The Botanical Review

, 74:469 | Cite as

The Subfamily Mutisioideae (Asteraceae)

  • Liliana KatinasEmail author
  • John Pruski
  • Gisela Sancho
  • María Cristina Tellería


The subfamily Mutisioideae (74 genera, ca. 865 species), which comprises three tribes, Mutisieae (43 genera, ca. 500 species), Nassauvieae (25 genera, ca. 315 species), and Stifftieae (six genera, 48 species), is analyzed at the generic level. A total of 87 genera traditionally related to Mutisioideae were studied. The genera of Mutisioideae are described and illustrated, and keys to tribes and genera are given. Corollas, anthers, styles, and pollen, are analyzed and discussed. The styles (smooth, rugulose to papillose, papillae short and rounded) constitute the main characters for delimiting the subfamily. The presence and distribution of the style papillae support the recognition of three tribes, although other characters as corolla shape contribute to their definition. The pollen of Nassauvieae can be clearly differentiated from the pollen of Mutisieae and Stifftieae. The morphology supports the exclusion of Brachylaena, Cloiselia, Dicoma, Duseniella, Erythrocephalum, Gladiopappus, Hesperomannia, Macledium, Moquinia, Pasaccardoa, Pleiotaxis, Tarchonanthus, and Warionia but not the exclusion of other taxa, for example, Hecastocleis, the Gochnatia complex, or the Ainsliaea group members.


Asteraceae Mutisioideae Corolla Style Pollen 


La subfamilia Mutisioideae (74 géneros, ca. 865 especies), que comprende tres tribus, Mutisieae (43 géneros, ca. 500 especies), Nassauvieae (25 géneros, ca. 315 especies), y Stifftieae (6 géneros, 48 especies), es analizada a nivel genérico. Se estudió un total de 87 géneros que tradicionalmente fueron relacionados a Mutisioideae. Se describen e ilustran los géneros de Mutisioideae, y se proveen claves para las tribus y los géneros. Se analizan y discuten las corolas, anteras y estilos. Los caracteres del estilo (glabro, ruguloso a papiloso, las papilas cortas y redondeadas) son los más importantes para delimitar la subfamilia. La presencia y distribución de las papilas del estilo ayudan al reconocimiento de las tres tribus, aunque otros caracteres como la forma de la corola contribuyen a su definición. El polen de Nassauvieae se puede diferenciar claramente del polen de Mutisieae y Stifftieae. La morfología apoya la exclusión de Brachylaena, Cloiselia, Dicoma, Duseniella, Erythrocephalum, Gladiopappus, Hesperomannia, Macledium, Moquinia, Pasaccardoa, Pleiotaxis, Tarchonanthus, y Warionia, pero no la exclusión de otros taxa, por ejemplo, Hecastocleis, los miembros del complejo Gochnatia o del grupo Ainsliaea.



We are grateful to Jorge Crisci and Bob Kowal for critical reading of the manuscript, and to Peter Hoch and Vicki Funk for their assistance and constant support. Jorge Crisci also provided some unpublished SEM photographs of Nassauvieae. Anonymous reviewers are also acknowledged for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Thanks are given to Susana Freire for helping with the Ainsliaea group, to Santiago Ortiz for comments and material on the African taxa, to Nicholas Hind for helping with material at Kew, to Melica Muñoz Schick for helping with literature and specimens of Chilean taxa, and to Dan Nicolson and Daniel Giuliano for nomenclatural advice. We also thank the curators of hebaria for loans of specimens, all the persons and institutions that granted permission to redraw their illustrations, and Hugo Calvetti for the designing of the SEM plates. The John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (LK), the Latin American, Caribbean, and Iberian Studies (LACIS) program (LK), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina, Agencia de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Argentina, the Botany Department of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and the Missouri Botanical Garden are also acknowledged for their generous support.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderberg, A. A. & S. E. Freire. 1990. Luciliopsis perpusilla Weddell is a species of Chaetanthera Ruiz & Pavon (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Taxon 39: 430–432.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. 1972. A monograph of the Mexican and Central American species of Trixis (Compositae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 22: 1–68.Google Scholar
  3. Aristeguieta, L. 1964. Compositae. Pp. 485–941. In: T. Lasser (ed.), Flora de Venezuela 10. Instituto Botánico, Dirección de Recursos Naturales Renovables, Ministerio de Agricultura, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1967. Compositae. Pp. 345–370. In: J. A. Steyermark (ed.), Flora of the Auyan-tepui. Acta Botánica Venezuelica 2. Instituto Botánico, Dirección de Recursos Naturales Renovables, Ministerio de Agricultura, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
  5. Ariza Espinar, L. 1973. Revisión del género Hyaloseris (Compositae). Kurtziana 7: 195–211.Google Scholar
  6. Arroyo, M. T. K., A. M. R. Davies & I. Till-Bottraud. 2004. Chaetanthera acheno-hirsuta (Tombesi) Arroyo, A. M. R. Davies & Till-Bottraud elevated to species, new for the flora of Chile. Gayana, Botánica 61: 27–31.Google Scholar
  7. Audissou, J.-A. 1999. Warionia saharae. British Cactus and Succulent Journal 3: 124–126.Google Scholar
  8. Baagøe, J. 1977. Microcharacters in the ligules of the Compositae. Pp. 119–139. In: V. H. Heywood, J. B. Harborne & B. L. Turner (eds.), The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, Vol. 1. Academic, London.Google Scholar
  9. Bacigalupi, R. 1931. A monograph of the genus Perezia, section Acourtia, with a provisional key to the section Euperezia. Contributions of the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 97: 1–81.Google Scholar
  10. Badillo, V. M. 1988. Sobre la vigencia del género Cardonaea Aristeg. et al. (Compositae–Mutisieae). Ernstia 46: 8–10.Google Scholar
  11. Baker, J. G. 1884. Compositae III. Mutisiaceae. Pp. 339–398. In: C. F. P. Martius (ed.), Flora Brasiliensis 6(3). Monachii in typographia regia C. Wolf et fil. et in offic. lithograph. Keller, Munich.Google Scholar
  12. Barreda, V. D. 1993. Late Oligocene?—Miocene pollen of the families Compositae, Malvaceae, and Polygonaceae from the Chenque Formation, Golfo San Jorge Basin, southeastern Argentina. Palynology 17: 169–186.Google Scholar
  13. ———, V. Barreda, L. Palazzesi & M. C. Tellería. 2008. Fossil pollen grains of Asteraceae from the Miocene of Patagonia: Nassauviinae affinity. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 151: 51–58.Google Scholar
  14. Barrie, F. R. 2006. Report of the General Committee: 9. Taxon 55: 795–800.Google Scholar
  15. Barroso, G. M. & B. Maguire. 1973. A review of the genus Wunderlichia (Mutisieae, Compositae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 33: 379–406.Google Scholar
  16. Beentje, H. J. 1998. The genus Tarchonanthus (Compositae–Mutisieae). Kew Bulletin 54: 81–95.Google Scholar
  17. Bentham, G. & J. D. Hooker. 1873. Genera plantarum ad exemplaria imprimis in herbariis kewensibus servata definite, volume 2. Lovell, Reeve and Co., London.Google Scholar
  18. Bittmann, M. 1990a. Die Gattung Adenocaulon (Compositae): I. Morphologie. Candollea 45: 389–420.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1990b. Die Gattung Adenocaulon (Compositae): II. Ökologie, Verbreitung und Systematik. Candollea 45: 493–518.Google Scholar
  20. Bolick, M. R. 1978. Taxonomic, evolutionary, and functional considerations of Compositae pollen ultrastructure and sculpture. Plant Systematics and Evolution 130: 209–218.Google Scholar
  21. Bond, P. 1987. A revision of Oldenburgia. South African Journal of Botany 53: 493–500.Google Scholar
  22. Bremer, K. 1987. Tribal interrelationships of the Asteraceae. Cladistics 3: 210–253.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1992. Ancestral areas: A cladistic reinterpretation of the center of origin concept. Systematic Biology 41: 436–445.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1993. Intercontinental relationships of African and South American Asteraceae: A cladistic biogeographic analysis. Pp. 104–135. In: P. Goldblatt (ed.), Biological Relationships Between Africa and South America. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1994. Asteraceae: Cladistics and Classification. Timber, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1996. Major clades and grades of the Asteraceae. Pp. 1–7. In: D. J. N. Hind & H. J. Beentje (eds.), Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, Vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  27. ——— & M. H. G. Gustafsson. 1997. East Gondwana ancestry of the sunflower alliance of families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 9188–9190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. ——— & R. K. Jansen. 1992. A new subfamily of the Asteraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 414–415.Google Scholar
  29. Brummitt, R. K. 2005. Report of the Committee for Spermatophyta: 57. Taxon 54: 1093–1103.Google Scholar
  30. Burkart, A. 1944. Estudio del género de Compuestas Chaptalia con especial referencia a las especies argentinas. Darwiniana 6: 505–594.Google Scholar
  31. Cabrera, A. L. 1936. Las especies argentinas y uruguayas del género Trixis. Revista del Museo de La Plata, Sección Botánica 2: 31–86.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1937. Revisión del género Chaetanthera (Compositae). Revista del Museo de La Plata, Sección Botánica 2: 87–210.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 1944. Vernonieas argentinas (Compositae). Darwiniana 6: 265–379.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1950. Observaciones sobre los géneros Gochnatia y Moquinia. Notas del Museo de La Plata, Botánica 15: 37–48.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 1951. Notas sobre compuestas de América Austral. Darwiniana 9: 363–386.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 1953a. Compuestas peruanas nuevas o críticas. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 5: 37–50.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 1953b. Las especies del género Pamphalea (Compositae). Notas del Museo de La Plata, Botánica 16: 225–237.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 1954. Compuestas sudamericanas nuevas o críticas. II. Notas del Museo de La Plata, Botánica 17: 71–80.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 1959a. Compositae catarinenses novae. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 7: 187–200.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1959b. Revisión del género Dasyphyllum (Compositae). Revista del Museo de La Plata, Sección Botánica 9: 21–100.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 1961. Compuestas argentinas. Clave para la determinación de los géneros. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, “Bernardino Rivadavia” Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales, Botánica 2: 291–362.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 1965. Revisión del género Mutisia (Compositae). Opera Lilloana 13: 5–227.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 1968. Rehabilitación del género Holocheilus Cassini (Compositae). Revista del Museo de La Plata, Sección Botánica 11: 1–15.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 1969. El género Moquinia (Compositae). Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 11: 255–261.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 1970. Actinoseris, nuevo género de compuestas. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 13: 45–52.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 1971a. Revisión del género Gochnatia (Compositae). Revista del Museo de La Plata, Sección Botánica 12: 1–160.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 1971b. Compositae. Pp. 1–451. In: M. N. Correa (ed.), Flora Patagónica. Colección Científica del INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 1974. Tres Compositae nuevas de Minas Gerais (Brasil). Boletim do Museu Botanico Municipal 15: 1–4.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 1975. Una nueva especie de Onoseris (Compositae) de Brasil. Boletim do Museu Botanico Municipal 19: 1–3.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 1976. Una nueva especie de Mutisia (Compositae) de Patagonia. Darwiniana 20: 210–212.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 1977. Mutisieae—Systematic review. Pp. 1039–1066. In: V. H. Heywood, J. B. Harborne & B. L. Turner (eds.), The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, Vol. 2. Academic, London.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 1978. Compositae. Pp. 9–726. In: A. L. Cabrera (ed.), Flora de la Provincia de Jujuy, República Argentina. Colección Científica del INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 1982. Revisión del género Nassauvia (Compositae). Darwiniana 24: 283–379.Google Scholar
  54. ——— & A. Willink. 1973. Biogeografía de América Latina. O.E.A. Serie de Biología, Monografía 13, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  55. Cabrera-Rodríguez, L. 1992. Systematic Study of the Genus Rzedowskiela R. Cabrera (Mutisieae, Compositae). Doctoral Thesis, The University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 2001. Six new species of Acourtia (Asteraceae) and a historical account of Acourtia mexicana. Brittonia 53: 416–429.Google Scholar
  57. ——— & G. Dieringer. 2003. Pollen structure of Acourtia (Asteraceae): New findings and some taxonomic considerations. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 287–294.Google Scholar
  58. Candia, R. & A. D. Dalmasso. 1995. Dieta del guanaco (Lama guanicoe) y productividad del pastizal en la Reserva La Payunia, Mendoza (Argentina). Multequina 4: 5–15.Google Scholar
  59. Carlquist, S. 1957a. Systematic anatomy of Hesperomannia. Pacific Science 11: 207–215.Google Scholar
  60. ———. 1957b. Anatomy of Guayana Mutisieae. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 9: 441–475.Google Scholar
  61. ———. 1957c. Wood anatomy of Mutisieae (Compositae). Tropical Woods 106: 29–45.Google Scholar
  62. ———. 1958. Anatomy of the Guayana Mutisieae. Part II. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 10: 157–184.Google Scholar
  63. ———. 1961. Comparative Plant Anatomy. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  64. ———. 1976. Tribal interrelationships and phylogeny of the Asteraceae. Aliso 8: 465–492.Google Scholar
  65. Cassini, H. 1816. Quatriéme memoire sur le famille des synantherées, contenant l’analyse de l’ovaire et de ses accesoires. Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d’Histoire Naturelle et des Arts 85: 5–21.Google Scholar
  66. ———. 1819. Suit du sixiéme mémoire sur la familie des Synanthérées, contenat les caractères des tribus. Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d’Histoire Naturelle et des Arts 88: 189–204.Google Scholar
  67. ———. 1824. Mutisiées. Pp. 462–465. In: G. Cuvier (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, Vol. 33. Le Normant, Paris.Google Scholar
  68. ———. 1825. Nassauviées. Pp. 204–208. In: G. Cuvier (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, Vol. 34. Le Normant, Paris.Google Scholar
  69. Cilliers, S. S. 1993. Synopsis of the genus Brachylaena (Asteraceae) in southern Africa. Bothalia 23: 175–184.Google Scholar
  70. Crisci, J. V. 1971. Sobre una especie de Jungia (Compositae) del Perú. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 13: 341–346.Google Scholar
  71. ———. 1974a. A numerical–taxonomic study of the subtribe Nassauviinae (Compositae, Mutisieae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 55: 568–610.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 1974b. Marticorenia: A new genus of Mutisieae (Compositae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 55: 38–45.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 1974c. Revision of the genus Moscharia (Compositae, Mutisieae) and a reinterpretation of its inflorescence. Contributions of the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 205: 163–173.Google Scholar
  74. ———. 1976a. Burkartia: Nuevo género de Mutisieae (Compositae). Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 17: 241–246.Google Scholar
  75. ———. 1976b. Revisión del género Leucheria (Compositae: Mutisieae). Darwiniana 20: 9–126.Google Scholar
  76. ———. 1980. Evolution in the subtribe Nassauviinae (Compositae, Mutisieae): A phylogenetic reconstruction. Taxon 29: 213–224.Google Scholar
  77. ——— & S. E. Freire. 1986. El género Calopappus (Compositae, Mutisieae). Caldasia 15: 57–69.Google Scholar
  78. ——— & C. Marticorena. 1978. Transfer of the Brazilian Trixis eryngioides to Perezia (Compositae, Mutisieae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 59: 352–359.Google Scholar
  79. Cristóbal, C. L. & A. L. Cabrera. 1982. Novedades en Hyaloseris Griseb. (Compositae). Hickenia 1: 255–257.Google Scholar
  80. Davies, A. M. R. 2006. Chaetanthera kalinae (Mutisieae, Asteraceae), a new species from Chile. Novon 16: 51–55.Google Scholar
  81. de Candolle, A. P. 1838. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 7. Treuttel and Würtz, Paris.Google Scholar
  82. de Candolle, M. 1812. Observations sur les plantes Composées, ou Syngenèses, troisième mémoire: Sur les Composées a corolles labiées ou Labiatiflores. Annales du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle 19: 59–72.Google Scholar
  83. Degener, O. 1946. Hesperomannia. In: Flora Hawaiiensis. New Illustrated Flora of the Hawaiian Islands. Published by the author.Google Scholar
  84. Díaz-Piedrahita, S. 2001. Tostimontia, un nuevo género de Asteraceae (Mutisieae) originario de Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas 25: 7–10.Google Scholar
  85. ——— & C. Vélez-Nauer. 1993. Revisión de las tribus Barnadesieae y Mutisieae (Asteraceae) para la Flora Colombiana. Monografías del Jardín Botánico Jose Celestino Mutis 1: 1–162.Google Scholar
  86. Dimon, M. T. 1971. Problémes généraux soulevés par l’étude pollinique de Composés Mediterranéennes. Naturalia Monspeleliensia, Série Botanique 22: 129–144.Google Scholar
  87. Don, D. 1830. Descriptions of the new genera and species of the class Compositae belonging to the floras of Peru, Mexico, and Chile. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 16: 171–297.Google Scholar
  88. Dormer, K. J. 1962. The fibrous layer in the anthers of the Compositae. New Phytologist 61: 150–163.Google Scholar
  89. Egeröd, K. & B. Stähl. 1991. Revision of Lycoseris (Compositae–Mutisieae). Nordic Journal of Botany 11: 549–574.Google Scholar
  90. Elsik, W. C. & T. E. Yancey. 2000. Palynomorph biozones in the context of changing paleoclimate, middle Eocene to lower Oligocene of the northwest Gulf of Mexico. Palynology 24: 177–186.Google Scholar
  91. Erbar, C. & P. Leins. 1995. Portioned pollen release and the syndromes of secondary pollen presentation in the Campanulales–Asterales complex. Flora 190: 323–338.Google Scholar
  92. Erdtman, G. 1960. The acetolysis method, a revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift utgifven uf Svenska Botaniska Föreningen (Stockholm) 54: 561–564.Google Scholar
  93. ———. 1966. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. Hafner, New York and London.Google Scholar
  94. ———. 1969. Handbook of Palynology: An Introduction to the Study of Pollen Grains and Spores. Hafner, Munksgaard, Copenhagen and New York.Google Scholar
  95. Fabris, H. A. 1968. Revisión del género Proustia (Compositae). Revista del Museo de La Plata, Sección Botánica 11: 23–49.Google Scholar
  96. Ferreyra, R. 1944. Revisión del género Onoseris. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 25: 349–395.Google Scholar
  97. ———. 1949. Una nueva especie de Onoseris procedente del Perú. Publicaciones del Museo de Historia Natural “Javier Prado,” Serie B, Botánica 2: 1–4.Google Scholar
  98. ———. 1953. Las especies peruanas del género Chaetanthera (Compositae). Publicaciones del Museo de Historia Natural “Javier Prado,” Serie B, Botánica 6: 1–8.Google Scholar
  99. ———. 1959. Dos especies nuevas de Onoseris (Compositae) para la flora peruana. Publicaciones del Museo de Historia Natural “Javier Prado,” Serie B, Botánica 11: 1–6.Google Scholar
  100. ———. 1980. Especies nuevas de Compuestas peruanas. Boletín de la Sociedad Peruana de Botánica 8: 75–82.Google Scholar
  101. ———. 1995. Family Asteraceae: Part VI. Fieldiana, Botany 35: 1–101.Google Scholar
  102. Franchet, M. A. 1888. Mutisiacées du Yun-nan. Journal de Botanique (Morot) 2: 1–7.Google Scholar
  103. Freire, S. E. 1996. Asteraceae, Tribu XII. Mutisieae, Subtribu 2. Gochnatiinae (excepto Gochnatia). Pp. 1–8, 12–17. In: A. T. Hunkiker (ed.), Flora Fanerogámica Argentina, Fascículo 28. PROFLORA, Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar
  104. ———. 2002. Two new species of Ainsliaea (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) from China and Vietnam. Novon 12: 451–455.Google Scholar
  105. ———. 2007. Systematic revision and phylogeny of Ainsliaea DC. (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 94: 79–191.Google Scholar
  106. ——— & L. Iharlegui. 2000. Ejemplares tipo de Asteraceae (= Compositae) de A. L. Cabrera. Darwiniana 38: 307–364.Google Scholar
  107. ——— & L. Katinas. 1995. Morphology and ontogeny of the cypsela hairs of Nassauviinae (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Pp. 107–143. In: D. J. N. Hind, C. Jeffrey & G. V. Pope (eds.), Advances in Compositae Systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  108. ———, J. V. Crisci & L. Katinas. 1993. A cladistic analysis of Nassauvia Comm. ex Juss. (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) and related genera. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 112: 293–309.Google Scholar
  109. ———, L. Katinas & G. Sancho. 2002. Gochnatia (Asteraceae: Mutisieae) and the Gochnatia complex: Taxonomic implications from morphology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89: 525–550.Google Scholar
  110. Funk, V. A., R. Chan & S. C. Keeley. 2004. Insights into the evolution of the tribe Arctoteae (Compositae: subfamily Cichorioideae s.s.) using trnL-F, ndhF, and ITS. Taxon 53: 637–655.Google Scholar
  111. ———, R. J. Bayer, S. Keeley, R. Chan, L. Watson, B. Gemeinholzer, E. Schilling, J. L. Panero, B. G. Baldwin, N. Garcia-Jacas, A. Susanna & R. K. Jansen. 2005. Everywhere but Antarctica: Using a supertree to understand the diversity and distribution of the Compositae. Biologiske Skrifter 55: 343–374.Google Scholar
  112. Gamerro, J. C. 1990. Identidad de Pseudostifftia con Moquinia (Compositae) y consideraciones sobre la ubicación tribal del taxón. Darwiniana 30: 123–136.Google Scholar
  113. Garnatje, T. & J. Martin. 2007. Pollen studies in the genus Echinops L. and Xeranthemum group (Asteraceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 154: 549–557.Google Scholar
  114. Gay, C. 1847. Historia física y política de Chile. Tomo 3, Museo de Historia Natural de Santiago, Santiago de Chile, Chile.Google Scholar
  115. Gleason, H. A. 1931. The botanical results of the Tyler-Duida expedition. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 58: 277–501.Google Scholar
  116. González-Medrano, J., J. L. Villaseñor & R. Medina. 2004. A new species of Gochnatia (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) from the desert scrubland of the state of Hidalgo, Mexico. Novon 14: 434–436.Google Scholar
  117. Graham, A. 1996. A contribution to the geologic history of the Compositae. Pp. 123–140. In: D. J. N. Hind & H. J. Beentje (eds.), Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, Vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  118. Grau, J. 1980. Die testa der Mutisieae und ihre systematische Bedeutung. Mitteilungen aus der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 16: 269–332.Google Scholar
  119. Greuter, W., J. McNeill, F. R. Barrie, H.-M. Burdet, V. Demoulin, T. S. Filgueiras, D. H. Nicolson, P. C. Silva, J. E. Skog, P. Trehane, N. J. Turland & D. L. Hawksworth (editors). 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code). Regnum Vegetabile 138.Google Scholar
  120. Gustafsson, M. H. G., A. S.-R. Pepper, V. A. Albert & M. Källersjö. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the Barnadesioideae (Asteraceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 21: 149–160.Google Scholar
  121. Hansen, H. V. 1985a. A taxonomic revision of the genus Gerbera (Compositae–Mutisieae) sections Gerbera, Parva, Piloselloides (in Africa) and Lasiopus. Opera Botanica a Societate Botanica Lundensi 78: 5–36.Google Scholar
  122. ———. 1985b. Notes on Gerbera sect. Pseudoseris (Compositae–Mutisieae). Nordic Journal of Botany 5: 451–453.Google Scholar
  123. ———. 1985c. A taxonomic revision of the genus Perdicium (Compositae–Mutisieae). Nordic Journal of Botany 5: 543–546.Google Scholar
  124. ———. 1988. A taxonomic revision of the genera Gerbera sect. Isanthus, Leibnitzia (in Asia), and Uechtritzia (Compositae, Mutisieae). Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 61–76.Google Scholar
  125. ———. 1990. Phylogenetic studies in the Gerbera-complex (Compositae, tribe Mutisieae, subtribe Mutisiinae). Nordic Journal of Botany 9: 469–485.Google Scholar
  126. ———. 1991a. Phylogenetic studies in Compositae tribe Mutisieae. Opera Botanica a Societate Botanica Lundensi 109: 1–50.Google Scholar
  127. ———. 1991b. SEM-studies and general comments on pollen in the tribe Mutisieae (Compositae) sensu Cabrera. Nordic Journal of Botany 10: 607–623.Google Scholar
  128. Harling, G. 1991. Compositae–Mutisieae. Pp. 1–106. In: G. Harling & L. Andersson (eds.), Flora of Ecuador, Vol. 42. Department of Systematic Botany, University of Göteborg, Section of Botany, Riksmuseum, Stockholm, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.Google Scholar
  129. ———. 1995. The genus Jungia L. fil. (Compositae–Mutisieae). Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum et Litterarium Gothoburgensis, Botanica 4: 5–133.Google Scholar
  130. ———. 1997. A new species of Jungia (Compositae) from Bolivia. Novon 7: 246–248.Google Scholar
  131. Harris, J. G. & M. Wolf Harris. 1994. Plant Identification Terminology. An Illustrated Glossary. Spring Lake, Spring Lake, Utah.Google Scholar
  132. Hellwig, P. 1985. Bau der blüten und köpfchen von Moscharia und verwandten gattungen der Compositae–Mutisieae. Mitteilungen aus der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 21: 1–47.Google Scholar
  133. Heng, L. 1995. Discussion on floristic features of the rare and endangered Compositae plant of China: Nouelia insignis. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 17: 401–404. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  134. Herman, P. P. J. 2002. Revision of Tarchonanthus camphoratus complex (Asteraceae–Tarchonantheae) in southern Africa. Bothalia 32: 21–28.Google Scholar
  135. Hershkovitz, M. A., M. T. K. Arroyo, C. Bell & L. F. Hinojosa. 2006. Phylogeny of Chaetanthera (Asteraceae: Mutisieae) reveals both ancient and recent origins of the high elevation lineages. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 594–605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Heusser, C. J. 1971. Pollen and Spores of Chile: Modern Types of the Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae and Angiospermae. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  137. Hickman, J. C. (editor) 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  138. Hind, D. J. N. 2000. A new species and a commentary on the genus Trixis (Compositae: Mutisieae) in Bahia, Brazil. Kew Bulletin 55: 381–386.Google Scholar
  139. ———. 2001a. Problems in Pertya Sch.Bip. Compositae Newsletter 36: 9–13.Google Scholar
  140. ———. 2001b. A new combination in Amblysperma (Compositae: Mutisieae). Kew Bulletin 56: 711–713.Google Scholar
  141. ———. 2004. A new species of Jungia (Compositae: Mutisieae: Nassauviinae) from Bolivia. Kew Bulletin 59: 311–314.Google Scholar
  142. ———. 2007. Tribe Mutisieae. Pp. 90–123. In: K. Kubitzki (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 8. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  143. ——— & J. Semir. 1998a. A new combination in Stifftia (Compositae: Mutisieae). Kew Bulletin 53: 617–622.Google Scholar
  144. ——— & ———. 1998b. Typification of Wunderlichia (Compositae: Mutisieae). Kew Bulletin 53: 1011–1012.Google Scholar
  145. Hoffmann, O. 1894. Compositae. Pp. 87–391. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol. 4(5). von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  146. Humbert, H. 1948. Un genre nouveau remarquable de Mutisiées à Madagascar. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 95: 181–183.Google Scholar
  147. ———. 1963. 189e Famille Composées. Flore de Madagascar et des Comores. 3. Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.Google Scholar
  148. Jansen, R. K. & K. -J. Kim. 1996. Implications of chloroplast DNA data for the classification and phylogeny of the Asteraceae. Pp. 317–339. In: D. J. N. Hind & H. Beentje (eds.), Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International CompositaeConference, Kew, 1994, Vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  149. ——— & J. D. Palmer. 1987. A chloroplast DNA inversion marks an ancient evolutionary split in the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84: 5818–5822.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. ——— & ———. 1988. Phylogenetic implications of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in the Mutisieae (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 75: 753–766.Google Scholar
  151. Jarvis, C. E. & N. J. Turland (editors). 1998. Typification of Linnean specific and varietal names in the Compositae (Asteraceae). Taxon 47: 347–370.Google Scholar
  152. Jeffrey, C. 1967. Notes on Compositae II. The Mutisieae in east tropical Africa. Kew Bulletin 21: 177–223.Google Scholar
  153. ———. 1977. Corolla forms in Compositae—Some evolutionary and taxonomic speculations. Pp. 111–118. In: V. H. Heywood, J. B. Harborne & B. L. Turner (eds.), The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, Vol. 1. Academic, London.Google Scholar
  154. ———. 2004. Systema Compositarium (Asteraceum) nova. Botanical Journal 89: 1817–1822.Google Scholar
  155. ———. 2007. Introduction with key to tribes. Pp. 61–87. In: K. Kubitzki (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  156. Jervis, R. N. 1954. A Summary of the Genus Gochnatia Including a Revision of the West Indian Species which Comprise the Section Anastraphioides. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  157. Jiménez Rodríguez, F., L. Katinas, M. C. Tellería & J. V. Crisci. 2004. Salcedoa gen. nov., a biogeographic enigma in the Caribbean Mutisieae (Asteraceae). Systematic Botany 29: 987–1002.Google Scholar
  158. Johnston, I. M. 1929. Undescribed species from the Cordillera of Atacama. Contributions of the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 85: 164–172.Google Scholar
  159. Kalin Arroyo, M. T. & C. Marticorena. 1988. A new species of the South American genus Nassauvia (Compositae: Mutisieae) from Chilean Patagonia. Brittonia 40: 332–334.Google Scholar
  160. Karis, P. O., M. Källersjö & K. Bremer. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis of the Cichorioideae (Asteraceae), with emphasis on the Mutisieae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 416–427.Google Scholar
  161. Katinas, L. 1994. Un nuevo género de Nassauviinae (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) y sus relaciones cladísticas con los géneros afines de la subtribu. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 30: 59–70.Google Scholar
  162. ———. 1995. Tribu XII. Mutisieae. Subtribu 4. Nassauviinae. Pp. 5–58. In: A. T. Hunziker (ed.), Flora Fanerogámica Argentina, Fascículo 13. PROFLORA, Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar
  163. ———. 1996a. Tribu XII. Mutisieae. Subtribu 3. Mutisiinae. Pp. 1–40. In: A. T. Hunziker (ed.), Flora Fanerogámica Argentina, Fascículo 4. PROFLORA, Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar
  164. ———. 1996b. Revisión de las especies sudamericanas del género Trixis (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Darwiniana 34: 27–108.Google Scholar
  165. ———. 1998. The Mexican Chaptalia hintonii is a Gerbera (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Novon 8: 380–385.Google Scholar
  166. ———. 2000. Implications of morphological phylogenetics for the placement of the genera Adenocaulon and Eriachaenium (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 223: 229–250.Google Scholar
  167. ———. 2004a. The Gerbera-complex (Asteraceae, Mutisieae): To split or not to split. Sida 21: 935–940.Google Scholar
  168. ———. 2004b. Amblysperma should be retained under Trichocline. Taxon 53: 108–112.Google Scholar
  169. ———. 2008. The genus Pachylaena (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 157: 373–380.Google Scholar
  170. ——— & J. V. Crisci. 2000. Cladistic and biogeographic analyses of the genera Moscharia and Polyachyrus (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Systematic Botany 25: 33–46.Google Scholar
  171. ——— & J. V. Crisci. 2008. Reconstructing the biogeographical history of two plant genera with different dispersion capabilities. Journal of Biogeography 35: 1374–1384.Google Scholar
  172. ——— & T. F. Stuessy. 1997. Revision of Doniophyton (Compositae, Barnadesioideae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 206: 33–45.Google Scholar
  173. ———, J. V. Crisci & S. E. Freire. 1992. Revisión sistemática y análisis cladístico del género Triptilion Ruiz et Pavón (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción 63: 101–132.Google Scholar
  174. ———, J. V. Crisci, M. C. Tellería, V. Barreda & L. Palazzesi. 2007. Early history of Asteraceae in Patagonia: Evidence from fossil pollen grains. New Zealand Journal of Botany 45: 605–610.Google Scholar
  175. ———, J. V. Crisci, R. Schmidt Jabaily, C. Williams, J. Walker, B. Drew, J. M. Bonifacino & K. J. Sytsma. 2008a. Evolution of secondary heads in Nassauviinae (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). American Journal of Botany 95: 229–240.Google Scholar
  176. ———, M. C. Tellería & J. V. Crisci. 2008b. A new species of Leucheria (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) from Chile. Novon 18: 366–369.Google Scholar
  177. Katinas, L., M. C. Tellería, A. Susanna & S. Ortiz. Warionia (Asteraceae): A relict genus of Cichorioideae? Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 65. In press.Google Scholar
  178. Keeley, S. C. & R. K. Jansen. 1991. Evidence from chloroplast DNA for the recognition of a new tribe, the Tarchonantheae, and the tribal placement of Pluchea (Asteraceae). Systematic Botany 16: 173–181.Google Scholar
  179. Keighery, G. J. 2005. A new species of Amblysperma (Asteraceae: Mutisieae). Compositae Newsletter 42: 26–31.Google Scholar
  180. Kim, H.-G., S. C. Keeley, P. S. Vroom & R. K. Jansen. 1998. Molecular evidence for an African origin of the Hawaiian endemic Hesperomannia (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95: 15440–15445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Kim, K.-J., R. K. Jansen, R. S. Wallace, H. J. Michaels & J. D. Palmer. 1992. Phylogenetic implications of rbcL sequence variation in the Asteraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 428–445.Google Scholar
  182. Kim, K.-J., D. J. Loockerman & R. K. Jansen. 2002. Systematic implications of ndhF sequence variation in the Mutisieae (Asteraceae). Systematic Botany 27: 598–609.Google Scholar
  183. ———, K.-S. Choi & R. K. Jansen. 2005. Two chloroplast DNA inversions originated simultaneously during the early evolution of the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1783–1792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Kimball, R. T., D. J. Crawford & T. K. Lowrey. 2004. A molecular study of Brachylaena (Asteraceae): phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Abstracts, Botany 2004, Snowbird, Utah.Google Scholar
  185. Kitamura, S. 1937. Tribe Mutisieae. Memoirs of the College of Science, Kyoto Imperial University, Series B, Biology 13: 292–316.Google Scholar
  186. Koch, M. F. 1930. Studies in the anatomy and morphology of the Compositae flower. II. The corollas of the Heliantheae and the Mutisieae. American Journal of Botany 17: 995–1010.Google Scholar
  187. Koster, J. T. 1945. Chaetanthera. Blumea 5: 673–674.Google Scholar
  188. Koyama, H. 1973. On the taxonomic characters of the genus Pertya. Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Plant Taxonomists 3: 20–21.Google Scholar
  189. ———. 1975. Notes on Pertya hossei and its allies. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo 1: 49–58.Google Scholar
  190. Lagasca, M. 1811. Disertación sobre un nuevo orden de plantas de la clase de las Compuestas. Amenidades Naturales de las Españas: 26–44.Google Scholar
  191. Leins, P. 1968. Versuch einer Gliederung der Inulinae und Buphtalminae nach den Pollenkorn typen. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, Berlin 81: 498–504.Google Scholar
  192. Lessing, C. F. 1832. Synopsis Generum Compositarum. Duncker and Humblot, Berlin.Google Scholar
  193. Lin, N. N., H. Wang, D. Li & S. Blackmore. 2005. Pollen morphology of eight genera of the subtribe Mutisiinae Less. sensu Bremer (Compositae) from Asia. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 47: 1036–1046.Google Scholar
  194. Lindley, J. 1829. Mutisioideae. Pp. 1072–1074. In: J. Loudon (ed.), An Encyclopaedia of Plants. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London.Google Scholar
  195. Luan, S., T.-Y. Chiang & X. Gong. 2006. High genetic diversity vs. low genetic differentiation in Nouelia insignis (Asteraceae), a narrowly distributed endemic species in China, revealed by ISSR fingerprinting. Annals of Botany 98: 583–589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. Maguire, B. 1956. Distribution, endemicity, and evolution patterns among Compositae of the Guayana Highland of Venezuela. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 100: 467–475.Google Scholar
  197. ———. 1967. Compositae. The botany of the Guayana Highland—Part VII. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 17: 437–439.Google Scholar
  198. ——— & J. J. Wurdack. 1958. New Guayana Compositae. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Ciencias Naturales, Caracas 20: 54–59.Google Scholar
  199. ———, ——— & collaborators. 1957a. The botany of the Guayana Highland—Part II. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 9: 235–392.Google Scholar
  200. ———, J. A. Steyermark, J. J. Wurdack & collaborators. 1957b. Botany of the Chimantá Massif-I. Gran Sabana, Venezuela. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 9: 393–439.Google Scholar
  201. Markgraf, V. & H. L. D’Antoni. 1978. Pollen Flora of Argentina. Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  202. Marticorena, C. & O. Parra. 1975. Morfología de los granos de polen de Hesperomannia Gray y Moquinia DC. (Compositae–Mutisieae). Estudio comparativo con géneros afines. Gayana, Botánica 29: 1–22.Google Scholar
  203. ——— & M. Quezada. 1974. Compuestas nuevas o interesantes para Chile. Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción 48: 99–108.Google Scholar
  204. Mattfeld, J. 1934. Compositae Novae Sinenses. Notizblatt des Botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin-Dahlem 11: 103–110.Google Scholar
  205. Mitsui, Y., S.-T. Chen, Z.-K. Zhou, C.-I.-Peng, Y. F. Deng & H. Segoguchi. 2007. Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Ainsliaea (Asteraceae) in the Sino-Japanese region based on nuclear rDNA and plastid DNA sequence data. Annals of Botany 101: 111–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Molfino, J. F. 1953. Una nueva especie del género Aphyllocladus. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 5: 30–34.Google Scholar
  207. Mondin, C. A. 1995. Holocheilus monocephalus (Asteraceae–Mutisieae), nova espécie do sul do Brasil. Napaea 11: 31–34.Google Scholar
  208. ——— & C. L. Vasques. 2004. O gênero Holocheilus Cass. (Asteraceae–Mutisieae–Nassauviinae) no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia, Botanica 59: 161–172.Google Scholar
  209. Moore, D. M. 1983. Flora of Tierra del Fuego. Anthony Nelson, Shropshire, England.Google Scholar
  210. Moore, S. 1925. The genus Pleiotaxis Steetz (Compositae). Journal of Botany 63: 43–50.Google Scholar
  211. Muñoz Pizarro, C. 1966. Sinopsis de la Flora Chilena: Claves para la Identificación de Familias y Géneros. Ediciones de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
  212. Nayar, M. P. & M. Ahmedullah. 1985. Catamixis baccharoides Thomson—An endemic chasmophyte of the W. Himalaya under threat. Bulletin of the Botanical Survey of India 27: 248–250.Google Scholar
  213. Nesom, G. L. 1983. Biology and taxonomy of American Leibnitzia (Asteraceae: Mutisieae). Brittonia 35: 126–139.Google Scholar
  214. ———. 1984. Taxonomy and distribution of Chaptalia dentata and C. albicans (Asteraceae: Mutisieae). Brittonia 36: 396–401.Google Scholar
  215. ———. 1995. Revision of Chaptalia (Asteraceae: Mutisieae) from North America and continental Central America. Phytologia 78: 153–188.Google Scholar
  216. Nordenstam, B. & E. El-Ghazaly. 1977. Floral micromorphology and pollen ultrastructure in some Centaureinae (Compositae) mainly from Egypt. Publicatins of the Cairo University Herbarium N° 7 & 8.Google Scholar
  217. Ohwi, J. 1965. Flora of Japan. National Science Museum, Tokyo; Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  218. Ortiz, S. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of Dicoma Cass. and related genera (Asteraceae: Cichorioideae: Mutisieae) based on morphological and anatomic characters. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 459–481.Google Scholar
  219. ———. 2001. Reinstatement of the genus Macledium Cass. (Asteraceae, Mutisieae): Morphological and phylogenetic arguments. Taxon 50: 733–744.Google Scholar
  220. ———. 2006a. Systematics of Cloiselia (Asteraceae, Mutisieae s. l.), a reinstated Madagascan genus. Systematic Botany 31: 421–431.Google Scholar
  221. ———. 2006b. African Mutisieae. P. 14. In: Book of Abstracts. The International Compositae Alliance (TICA–Deep Achene), Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  222. ——— & A. P. Coutinho. 2001. Achyrothalamus reduced to Erythrocephalum (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Taxon 50: 389–403.Google Scholar
  223. ——— & N. C. Netnou. 2005. A new species of Dicoma (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) from South Africa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 147: 509–513.Google Scholar
  224. ——— & I. Pulgar. 2002. A new species of Dicoma Cass. (Asteraceae: Mutisieae) from Namibia. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 139: 317–322.Google Scholar
  225. ——— & J. Rodríguez-Oubiña. 1998. The infraspecific taxa of Pleiotaxis huillensis (Mutisieae, Asteraceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 19: 23–26.Google Scholar
  226. ———, J. Rodríguez-Oubiña & M. Tadesse. 1998. A taxonomic revision of Dicoma (Asteraceae: Cichorioideae: Mutisieae) for the horn of Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 440–459.Google Scholar
  227. Ozenda, P. 1991. Flore et Végétation du Sahara, 3rd ed. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar
  228. Paiva, J. A. R. 1972. New and little known species from the flora zambesiaca area. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 46: 355–384.Google Scholar
  229. Panero, J. L. 2007. Calorezia, a new genus of tribe Nassauvieae (Asteraceae, Mutisioideae). Phytologia 89: 198–201.Google Scholar
  230. ——— & V. A. Funk. 2002. Toward a phylogenetic subfamilial classification for the Compositae (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 115: 909–922.Google Scholar
  231. ——— & ———. 2007. New infrafamilial taxa in Asteraceae. Phytologia 89: 356–360.Google Scholar
  232. ——— & ———. 2008. The value of sampling anomalous taxa in phylogenetic studies: Major clades of the Asteraceae revealed. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47: 757–782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  233. Parra, O. & C. Marticorena. 1972. Granos de polen de plantas chilenas, II. Compositae–Mutisieae. Chile. Gayana, Botánica 21: 1–107.Google Scholar
  234. Pehlivan, S. 1995. Pollen morphology of some Turkish endemic Centaurea. Grana Palynologica 34: 29–38.Google Scholar
  235. Poljakov, P. P. 1967. Systematika i proischozdenie sloznocvetnych. Alma-Ata, Nauka.Google Scholar
  236. Pope, G. V. 1991. Notes on Dicoma Cass. (Compositae). Kew Bulletin 46: 699–709.Google Scholar
  237. ———. 1992. Flora Zambesiaca. Managing Commitee on Behalf of the Contributors to Flora Zambesiaca. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  238. Pruski, J. F. 1989a. Notes on the Compositae of the Guayana Highland—I. A new species of Stomatochaeta and the reduction of Guaicaia to Glossarion (Compositae: Mutisieae). Brittonia 41: 35–40.Google Scholar
  239. ———. 1989b. Compositae of the Guayana Highland—II. Novelties in Gongylolepis and Stenopadus (Mutisieae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 76: 993–1003.Google Scholar
  240. ———. 1991. Compositae of the Guayana Highland—V. The Mutisieae of the Lost World of Brazil, Colombia, and Guyana. Boletim do Museo Paraense de Historia Natural 7: 335–392.Google Scholar
  241. ———. 1997. Asteraceae. Pp. 177–393. In: J. A. Steyermark, P. E. Berry & B. K. Holst (eds.), Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana, Vol. 3. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  242. ———. 1998. Stenopadus andicola sp. nov. (Asteraceae: Mutisieae), a new generic record for Ecuador. Novon 8: 67–69.Google Scholar
  243. ———. 2004. Missouri Botanical Garden, Research: Asteraceae (Compositae). The Missouri Botanical Garden, Poster, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  244. ——— & H. Beltrán. 2003. Stenopadus andicola (Compositae: Mutisieae), a new generic record for Peru. Compositae Newsletter 39: 2–12.Google Scholar
  245. ——— & G. Sancho. 2004. Asteraceae or Compositae (Aster or sunflower family). Pp. 33–39. In: N. P. Smith, S. V. Heald, A. Anderson, S. A. Mori & D. W. Stevenson (eds.), Flowering Plants of the Neotropics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  246. Punt, W., S. Blackmore, S. Nilsson & A. Le Thomas. 1994. Glossary of pollen and spores terminology. Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology. Contributions Series of the University of Utrech, ser. 1, 1: 1–71.Google Scholar
  247. Rao, R. R. 1995. Tribe Mutisieae Cass. Pp. 163–186. In: P. K. Hajra, R. R. Rao, D. K. Singh & B. Uniyal (eds.), Flora of India, Bulletin of the Botanical Survey of India. Vol. 13. Botanical Survey of India, India.Google Scholar
  248. Reiche, C. 1905. Mutisieas. Pp. 288–460. In: Flora de Chile, Vol. 4. Imprenta Cervantes, Santiago de Chile, Chile.Google Scholar
  249. Reveal, J. L. & R. M. King. 1973. Re-establishment of Acourtia D. Don (Asteraceae). Phytologia 27: 228–232.Google Scholar
  250. Ricardi, M. & E. Weldt. 1974. Revisión del género Polyachyrus (Compositae). Gayana, Botánica 26: 3–34.Google Scholar
  251. Robinson, H. 1979. Two new genera of Vernonieae (Asteraceae) from Brazil: Heterocypsela and Pseudostifftia. Phytologia 44: 442–450.Google Scholar
  252. ———. 1980. Harthamnus, a new genus of Mutisieae from Bolivia. Phytologia 45: 451–455.Google Scholar
  253. ———. 1983. A generic review of the tribe Liabeae (Asteraceae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 54: 1–69.Google Scholar
  254. ———. 1987. Some suggestions regarding the significance of chloroplast DNA variation in the Asteraceae. Phytologia 63: 316–324.Google Scholar
  255. ———. 1988. A new species of Trichocline from northern Peru. Phytologia 65: 47–49.Google Scholar
  256. ———. 1991. Two new species of Stifftia with notes on relationships of the genus (Asteraceae: Mutisieae). Systematic Botany 16: 685–692.Google Scholar
  257. ———. 1994. Notes on the tribes Eremothamneae, Gundeliae, and Moquinieae, with comparisons of their pollen. Taxon 43: 33–44.Google Scholar
  258. ———. 1999. Generic and subtribal classification of American Vernonieae. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 89: 1–116.Google Scholar
  259. ——— & R. D. Brettell. 1973. Tribal revisions in Asteraceae. VI. The relationships of Eriachaenium. Phytologia 26: 71–72.Google Scholar
  260. ——— & B. Kahn. 1985. A new species of Stifftia from Cayenne. Phytologia 58: 248–251.Google Scholar
  261. ——— & C. Marticorena. 1986. A palynological study of the Liabeae (Asteraceae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 64: 1–50.Google Scholar
  262. Roque, N. 1997. A reassessment of Actinoseris polymorpha (Less.) Cabrera (Mutisieae–Compositae), with a new combination. Kew Bulletin 52: 197–204.Google Scholar
  263. ———. 2001a. Five new species of Richterago (Compositae, Mutisieae): A genus endemic to Brazil. Novon 11: 341–349.Google Scholar
  264. ———. 2001b. Fenología de Wunderlichia mirabilis Riedel ex Baker (Compositae–Mutisieae) na Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Sitientibus, Série Ciencias Biologicas 1: 108–111.Google Scholar
  265. ——— & D. J. N. Hind. 2001. Ianthopappus, a new genus of the tribe Mutisieae (Compositae). Novon 11: 97–101.Google Scholar
  266. ——— & N. Nakajima. 2001. Two new species of Richterago Kuntze (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) from Minas Gerais. Kew Bulletin 56: 697–703.Google Scholar
  267. ——— & J. R. Pirani. 1997. Flora da Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais: Compositae–Barnadesieae e Mutisieae. Boletim de Botânica da Universidade de São Paulo 16: 151–185.Google Scholar
  268. ——— & ———. 2001. Reinstatement of the name Richterago Kuntze and recircumscription of the genus to include species formerly treated as Actinoseris (Endl.) Cabrera (Compositae, Mutisieae). Taxon 50: 1155–1160.Google Scholar
  269. ——— & M. S. F. Silvestre-Capelato. 2001. Generic delimitation of Gochnatia, Richterago and Ianthopappus (Compositae–Mutisieae) based on pollen morphology. Grana Palynologica 40: 197–204.Google Scholar
  270. Rydberg, P. A. 1917. Flora of the Rocky Mountains and Adjacent Plains. Published by the author, New York.Google Scholar
  271. Rzedowski, J. 1983. Algunas adiciones al género Acourtia (Compositae–Mutisieae). Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 45: 97–109.Google Scholar
  272. Sagástegui Alva, A. & M. O. Dillon. 1985. Four new species of Asteraceae from Peru. Brittonia 37: 6–13.Google Scholar
  273. Salgado-Labouriau, M. L. 1982. Pollen morphology of the Compositae of the northern Andes. Pollen and Spores 24: 397–452.Google Scholar
  274. Sancho, G. 1996. Asteraceae, Tribu XII. Mutisieae, Subtribu 2. Gochnatia. Pp. 9–11. In: A. T. Hunziker (ed.), Flora Fanerogámica Argentina, Fascículo 28. PROFLORA, Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar
  275. ———. 1999. Gochnatia calophylla: A synonym of Gochnatia oligocephala (Gardner) Cabrera (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Willdenowia 29: 235–237.Google Scholar
  276. ———. 2000. Revisión y filogenia de la sección Moquiniastrum Cabrera del género Gochnatia Kunth (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Fontqueria 54: 61–122.Google Scholar
  277. ———. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Onoseris (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) inferred form morphology. Systematic Botany 29: 432–447.Google Scholar
  278. ———, S. E. Freire, L. Katinas & M. C. Tellería. 2005. A new species and a new combination in Andean Mutisieae (Asteraceae). Taxon 54: 85–90.Google Scholar
  279. Scott, L., A. Cadman & I. McMillan. 2006. Early history of Cainozoic Asteraceae along the southern African west coast. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 142: 47–52.Google Scholar
  280. Selling, O. H. 1947. Studies in Hawaiian Pollen Statistics. Part III. The Pollen of the Hawaiian Phanerogams. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Special Publication 38: 1–430.Google Scholar
  281. Simpson, B. B. 1973. Contrasting modes of evolution in two groups of Perezia (Mutisieae, Compositae) of southern South America. Taxon 22: 525–536.Google Scholar
  282. ———. 1978. Compositae, tribe Mutisieae (except Trixis). Pp. 1–10. In: C. T. Rogerson ed.), North American Flora 2. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  283. Simpson Vuilleumier, B. 1969. The systematics and evolution of Perezia section Perezia (Compositae). Contributions of the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 199: 1–163.Google Scholar
  284. Skvarla, J. J. & B. L. Turner. 1966. Systematic implications from electron microscopic studies of Compositae pollen: A review. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 53: 220–256.Google Scholar
  285. ———, B. L. Turner, V. C. Patel & A. S. Tomb. 1977. Pollen morphology in the Compositae and in morphologically related families. Pp. 141–248. In: V. H. Heywood, J. B. Harborne & B. L. Turner (eds.), The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, Vol. 1. Academic, London.Google Scholar
  286. Small, J. 1919. The origin and development of the Compositae. New Phytologist 11: 1–333.Google Scholar
  287. Southworth, D. 1983. Exine development in Gerbera jamesonii (Asteraceae: Mutisieae). American Journal of Botany 70: 1038–1047.Google Scholar
  288. Stearn, W. T. 1996. Botanical Latin: History, Grammar, Syntax, Terminology and Vocabulary. Timber, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  289. Steyermark, J. A., B. Maguire & collaborators. 1972. The Flora of Meseta del Cerro Jáua. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 23: 833–892.Google Scholar
  290. Stix, E. 1960. Pollenmorphologische Untersuchungen an Compositen. Grana Palynologica 2: 41–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  291. Stuessy, T. F., T. Sang & M. L. Devore. 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of the subfamily Barnadesioideae with implications for early evolution of the Compositae. Pp. 463–490. In: D. J. N. Hind & H. J. Beentje (eds.), Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, Vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  292. Teeri, T. H., P. Elomaa, M. Kotilainen & V. A. Albert. 2006. Mining plant diversity: Gerbera as a model system for plant developmental and biosynthetic research. BioEssays 28: 756–767.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  293. Tellería, M. C. 2008. Taxonomic significance of pollen types in the Guyana Highland-centred composite genera of Mutisioideae (Asteraceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 156: 327–340.Google Scholar
  294. ——— & A. Forcone. 2002. Morfología del polen de las mieles del valle de Río Negro, valle inferior del río Chubut y llanura del río Senguerr (Patagonia Argentina). Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 37: 235–250.Google Scholar
  295. ——— & L. Katinas. 2004. A Comparative palynologic study of Chaetanthera (Asteraceae, Mutisieae) and allied genera. Systematic Botany 29: 752–773.Google Scholar
  296. ——— & ———. 2005. The unusual occurrence of tricolpate pollen within Mutisieae (Asteraceae). Grana Palynologica 44: 91–97.Google Scholar
  297. Tellería, M. C. & L. Katinas. New insights into the pollen morphology of the genus Mutisia (Asteraceae, Mutisieae). Plant Systematics and Evolution. In press.Google Scholar
  298. ———, E. Urtubey & L. Katinas. 2003. Proustia and Lophopappus (Asteraceae, Mutisieae): Generic and subtribal relationships based on pollen morphology. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 123: 237–246.Google Scholar
  299. Thomson, T. 1865. On two new genera of Compositae Mutisiaceae from India. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 9: 342–344.Google Scholar
  300. Tormo-Molina, R. & J. L. Ubera-Jiménez. 1995. Tipos polínicos de la Tribu Cardueae en la península Ibérica. Monografías del Jardín Botánico de Córdoba 2: 1–52.Google Scholar
  301. Tseng, Y. C. 1985. Materials for Chinese Pertya (Compositae). Guihaia 5: 327–335.Google Scholar
  302. Turner, B. L. 1986. A new species of Hyaloseris (Asteraceae–Mutisieae) from Bolivia. Phytologia 59: 317–318.Google Scholar
  303. ———. 1993a. New taxa, new combinations, and nomenclatural comments on the genus Acourtia (Asteraceae: Mutisieae). Phytologia 74: 385–413.Google Scholar
  304. ———. 1993b. Berylsimpsonia (Asteraceae: Mutisieae), a new genus of the Greater Antilles. Phytologia 74: 349–355.Google Scholar
  305. Ulloa Ulloa, C. & P. M. Jørgensen. 1996. A new species of Mutisia (Compositae–Mutisieae) from Ecuador. Novon 6: 131–133.Google Scholar
  306. Urtubey, E. 1999. Revisión del género Barnadesia (Asteraceae: Barnadesioideae, Barnadesieae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 57–117.Google Scholar
  307. ——— & T. F. Stuessy. 2001. New hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships in Barnadesioideae (Asteraceae) based on morphology. Taxon 50: 1043–1063.Google Scholar
  308. ——— & M. C. Tellería. 1998. Pollen morphology of the subfamily Barnadesioideae (Asteraceae) and its phylogenetic and taxonomic implications. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 104: 19–37.Google Scholar
  309. Vezey, E. L., L. E. Watson, J. J. Skvarla & R. Estes. 1994. Plesiomorphic and apomorphic pollen structure characteristics of Anthemideae (Asteroideae: Asteraceae). Amererican Journal of Botany 81: 648–657.Google Scholar
  310. Von Bunge, A. A. 1835. Myripnois. Mémoires présentés a l’ Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg par Divers Savans et Lus dans ses Assemblées 2: 112.Google Scholar
  311. Wagenitz, G. 1955. Pollenmorphologie and Systematick in der Gattung Centaurea L. s. l. Flora 142: 213–279.Google Scholar
  312. Wagner, W. L., D. R. Herbst & S. H. Sohmer. 1990. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  313. Wilson, F. C. 1923. Revision of the genus Dicoma. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information 1923: 377–388.Google Scholar
  314. Wingenroth, M. & C. J. Heusser. 1983. Pollen of the high Andean Flora. Instituto Argentino de Nivología y Glaciología, IANIGLA, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
  315. Wodehouse, R. P. 1929a. Pollen grains in the identification and classification of plants, III. The Nassauviinae. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 56: 123–138.Google Scholar
  316. ———. 1929b. Pollen grains in the identification and classification of plants, IV. The Mutisieae. American Journal of Botany 16: 297–313.Google Scholar
  317. ———. 1935. Pollen Grains. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  318. Wortley, A. H., V. A. Funk, H. Robinson, J. J. Skvarla & S. Blackmore. 2007. A search for pollen morphological synapomorphies to classify rogue genera in Compositae (Asteraceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 146: 169–181.Google Scholar
  319. Zardini, E. M. 1974. Sobre la presencia del género Gerbera en América. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 16: 103–108.Google Scholar
  320. ———. 1975. Revisión del género Trichocline (Compositae). Darwiniana 19: 618–733.Google Scholar
  321. ———. 1980. Lulia: Un nuevo género de Compuestas. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 19: 255–258.Google Scholar
  322. Zao, Z., J. J. Skvarla, R. K. Jansen & M. De Vore. 2000. Phylogenetic implications of pollen morphology and ultrastructure in the Barnadesioideae(Asteraceae). Lundellia 3: 26–40.Google Scholar
  323. ———, ——— & ———. 2006. Mutisieae (Asteraceae) pollen ultrastructure atlas. Lundellia 9: 57–76.Google Scholar
  324. Zavada, M. S. & S. E. De Villiers. 2000. Pollen of the Asteraceae from the Paleocene–Eocene of South Africa. Grana Palynologica 39: 39–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liliana Katinas
    • 1
    Email author
  • John Pruski
    • 2
  • Gisela Sancho
    • 1
  • María Cristina Tellería
    • 3
  1. 1.División Plantas VascularesMuseo de La PlataLa PlataArgentina
  2. 2.Missouri Botanical GardenSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Laboratorio de Sistemática y Biología Evolutiva (LASBE)Museo de La PlataLa PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations