, and C. E. Hanson, eds., Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Boster, J. S. 1984. Classification, Cultivation, and Selection of Aguaruna Cultivars of Manihot Esculenta (Euphorbiaceae). Advances in Economic Botany 1:34–47.Google Scholar
- ———. 1985. Selection for Perceptual Distinctiveness: Evidence from Aguaruna Cultivars of Manihot Esculenta. Economic Botany 39:310–325.Google Scholar
- Brush, S. B. 1992. Ethnoecology, Biodiversity, and Modernization in Andean Potato Agriculture. Journal of Ethnobiology 12:161–185.Google Scholar
- ———, H. J. Carney, and Z. Huaman. 1981. Dynamics of Andean Potato Agriculture. Economic Botany 35:70–88.Google Scholar
- ——— and S. Grando. 1991. Barley Landraces from the Fertile Crescent: A Lesson for Plant Breeders. Pages 51–76 (Chapter 3) in S. B. Brush, ed., Genes in the Field. On-farm Conservation of Crop Diversity. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
- Choudhary, M. K., E. Weltzien, and M. M. Sharma. 1997. Evaluating Pearl Millet Varieties with Farmers in Barmer District. In L. Sperling and M. Loevinsohn, Using Diversity Enhancing and Maintaining Genetic Resources On-farm. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-9290–201–1-DO_TOPIC.html (IDRC Canada).
- CIMMYT. 2000. Focus Group Interviews with Farm Households on Their Views about Crop Improvement. http://www.cimmyt.org/Research/economics/oaxaca/overview/ov_fg.views.htm (9 September 2007).
- Clawson, D. L. 1985. Harvest Security and Intraspecific Diversity in Traditional Tropical Agriculture. Economic Botany 39:56–67.Google Scholar
- ———, D. Soleri, and S. E. Smith. 2000. A Biological Framework for Understanding Farmers’ Plant Breeding. Economic Botany 54:377–394.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. First Collier Books Edition 1962; seventh printing 1974. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
- Defoer, T., A. Kamara, and H. de Groote. 1997. Gender and Variety Selection: Farmers’ Assessment of Local Maize Varieties in Southern Mali. African Crop Science Journal 5:65–76.Google Scholar
- De Waal, D., F. R. Chinjinga, L. Johansson, E. F. Kanju, and N. Nathaniels. 1997. Village-Based Cassava Breeding in Tanzania. Pages 83–88 in L. van Veldhuizen, A. Waters-Bayer, R. Ramirez, D. Johnson, and J. Thompson, eds., Farmers’ Research in Practice: Lessons from the Field. International Technology Publications, U.K.Google Scholar
- ———, L. Penet, P. Vindry, D. McKey, O. Panaud, and T. Robert. 2001b. Unmanaged Sexual Reproduction and the Dynamics of Genetic Diversity of a Vegetatively Propagated Crop Plant, Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), in a Traditional Farming System. Molecular Ecology 10:1895–1907.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gomez, J. A. A., M. R. Bellon, and M. Smale. 2000. A Regional Analysis of Maize Biological Diversity in Southeastern Guanajuato, Mexico. Economic Botany 54:60–72.Google Scholar
- Haddi, A. and T. Berg. 2006. Selectors and Non-selectors: Agricultural and Socio-economic Implications of On-farm Seed Selection in Ethiopia. PGR Newsletter 145:1–10.Google Scholar
- Harlan, J. R. 1975. Crops and Man. American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- Hernandez Xolocotzi, E. 1985. Maize and Man in the Great Southwest. Economic Botany 39:416–430.Google Scholar
- Hosfield, G. L. 2001. Seed Coat Color in Phaseolus vulgaris L.: Its Chemistry and Associated Health Benefits. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 44:1–6.Google Scholar
- Humphries, S., O. Gallardo, J. Jimenez, and F. Sierra. 2005. Linking Small Farmers to the Formal Research Sector: Lessons from a Participatory Bean Breeding Programme in Honduras. Agricultural Research and Extension Network (AgREN) Paper No. 142.Google Scholar
- IPGRI. 2001. On Farm Management of Crop Genetic Diversity and the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Agricultural Biodiversity. http://www.unu.edu/env/plec/cbd/Montreal/reports/IPGRI-on-farm.pdf.
- Iskandar, J. and R. Ellen. 1999. In Situ Conservation of Rice Landraces among the Baduy of West Java. Journal of Ethnobiology 19:97–125.Google Scholar
- Jarvis, D. I., V. Zoes, D. Nares, and T. Hodgkin. 2006. On-farm Management of Crop Genetic Diversity and the Convention on Biological Diversity Programme of Work on Agricultural Biodiversity. PGR Newsletter Issue 2006, No 138:5–17.Google Scholar
- Jones, R. B., P. A. Audi, and R. Tripp. 2001. The Role of Informal Seed Systems in the Dissemination of Modern Varieties. The Example of Pigeonpea from a Semi-arid Area of Kenya. Experimental Agriculture 37:539–548.Google Scholar
- Kornegay, J., J. A. Beltran, and J. Ashby. 1996. Farmer Selection within Segregating Populations of Common Bean in Columbia. Pages 151–160 in P. Eyzaquirre and M. Iwanaga, eds., Participatory Plant Breeding. Proceedings of a Workshop on Participatory Plant Breeding, 26–29 July 1995, Wageningen, The Netherlands. IPGRI, Rome.Google Scholar
- Lambert, D. H. 1985. Swamp Rice Farming. The Indigenous Pahang Malay Agricultural System. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
- Louette, D. 1991. Traditional Management of Seed and Genetic Diversity: What Is a Landrace? Pages 109–142 (Chapter 5) in S. B. Brush, ed., Genes in the Field. On-farm Conservation of Crop Diversity. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
- ———, A. Charrier, and J. Berthaud. 1997. In Situ Conservation of Maize in Mexico: Genetic Diversity and Maize Seed Management in a Traditional Community. Economic Botany 51:20–38.Google Scholar
- ———, R. I. Lamboll, G. Ampong Mensah, J. N. Lamptey, E. Moses, A. A. Dankyi, and R. W. Gibson. 2006. Development of Superior Cassava Cultivars in Ghana by Farmers and Scientists: The Process Adopted, Outcomes and Contributions and Changed Roles of Different Stakeholders. Euphytica 150:47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, G. B. and M. W. Adams. 1987. Landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in Northern Malawi. I. Regional Variation. Economic Botany 41:190–203.Google Scholar
- McCann, J. 2005. Maize and Grace. Africa’s Encounter with a New World Crop, 1500–2000. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- ———. 1999. Informal Bean Seed Systems. Page 15 in ILEIA Newsletter, December 1999.Google Scholar
- Mkumbira, J., L. Chiwona-Karltun, U. Lagercrantz, N. M. Mahungu, J. Saka, A. Mhone, M. Bokanga, L. Brimer, U. Gullberg, and H. Rosling. 2003. Classification of Cassava into ‘Bitter’ and ‘Cool’ in Malawi: From Farmers’ Perceptions to Characterisation by Molecular Markers. Euphytica 132:7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nazarea, V. D. 1998. Cultural Memory and Biodiversity. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
- ———. 2005. Heirloom Seeds and Their Helpers. Marginality and Memory in the Conservation of Biological Diversity. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
- Nuijten, E. and C. J. M. Almekinder. 2008. Mechanisms Explaining Variety Naming by Farmers and Name Consistency of Rice Varieties in the Gambia. Economic Botany 62:148–160.Google Scholar
- Parry, M. L., O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, and co-authors. 2007. Technical Summary. Pages 23–78 in M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, and C. E. Hanson, eds., Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation andVulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Quiros, C. F., D. S. Douches, K. S. Zimmerer, and G. Huestos. 1990. Biochemical and Folk Assessment of Variability of Andean Cultivated Potatoes. Economic Botany 44:254–66.Google Scholar
- Reed, J. D., Y. Kebede, and L. K. Fussell. 2007. Factors Affecting the Nutritive Value of Sorghum and Millet Crop Residues. http://www.fao.org/Wairdocs/ILRI/x5495E/x5495eOd.htm (22 November 2007).
- Rhoades, R. E. and A. Bebbington. 1995. Farmers Who Experiment: An Untapped Resource for Agricultural Research and Development. Pages 297–307 in M. D. Warren, L. J. Slikkerveer, and D. Brokensha, eds., The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge Systems. London Intermediate Technology Publications, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
- Salick, J., N. Cellinese, and S. Knapp. 1997. Indigenous Diversity of Cassava: Generation, Maintenance, Use and Loss among the Amuesha, Peruvian Upper Amazon. Economic Botany 51:6–19.Google Scholar
- Sambatti, J. B. M., P. S. Martins, and A. Ando. 2001. Folk Taxonomy and Evolutionary Dynamics of Cassava: A Case Study in Utatuba, Brazil. Economic Botany 55:93–105.Google Scholar
- Sanchez, J. J., G. M. M. Goodman, and C. W. Stuber. 2000. Isozymatic and Morphological Diversity in the Races of Maize in Mexico. Economic Botany 54:43–59.Google Scholar
- Schneider, S. H., S. Semenov, A. Patwardhan, I. Burton, C. H. D. Magadza, M. Oppenheimer, A. B. Pittock, A. Rahman, J. B. Smith, A. Suarez, and F. Yamin. 2007. Assessing Key Vulnerabilities and the Risk from Climate Change. Pages 779–810 in M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, and C. E. Hanson, eds., Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation andVulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Shigeta, M. 1996. Creating Landrace Diversity: The Case of the Ari People and Ensete (Ensete ventricosum) in Ethiopia. Pages 233–268 in R. Ellen and K. Fukui, eds., Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture and Domestication. Berg, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
- Smolders, H., ed. 2006. Enhancing Farmers’ Role in Crop Development: Framework Information for Participatory Plant Breeding in Farmer Field Schools. PEDIGREA publication. Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Soleri, D. and D. A. Cleveland. 1993. Hopi Crop Diversity and Change. Journal of Ethnobiology 13:203–231.Google Scholar
- Sperling, L. and P. Berkowitz. 1994. Partners in Selection. Bean Breeders and Women Bean Experts in Rwanda. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, M. K. 1999. Maize Diversity and Cultural Change in a Maya Agroecological Landscape. Journal of Ethnobiology 19:127–139.Google Scholar
- Teshome, A., L. Fahrig, J. K. Torrance, J. D. Lambert, T. J. Arnason, and B. R. Baum. 1999. Maintenance of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolour, Poaceae) Landrace Diversity by Farmers’ Selection in Ethiopia. Economic Botany 53:79–88.Google Scholar
- Tin, H. Q. 1999. V. Agromorphological Characters and Farmer Perceptions: Data Collection and Analysis. Vietnam. In D. Jarvis, B. Sthapit, and L. Sears, eds., Conserving Agricultural Biodiversity in Situ: A Scientific Basis for Sustainable Agriculture. IPGRI, Rome, Italy. http://www.bioversityinternational.org/publications/Web_version/541/ch06.htm (21 November 2006).
- Tiwari, R. and A. Das. 1997. Documentation of Local Crop Varieties: Evolving a Participatory Methodology. In L. Sperling and M. Loevinsohn, eds., Using Diversity Enhancing and Maintaining Genetic Resources On-farm. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-9290–201–1-DO_TOPIC.html (IDRC Canada).
- Vaughan, D. A. and T. T. Chang. 1992. In Situ Conservation of Rice Genetic Resources. Economic Botany 46:368–383.Google Scholar
- Vernooy, R. 2003. Seeds That Give: Participatory Plant Breeding. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.Google Scholar
- Voss, J. 1992. Conserving and Increasing On-farm Genetic Diversity: Farmer Management of Varietal Bean Mixtures in Central Africa. Pages 34–51 (Chapter 2) in J. L. Moock and R. E. Rhoades, eds., Diversity, Farmer Knowledge and Sustainability. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
- Weltzien, E., M. L. Whitaker, and M. M. Anders. 1996. Farmer Participation in Pearl Millet Breeding for Marginal Environments. Pages 128–143 in P. Eyzaguirre and M. Iwanaga, eds., Participatory Plant Breeding. Proceedings of a Workshop on Participatory Plant Breeding, 26–29 July 1995, Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- ———, M. E. Smith, L. S. Meitzner, and L. Sperling. 2003. Technical and Institutional Issues in Participatory Plant Breeding—Done from a Perspective of Farmer Plant Breeding. A Global Analysis of Issues, Results and Current Experience. PPB Monograph No 1. Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Columbia.Google Scholar
- Zimmerer, K. S. 1991. Managing Diversity in Potato and Maize Fields of the Peruvian Andes. Journal of Ethnobiology 11:23–49.Google Scholar