The Botanical Review

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 205–234

Arecaceae Fossil Fruits from the Paleocene of Patagonia, Argentina

  • Mary K. Futey
  • Maria A. Gandolfo
  • Maria C. Zamaloa
  • Rubén Cúneo
  • Gerardo Cladera


We describe fossil fruits collected from outcrops of the Salamanca Fm. (Paleocene, Danian, 63.3–61.9 Ma) at the Estancia Las Violetas locality, Chubut, Argentina that show affinities with members of the Subtribe Attaleinae, Tribe Cocoseae, Subfamily Arecoideae within the Arecaceae. The fossils are preserved as permineralizations, and were examined by longitudinal, tangential and cross-sections, as well as by the application of Computed Tomography Scanning technology (CT Scan). The fruits are ovoid drupes with 3 longitudinal grooves delimiting three valves; displaying apical stigmatic remains and a single apical germination pore. The exocarp and mesocarp are fused and anatomically indistinguishable one from another; they contain longitudinal fibrous bands with brachysclereids. A centrally placed seed occupies the single locule entirely; the seeds are deltoid with a basal hilum and acuminate tip while the endosperm is ruminate. The taxonomic position of the fossils was explored using phylogenetic analyses of molecular sequences combined with morphological data. Along with the suite of morphological characters that points to an affinity with the Subtribe Attaleinae, Tribe Cocoseae, subfamily Arecoideae, the results of the combined phylogenetic analyses confirm the taxonomic placement. This report constitutes the first confirmed record for the Subtribe Attaleinae worldwide and the first record of fossil palm fruits from Argentina.


Arecaceae Fossil fruits Paleocene Salamanca Formation Patagonia Argentina 

Literature Cited

  1. Ancibor, E. 1995. Palmeras fósiles del Cretácico Tardío de la Patagonia, Argentina (Bajo de Santa Rosa, Río Negro). Ameghiniana 32: 287–299.Google Scholar
  2. Archangelsky, S. 1973. Palinología del Paleoceno de Chubut. I. Descripciones sistemáticas. Ameghiniana 10: 339–399.Google Scholar
  3. Argujio, M. H. 1979. Palmoxylon bororoense n. sp. de la Formación Cerro Bororó (Paleoceno), provincia de Chubut, República Argentina. Physis C. 38: 87–96.Google Scholar
  4. ——— 1981. Palmoxylon vaterum n. sp. del Paleoceno (Daniano) de la provincia del Chubut, Argentina. Physis Sección C. 39: 49–59.Google Scholar
  5. Asmussen, C. B., J. Dransfield, V. Deickmann, A. S. Barfod, J. Pintaud & W. J. Baker. 2006. A new subfamily classification of the palm family (Arecaceae): evidence from plastid DNA phylogeny. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151: 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, W. J., V. Savolainen, C. B. Asmussen-Lange, M. W. Chase, J. Dransfield, F. Forest, M. M. Harley, N. W. Uhl & M. Wilkinson. 2009. Complete generic- level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches. Systematic Biology 58: 240–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballance, P. F., M. R. Gregory & G. W. Gibson. 1981. Coconuts in Miocene turbidites in New Zealand: possible evidence for tsunami origin of some turbidity currents. Geology 9: 592–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, E. W. 1914. The Upper Cretaceous and Eocene floras of South Carolina, Georgia. U. S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper. 84: 1–200.Google Scholar
  9. ——— 1916. A petrified palm from the Cretaceous of New Jersey. American Journal of Science 41: 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ——— 1926. Cocos and Phymatocaryon in the Pilocene of New Zealand. American Journal of Science 212: 181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ——— 1937. A Paleocene flora from Patagonia. Johns Hopkins University Studies in Geology 12: 33–50.Google Scholar
  12. Bjorholm, S., J. Svenning, F. Skov & H. Balslev. 2005. Environmental and spacial controls of palm (Arecaceae) species richness across the Americas. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14: 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, J. D., R. E. Fordyce, A. Grebneff & P. A. Maxwell. 2000. Fossil coconuts from mid-Cenozoic shallow-marine sediments in southern New Zealand. Otago University, Geology Department, Dunedin [Poster abstract].Google Scholar
  14. Crié, L. 1892. Recherches sur les Palmiers silicifiés des terains Crétacés de l’Anjou. Bulletin de la Socíeté d’Études Scientifiques d’Angers 21: 97–103.Google Scholar
  15. Daghlian, C. P. 1981. A review of the fossil record of monocotyledons. The Botanical Review 47: 517–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dransfield, J., N. W. Uhl, C. B. Asmussen, W. J. Baker, M. M. Harley & C. E. Lewis. 2008. Genera Palmarum. Kew Publishing, Kew.Google Scholar
  17. Edgar, R. C. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Essig, F. B. 1999. Trends of specialization in the palm pericarp. In: A. Henderson & F. Borchsenius (eds). Evolution, variation and classification of palms. The New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx.Google Scholar
  19. Fliche, P. 1896. Etudes sur la flore fossile de l’Argonne Albian-Cenomanien. Bulletin de la Societe des Sciences de Nancy. 14: 114–306.Google Scholar
  20. Gandolfo, M.A., M.C. Zamaloa & N. Caviglia. 2010. Revisiting the Argentinean monocotyledon fossil record. VI Southern Connection Congress, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina. [Symposium abstract].Google Scholar
  21. Glassman, S. F. 1987. Revisions of the palm genus Syagrus Mart. and other selected genera in the Cocos alliance. Illinois Biological Monographs 56: 1–230.Google Scholar
  22. Goloboff, P. A. 1998. NONA. Computer program and software. Published by the author, Tucuman.Google Scholar
  23. ———, J. A. Farris & K. C. Nixon. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gomez-Navarro, C., C. Jaramillo, F. Herrera, S. L. Wing & R. Callejas. 2009. Palms (Arecaceae) from a Paleocene rainforest of northern Colombia. American Journal of Botany 96: 1300–1312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harley, M. M. 2006. A summary of fossil record for Arecaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151: 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ——— & W. J. Baker. 2001. Pollen aperture morphology in Arecaceae: application within phylogenetic analyses, and a summary of the fossil record of palm-like pollen. Grana 40: 45–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hollick, A. 1928. Paleobotany of Porto Rico. Scientific survey of Porto Rico and the virgin islands. New York Academy of Sciences 7: 177–393.Google Scholar
  28. Iglesias, A., P. Wilf, K. R. Johnson, A. B. Zamuner, N. R. Cúneo, S. D. Matheos & B. S. Singer. 2007. A Paleocene lowland macroflora from Patagonia reveals significantly greater richness than North American analogs. Geology 35: 947–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lutz, A. I. 1980. Palmoxylon concordiense n. sp. del Plioceno de la provincia de Entre Ríos, República Argentina. Actas del II Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Biostratigrafía y I Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología 3: 129–140.Google Scholar
  30. ——— 1984. Palmoxylon yuqueriense n. sp. del Plioceno de la provincia de Entre Ríos, República Argentina. Actas del II Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Biostratigrafía: 197–207.Google Scholar
  31. Maury, C. J. 1930. O Cretáceo da Parahyba do Norte. Serviço Geológico e Mineralógico do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro. Monographias 8: 1–305.Google Scholar
  32. Nixon, K. C. 1999. WinClada version 1.87. Published by the author. Ithaca, NY. [Available at].
  33. Noblick, L. R. & H. Lorenzi. 2010. Lytocaryum, including a new species from Bahia, Brazil. Journal of the International Palm Society 54: 5–17.Google Scholar
  34. Ottone, E. 2007. A new palm trunk from the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina. Ameghiniana 44: 719–725.Google Scholar
  35. Pan, A. D., B. F. Jacobs, J. Dransfield & W. J. Baker. 2006. The fossil history of palms (Arecaceae) in Africa and new records from the Late Oligocene (28-27 Mya) of north-western Ethiopia. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 151: 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Petriella, B. 1972. Estudio de maderas petrificadas del Terciario Inferior del area Central de Chubut (Cerro Bororo). Revista del Museo de La Plata 6: 159–262.Google Scholar
  37. Romero, E. J. 1968. Palmoxylon patagonicum n. sp. del Terciario inferior de la Provincia de Chubut, Argentina. Ameghiniana 10: 417–432.Google Scholar
  38. Schenk, A. 1882. Die von den Gebrüdern Schlagenwelt in Indein gesammelten fossilen Hölzer. Botanischer Jahrbücher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 3: 353–358.Google Scholar
  39. Somoza, R., G. Cladera & S. Archangelsky. 1995. Una nueva tafoflora paleocena de Chubut, Patagonia. Su edad y ambiente de depositación. VI Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Biostratigrafía, Actas: 265–269.Google Scholar
  40. Tripathi, R. P., S. N. Mishra & B. D. Sharma. 1999. Cocos nucifera like petrified fruit from the Tertiary of Amarkantak, MP, India. Paleobotanist 48: 251–255.Google Scholar
  41. Vaudois-Miéja, N. & A. Lejal-Nicol. 1987. Paléocarpologie africaine: apparition dès l’Aptien en Égypte d’un Palmier (Hyphaeneocarpon aegyptiacum n.sp.). Comptes Rendus de l’académie des Sciences 304: 233–238.Google Scholar
  42. Zucol, A. F., M. Brea, E. Bellosi, A. A. Carlini & G. Vucetich. 2007. Preliminary phytolith analysis of Sarmiento Formation in the Gran Barranca (central Patagonia, Argentina). Pp 189–195. In: M. Madella & D. Zurro (eds). Plants, people and places: recent studies in phytolith analysis. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
  43. Zuloaga, F. O. & O. Morrone (eds.) 1996. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de la República Argentina. I. Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae y Angiospermae (Monocotyledoneae). Monographs in Systematic Botany 60: 1–323.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary K. Futey
    • 1
  • Maria A. Gandolfo
    • 1
  • Maria C. Zamaloa
    • 2
  • Rubén Cúneo
    • 3
  • Gerardo Cladera
    • 3
  1. 1.L. H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Departmento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Museo Paleontológico Egidio FeruglioTrelewArgentina

Personalised recommendations