Fibers and Polymers

, Volume 19, Issue 12, pp 2590–2596 | Cite as

Effect of the Bleaching on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Different Fabrics

  • Giulia Dalla Fontana
  • Alessio Varesano
  • Claudia Vineis


Two different commercial bleaching products containing hypochlorite were used on different fabrics (plain-weave cotton, knitted cotton, plain-weave polyester-cotton and knitted lycra-cotton) to verify possible fibres damages. Bleaching products differ each other for the alkaline formulation. In particular, one of them has an alkaline bleaching formulation and the other has a low-alkaline bleaching formulation. The degree of whiteness, the tensile and bursting strength, and the thermal and surface properties were evaluated after a different number of washing cycles. The obtained results reveal that the alkaline bleaching product is better than the low-alkaline bleaching product in maintaining mechanical properties and in improving optical properties of the fabrics.


Fibres Textile Bleaching Whiteness index Tensile strength 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. S. Abdel-Halim, Carbohydr. Polym., 90, 316 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Lienardy and P. Van Damme, Restaurator, 9, 178 (2009).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. C. Baker, K. Buchberg, M. Cohn-Fairbanks, T. Foster, C. King, A. Krill, J. Krueger, H. Mayer, D. McKay, G. Lodge, J. Sterrett, M. Stevenson, and J. Walsh, “American Institute for Conservation Book and Paper Group Bleaching”, 6th ed. (H. Walter Ed.), Vol. 19, p.1, Washington, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Carrillo, X. Colom, J. J. Suñol, and J. Saurina, Eur. Polym. J., 40, 2229 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Chung, M. Lee, and E. K. Choe, Carbohydr. Polym., 58, 417 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Fan, D. Dai, and B. Huang, Fourier Transform - Materials Analysis, Mohammed Salih, Salih (Ed.), InTechOpen 1, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. V. Gore and A. Venkataraman, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 23, 165 (1998).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. C. Tracey and B. D. Flinn, International Sample Technical Conference, North Charleston, South Carolina, p.590, 2012.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. S. Muralidhara and S. Sreenivasan, World Appl. Sci. J., 11, 184 (2010).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. H. Stanley, C. H. Mack, D. J. Donaldson, and J. P. Neumeyer, Thermochim Acta, 16, 149 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Ibrahim, E. S. El-Amoudy, and K. E. Shady, Int. J. Chem., 3, 40 (2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Witkowska and I. A. Frydrych, East. Eur., 12, 42 (2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Fiber Society, The Korea Science and Technology Center 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulia Dalla Fontana
    • 1
  • Alessio Varesano
    • 1
  • Claudia Vineis
    • 1
  1. 1.CNR ISMAC Institute for Macromolecular StudiesBiellaItaly

Personalised recommendations