Properties and performance of polypyrrole (PPy)-coated silk fibers
Abstract
Different silk substrates in form of spun silk tops, nonwoven web, yarn, and fabric were coated with electrically conducting doped polypyrrole (PPy) by in situ oxidative polymerization from an aqueous solution of pyrrole (Py) at room temperature using FeCl3 as catalyst. PPy-coated silk materials were characterized by optical (OM) and scanning electron (SEM) microscopy, FT-IR spectroscopy, and thermal analysis (DSC, TG). OM and SEM showed that PPy completely coated the surface of individual silk fibers and that the polymerization process occurred only at the fiber surface and not in the bulk. Dendrite-like aggregates of PPy adhered to the fiber surface, with the exception of the sample first polymerized in the form of tops and then spun into yarn using conventional industrial machines. FT-IR (ATR mode) showed a mixed spectral pattern with bands typical of silk and PPy overlapping over the entire wavenumbers range. DSC and TG showed that PPy-coated silk fibers attained a significantly higher thermal stability owing to the protective effect of the PPy layer against thermal degradation. The mechanical properties of silk fibers remained unchanged upon polymerization of Py. The different PPy-coated silk materials displayed excellent electrical properties. After exposition to atmospheric oxygen for two years a residual conductivity of 10–20 % was recorded. The conductivity decreased sharply under the conditions of domestic washing with water, while it remained essentially unchanged upon dry cleaning. Abrasion tests caused a limited increase of resistance. PPy-coated silk tops were successfully spun into yarn either pure or in blend with untreated silk fibers. The resulting yarns maintained good electrical properties.
Keywords
Silk Polypyrrole Composite Conductive textilePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.A. Harlin, P. Nousiainen, A. Puolakka, J. Pelto, and J. Sarlin, J. Mater. Sci., 40, 5365 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.P. Lekpittaya, N. Yanumet, B. P. Grady, and E. A. O’Rear, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 92, 2629 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.E. Hakansson, A. Amiet, and A. Kaynak, Synth. Met., 156, 917 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.L. Dall’Acqua, C. Tonin, R. Peila, F. Ferrero, and M. Catellani, Synth. Met., 146, 213 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.L. Dall’Acqua, C. Tonin, A. Varesano, M. Canetti, W. Porzio, and M. Catellani, Synth. Met., 156, 379 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.S. N. Bhadani, M. Kumari, S. K. Sen Gupta, and G. C. Sahu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 64, 1073 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.S. Subianto, G. D. Will, and S. Kokot, Int. J. Polym. Mater., 54, 141 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.A. Varesano, L. Dall’Acqua, and C. Tonin, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 89, 125 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.A. Varesano, A. Aluigi, C. Tonin, and F. Ferrero, Fiber. Polym., 7, 105 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.S. S. Najar, A. Kainak, and R. C. Foitzik, Synth. Met., 157, 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.A. M. White and R. C. T. Slade, J. Mater. Chem., 13, 1345 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.S. H. Hosseini and A. Pairovi, Iran. Polym. J., 14, 934 (2005).Google Scholar
- 13.I. Cucchi, A. Boschi, C. Arosio, F. Bertini, G. Freddi, and M. Catellani, Synth. Met., in press.Google Scholar
- 14.S. P. Khedkar and S. Radhakrishnan, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 57, 51 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.F. J. Wortmann, G. Wortmann, and H. Zahn, Text. Res. J., 67, 720 (1997).Google Scholar
- 16.S. Krimm and J. Bandekar, Adv. Protein Chem., 38, 181 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.R. D. B. Fraser and T. P. MacRae, “Conformation in Fibrous Proteins and Related Synthetic Polypeptides”, pp.293–343, Academic Press Inc., NY, 1973.Google Scholar
- 18.T. Arai, G. Freddi, R. Innocenti, and M. Tsukada, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 89, 324 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar