A comparative study of finer conventional and modified cotton yarns and their resultant woven fabrics
- 111 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
A modified ring spinning technique has been recently developed by incorporating false twisting devices into the conventional ring frame. Its application on the coarser yarn counts (7–32 Ne) showed notable advantages in modified yarn and fabric performance. More recently, it was noted that this technique can also be applied for producing finer cotton yarns. Thus this paper aims to carry out a systematic study of the physical properties of the finer modified yarns (80 Ne) and woven fabrics with respect to the conventional ones. Physical properties of conventional and modified single yarns were evaluated and compared. These two types of single yarn were used for the production of woven fabrics. Moreover, the above two types of single yarn were also plied and used for the production of woven fabrics under a commercial condition. All woven fabrics were assessed in terms of fabric tensile strength, tearing strength, abrasion resistance, fabric weight, and air-permeability as well as other fabric performance measured by the Kawabata Evaluation System (KES). Experimental results showed that finer modified yarns and fabrics exhibit higher strength, lower hairiness, and improved abrasion resistance, slightly better compression property, and smoother surface with relatively larger thickness.
Keywords
Finer yarn Cotton Woven fabric Ring spinning Physical propertiesPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.X. M. Tao and B. G. Xu, U. S. Patent, 6860095 (2005).Google Scholar
- 2.X. M. Tao, B. G. Xu, and S. K. Wong, U. S. Patent, 7096655 (2006).Google Scholar
- 3.B. G. Xu and X. M. Tao, Text. Res. J., 78, 869 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.B. G. Xu, X. M. Tao, and C. S. Leung, Fiber. Polym., 11, 899 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.T. Hua, Ph.D. Dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 2006.Google Scholar
- 6.K. Yang, Ph.D. Dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 2006.Google Scholar
- 7.K. Yang, X. M. Tao, B. G. Xu, and K. C. Lam, Text. Res. J., 77, 675 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Y. Guo, X. M. Tao, B. G. Xu, J. Feng, and S. Y. Wang, Text. Res. J., 81, 778 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.J. Feng, B. G. Xu, X. M. Tao, and T. Hua, Text. Res. J., 80, 1456 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. Feng, B. G. Xu, and X. M. Tao, Text. Res. J., 83, 238 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.N. Ozdil, G. O. Kayseri, and G. S. Menguc, “Abrasion Resistance of Materials”, pp.119–146, 2012.Google Scholar