Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 1–3 | Cite as

Coppicing systems as a way of understanding patterns in forest vegetation

  • Radim Hédl
  • Jörg Ewald
  • Markus Bernhardt-Römermann
  • Keith Kirby
Article

Keywords

biodiversity forest management restoration vegetation dynamics traditional coppicing 

References

  1. Baeten L, Bauwens B, De Schrijver, A, De Keersmaeker L, Van Calster H, Vandekerkhove K, Roelandt B, Beeckman H, Verheyen K (2009) Herb layer changes (1954–2000) related to the conversion of coppice- with- standards forest and soil acidification. Appl Veg Sci 12:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartha S, Merolli A, Campetella G, Canullo R (2008) Changes of vascular plant diversity along a chronosequence of beech coppice stands, central Apennines, Italy. Pl Biosyst 142:572–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley GP, Mills J (2015a) Coppice silviculture: from the mesolithic to 21st century. In Kirby KJ, Watkins C (eds) Europe's changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes. CABI, Wallingford, pp 77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley GP, Mills J (2015b) The flora and fauna of coppice woods: winners and losers of active management or neglect. In Kirby KJ, Watkins C (eds) Europe's changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes. CABI, Wallingford, pp 129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canullo R, Simonetti E, Cervellini M, Chelli S, Bartha S, Wellstein C, Campetella G (2017) Unravelling mechanisms of short-term vegetation dynamics in complex coppice forest systems. Folia Geobot doi:10.1007/s12224-016-9264-x
  6. Erfanifard and Sheikholeslami (2017) Competitive interactions of Persian oak coppice trees (Quercus brantii var. persica) in a pure dry woodland revealed through point pattern analysis. Folia Geobot doi:10.1007/s12224-017-9293-0
  7. Hédl R, Šipoš J, Chudomelová M, Utinek D (2017) Dynamics of herbaceous vegetation during four years of experimental coppice introduction. Folia Geobot doi:10.1007/s12224-016-9281-9
  8. Hölscher D, Schade E, Leuschner C (2001) Effects of coppicing in temperate deciduous forests on ecosystem nutrient pools and soil fertility. Basic Appl Ecol 2:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hopkins JJ, Kirby KJ (2007) Ecological change in British broadleaved woodland since 1947. Ibis 149(suppl. 2):29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirby KJ, Buckley GP, Mills J (2017) Biodiversity implications of coppice decline, transformations to high forest and coppice restoration in British woodland. Folia Geobot doi:10.1007/s12224-016-9252-1
  11. Kopecký M, Hédl R, Szabó P (2013) Non-random extinctions dominate plant community changes in abandoned coppices. J Appl Ecol 50:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roleček J, Vild O, Sladký J, Řepka R (2017) Habitat requirements of endangered species in a former coppice of high conservation value. Folia Geobot doi:10.1007/s12224-016-9276-6
  13. Salomón R, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, González-Doncel I, Gil L, Valbuena-Carabaña M (2017) On the general failure of coppice conversion into high forest in Quercus pyrenaica stands: a genetic and physiological approach. Folia Geobot doi:10.1007/s12224-016-9257-9
  14. Szabó P, Müllerová J, Suchánková S, Kotačka M (2015) Intensive woodland management in the Middle Ages: spatial modelling based on archival data. J Hist Geogr 48:1–10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Šebesta J, Maděra P, Řepka R, Matula R (2017) Comparison of vascular plant diversity and species composition of coppice and high beech forest in the Banat region, Romania. Folia Geobot doi:10.1007/s12224-016-9279-3
  16. Šipoš J, Hédl R, Hula V, Chudomelová M, Košulič O, Niedobová J, Riedl V (2017) Patterns of functional diversity of two trophic groups after canopy thinning in an abandoned coppice. Folia Geobot doi;10.1007/s12224-017-9282-3
  17. Van Calster H, Baeten L, Schrijver A, Keersmaeker L, Rogister LE, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2007) Management driven changes (1967–2005) in soil acidity and the understorey plant community following conversion of a coppice-with-standards forest. Forest Ecol Managem 241:258–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Volařík D, Svátek M, Šenfeldr M, Kučera A, Šrámek M, Dreslerová J, Matula R (2017) Variation in canopy openness among main structural types of woody vegetation in a traditionally managed landscape. Folia Geobot doi:10.1007/s12224-016-9280-x
  19. Vrška T, Motta R, Mosseler A (eds) (2016) Is there a place for coppicing as a silvicultural system in the 21th century? iForest, on-line material. Available at http://www.sisef.it/iforest/pdf/COPCZ_introduction.pdf

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radim Hédl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jörg Ewald
    • 3
  • Markus Bernhardt-Römermann
    • 4
  • Keith Kirby
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Vegetation EcologyInstitute of Botany, Czech Academy of SciencesBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Botany, Faculty of SciencePalacký UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic
  3. 3.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan-TriesdorfFreisingGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Ecology, Friedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  5. 5.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations