Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 559–577 | Cite as

Changes in the Distribution of European Mistletoe (Viscum album) in Hungary During the Last Hundred Years

  • Ildikó Varga
  • Péter Poczai
  • Viktor Tiborcz
  • Nikolett Réka Aranyi
  • Tivadar Baltazár
  • Dénes Bartha
  • Miloš Pejchal
  • Jaakko Hyvönen
Article

Abstract

The hemiparasitic European mistletoe (Viscum album) from the family Viscaceae (Santalaceae s.l.) is able to infest more than 380 woody taxa in Europe. At the beginning of the 20th century, less than 10 % of Hungary was infested. The distribution area was centralized in the Transdanubian Mountains, and no mass occurrence was noticed elsewhere. Since then, the infested area has almost tripled, and heavily infested forests can be observed in numerous parts of Hungary, especially in the northeast area of the Hungarian Great Plain. However, the central region of the Hungarian Great Plain is still uninfested. In the North Hungarian Mountains, where the presence of potential hosts is very frequent, mistletoe is still quite rare. The most infested macroregion of Hungary is Western Transdanubia, the only region where all three different subspecies can be found. No significant changes have been observed in the proportions of the most common hosts in the last 90 years, with poplars (Populus spp.) and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) still being the most frequently infested species. Silver maple (Acer saccharinum) is now a heavily infested host in city parks, while the abundance of infested apple (Malus spp.) and pear (Pyrus spp.) trees has decreased with the transformation of cultivation techniques. In infested areas, nine to twelve of the most common 18 host species can be found, while only five to eight species can be observed in uninfested areas. The increased mistletoe occurrence can be attributed to several factors, including human impact, larger forest area and a growing number of breeding pairs of the mistle thrush (Turdus viscivorus).

Keywords

distribution map habitats hemiparasite Hungarian macroregions Viscum album 

Supplementary material

12224_2014_9193_MOESM1_ESM.doc (266 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 266 kb)

