Journal of Micro-Bio Robotics

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 91–103 | Cite as

An optimized self-sensing piezoelectric cantilever for micro-robotic applications

  • Louis MassonEmail author
  • Liu Xinchang
  • Yves Perriard
Research Paper


Quasi-static piezoelectric actuators are used in micro-robotics due to the small displacements they can achieve, and they have been proven to be suitable for Self-Sensing Actuation (SSA) applications. The morphology and material of an actuator, and therefore its characteristics (i.e. stiffness, capacitance), all have an impact on the performance of the SSA implementation. This article presents a methodology that can be used to optimize the design parameters for a piezoelectric quasi-static bimorph cantilever for micro-robotic applications with sub-mN manipulation forces and sub-μ m positioning resolutions in mind. A model is established for this type of actuator, from which an objective function aiming to maximize β, the charge accumulation coefficient, is defined. Boundary conditions are set on the optimization study by imposing constraints on the design. An analytical optimization approach is then adopted to study the evolution of the objective function across the design space. The study evidences the existence of a subset of solutions satisfying the constraints and maximizing the objective function, and the partial derivatives of this subset are studied, leading to conclusions for an optimized design strategy. Experimental results show that inaccuracies in the prediction of the β parameter lie within the self-sensing actuator model due to the omission of the thin electrode layers inserted between each piezoelectric layer. Nonetheless, the presented optimization methodology has proven to be suitable to maximize the potential SSA performance of a design, with the fabricated optimized actuator having a higher β coefficient than a commercial actuator of similar external dimensions by a factor of approximately 7.


Piezoelectric Self-sensing Optimization Modelling 



  1. 1.
    Burkart I, Klocke V, Maynicke E (2014) The Nanoworkbench: Automated Nanorobotic system inside of scanning electron or focused ion beam microscopes. In: 2014 9th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS), IEEE, pp 89–92Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang YL, Changhai R, Chen BK, Sun Y (2011) A load-Lock-Compatible Nanomanipulation System for Scanning Electron Microscope. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klocke V, Jones G (2011) The SEM/FIB workbench: automated nanorobotics system inside of scanning electron or focussed ion beam microscopes. In: 2011 11th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), IEEE, pp 1510–1515Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McPherson T, Ueda J (2014) A force and displacement self-sensing piezoelectric MRI-compatible tweezer end effector with an on-site calibration procedure. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 19(2):755–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Péclat C, Trumpy K (1998) Piezoelectric motor having an arrangement which provides information relative to the rotor position and/or the rotor’s number of revolutionsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flueckiger M, Zogg W, design YP (2010) Sensorless position control of a piezoelectric motor integrated into a mechatronic cylinder lock. In: Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) Optimal IEEE, IEEE, pp 3428–3433Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dosch JJ, Inman DJ, Garcia E (1992) A self-Sensing piezoelectric actuator for collocated control. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 3(1):166–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hagood NW, Anderson EH (1992) Simultaneous sensing and actuation using piezoelectric materials. In: San Diego-DL Tentative, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 409–421Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ivan IA, Rakotondrabe M, Lutz P, Chaillet N (2009) Quasistatic displacement self-sensing method for cantilevered piezoelectric actuators. Review of Scientific Instruments 80(6):065102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rakotondrabe M, Ivan IA, Khadraoui S, Lutz P, Chaillet N (2015) Simultaneous displacement/Force self-Sensing in piezoelectric actuators and applications to robust control. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 20(2):519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Islam MN, Seethaler RsJ (2014) Sensorless position control for piezoelectric actuators using a hybrid position observer. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 19(2):667–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Masson L., Civet Y., Germano P., Perriard Y. (2017) Design of a generalised charge-based self-sensing model for quasi-static piezoelectric actuators. In: 2017 20Th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smits JG, Choi W-s (1991) The constituent equations of piezoelectric heterogeneous bimorphs. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 38(3):256–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunsch R, Breguet J-M (2007) Unified mechanical approach to piezoelectric bender modeling. Sensors Actuators A Phys 134(2):436–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ivan IA, Rakotondrabe M, Lutz P, Chaillet N (2009) Current integration force and displacement self-sensing method for cantilevered piezoelectric actuators. Review of Scientific Instruments 80(12):126103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering (STI)École Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneNeuchatelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations