Electrical properties of ultrafine nylon-6 nanofibers prepared via electrospinning
- 239 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
We report on the preparation and electrical characterization of nylon-6 nanofibers via electrospinning technique. During electrospinning, the polymer solution became highly ionized and emerging out of the micro-tip syringe by forming mesh-like ultrafine nanofibers structure in between the main fibers. The resultant nylon-6 nanofibers were well-oriented with uniform structure. The diameter of the ultrafine nanofibers (7 to 40 nm) is one order less than those of main fibers (100 to 200 nm). The current-voltage (I-V) measurements revealed a linear curve with an occurrence of negative differential resistance (NDR) behavior. The existence of NDR region in the nylon-6 nanofibers can be attributed to the tunneling current through the ultrafine structures. The fabrication of nanofibers, in the form of ultrafine mesh-like form, is relatively fast and inexpensive, and it paves the way to build up of new dimension for nano device applications.
Keywords
Electrospinning Nylon-6 Ultrafine nanofibers Electrical studies Negative differential resistancePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.D. Li and Y. Xia, Adv. Mater., 16, 1151 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.K. Jayaraman, M. Kotaki, Y. Zhang, X. Mo, and S. Ramakrishna, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 4, 52 (2004).Google Scholar
- 3.R. Dersh, M. Steinhart, U. Boudriot, A. Greiner, and J. H. Wendorff, Polym. Adv. Technol., 16, 276 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Z. M. Huang, Y. Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, Composites Sci. Technol., 63, 2223 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.B. Adikari and S. Majumdar, Prog. Polym. Sci., 29, 699 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.A. Greiner and J. H. Wendorff, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 46, 5670 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.X. Lu, C. Wang, and Y. Wei, Small, 5, 2349 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. A. Wan, Adv. Mater., 20, 2926 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.C. Li, H. Bai, and G. Q. Shi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 2397 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. S. Stephens, D. B. Chase, and J. F. Rabolt, Macromolecules, 73, 877 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Y. Ma, T. Zhou, and C. Zhao, Carbohydrate Res., 343, 230 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.L. V. D. Schueren, T. Mollet, O. Ceylan, and K. D. Clerck, Eur. Polym. J., 46, 2229 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.B. Ding, C. Li, Y. Miyauchi, O. Kuwaki, and S. Shiratori, Nanotechnology, 17, 3685 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.R. Nirmala, K. T. Nam, S. J. Park, Y. S. Shin, R. Navamathavan, and H. Y. Kim, Appl. Surf. Sci., 256, 6318 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.X. F. Wang, B. Ding, J. Yu, M. Wang, and F. Pan, Nanotechnology, 21, 055506 (2010).Google Scholar
- 16.D. C. Parajuli, M. P. Bajgai, J. A. Ko, H. K. Kang, M. S. Khil, and H. Y. Kim, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 1, 750 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.D. Dragoman and M. Dragoman, Physica E, 36, 158 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.T. Yakabe, Z. C. Dong, and H. Nejoh, Appl. Surf. Sci., 121/122, 187 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.S. Y. Quek, J. B. Neaton, M. S. Hybersten, E. Kaxiras, S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 066807 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.D. M. T. Kuo and Y. C. Chang, Physica E, 41, 395 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.R. Nirmala, H. R. Panth, C. Yi, K. T. Nam, S. J. Park, H. Y. Kim, and R. Navamathavan, Macromol. Res., 18, 759 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.M. Dragoman, G. Konstantinidis, A. Cismaru, D. Vasilache, A. Dinescu, D. Dragoman, D. Neculoiu, R. Buiculescu, G. Deligeorgis, A. P. Vajpeyi, and A. Georgakilas, Appl. Phys. Lett., 96, 053116-1 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Z. Ng, K. P. Loh, L. Li, P. Ho, P. Bai, and J. H. K. Yip, ACS Nano, 3, 2103 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar