Polyester modification through synthesis of copper nanoparticles in presence of triethanolamine optimized with response surface methodology
- 89 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
In this paper, polyester fabric was modified through synthesis and fabrication of Cu/Cu2O nanoparticles using a facile and cost-effective method at boil by chemical reduction through exhaustion route. Triethanolamine (TEA) was used for aminolysis of polyester fabric and pH adjusting, copper sulfate (CuSO4) as metal salt, sodium hypophosphite (SHP) as reducing agent and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as stabilizer. A response surface methodology was also employed to optimize the reaction conditions and study the effects of SHP, PVP and TEA concentrations in the processing. The images of field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), the patterns of energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns confirmed successfully synthesis of Cu and Cu2O nanoparticles on the polyester fabric. Further, the thermal behavior of the untreated and treated fabrics was studied by using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning colorimetry (DSC). The treated fabrics indicated good properties regarding wettability and flame-retardant along with high tensile strength.
Keywords
Copper nanoparticles Polyester fabric Triethanolamine Response surface methodology Flame-retardantPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.B. Khodashenas and H. R. Ghorbani, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31, 1105 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.M. N. K. Chowdhury, M. D. H. Beg, M. R. Khan, and M. F. Mina, Mater. Lett., 98, 26 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.X. Zhang, J. Song, J. Jiao, and X. Mei, Solid State Sci., 12, 1215 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.R. H. Guo, S. X. Jiang, C. W. M. Yuen, M. C. F. Ng, J. W. Lan, Y. L. Yeung, and S. J. Lin, Fiber. Polym., 14, 752 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Z. Komeily-Nia, M. Montazer, and M. Latifi, Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 439, 167 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.N. A. Dhas, C. P. Raj, and A. Gedanken, Chem. Mater., 10, 1446 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.H. H. Huang, F. Q. Yan, Y. M. Kek, C. H. Chew, G. Q. Xu, W. Ji, P. S. Oh, and S. H. Tang, Langmuir, 13, 172 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.N. Cioffi, L. Torsi, N. Ditaranto, G. Tantillo, L. Ghibelli, L. Sabbatini, T. Bleve-Zacheo, M. D'Alessio, P. G. Zambonin, and E. Traversa, Chem. Mater., 17, 5255 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.S. H. Wu and D. H. Chen, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 273, 165 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R. Zhou, X. Wu, X. Hao, F. Zhou, H. Li, and W. Rao, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 266, 599 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.I. Capek, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 110, 49 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.L. M. Liz-Marzán, Mater. Today, 7, 26 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.M. Salavati-Niasari and F. Davar, Mater. Lett., 63, 441 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.X. Ge, H. Hu, C. Deng, Q. Zheng, M. Wang, and G. Chen, Mater. Lett., 141, 214 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.A. Sedighi, M. Montazer, and N. Samadi, Carbohydr. Polym., 110, 489 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.W. Qin and R. Guo, Fiber. Polym., 16, 1671 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.K. Cheirmadurai, S. Biswas, R. Murali, and P. Thanikaivelan, RSC Adv., 4, 19507 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.M. Montazer, M. Dastjerdi, M. Azdaloo, and M. M. Rad, Cellulose, 22, 4049 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.D. Lai, T. Liu, G. Jiang, and W. Chen, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 128, 1443 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.L. Bech, T. Meylheuc, B. Lepoittevin, and P. Roger, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 45, 2172 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.T. Harifi and M. Montazer, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2, 272 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.T. Harifi and M. Montazer, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53, 1119 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.N. Ibrahim, E. El-Zairy, M. El-Zairy, and H. Khalil, J. Ind. Text., 42, 269 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.K. N. Pandiyaraj, R. R. Deshmukh, R. Mahendiran, P.-G. Su, E. Yassitepe, I. Shah, S. Perni, P. Prokopovich, and M. N. Nadagouda, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 36, 309 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.J. Dave, R. Kumar, and H. C. Srivastava, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 33, 455 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.N. A. Ibrahim, B. Eid, M. Youssef, H. Ameen, and A. Salah, J. Ind. Text., 42, 353 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.N. A Ibrahim, E. El-Zairy, M. El-Zairy, and H. Khalil, AATCC Rev., 11, 52 (2011).Google Scholar
- 28.F. Chen, Q. Zhou, R. Bu, F. Yang, and W. Li, Fiber. Polym., 16, 1213 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.I. Shahidul and F. Mohammad, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 54, 3727 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Y. Zhu, Z. Mao, and C. Gao, RSC Adv., 3, 2509 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.H. Poortavasoly, M. Montazer, and T. Harifi, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 58, 495 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.H. Poortavasoly, M. Montazer, and T. Harifi, RSC Adv., 4, 46250 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.K. Fukatsu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 45, 2037 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.L. Azfarniam and M. Norouzi, Fiber. Polym., 17, 298 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.M. Montazer, F. Alimohammadi, A. Shamei, and M. K. Rahimi, Carbohydr. Polym., 87, 1706 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.S. Gaan and G. Sun, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 84, 108 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.F. Lessan, M. Montazer, and M. Moghadam, Thermochim Acta., 520, 48 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Y. Lee, J.-R. Choi, K. J. Lee, N. E. Stott, and D. Kim, Nanotechnology, 19, 415604 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.S. A. Holmes, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 61, 255 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.C. E. Hoppe, M. Lazzari, I. Pardiñas-Blanco, and M. A. López-Quintela, Langmuir, 22, 7027 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar