Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system
As the demand in the market for a product with a high sensibility has dramatically increased, research has been conducted in designing products for better sensibility; however, most studies have employed a paper-and-pencil (P&P) questionnaire in administering a sensibility evaluation, causing a lack of efficiency and systematicity in sensibility research. The present study developed a computerized textile sensibility evaluation system which can be used to efficiently evaluate the visual, tactile, visual-tactile, and auditory sensibilities of textiles and examined its effectiveness in visual sensibility evaluation compared with the traditional P&P evaluation method. The computerized evaluation system has capabilities of managing information of textile properties, designing a sensibility evaluation experiment, administering a sensibility evaluation, and managing evaluation data for post hoc analysis. The test-retest protocol was administered with a within-subject design for 15 females in their 20 s and 30 s to examine the difference in visual sensibility evaluation between the P&P method and the computer-based method. A high correlation (r=.88∼.97) was found in sensibility evaluation between the two methods and the computer-based system showed a higher repeatability within a rater in repeated evaluation (a decrease of 25 % in intra-rater SD), which indicates the computer-based method is an effective alternative to the P&P method in visual sensibility evaluation. The findings of the present study support use of a computerized system for practitioners to efficiently identify preferred characteristics of textiles for the design of sensible clothing.
KeywordsTextile sensibility evaluation Paper-and-pencil method Computerized system Effectiveness Sensibility adjective pairs
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.G. Cho, E. Yi, and J. Casali, Res. J. Text. Apparel, 5, 29, (2001b).Google Scholar
- 7.H. Jang and H. Yoon, Korean Journal of Emotion and Sensibility, 6, 49 (2003).Google Scholar
- 8.S. Jeong, Korean Journal of Emotion and Sensibility, 10, 403 (2007).Google Scholar
- 10.S. Kim, K. Eum, S. Chung, and J. Lee, Korean Journal of Emotion and Sensibility, 8, 355 (2005).Google Scholar
- 12.Y. Lee, H. Chung, H. Park, J. Lee, and G. Cho, Korean Journal of Emotion and Sensibility, 5, 21 (2002).Google Scholar
- 13.B. Min, B. Min, K. Jung, and C. Kim, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 22, 1 (2003).Google Scholar
- 15.Y. Na and W. Shin, Text. Sci. Eng., 47, 54 (2010).Google Scholar
- 16.H. Oh and K. Lee, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 26, 1412 (2002).Google Scholar
- 19.J. Sohn, M. Park, B. Lee, and B. Min, Korean Journal of Emotion and Sensibility, 5, 61 (2002).Google Scholar
- 21.E. Yi and G. Cho, Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 8, 393 (2005).Google Scholar