Folia Microbiologica

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 315–320 | Cite as

Plasma discharge and time-dependence of its effect to bacteria

  • I. Justan
  • L. CernohorskaEmail author
  • Z. Dvorak
  • P. Slavicek


Several types of plasma discharge have been proven to have a capacity for sterilization. Our goal is to introduce new nonthermal plasma pencil. We used it to sterilize different microbial populations with differing ages. We used a plasma discharge of the following characteristics: radio frequency barrier discharger at atmospheric pressure with a working frequency of 13.56 MHz, and the working gas used was argon. We performed 110 tests with the following microbial populations: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus species, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. All populations were inoculated on the previous day and also on the day of our experiment. We made our evaluations the following day and also after 5 days, with all our microbial populations. Eradication of microbial populations is dependent on the plasma discharge exposure time in all cases. With regard to freshly inoculated microbes, we were able to sterilize agar with intensive exposure lasting for 10 s of colonies Pseudomonas, Proteus, and Klebsiella. The most resistant microbe seems to be S. aureus, which survives 5 s of coherent exposure in half of the cases. Using the lightest plasma discharge exposure, we achieved a maximum of 104–105 CFU/mL (colony-forming unit — CFU). Regarding older microbial populations inoculated the day before the experiment, we can only decrease population growth to 105 CFU/mL approximately, but never completely sterilize. The plasma discharge with our characteristics could be used for the sterilization of the aforementioned superficially growing microbes, but does not sufficiently affect deeper layers and thus seems to be a limitation for eradication of the already erupted colonies.


Plasma Discharge Blood Agar Dielectric Barrier Discharge Normal Exposure Nonthermal Plasma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research has been partially supported by grant 202/09/2064 from the Czech Science Foundation and by the research intent MSM: 0021622411 funding from the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic and by the contract KAN101630651 from Grant Agency of Academy of Science of Czech Republic.


  1. Bogle MA, Arndt KA, Dover JS (2007) Plasma skin regeneration technology. J Drugs Dermatol 6(11):1110–1112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Conrads H, Schmidt M (2000) Plasma generation and plasma sources. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 9:441–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ehlbeck J, Schnabel U, Polak M, Winter J, von Woedtke T, Brandenburg R, von dem Hagen T, Weltmann K-D (2011) Low temperature atmospheric pressure plasma sources for microbial decontamination. J Phys D Appl Phys 44(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elsaie ML, Kammer JN (2008) Evaluation of plasma skin regeneration technology for cutaneous remodeling. J Cosmet Dermatol 7(4):309–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foster KW, Moy RL, Fincher EF (2008) Advances in plasma skin regeneration. J Cosmet Dermatol 7(3):169–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fridman G, Peddinghaus M, Ayan H, Fridman A, Balasubramanian M, Gutsol A, Brooks A, Friedman G (2006) Blood coagulation and living tissue sterilization by floating-electrode dielectric barrier discharge in air. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 26:425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Justan I, Tichý F, Slavícek P (2010) A new type of plasma knife and its effect on biological issues—a pilot study. Acta Chir Plast 52(2–4):31–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kilmer S, Semchyshyn N, Shah G, Fitzpatrick R (2007) A pilot study on the use of a plasma skin regeneration device (Portrait PSR3) in full facial rejuvenation procedures. Lasers Med Sci 22(2):101–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kong MG, Kroesen G, Morfill G, Nosenko T, Shimizu T, van Dijk J, Zimmermann JL (2009) Plasma medicine: an introductory review. New J Phys 11:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laroussi M (1996) Sterilization of contaminated matter with an atmospheric pressure plasma. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 24(3):1188–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Machala Z, Chládeková L, Pelach M (2010) Plasma agents in bio-decontamination by dc discharges in atmospheric air. J Phys D Appl Phys 43(10):1–7Google Scholar
  12. Masaryk University, Brno: The method of making a physically and chemically active environment by means of a plasma jet and the related plasma jet. Inventors: Klima M, Janca J, Kapicka V, Slavicek P, Saul P European Patent Office, Munich, Germany. Patent No.: EP 1077021. 2005-07-27Google Scholar
  13. Scholtz V, Julák J, Kříha V, Mosinger J, Kopecká S (2007) Decontamination effects of low-temperature plasma generated by corona discharge part II: new insights. Prague Med Rep 108(2):128–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sladek REJ, Stoffels E (2005) Deactivation of Escherichia coli by the plasma needle. J Phys D Appl Phys 38(11):1716–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Traba C, Liang JF (2011) Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to reactive discharge gases. Biofouling 27(7):763–772PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Justan
    • 1
  • L. Cernohorska
    • 2
    Email author
  • Z. Dvorak
    • 1
  • P. Slavicek
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Anne’s Faculty Hospital, Faculty of MedicineMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Microbiology, St. Anne’s University Faculty Hospital, Faculty of MedicineMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Physical Electronics, Faculty of ScienceMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations