Advertisement

Brittonia

, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 418–426 | Cite as

Generic limits re-visited and an updated sectional classification for Protium (tribe Protieae). Studies in Neotropical Burseraceae XXV

  • Douglas C. Daly
  • Paul V. A. Fine
Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

In recent molecular phylogenetic work on tribe Protieae (Burseraceae) with thorough sampling, the major well-supported clades show remarkable congruence with infrageneric classifications based on morphology, but the results call for synonymizing Crepidospermum and Tetragastris with Protium, thereby making Protieae monophyletic and monogeneric under the name Protium. The necessary synonymies and a brief diagnosis for each of the eight sections of Protium are provided, and these new combinations are made: Protium balsamiferum, P. catuaba, P. chagrense, P. herbertii, P. mucronatum, P. occhionii, and P. rhynchophyllum.

Keywords

Crepidospermum phylogeny Tetragastris 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge NSF award 0918600/0919567.

Literature cited

  1. Christenhuz, J. M., M. F. Fay, J. W. Byng, E. Bidault, J. E. Burrows, F. Jabbour, V. S. F. T. Merckx & G. Stull. 2018. Plant Gateway’s the global flora: A practical flora to vascular plant species of the world. Plant Gateway Ltd., Bradford, U.K.Google Scholar
  2. Cuatrecasas, J. 1957. Prima Flora Colombiana 1. Burseraceae. Webbia 12: 375–441.Google Scholar
  3. Daly, D. C. 1989. Studies in neotropical Burseraceae II. Generic limits in Neotropical Protieae and Canarieae. Brittonia 41: 17–27.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2007. A new section of Protium Burm. f. from the Neotropics. Studies in neotropical Burseraceae XIV. Brittonia 59: 124. Google Scholar
  5. Engler, A. 1874. Burseraceae. Pages 247–294. In: C. F. P. von Martius. Flora brasiliensis. Vol. 12, pars II. Monachii.Google Scholar
  6. Fine, P. V. A., D. C. Daly, F. G. Villa M., I. Mesones A. & K. M. Cameron. 2005. The contribution of edaphic heterogeneity to the evolution and diversity of Burseraceae trees in the Western Amazon. Evolution 29: 14641478. Google Scholar
  7. Fine, P. V. A., F. Zapata & D. C. Daly. 2014. Investigating processes of Neotropical rain forest tree diversification by examining the evolution and historical biogeography of the Protieae (Burseraceae). Evolution 68: 19882004 [DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12414].
  8. Swart, J. J. 1942. A monograph of the genus Protium and some allied genera (Burseraceae). Drukkerij Koch en Knuttel, Gouda.Google Scholar
  9. Thulin, M., B. A. Beier, S. G. Razafimandimbison & H. I. Banks. 2008. Ambilobea, a new genus from Madagascar, the position of Aucoumea, and comments on the tribal classification of the frankincense and myrrh family. Nordic Journal of Botany 26: 218–229.Google Scholar
  10. Weeks, A., D. C. Daly & B. B. Simpson. 2005. The phylogenetic history and historical biogeography of the frankincense and myrrh family (Burseraceae) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 85101.Google Scholar
  11. ———. Zapata, S. K. Pell, D. C. Daly, J. D. Mitchell & P. V. A. Fine. 2014. To move or to evolve: Contrasting patterns of intercontinental connectivity and climatic niche evolution in "Terebinthaceae" (Anacardiaceae and Burseraceae). Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 5, Nov 2014, Article 409: 1–20 [DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00409].

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The New York Botanical GardenBronxUSA
  2. 2.Department of Integrative Biology and University and Jepson HerbariaUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations