Advertisement

Folia Microbiologica

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 313–316 | Cite as

Effects of volatile fatty acids, ammonium and agitation on thermophilic methane production from biogas plant sludge in lab-scale experiments

  • Philipp LinsEmail author
  • Paul Illmer
Article

Abstract

The effects of different volatile fatty acids (VFA, formate, acetate, propionate and butyrate), ammonium (NH 4 + ) and agitation on methane (CH4) production were determined in 120-mL serum bottles. We showed that the addition of formate did not lead to an inhibition of methanogenesis until a concentration of 120 mmol/L. A complete inhibition of methanogenesis was detected in variants containing 360 mmol/L formate or propionate until day 3 but the production started afterwards within next 2 days. This might indicate a kind of adaptation to the higher volatile fatty acid concentrations. Increasing NH 4 + concentrations led to higher initial CH4 production, with an optimum at 120 mmol/L. The addition of 720 mmol/L NH 4 + led to a complete inhibition until day 3; subsequently, CH4 production started again on day 5 though it was still significantly lower compared to the other variants. Finally, also the speed of agitation showed significant effects on methanogenesis. The CH4 production from complex carbon sources was most favourable at a moderate agitation of 150 rpm of the lab-scale serum bottles. A lower or higher speed brought about a distinct reduction of CH4 production.

Keywords

Butyrate Anaerobic Digestion Volatile Fatty Acid Agitation Speed Serum Bottle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahring BK, Sandberg M, Angelidaki I (1995) Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:559–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Illmer P, Gstraunthaler G (2009) Seasonal changes in quantities of biowaste on full scale anaerobic digester performance. Waste Manag 29:162–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Illmer P, Schwarzenauer T, Malin C, Wagner AO, Miller LM (2009) Process parameters within a 750,000 litre anaerobic digester during a year of disturbed fermenter performance. Waste Manag 29:1838–1843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kadam PC, Boone DR (1996) Influence of pH on ammonia accumulation and toxicity in halophilic, methylotrophic methanogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:4486–4492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lay JJ, Li YY, Noike T (1998) Influences of pH and moisture content on the methane production in high-solids sludge digestion. Water Environ Res 70:1075–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lins P, Malin C, Wagner AO, Illmer P (2010) Reduction of accumulated volatile fatty acids by an acetate-degrading enrichment culture. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:469–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Malin C, Illmer P (2008) Ability of DNA content and DGGE analysis to reflect the performance condition of an anaerobic biowaste fermenter. Microbiol Res 163:503–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Scherer PA (2001) Mikrobiologie der Vergärung von festen Abfallstoffen. In: Kämpfer P, Weißenfels WD (eds) Biologische Behandlung von organischen Abfällen. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 45–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schink B (1997) Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:262–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wagner AO, Gstraunthaler G, Illmer P (2010) Utilisation of single added fatty acids by consortia of digester sludge in batch culture. Waste Manag 30:1822–1827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of MicrobiologyUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations