Advertisement

Fibers and Polymers

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 926–933 | Cite as

Post-consumer energy consumption of textile products during ‘use’ phase of the lifecycle

  • Jooyoun Kim
  • Changsang Yun
  • Yaewon Park
  • Chung Hee Park
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to propose a rating model that measures the post-consumer energy consumption, specifically during the washing, drying, and ironing processes of textile products. Prior to designing the rating model, the methodology of sustainability assessment is overviewed, with discussions on textile sector’s efforts in developing the sustainability index as an assessment tool for textile products or their manufacturers. Despite the significant environmental impacts made by the ‘maintenance’ or ‘use’ phase of the textile lifecycle, the assessment of ‘use’ phase is not thoroughly evaluated. In this study, a rating model was built to measure or estimate the amount of energy use during the product maintenance. The maintenance during ‘use’ phase, defined as washing, drying and ironing processes, is categorized for its maintenance options; washer type, wash temperature, dryer type, filling load, and ironing. The selection of maintenance options generates the score for the impact on energy use. Scenario analysis for different maintenance conditions with different textile products presents the applicability of the proposed rating model as a simple yet effective measurement tool.

Keywords

Sustainability Textile products Lifecycle Use phase Energy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. H. Brundtland, “Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development”, pp.41–43, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), “G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosure”, pp.7–14, Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam, 2013.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. J. Brown, M. E. Hanson, D. M. Liverman, and R. W. Meredith, Environ. Manage., 11, 713 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. M. Allwood, S. E. Laursen, C. M. de Rodriguez, and N. M. Bocken, “Well Dressed? The Present and Future Sustainability of Clothing and Textiles in the United Kingdom”, pp.8–14, University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Herva, A. Franco, S. Ferreiro, A. Alvarez, and E. Roca, J. Hazard. Mater., 156, 478 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. L. Chen and L. D. Burns, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 24, 248 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. S. Muthu, Y. Li, J. Y. Hu, and P. Y. Mok, Ecol. Indic., 13, 66 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. W. Kates, W. C. Clark, R. Corell, J. M. Hall, C. C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J. J. McCarthy, H. J. Schellnhuber, B. Bolin, N. M. Dickson, S. Faucheux, G. C. Gallopin, A. Grubler, B. Huntley, J. Jager, N. S. Jodha, R. E. Kasperson, A. Mabogunje, P. Matson, H. Mooney, B. Moore III, T. O’Riordan, and U. Svedin, Science, 292, 641 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S&P Dow Jones Indices and RobecoSAM, “Dow Jones Sustainability World Index Guide: Version 12.2”, pp.32–35, RobecoSAM AG, Zurich, 2013.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI), “Annual Review 2013”, Retrieved October 17, 2013, http://www.sustainabilityindices.com/images/review-presentation-2013.pdfGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Interbrand, “Best Global Green Brands 2013”, Retrieved September 23, 2013, from http://www.interbrand.com/en/best-global-brands/Best-Global-Green-Brands/2013/Best-Global-Green-Brands-2013.aspxGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    CR Magazine, “CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2013”, Retrieved October 17, 2013, from http://www.thecro.com/files/100Best2013_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newsweek. “Green Rankings”, Retrieved September 23, 2013, from http://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-greenrankings-2012-full-methodology-65325.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14040: 2006, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 14044: 2006, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. K. Singh, H. R. Murty, S. K. Gupta, and A. K. Dikshit, Ecol. Indic., 9, 189 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Klöpffer, Int. J. Life. Cycle. Ass., 13, 89 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Valdivia, C. M. L. Ugaya, G. Sonnemann, J. Hildenbrand, A. Ciroth, M. Finkbeiner, W. Klöpffer, B. Mazjin, S. Prakash, and M. Traverso, “Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Making Informed Choices on Products”, pp.1–22, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Intiative, Paris, 2011.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Swarr, D. Hunkeler, W. Klöpffer, H. L. Pesonen, A. Ciroth, A. C. Brent, and R. Pagan, Int. J. Life. Cycle. Ass. 13, 89 (2011).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. S. Andrews, L. P. Barthel, T. Beck, C. Benoit, A. Ciroth, C. Cucuzzella, C. O. Gensch, J. Hebert, P. Lesage, A. Manhart, and P. Mazeau, “Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products”, pp.37–41, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), 2009.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Radhakrishnan in “Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing” (S. S. Muthu Ed.), pp.23–57, Springer, Singapore, 2015.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    K. T. Fletcher, J. Text. Inst., 89, 72 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Laitala, C. Boks, and I. G. Klepp, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 35, 254 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Josephy, E. Bush, J. Nipkow, and S. Attali, “Proc. the 6th International Conference EEDAL’11”, pp.770–782, Luxembourg, 2013.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. W. Tenney and J. B. Carberry in “Detergency-theory and Test Methods: Detergents and Our Environment” (W. G. Cutler and R. C. Davis Eds.), pp.900–940, Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel, 1981.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. J. Vinson in “Detergency-theory and Test Methods: Detergents and Our Environment” (W. G. Cutler and R. C. Davis Eds.), pp.679–704, Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel, 1981.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Yamaguchi, E. Seii, M. Itagaki, and M. Nagayama, Int. J. Consum. Stud., 35, 243 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. H. Park, O. K. Lee, E. Y. Kim, and S. R. Kim, Jpn. Res. Assn. Text. End-Uses., 43, 60 (2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Fiber Society and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jooyoun Kim
    • 3
  • Changsang Yun
    • 1
  • Yaewon Park
    • 2
  • Chung Hee Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Textiles, Merchandising, and Fashion DesignSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Textile Engineering Chemistry and ScienceNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Department of Apparel, Textiles, and Interior DesignKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations