Fibers and Polymers

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1349–1361 | Cite as

Mechanical response and failure of 3D MWK carbon/epoxy composites at cryogenic temperature

Article

Abstract

Static tensile and bending experiments are conducted on 3D MWK carbon/epoxy composites with two types of fiber architecture at room and cryogenic temperature (low as −196 ℃). Macro-Fracture morphology and SEM micrographs are examined to understand the deformation and failure mechanism. The results show that tensile stress vs. strain curves have linear elastic feature up to failure; while the load-deflection curves for composites with large fiber orientation angle have pronounced nonlinear and failure in steps. Meanwhile, tensile and bending properties at liquid nitrogen temperature have been improved significantly. Moreover, the properties can be affected greatly by the fiber architecture and these decrease with increasing fiber orientation angle at room and cryogenic temperatures. The results also show the damage and failure patterns of composites vary with the fiber architecture and temperature. The main failure for material A is 0 ° fibers fracture and matrix cracking. The failure mechanism for material B is the delamination, 90 °/+45 °/−45 ° fiber/matrix interface debonding and fibers tearing, as well as 0 ° fibers’ breakage. At cryogenic temperature, the matrix is solidified and the interfacial adhesion between fibers and matrix is enhanced significantly. However, the brittle failure becomes more obvious, more microcracks propagate and interpenetrate.

Keywords

3D multi-axial warp knitted carbon/epoxy composites Mechanical properties Failure mechanism Fiber architecture Cryogenic temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. H. Leong, S. Ramakrishna, and Z. M. Huang, Compos. Pt. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf., 31, 197 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Hufenbach, R. Böhm, and M. Thieme, Mater. Des., 32, 1468 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. H. Xu, X. L. Yuan, N. Wang, and Z. L. Liu, Fiber. Polym., 15, 1288 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. B. Ma, G. M. Jiang, Z. Gao, Q. Zhang, and D. Xia, Fiber. Polym., 15, 382 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. W. Du and F. Ko, Compos. Sci. Technol., 56, 253 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. A. Bibo, P. J. Hogg, and M. Kemp, Compos. Sci. Technol., 57, 1221 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Kong, A. P. Mouritz, and R. Paton, Compos. Struct., 66, 249 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Edgren, D. Mattsson, and L. E. Asp, Compos. Sci. Technol., 64, 675 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Edgren and L. E. Asp, Compos. Pt. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf., 36, 173 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Mattsson, R. Joffe, and J. Varna, Eng. Fract. Mech., 75, 2666 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. X. Zhou, H. Hu, and N. L. Chen, J. Compos. Mater., 39, 525 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Saito and I. Kimpara, Compos. Pt. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf., 37, 2226 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Z. Sun, H. Hu, and B. H. Gu, Compos. Struct., 78, 84 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Vallons, M. Zong, S. V. Lomov, and I. Verpoest, Compos. Pt. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf., 38, 1633 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. S. Li, N. Jiang, C. Q. Zhao, L. Jiang, and Y. Tan, Compos. Pt. B-Eng., 68, 126 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. V. Lomov, M. Barburski, T. Stoilova, I. Verpoest, R. Akkerman, R. Loendersloot, and R. T. Thije, Compos. Pt. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf., 36, 1188 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. V. Lomov, D. S. Ivanov, T. C. Truong, I. Verpoest, F. Baudry, K. Vanden, and H. Xie, Compos. Sci. Technol., 68, 2340 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Vallons, S. V. Lomov, and I. Verpoest, Compos. Pt. AAppl. Sci. Manuf., 40, 251 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. S. Li, C. Q. Zhao, L. Jiang, N. Lu, L. M. Chen, and N. Jiang, Polym. Compos., 35, 1294 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. S. Li, N. Jiang, C. Q. Zhao, L. Jiang, and Y. Tan, Cryogenics, 62, 37 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Shindo, T. Takeda, and F. Narita, Cryogenics, 50, 564 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Takeda, Y. Shindo, and S. Watanabe, Cryogenics, 52, 784 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Gong, X. F. Wang, and J. H. Zhao, Cryogenics, 47, 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    W. Hufenbach, M. Gude, R. Böhm, and M. Zscheyge, Mater. Des., 32, 4278 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Fiber Society and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Bio-Inspired Smart Interfacial Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry and EnvironmentBeijing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsBeijingPR China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine MicrostructureChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiPR China
  3. 3.China Academy of Machinery of Science & TechnologyBeijingPR China

Personalised recommendations