, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 49–56 | Cite as

An ecologically significant new species of Dacryodes from the northern Andes. Studies in neotropical Burseraceae XV

  • Douglas C. Daly
  • David Neill
  • María Cristina Martínez-Habibe


Dacryodes uruts-kunchae is described, illustrated, and contrasted with D. steyermarkii. It is from white-sand plateaus and slopes of the sub-Andean cordilleras east of the Eastern Cordillera of the Andes in Ecuador, and from eastern foothills of the Andes in Peru. The new species is unusual for a number of reasons: (1) relatively few Burseraceae are found in tropical pre-montane and montane habitats; (2) it is dominant where it occurs, a rare phenomenon for Neotropical Dacryodes; (3) its staminate flowers show three stages in the transition from disk+pistillode to “ovariodisk”; and (4) it has relatively small, densely glandular-punctate, sclerophyllous leaflets.

Key Words

Andes Burseraceae Dacryodes Ecuador pre-montane forest neotropics Peru sclerophylly taxonomy white-sand formations 



We thank Bobbi Angell for her typically excellent illustration and the herbarium staffs at MO, NY, RSA, QCA, QCNE, and USM.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, A. B. 1981. White-sand vegetation of Brazilian Amazonia. Biotropica 13: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basnet, K. 1992. Effect of topography on the pattern of trees in tabonuco (Dacryodes excelsa) dominated rain forest of Puerto Rico. Biotropica 24: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, B. C., M. A. Baker & P. Gómez Andrade. 2002. Ethnobotany of the Shuar of Eastern Ecuador. Advances in Economic Botany 14: 1–299.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, P. E., O. Huber & B. K. Holst. 1995. Phytogeography of the Guayana Region. Pp. 170–192. In: J. A. Steyermark, P. E. Berry & B. K. Holst (eds.), Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana. Vol. 1: Introduction. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  5. Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  6. Daly, D. C. 1987. Studies in neotropical Burseraceae I. A synopsis of the genus Crepidospermum Hook. f. Brittonia 39: 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 1989. Studies in neotropical Burseraceae II. Generic limits in Neotropical Protieae and Canarieae. Brittonia 41: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 1992. New taxa and combinations in Protium Burm. f. Studies in neotropical Burseraceae VI. Brittonia 44: 280–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 1999. Notes on Trattinnickia, including a synopsis in eastern Brazil’s Atlantic forest complex. Studies in neotropical Burseraceae IX. Kew Bulletin 54 (1): 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ——— & M. C. Martínez-Habibe. 2002 (2003). Notes on Dacryodes Vahl, including a new species from the Rio Negro basin. Studies in neotropical Burseraceae XI. Brittonia 54: 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, C., J. Read & G. Sanson. 2000. Characterising sclerophylly: Some mechanical properties of leaves from heath and forest. Oecologia 123: 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fine, P. V. A., I. Mesones & P. D. Coley. 2004. Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in Amazonian forests. Science 305: 663–665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———, Z. J. Miller, I. Mesones, S. Irazuzta, H. M. Appel, M. H. H. Stevens, I. Sääksjärvi, J. C. Schultz & P. D. Coley. 2006. The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. Ecology 87 (7) Supplement: S150–S162.Google Scholar
  14. Gregory-Wodzicki, K. M. 2000. Uplift history of the central and northern Andes: A review. Geological Society of America Bulletin 112(7): 1091–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jernigan, K. 2006a. An Ethnobiological Exploration of Sensory and Ecological Aspects of Tree Identification among the Aguaruna Jívaro. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2006b. An ethnobotanical investigation of tree identification by the Aguaruna Jívaro of the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Ethnobiology 26 (1): 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lam, H. J. 1932. The Burseraceae of the Malay Archipelago and Peninsula. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg, Série 3, 12: 281–561.Google Scholar
  18. Neill, D. A. 2007. Floristic inventory of the Cordillera del Cóndor, Ecuador and Peru. Posted November, 2007
  19. Rzedowski, J., R. Medina & G. Calderón de Rzedowski. 2004. Las especies de Bursera (Burseraceae) en la cuenca superior del río Papaloapan (México). Acta Botanica Mexicana 66: 23–147.Google Scholar
  20. Turner, I. M. 1994. Sclerophylly: primarily protective? Functional Ecology 8: 669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas C. Daly
    • 1
  • David Neill
    • 2
  • María Cristina Martínez-Habibe
    • 3
  1. 1.The New York Botanical GardenBronxU.S.A.
  2. 2.Missouri Botanical GardenSt. LouisU.S.A.
  3. 3.Rancho Santa Ana Botanic GardenClaremontU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations