Predicting the tensile strength of polyester/cotton blended woven fabrics using feed forward back propagation artificial neural networks
- 289 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
Tensile strength plays a vital role in determining the mechanical behavior of woven fabrics. In this study, two artificial neural networks have been designed to predict the warp and weft wise tensile strength of polyester cotton blended fabrics. Various process and material related parameters have been considered for selection of vital few input parameters that significantly affect fabric tensile strength. A total of 270 fabric samples are woven with varying constructions. Application of nonlinear modeling technique and appreciable volume of data sets for training, testing and validating both prediction models resulted in best fitting of data and minimization of prediction error. Sensitivity analysis has been carried out for both models to determine the contribution percentage of input parameters and evaluating the most impacting variable on fabric strength.
Keywords
Fabric strength Artificial neural network Sensitivity analysis Polyester cotton blend ModelingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.M. Nikolic, T. Mihailovic, and L. Simovic, Fibers Text. East. Eur., 8, 74 (2000).Google Scholar
- 2.H. M. Taylor, J. Text. Inst., 50, T161 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.J. Hu, “Structure and Mechanics of Woven Fabrics”, Wood Head Publishing Ltd., England, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.M. Realff, M. Boyce, and S. Backer, Text. Res. J., 67, 445 (1997).Google Scholar
- 5.B. Olofsson, J. Text. Inst., 55, T541 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.A. Majumdar, A. Ghosh, S. Saha, A. Roy, S. Barman, D. Panigrahi, and A. Biswas, Fiber. Polym., 9, 240 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.A. Farooq and C. Cherif, Text. Res. J., 78, 502 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. C. Ramesh, R. Rajamanickam, and S. Jayaraman, J. Text. Inst., 87, 596 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.M. C. Ramesh, R. Rajamanickam, and S. Jayaraman, J. Text. Inst., 86, 459 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Z. Pei and C. Yu, Text. Res. J., 81, 1796 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.A. Babay, M. Cheikhrouhou, B. Vermeulen, B. Rabenasolo, and J. M. Castelain, J. Text. Inst., 96, 185 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.J.-J. Lin, Text. Res. J., 77, 336 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.A. Majumdar, M. Ciocoiu, and M. Blaga, Fiber. Polym., 9, 210 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.M. Zeydan, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol., 20, 104 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.R. Pan, W. Gao, J. Liu, and H. Wang, J. Text. Inst., 102, 19 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.H. Jedda, A. Ghith, and F. Sakli, J. Text. Inst., 98, 219 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.D. Bhattacharjee and V. J. K. Kothari, Text. Res. J., 77, 4 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Y. Chen, T. Zhao, and B. J. Collier, J. Text. Inst., 92, 157 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.R. Furferi and L. Governi, J. Text. Inst., 99, 57 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.M. Hadizadeh, A. A. A. Jeddi, and M. A. Tehran, Text. Res. J., 79, 1599 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.T. Rolich, A. Šajatović, and D. Pavlini, Fiber. Polym., 11, 917 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.B. Yegnanarayana, “Artificial Neural Networks”, PHI Learning Pvt Ltd., 2004Google Scholar
- 23.L. Wang and K. Fu, “Artificial Neural Networks”, Wiley Online Library, 1993Google Scholar
- 24.K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, Neural Networks, 2, 359 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar