Folia Microbiologica

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 85–89 | Cite as

Fermentation of mucin by bifidobacteria from rectal samples of humans and rectal and intestinal samples of animals

  • J. Killer
  • M. MarounekEmail author


Bifidobacteria (246 strains in total) were isolated from rectal samples of infants and adult humans and animals, and from intestinal samples of calves. Twenty-five strains grew well on mucin: 20 from infants, two from adults, and three from goatlings. Poor or no growth on mucin was observed in 156 bifidobacterial strains of animal origin. The difference between human and animal isolates in ability to grow on mucin was significant at p < 0.001. Nine human strains with the best growth on mucin were identified as Bifidobacterium bifidum. These strains produced extracellular, membrane-bound, and intracellular mucinases with activities of 0.11, 0.53, and 0.09 μmol/min of reducing sugars per milligram of protein, respectively. Membrane-bound mucinases were active between pH 5 and 10. The optimum pH of extracellular mucinases was 6–7. Fermentation patterns in cultures grown on mucin and glucose differed. On mucin, the acetate-to-lactate ratio was higher than in cultures grown on glucose (p = 0.012). We showed that the bifidobacteria belong to the mucin-fermenting bacteria in humans, but their significance in mucin degradation in animals seems to be limited.


Human Strain Bifidobacterium Longum Gastric Mucin Galacturonates Bifidobacterium Bifidum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was supported by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (project AV0Z 5045 0515).


  1. Abe F, Muto M, Yaeshima T, Iwatsuki K, Aihara H, Ohashi Y, Fujisawa T (2009) Safety evaluation of probiotic bifidobacteria by analysis of mucin degradation activity and translocation ability. Anaerobe 16:131–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen A, Snary D (1972) The structure and function of gastric mucus. Gut 13:666–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayliss CE, Houston AP (1984) Characterization of plant polysaccharide- and mucin-fermenting anaerobic bacteria from human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:626–632PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Collmer A, Ried JL, Mount MS (1988) Assay methods of pectic enzymes. In: Wood WA, Kellog ST (eds) Methods in Enzymology, vol 161. Academic, San Diego, pp 329–334Google Scholar
  5. Conway EJ (1957) Microdiffusion analysis and volumetric error, 4th edn. Crosby Lockwood and Son, London, p 277Google Scholar
  6. Corfield AP, Wagner SA, Clamp JR, Kriaris MS, Hoskins LC (1992) Mucin degradation in the human colon: production of sialidase, sialate-O-acetylesterase, N-acetylneuraminate lyase, arylesterase and glycosulfatase activities by strains of fecal bacteria. Infect Immun 60:3971–3978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crociani F, Alessandrini A, Mucci MM, Biavati B (1994) Degradation of complex carbohydrates by Bifidobacterium spp. Int J Food Microbiol 24:199–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vries W, Stouthamer AH (1968) Fermentation of glucose, lactose, galactose, mannitol, and xylose by bifidobacteria. J Bacteriol 96:472–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrien M, Vaughan EE, Plugge CM, de Vos WM (2004) Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1469–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herbert D, Phipps PJ, Strange RE (1971) Chemical analysis of microbial cells. In: Norris JR, Ribbons DW (eds) Methods in microbiology, vol 5B. Academic, London, pp 204–344Google Scholar
  11. Hill RRH (1986) Digestion of mucin polysaccharides in vitro by bacteria isolated from the rabbit cecum. Curr Microbiol 14:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horowitz MI (1967) Mucopolysaccharides and glycoproteins of the alimentary tract. In: Code CF, Heidel W (eds) Alimentary Canal, vol II. American Physiological Society, Washington (DC), pp 1063–1085Google Scholar
  13. Hoskins LC (1993) Mucin degradation in the human gastrointestinal tract and its significance to enteric microbial ecology. Eur J Gastroen Hepatol 5:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kandler O (1983) Carbohydrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 49:209–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katayama T, Fujita K, Yamamoto K (2005) Novel bifidobacterial glycosidases acting on sugar chains of mucin glycoproteins. J Biosci Bioeng 99:457–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lever M (1977) Carbohydrate determination with 4-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH): effect of bismuth on the reaction. Anal Biochem 81:21–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindstedt G, Lindstedt S, Gustafsson B (1965) Mucus in intestinal contents of germfree rats. J Exp Med 121:201–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marounek M, Petr O, Šimůnek J (1993) Monensin has no effect on growth and metabolism of Megasphaera elsdenii. Folia Microbiol 38:383–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Tanaka R, Fukuda M, Oyaizu H (1999) Distribution of bifidobacterial species in human intestinal microflora examined with 16 S rRNA-gene-targeted species-specific primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4506–4512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Orban JI, Patterson JA (2000) Modification of the phosphoketolase assay for rapid identification of bifidobacteria. J Microbiol Meth 40:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roberton AY, Stanley RA (1982) In vitro utilization of mucin by Bacteroides fragilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:325–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruas-Madiedo P, Gueimonde M, Fernández-García M, de los Reyes-Gavilán CG, Margolles A (2008) Mucin degradation by Bifidobacterium strains isolated from the human intestinal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1936–1940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Salyers AA, West SEH, Vercellotti JR, Wilkins TD (1977) Fermentation of mucins and plant polysaccharides by anaerobic bacteria from the human colon. Appl Environ Microbiol 34:529–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Scardovi V, Trovatelli LD (1965) The fructose-6-phosphate shunt as peculiar pattern of hexose degradation in the genus Bifidobacterium. Ann Microbiol Enzimol 15:19–29Google Scholar
  25. Schrager J (1970) The chemical composition and function of gastrointestinal mucus. Gut 11:450–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sgorbati B, Biavati B, Palenzona D (1995) The genus Bifidobacterium. In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH (eds) The genera of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, pp 279–306Google Scholar
  27. Sirotek K, Santos E, Benda V, Marounek M (2003) Isolation, identification and characterization of rabbit caecal mucinolytic bacteria. Acta Vet Brno 72:365–370Google Scholar
  28. Slomiany A, Zdebska E, Slomiany BL (1984) Structures of the neutral oligosaccharides isolated from A-active human gastric mucin. J Biol Chem 259:14743–14749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Slováková L, Dušková D, Marounek M (2002) Fermentation of pectin and glucose, and activity of pectin-degrading enzymes in the rabbit caecal bacterium Bifidobacterium pseudolongum. Lett Appl Microbiol 35:126–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsai HH, Hart CA, Rhodes JM (1991) Production of mucin degrading sulfatase and glycosidases by Bacteroides thetaiotamicron. Lett Appl Microbiol 13:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vlková E, Nevoral J, Jenciková B, Kopečný J, Godefrooij J, Trojanová I, Rada V (2005) Detection of infant fecal bifidobacteria by enzymatic methods. J Microbiol Meth 60:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vlková E, Trojanová I, Rada V (2006) Distribution of bifidobacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of calves. Folia Microbiol 51:325–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 4-KrčCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Animal SciencePrague 10-UhříněvesCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations