Effects of the hydroedaphic gradient on tree species composition and aboveground wood biomass of oligotrophic forest ecosystems in the central Amazon basin
- 297 Downloads
Amazonian forests in black-water floodplains (igapó) and upon hydromorphic white-sand soils (campinarana) cover at least 500,000 km2 of the area of the Amazon basin, but are poorly investigated ecosystems. We compared variation in tree species richness and composition (≥ 10 cm diameter at breast height), as well as forest structure and aboveground wood biomass (AGB) along hydroedaphic gradients in an igapó and a campinarana in the central Brazilian Amazon, in an area totalling 6 ha. Inundation height (igapó) and groundwater level oscillations (campinarana) were monitored during a one year period. Soil grain sizes and chemical variables were analysed. Variation in tree species composition was assessed using non-metric multidimensional scaling, and soil parameters using principal component analysis. The influence of hydroedaphic gradients on tree species richness, composition and AGB was investigated using partial and multiple regression analyses. Significant differences in soil texture, soil chemical variables, and tree species richness and composition were detected between both forest types, while AGB amounted to similar values, ranging from 141 ± 62 Mg·ha−1 in the igapó to 164 ± 121 Mg·ha−1 in the campinarana. Although both forest types were floristically distinct, inundations in the igapó and groundwater table oscillations in the campinarana influenced patterns of species richness and forest structure in similar ways, indicating decreasing species richness, forest stature and AGB in plots subjected to higher inundations and/or groundwater levels. Given the comparatively low AGB in the ecosystems studied, we call attention to the need for more studies in oligotrophic ecosystems of the Amazon basin with emphasis on their contribution to global carbon cycles.
KeywordsAmazon flood-pulse groundwater level soil texture white sand forest
This work was performed within the frame of the German-Brazilian ATTO project and supported by the federal governments (grant No. MCTI-FINEP 1759/10; grant No. BMBF 01LB1001A). We acknowledge the fundamental support by the Max Planck Society, INPA and UEA. We thank the Amazonas State SDS/CEUC-RDS Uatumã, MAUA Group (Monitoring of Amazonian Wetlands, INPA/Max Planck, Manaus, Brazil) and CAPES.
- Centro Estadual de Unidades de Conservação (CEUC) (2009) Coletânia de Unidades de Conservação no Estado do Amazonas: leis, decretos e portarias. CEUC/SDSGoogle Scholar
- Coomes DA (1997) Nutrient status of Amazonian caatinga forests in a seasonally dry area: nutrient fluxes in litter fall and analyses of soils. Canad J Forest Res 27:831–839Google Scholar
- DeWalt SJ, Chave J (2004) Structure and biomass of four lowland Neotropical forests. Biotropica 36:7–19Google Scholar
- Embrapa-Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (1997) Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa d Solos, Rio de Janeiro Google Scholar
- Hougton RA, Lawrence KT, Hackler JL, Brown S (2001) The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: A comparison of estimates. Global Change Bio 7:731--746Google Scholar
- IBGE (2012) Mapas Temáticos. Available at www.mapas.ibge.gov.br/tematicos
- Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canad Spec Publ Fish Aquatic Sci 106:110–127Google Scholar
- Klinge H, Medina E (1979) Rio negro caatingas and campinas, Amazonas States of Venezuela and Brazil. In: Specht RL (ed) Heatlands and related shrublands. Ecosystems of the world. Vol. 9a. Elsevier Amsterdam, pp 483–488Google Scholar
- Mitch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 4th edition. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Prance GT (1975) Estudos sobre a vegetação das Campinas Amazônicas – I. Introdução a uma série de publicações sobre a vegetação das Campinas Amazônicas. Acta Amazon 5:207–209Google Scholar
- Prance GT, Daly D (1985) Brazilian Amazon. In: Campbell DG, Hammond HD (eds) Floristic inventory of tropical countries. New York Botanical Garden Press, pp 523–533Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: the R Foundation f Statistical Computing. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Availabe online at http://www.R-project.org/.
- Schöngart J, Wittmann F, Worbes M (2010) Biomass and net primary production of Central Amazonian floodplains forests. In: Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Wittmann F et al. (eds) Amazonian floodplain forests: ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management. Springer New York, pp 347–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sioli H (1954) Beiträge zur regionalen Limnologie des Amazonasgebietes. Arch Hydrobiol 45:267–283Google Scholar
- Takeuchi M (1960) A estrutura da vegetação na Amazônia: III – A mata de campina na região do rio Negro. Bol. Mus. Paraense “Emilio Goeldi” 8:1–13Google Scholar
- Veloso HP, Rangel Filho ARL, Lima JCA (1991) Classificação da vegetação Brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
- Vicentini A (2004) A vegetação ao longo de um gradiente edáfico no Parque Nacional do Jaú. In: Borges SH, Iwanaga S, Durigan CC, Pinheiro MR (eds) Janelas para a biodiversidade no Parque Nacional do Jaú: uma estratégia para o estudo da biodiversidade na Amazônia. Fundação Vitória Amazônica/WWF/IBAMA Manaus, pp 117–143Google Scholar
- Wittmann F, Schöngart J, Junk WJ (2010) Phytogeography, species diversity, community structure and dynamics of Central Amazonian floodplain forests. In: Junk WJ, Piedade MTF., Wittmann F et al. (eds) Amazonian floodplain forests: ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management. Springer New York, pp 61–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Worbes M (1989) Growth rings, increment and age of tree in inundation forest, savannas and a mountain forest in the Neotropics. I A W A Bull 10:109–122Google Scholar