References

  1. Apáti F (2007a) Az intenzív almatermelés gazdaságossága. (The economics of intensive apple production method.) In Nyéki J, Soltész M, Szabó Z (eds) Ökológiai szemléletű integrált gyümölcstermesztés. InterClaster Szolgáltató Kht., Kecskemét pp 81–98Google Scholar
  2. Apáti F (2007b) A jó színvonalú magyar és német almatermesztés összehasonlító gazdasági elemzése. (The Comparative Economic Analysis Of Hungarian And German Apple Production Of Good Standard.) PhD Thesis. University of Debrecen, Debrecen, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  3. Aukema JE (2003) Vectors, viscin, and Viscaceae: mistletoes as parasites, mutualists, and resources. Front Ecol Environ 1 (3): 212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balsay S (1986) Léprigó (Turdus viscivorus) fészkelése a Hanságban. (The nesting of mistletoe thrush (Turdus viscivorus) in Hanság.) Madártani tájékoztató 24–25Google Scholar
  5. Barbu CO (2007) Aspecte privind atacul produs de vâsc (Viscum album abietis) în brâdete. In: Abrudan IV, Spãrchez G, Oprea I, Simon D, Ignea G, Chitea G. (eds) Lucrările sesiunii ştiinţifice bienale cu participare internaţională Pădurea şi Dezvoltarea Durabilă Braşov, Romania. 183–188Google Scholar
  6. Barbu I (1991) Silver fir dieback. A symptom of the environment degradation. Ed Ceres, Bucureşti. 276Google Scholar
  7. Barney CW, Hawksworth FG, Geils BW (1998) Hosts of Viscum album. Eur J For Path 28: 187–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartha D (2012) Dendrológia. (Dendrology). University of West Hungary Press, Sopron, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartha D, Mátyás Cs. (1995) Erdei fa- és cserjefajok előfordulása Magyarországon. (Occurrence of forest trees and shrubs in Hungary.) Sopron, Hungary, EFE PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker H (2000) European mistletoe: Taxonomy, Host trees, Parts used, Physiology. In Büssing A (ed) Mistletoe: The genus Viscum. Hardwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam. pp 31–44Google Scholar
  11. Böhling N, Greuter W, Raus T, Snogerup B, Songerup S, Zuber D (2003) Notes on the Cretan mistletoe, Viscum album subsp. creticum subsp. nova (Loranthaceae/Viscaceae). Israel J Pl Sci 50 (Suppl.):77–84Google Scholar
  12. Boros Á (1926) Kiegészítő adatok a fehér fagyöngy hazai elterjedéséhez. (Additional data to the domestical distribution of European mistletoe in Hungary.) Erdészeti Kutatások 29: 64–66Google Scholar
  13. Briggs J (2011) Mistletoe (Viscum album): A brief review of its local status with recent observations on its insects associations and conservation problems. Proc Cotteswold Natur Fld Club 45: 181–193Google Scholar
  14. Dobbertin M, Hilker N, Rebetez M, Zimmermann NE, Wohlgemuth T, Rigling A (2005) The upward shift in altitude of pine mistletoe (Viscum album ssp. austriacum) in Switzerland – the result of climate warming? Int J Biometeorol 50: 40–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. FloraWeb (2013) http://www.floraweb.de. Accessed at 26.7.2013
  16. Gencsi L, Vancsura R (1992) Dendrológia. (Dendrology). Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagemeijer EJM, Blair MJ (1997) The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. T and A D Poyser, London pp 552–553Google Scholar
  18. Grundmann BM, Pietzarka U, Roloff A (2010) Viscum album L. Enzyclopedia Of Woody Plants 56: 1–23Google Scholar
  19. Halász A (1994) A magyar erdészet 70 éve számokban: 1920–1990. (The last 70 years of Hungarian forest management in number: 1920–1990). FM Erdészeti Szolgálat, Budapest pp 29–30Google Scholar
  20. Hawksworth FG (1983) Mistletoes as forest parasites. In: Calder M, Bernhardt P (eds) The biology of mistletoes. Acad. Press Sydney, Australia. pp 317–333Google Scholar
  21. Hirka A, Janik G (2009) A fehér fagyöngy (Viscum album L.) és a sárga fagyöngy (Loranthus europeaus Jacq.) életmódja és jelentősége Magyarországon. (Life history and importance of mistletoes (Viscum album L. and Loranthus europeaus Jacq.) in Hungary). Növényvédelem 45 (4): 179–183Google Scholar
  22. Horváth G (1917) Fagyöngyön élő rovarok. (Insects living on European mistletoe.) Rovartani Lapok 24:180–181Google Scholar
  23. Hungarian Bird Monitoring Centre (MME Monitoring Központ) Online Database (2013): http://www.mme.hu; http://www.mme-monitoring.hu/birds.php?huring=TURVIS
  24. Idžojtić M, Pernar R, Glavaš M, Zebec M, Diminić D (2008) The incidence of mistletoe (Viscum album ssp. abietis) on silver fir (Abies alba) in Croatia. Biologia 63 (1): 81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iversen J (1944) Viscum, Hedera and Ilex as climate indicators. Geol För Förh Stockh 66: 463–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jandrasits L (2011) Fungal diseases of protected plant species and of white mistletoe in the National Park of Őrség. PhD Thesis, University of Pannonia, Keszthely, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  27. de Jong YSDM (2013) Fauna Europaea version 2.6. Web service available online at http://www.faunaeur.org
  28. Juhász L (1995) Léprigó (Turdus viscivorus) fészkelése Debrecenben. (The nesting of mistletoe thrush (Turdus viscivorus) in Debrecen.) Calandrella 9: 100–101Google Scholar
  29. Kasza F (1983) Léprigó (Turdus viscivorus) nyári előfordulása Somogyszob környékén. (The summer appearance of mistletoe thrush (Turdus viscivorus) around Somogyszob). Madártani tájékoztató 37Google Scholar
  30. Király G, Balogh L, Barina Z, Bartha D, Bauer N, Bodonczi L, Dancza I, Farkas S, Galambos I, Gulyás G, Molnár VA, Nagy J, Pifkó D, Schmotzer A, Somlyay L, Szmoard F, Vidéki R, Vojtkó A, Zólyomi Sz (2003) A magyarországi flóratérképezés módszertani alapjai, útmutató és magyarázat a hálótérképezési adatlapok használatához. (The methodical bases of Hungarian Flora Mapping System and the explanation to the use of the mapping data.) Flora Pannonica 1: 3–20Google Scholar
  31. Kołodziejek J, Patykowski J, Kołodziejek R (2013) Distribution, frequency and host patterns of European mistletoe (Viscum album subsp. album) in the major city of Lodz, Poland. Biologia 68 (1): 55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koltay A (2005) Az erdők egészségi állapota- új növényi betegségek megjelenése. (Forest health condition and the appearance of new plant pathogens.) X. Tiszántúli Növényvédelmi Fórum, Hungary 130–140Google Scholar
  33. Kottek P (2008) Magyarország Erdőállományai 2006. (Forests in Hungary in 2006). Mezőgazdasági Szakigazgatási Hivatal Központ Erdészeti Igazgatósága, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  34. Kubát K (1997) Viscum L. – jmelí. In: Slavík B (ed) Květena České republiky. Academia, Praha. 5: 470–473Google Scholar
  35. Kuhbier H (1997) Misteln (Viscum album L.) in Nordwest-Deutschland. Osnabrücker Naturwiss Mitt 23: 187–197Google Scholar
  36. Marosi S, Somogyi S (1990) Magyarország kistájainak katasztere I–II. (Cadastres of Hungarian microregios I–II.) MTA Földrajztudományi Kutató Intézet, Budapest 1023Google Scholar
  37. Nickrent DL, Malécot V, Vidal-Russell R, Der JR (2010) A revised classification of Santalales. Taxon 59: 538–558Google Scholar
  38. Niklfeld H (1971) Bericht über die Kartierung der Flora Mitteleuropas. Taxon 20: 545–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Overton JM (1994) Dispersal and infection in mistletoe metapopulation. J Ecol 82: 711–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plagnat F (1950) The Fir Mistletoe, Viscum album f. sp. abietis. Ann Ec Eaux For Nancy12: 155–231Google Scholar
  41. Reid N, Lange RT (1988) Host specificity, dispersion and persistence through drought of two arid zone mistletoes. Aust J Bot 36: 299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roth Gy (1926) A fehér fagyöngy (Viscum album L.) elterjedése hazánkban. (Domestical distribution of European mistletoe ((Viscum album L.) in Hungary.) Erdészeti Kutatások 29: 44–63Google Scholar
  43. Skre O (1979) The regional distribution of vascular plants in Scandinavia with requirements for high summer temperatures. Norw J Bot 26: 295–318Google Scholar
  44. Szabó T (2006) Az almatermesztés helyzete és kilátásai Magyarországon. (The current status and the future of Hungarian apple production.) Őstermelő-gazdálkodók Lapja 6: 38–40Google Scholar
  45. Tsopelas P, Angelopoulos A, Economou A, Soulioti N (2004) Mistletoe (Viscum album) in the fir forest of Mount Parnis, Greece. For Ecol Manage 202: 59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tubeuf K von (1923) Monographie der Mistel. R. Oldenbourg, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  47. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb (1964-80) Flora Europaea, Vols 1-5. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wangerin W (1937) Loranthaceae. In: Kirchner Ov, Loew E, Schroeter C (eds) Lebensgeschichte der Blütenpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Ulmer, Stuttgart 2: 953–1146Google Scholar
  49. Watson D M (2001) Mistletoe-a keystone resource in forests and woodlands worldwide. Annu Rev Ecol System 32: 219–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zalai T, Haracsi T (2008) Magyarország madarainak névjegyzéke – Nomenclator Avium Hungariae. (List of bird species in Hungary – Nomenclator Avium Hungariae.) Magyar Madártani és Természetvédelmi Egyesület, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  51. Zuber D (2004) Biological flora of Central Europe: Viscum album L. Flora 199:181–203Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ildikó Varga
    • 1
  • Péter Poczai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Viktor Tiborcz
    • 3
  • Nikolett Réka Aranyi
    • 4
  • Tivadar Baltazár
    • 5
  • Dénes Bartha
    • 3
  • Miloš Pejchal
    • 5
  • Jaakko Hyvönen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiosciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Botanical MuseumUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of Botany and Nature Conservation, Faculty of ForestryUniversity of West HungarySopronHungary
  4. 4.Department of Plant Sciences and Biotechnology, Georgikon FacultyUniversity of PannoniaKeszthelyHungary
  5. 5.Department of Planting Design and Maintenance, Faculty of Horticulture in LedniceMendel University in BrnoLedniceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations