Economic Botany

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 604–614

Plants Used for Reproductive Health by Nahua Women in Northern Veracruz, Mexico

Article

Abstract

Plants Used for Reproductive Health by Nahua Women in Northern Veracruz, Mexico. This paper reports the use of medicinal plants by Nahua women in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. It documents the women’s plant knowledge for reproductive purposes, which includes uses such as conception, pregnancy, birth, contraception, menstruation, post-partum, and general reproductive health. The concept of equilibrium is very important in regaining health among the Nahua; consequently, many of the medicinal plants have this as their primary purpose. The introduction of biomedical clinics and hospitals in the region has had a significant effect on the loss of knowledge about medicinal plants. Additionally, the midwives are not taking any new apprentices and laywomen are not passing on their knowledge to future generations. This generational gap contributes to the loss of knowledge about medicinal plants. This research contributes to the study of indigenous ethnobotany by (a) creating a record of the plant knowledge possessed by indigenous women, (b) giving voice to some of their health concerns, (c) indicating how the introduction of biomedicine has affected their plant use, and (d) providing a framework for understanding how marginal peoples around the world respond to the impact that globalization and change has on their health needs and local ethnobotanical knowledge.

Key Words

Ethnobotany indigenous women reproduction plant knowledge Nahua Mexico 

Literature Cited

  1. Alcorn, J. B. 2000. Factors Influencing Botanical Resource Perception among the Huastec: Suggestions for Future Ethnobotanical Inquiry. Pages 17–28 in P. E. Minnis, ed., Ethnobotany: A Reader. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, B. C. 2007. Doctrine of Signatures: An Explanation of Medicinal Plan Discovery or Dissemination of Knowledge? Economic Botany 613:246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlin, E. A., V. M. Jara, B. Berlin, D. E. Breedlove, T. O. Duncan, and R. M. Laughlin. 1993. Me’ winik: Discovery of the Biomedical Equivalence for a Maya Ethnomedical Syndrome. Social Science and Medicine 375:671–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyene, Y. and M. C. Martin. 2001. Menopausal Experiences and Bone Density of Mayan Women in Yucatan, Mexico. American Journal of Human Biology 13:505–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bletter, N. 2006. Talking Books: A New Method of Returning Ethnobiological Research Documentation to the Non-literate. Notes on Economic Botany. Economic Botany 601:85–90.Google Scholar
  6. Browner, C. H. 1985. Plants Used for Reproductive Health in Oaxaca, Mexico. Economic Botany 39:482–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Castañeda, X., C. García, and A. Langer. 1996. Ethnography of Fertility and Menstruation in Rural Mexico. Social Science and Medicine 421:133–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castañeda Camey, X., C. García Barrios, X. Romero Guerrero, R. M. Nuñez-Urquiza, D. González Hernández, and A. Langer Glass. 1996. Traditional Birth Attendants in Mexico: Advantages and Inadequacies of Care for Normal Deliveries. Social Science and Medicine 432:199–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas, M. 2000 [1966]. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Etkin, N. L. 1996. Ethnopharmacology: The Conjunction of Medical Ethnography and the Biology of Therapeutic Action Pages 151–164 in C. F. Sargent and T. M. Johnson, eds., Medical Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Method. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  11. Frei, B., M. Baltisberger, O. Sticher, and M. Heinrich. 1998. Medical Ethnobotany of the Zapotecs of the Isthmus-Sierra (Oaxaca, Mexico): Documentation and Assessment of Indigenous Uses. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 62:149–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goman, M. and R. Byrne. 1998. A 5,000-Year Record of Agriculture and Tropical Forest Clearance in the Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Holocene 81:83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leonti, M., O. Sticher, and M. Heinrich. 2002. Medicinal Plants of the Popolucas, México: Organoleptic Properties as Indigenous Selection Criteria. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 81:307–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leslie, C. (ed.). 1998. Asian Medical Systems: A Comparative Study. Motilal Banarsidass, India.Google Scholar
  15. Michel, J. L., G. B. Mahady, M. Veliz, D. D. Soejarto, and A. Caceres. 2006. Symptoms, Attitudes and Treatment Choices Surrounding Menopause among Q’eqchi Maya of Livingston, Guatemala. Social Science and Medicine 63:732–742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oths, K. S. 1999. Debilidad: A Biocultural Assessment of an Embodied Andean Illness. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 133:286–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paré, L., J. L. Blanco, D. Buckles, J. Chevalier, R. Gutiérrez, A. Hernández, F. Ramírez, and E. Vázquez. 1997. Características Generales de la Sierra de Santa Marta. Pages 17–37 in L. Paré and E. Velázquez H., eds., Gestión de Recursos Naturales y Opciones Agroecológicas para la Sierra de Santa Marta, Veracruz. UNAM, Mexico.Google Scholar
  18. Rodríguez López, T., A. Aguilar, and H. Macías Cuéllar. 1998. Plantas Medicinales y Salud Reproductiva de las Mujeres Nahuas de Tamazunchale, San Luis Potosí. Pages 253–262 in J. Ruvalcaba Mercado, ed., Nuevos Aportes al Conocimiento de la Huasteca. CIESAS, México.Google Scholar
  19. Ruvalcaba Mercado, J. 1998. Presentación. Pages 11–26 in J. Ruvalcaba Mercado, ed., Nuevos Aportes al Conocimiento de la Huasteca. CIESAS, México.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, V. 2006. National Policies, Local Knowledge: Women’s Health and Political Ecology in an Indigenous Mexican Village. Ph.D. thesis, Anthropology, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Smith-Oka, V. 2007. Traditional Medicine among the Nahua: Contemporary and Ancient Medicinal Plants. Report to FAMSI. [online] URL: http://www.famsi.org/reports/05063/index.html.
  22. Terrell, J. E., J. P. Hart, S. Barut, N. Cellinese, A. Curet, T. Denham, C. M. Kusimba, K. Latinis, R. Oka, J. Palka, M. E. D. Pohl, K. O. Pope, P. R. Williams, H. Haines, and J. E. Staller. 2003. Domesticated Landscapes: The Subsistence Ecology of Plant and Animal Domestication. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 104:323–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomas, E., I. Vandebroek, and P. Van Damme. 2007. What Works in the Field? A Comparison of Different Interviewing Methods in Ethnobotany with Special Reference to the Use of Photographs. Economic Botany 614:376–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vázquez-García, V. 2008. Gender, Ethnicity, and Economic Status in Plant Management: Uncultivated Edible Plants among the Nahua and Popolucas of Veracruz, Mexico. Agriculture and Human Values 25:65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weimann, C. and M. Heinrich. 1997. Indigenous Medicinal Plants in Mexico: The Example of the Nahua (Sierra de Zongolica). Botanica Acta 110:62–72.Google Scholar
  26. Zumsteg, I. S. and C. S. Weckerle. 2007. Bakera, a Herbal Steam Bath for Postnatal Care in Minhasa (Indonesia): Documentation of the Plants Used and Assessment of the Method. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 111:641–650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations