Advertisement

Fibers and Polymers

, Volume 19, Issue 11, pp 2365–2371 | Cite as

Application of Jackfruit Latex Gum as an Eco-friendly Binder to Pigment Printing

  • Shekh Md. Mamun Kabir
  • Sung Dong Kim
  • Joonseok KohEmail author
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Jackfruit latex gum was applied to pigment printing of cotton fabrics as a binder and their printing properties were compared with those of conventional pigment printing. The printing performances were influenced by the content of Jackfruit latex gum in the binder and the curing conditions. Based on a series of experiments, the pigment printing paste recipe and the process were optimized, considering color fastness, color strength, and fabric handle properties compared with those of the synthetic binder. The use of combined binder containing Jackfruit latex gum for pigment printing showed reasonable printing performances and offers an option for replacing synthetic binders, which cause adverse effect on human health and environments.

Keywords

Jackfruit latex gum Synthetic binder Sharpness Color strength Drape property Color fastness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Schwindt and G. Faulhaber, Rev. Prog. Coloration, 14, 166 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Carlier, Industrie Textile, 1222, 68 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Grund, Melliand Textilber, 75, 630 (1994).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Fay, Melliand Textilber, 75, 1007 (1994).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. W. C. Miles, “Textile Printing”, 2nd ed., p.142, Society of Dyers & Colorists, Bradford, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. A. Ibrahim, B. M. Eid, and H. M. Khalil, Carbohydr. Polym., 115, 559 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. A. Ibrahim, H. M. Khalil, E. M. R. EI–Zairy, and W. A. Abdalla, Carbohydr. Polym., 96, 200 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. A. Ibrahim, B. M. Eid, Abd EI–Aziz, and T. M. Abou Elmaaty, Carbohydr. Polym., 97, 537 (2013).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. A. Ibrahim, T. M. Abou Elmaaty, B. M. Eid, and E. Abd EI–Aziz, Carbohydr. Polym., 95, 379 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. A. Ibrahim, B. M. Eid, T. M. Abou Elmaaty, and E. Abd EI–Aziz, Carbohydr. Polym., 97, 537 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. A. Ibrahim, B. M. Eid, T. M. Abou Elmaaty, and E. Abd EI–Aziz, Carbohydr. Polym., 94, 612 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. A. Ibrahim, W. A. Abdalla, E. M. R. EI–Zairy, and H. M. Khalil, Carbohydr. Polym., 92, 1520 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. A. Ibrahim, E. M. R. EI–Zairy, W. A. Abdalla, and H. M. Khalil, Carbohydr. Polym., 92, 1386 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. A. Ibrahim, A. Amr, B. M. Eid, A. A. Almetwally, and M. M. Mourad, Carbohydr. Polym., 98, 1603 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. A. Ibrahim, B. M. Eid, M. A. Youssef, H. M. Ibrahim, H. A. Ameen, and A. M. Salah, Carbohydr. Polym., 97, 783 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Shin and D. I. Yoo, Text. Sci. Eng., 53, 63 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Noh, B. Sarmandakh, and E. Yi, Text. Sci. Eng., 53, 143 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. J. Kim, S. W. Lee, H. J. Jeon, S. H. Kim, H. G. Joo, D. H. Jang, and J. Jang, Text. Sci. Eng., 53, 158 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. You, S. H. Lee, and W. H. Park, Text. Sci. Eng., 53, 347(2016).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Y. Park, Tex. Sci. Eng., 54, 125 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Kim, J. Yoon, M. Shin, S. Yoon, J. Shim, and J. Koh, Text. Sci. Eng., 54, 171 (2017).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. A. Bahmani, G. C. East, and I. Holme, Color. Technol., 116, 94 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Mekkriengkrai, K. Ute, E. Swiezewska, T. Chojnacki, Y. Tanaka, and J. Sakdapipanich, Biomacromolecules, 5, 2013 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. T. Islam, S. H. Khan, and M. M. Hasan, Color. Technol., 132, 255 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. Ingamells, “Colour for Textiles: A User’s Handbook”, p.154, Society of Dyers and Colourists, Bradford, UK, 1993.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    BS 5058:1973, “Method for the Assessment of Drape of Fabrics”, London, BSI, 1973.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. M. El–Molla and R. Schneider, Dyes Pigm., 71, 130 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    N. A. Ibrahim, M. M. Rashad, and M. H. Abo–Shosha, Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng., 42, 757 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Jassal and P. Bajaj, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 26, 143 (2001).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. R. Trotman, “Dyeing and Chemical Technology of Textile Fibres”, p.340, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. D. Chantler, G. A. Partlett, and J. A. B. Whiteside, J. Soc. Dyers Colour., 85, 621 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. M. El–Molla and R. Schneider, Dyes Pigm., 71, 130 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Fiber Society, The Korea Science and Technology Center 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shekh Md. Mamun Kabir
    • 1
  • Sung Dong Kim
    • 2
  • Joonseok Koh
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Wet Process EngineeringBangladesh University of TextilesDhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.Divison of Chemical EngineeringKonkuk UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations