Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 185–205 | Cite as

Effects of the hydroedaphic gradient on tree species composition and aboveground wood biomass of oligotrophic forest ecosystems in the central Amazon basin

  • Natália TarghettaEmail author
  • Jürgen Kesselmeier
  • Florian Wittmann


Amazonian forests in black-water floodplains (igapó) and upon hydromorphic white-sand soils (campinarana) cover at least 500,000 km2 of the area of the Amazon basin, but are poorly investigated ecosystems. We compared variation in tree species richness and composition (≥ 10 cm diameter at breast height), as well as forest structure and aboveground wood biomass (AGB) along hydroedaphic gradients in an igapó and a campinarana in the central Brazilian Amazon, in an area totalling 6 ha. Inundation height (igapó) and groundwater level oscillations (campinarana) were monitored during a one year period. Soil grain sizes and chemical variables were analysed. Variation in tree species composition was assessed using non-metric multidimensional scaling, and soil parameters using principal component analysis. The influence of hydroedaphic gradients on tree species richness, composition and AGB was investigated using partial and multiple regression analyses. Significant differences in soil texture, soil chemical variables, and tree species richness and composition were detected between both forest types, while AGB amounted to similar values, ranging from 141 ± 62 Mg·ha−1 in the igapó to 164 ± 121 Mg·ha−1 in the campinarana. Although both forest types were floristically distinct, inundations in the igapó and groundwater table oscillations in the campinarana influenced patterns of species richness and forest structure in similar ways, indicating decreasing species richness, forest stature and AGB in plots subjected to higher inundations and/or groundwater levels. Given the comparatively low AGB in the ecosystems studied, we call attention to the need for more studies in oligotrophic ecosystems of the Amazon basin with emphasis on their contribution to global carbon cycles.


Amazon flood-pulse groundwater level soil texture white sand forest 



This work was performed within the frame of the German-Brazilian ATTO project and supported by the federal governments (grant No. MCTI-FINEP 1759/10; grant No. BMBF 01LB1001A). We acknowledge the fundamental support by the Max Planck Society, INPA and UEA. We thank the Amazonas State SDS/CEUC-RDS Uatumã, MAUA Group (Monitoring of Amazonian Wetlands, INPA/Max Planck, Manaus, Brazil) and CAPES.


  1. Baker TR, Phillips OL, Malhi Y et al. (2004a) Increasing biomass in Amazonian forest plots. Philos Trans, Ser B 359:353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker TR, Phillips OL, Malhi Y et al. (2004b) Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns in Amazonian forest biomass. Global Change Biol 10:545–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baraloto C, Rabaud S, Molto Q et al. (2011) Disentangling stand and environmental correlates of aboveground biomass in Amazonian forests. Global Change Biol 17:2677–2688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa RI, Ferreira CAC (2004) Biomassa acima do solo de um ecossistema de “campina” em Roraima, norte da Amazônia Brasileira. Acta Amazon 34:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown S (2002) Measuring, monitoring, and verification of carbon benefits for forest-based projects. Philos Trans, Ser A 360:1669–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cannel MGR (1984) Woody biomass of forest stands. Forest Ecol Managem 8:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Centro Estadual de Unidades de Conservação (CEUC) (2009) Coletânia de Unidades de Conservação no Estado do Amazonas: leis, decretos e portarias. CEUC/SDSGoogle Scholar
  9. Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, et al. (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Coomes DA (1997) Nutrient status of Amazonian caatinga forests in a seasonally dry area: nutrient fluxes in litter fall and analyses of soils. Canad J Forest Res 27:831–839Google Scholar
  11. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1951) An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32:476–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damasco G, Vicentini A, Castilho CV et al. (2013) Disentangling the role of edaphic variability, flooding regime and topography of Amazonian white-sand vegetation. J Veg Sci 24:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeWalt SJ, Chave J (2004) Structure and biomass of four lowland Neotropical forests. Biotropica 36:7–19Google Scholar
  14. Embrapa-Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (1997) Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa d Solos, Rio de Janeiro Google Scholar
  15. Fearnside PM (1997) Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecol Managem 90:59–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferreira LV (1997) Effects of the duration of flooding on species richness and floristic composition in three hectares in the Jaú National Park in floodplain forests in central Amazonia. Biodivers & Conservation 6:1353–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fine PVA, Mesones I, Coley PD (2004) Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in Amazonian forests. Science 305:663–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fine PVA, García-Villacorta R, Pitman NCA, et al. (2010) A floristic study of the white-sand forests of Peru. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 97:283–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher AA, Corbet AS, Williams CB (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J Anim Ecol 12:42–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frangi JL, Lugo AE (1985) Ecosystem dynamics of a subtropical floodplain forest. Ecol Monogr 55:351–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haugaasen T, Peres CA (2006) Floristic, edaphic and structural characteristics of flooded and unflooded forests in the lower Rio Purus region of central Amazonia, Brazil. Acta Amazon 36:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Houghton RA, Skole DL, Nobre CA, et al. (2000) Annual fluxes from carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature 403:301–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hougton RA, Lawrence KT, Hackler JL, Brown S (2001) The spatial distribution of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: A comparison of estimates. Global Change Bio 7:731--746Google Scholar
  24. Houghton RA (2005) Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance. Global Change Biol 11:945–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hultine KR, Dudley TJ, Leavitt SW (2013) Herbivory-induced mortality increases with radial growth in an invasive riparian phreatophyte. Ann Bot 111:1197–1206PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. IBGE (2012) Mapas Temáticos. Available at
  27. Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canad Spec Publ Fish Aquatic Sci 106:110–127Google Scholar
  28. Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Schöngart J, et al. (2011) A classification of major naturally-occurring Amazonian lowland wetlands. Wetlands 31:623–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klinge H, Herrera R (1983) Phytomass structure of natural plant communities on spodosols in southern Venezuela: The tall Amazon Caatinga forest. Vegetatio 53:65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klinge H, Medina E (1979) Rio negro caatingas and campinas, Amazonas States of Venezuela and Brazil. In: Specht RL (ed) Heatlands and related shrublands. Ecosystems of the world. Vol. 9a. Elsevier Amsterdam, pp 483–488Google Scholar
  31. Kubitzki K (1989) The ecogeographical differentiation of Amazonia inundation forests. Plant Syst Evol 162:285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laurance WF, Fearnside PM, Laurance SG et al. (1999) Relationship between soils and Amazon forest biomass: a landscape-scale study. Forest Ecol Managem 188:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malhi Y, Baker TR, Phillips OL et al. (2004) The above-ground coarse wood productivity of 104 neotropical forest plots. Global Change Biol 10:563–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malhi Y, Wood D, Baker TR et al. (2006) The regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old-growth Amazonian forests. Global Change Biol 12:1107–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Medina E, Sobrado M, Herrera R (1978) Significance of leaf orientation for leaf temperature in an Amazonian sclerophyll vegetation. Radiat Environm Biophys 15:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 4th edition. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Melack JM, Hess LL (2010) Remote sensing of the distribution and extent of wetlands in the Amazonian basin. In: Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Wittmann F et al. (eds) Amazonian floodplain forests: ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management. Springer New York, pp 43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nebel G, Kvist LP, Vanclay JL, et al. (2001) Structure and floristic composition of flood plain forests in the Peruvian Amazon I. Overstorey. Forest Ecol Managem 150:27–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paoli GD, Curran LM, Slik JWF (2008) Soil nutrients affect spatial patterns of aboveground biomass and emergent tree density in southwestern Borneo. Oecologia 155:287–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Parolin P, De Simone O, Haase K et al. (2004) Central Amazonian floodplain forests: tree adaptations in a pulsing system. Bot Rev 70:357–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parolin P, Lucas C, Piedade MTF, et al. (2009) Drought responses of flood-tolerant trees in Amazonian floodplains. Ann Bot 105:129–139PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prance GT (1975) Estudos sobre a vegetação das Campinas Amazônicas – I. Introdução a uma série de publicações sobre a vegetação das Campinas Amazônicas. Acta Amazon 5:207–209Google Scholar
  43. Prance GT, Daly D (1985) Brazilian Amazon. In: Campbell DG, Hammond HD (eds) Floristic inventory of tropical countries. New York Botanical Garden Press, pp 523–533Google Scholar
  44. Quesada CA, Lloyd J, Schwarz M, et al. (2010) Variations in chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis. Biogeosciences 7:1515–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: the R Foundation f Statistical Computing. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Availabe online at
  46. Saatchi SS, Houghton RA, Dos Santos Alvalá RC, et al. (2007) Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin. Global Change Biol 13:816–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schöngart J, Piedade MTF, Wittmann F, et al. (2005) Wood growth patterns of Macrolobium acaciifolium (Benth.) Benth. (Fabaceae) in Amazonian black-water and white-water floodplain forests. Oecologia 145:454–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Schöngart J, Wittmann F, Worbes M (2010) Biomass and net primary production of Central Amazonian floodplains forests. In: Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Wittmann F et al. (eds) Amazonian floodplain forests: ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management. Springer New York, pp 347–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schöngart J, Arieira J, Felfili Fortes C, et al. (2011) Age-related and stand-wise estimates of carbon stocks and sequestration in the aboveground coarse wood biomass of wetland forests in the northern Pantanal, Brazil. Biogeosciences 8:3407–3421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sioli H (1954) Beiträge zur regionalen Limnologie des Amazonasgebietes. Arch Hydrobiol 45:267–283Google Scholar
  51. Sollins P (1998) Factors influencing species composition in tropical lowland rain forest: Does soil matter? Ecology 79:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stropp J, Van Der Sleen P, Assunção PA, et al. (2011) Tree communities of white-sand and terra-firme forests of the upper Rio Negro. Acta Amazon 41:521–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Takeuchi M (1960) A estrutura da vegetação na Amazônia: III – A mata de campina na região do rio Negro. Bol. Mus. Paraense “Emilio Goeldi” 8:1–13Google Scholar
  54. Veloso HP, Rangel Filho ARL, Lima JCA (1991) Classificação da vegetação Brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  55. Vicentini A (2004) A vegetação ao longo de um gradiente edáfico no Parque Nacional do Jaú. In: Borges SH, Iwanaga S, Durigan CC, Pinheiro MR (eds) Janelas para a biodiversidade no Parque Nacional do Jaú: uma estratégia para o estudo da biodiversidade na Amazônia. Fundação Vitória Amazônica/WWF/IBAMA Manaus, pp 117–143Google Scholar
  56. Wittmann F, Junk WJ (2003) Sapling communities in Amazonian white-water forests. J Biogeogr 30:1533–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wittmann F, Junk WJ, Piedade MTF (2004) The várzea forests in Amazonia: flooding and the highly dynamic geomorphology interact with natural natural forest succession. Forest Ecol Managem 196:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wittmann F, Parolin P (2005) Aboveground roots in Amazonian floodplain trees. Biotropica 37:609–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wittmann F, Zorzi BT, Tizianel FAT, et al. (2008) Tree species composition, structure and aboveground wood biomass of a riparian forest of the lower Miranda River, Southern Pantanal, Brazil. Folia Geobot 43:397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wittmann F, Schöngart J, Junk WJ (2010) Phytogeography, species diversity, community structure and dynamics of Central Amazonian floodplain forests. In: Junk WJ, Piedade MTF., Wittmann F et al. (eds) Amazonian floodplain forests: ecophysiology, biodiversity and sustainable management. Springer New York, pp 61–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wittmann F, Householder E, Piedade MTF et al. (2013) Habitat specifity, endemism and the neotropical distribution of Amazonian white-water floodplain trees. Ecography 36:690–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Worbes M (1989) Growth rings, increment and age of tree in inundation forest, savannas and a mountain forest in the Neotropics. I A W A Bull 10:109–122Google Scholar
  63. Worbes M (1997) The forest ecosystem of the floodplains. In: Junk WJ (ed) The central Amazon floodplain: ecology of a pulsing system. Springer New York, pp 223–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zanchi FB, Waterloo MJ, Dolmann AJ et al. (2011) Influence of drainage status on soil and water chemistry, litter decomposition and soil respiration in central Amazonian forests on sandy soils. Rev Amb Água 6:6–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natália Targhetta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jürgen Kesselmeier
    • 2
  • Florian Wittmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em EcologiaManausBrazil
  2. 2.Biogeochemistry DepartmentMax Planck Institute for ChemistryMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations