Advertisement

Design and analysis of a 2-DOF compliant gripper with constant-force flexure mechanism

  • Xiaozhi Zhang
  • Qingsong XuEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

This paper presents the design and testing of a novel flexure-based compliant parallel gripper with constant driving force. One uniqueness of the gripper lies in that it achieves two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) independent constant driving force in grasping and rolling operations. In each direction, the grasping and rolling operation is executed with the constant driving force. The parallel-kinematic flexure mechanism design enables nearly decoupled operations in 2-DOF manipulation. The constant driving force property enlarges the grasping range by reducing the required driving force. Analytical modeling of the gripper mechanism is carried out based on pseudo-rigid-body method, which is verified by conducting simulation study with nonlinear finite-element analysis (FEA). Parametric study is conducted to investigate the influence of each design variable on the gripper performance. To demonstrate the performance of the gripper, a prototype is fabricated by 3D printer. Experimental results reveal that the devised gripper owns a good constant driving force property during grasping.

Keywords

Compliant mechanism Gripper Parallel mechanism Constant force Mechanism design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51575545, the Macao Science and Technology Development Fund under Grant No. 179/2017/A3, and the Research Committee of the University of Macau under Grant No.: MYRG2018-00034-FST.

References

  1. 1.
    Morsch FM, Herder J (2010) Design of a generic zero stiffness compliant joint. Proceedings of ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, pp 427–435Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tolman KA, Merriam EG, Howell L (2016) Compliant constant-force linear-motion mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 106:68–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen Z, Jiang X, Zhang X (2018) Damped circular hinge with integrated comb-like substructures. Precis Eng 53:212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lan C-C, Wang J-H, Chen Y-H (2010) A compliant constant-force mechanism for adaptive robot end-effector operations. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 2131–2136Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Howell L, Magleby S (2004) Substantially constant-force exercise machine. US Patent 20040198571A1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berliant I (2011) Constant force rail clamp. US Patent 7,975,811Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang P, Xu Q (2018) Design and testing of a flexure-based constant-force stage for biological cell micromanipulation. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 15(3):1114–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Radaelli G, Herder J (2016) A monolithic compliant large-range gravity balancer. Mech Mach Theory 102:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu Y, Zhang Y, Xu Q (2017) Design and control of a novel compliant constant-force gripper based on buckled fixed-guided beams. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 22(1):476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang P, Xu Q (2018) Design and modeling of constant-force mechanisms: a survey. Mech Mach Theory 119:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carrella A, Brennan M, Kovacic I, Waters T (2009) On the force transmissibility of a vibration isolator with quasi-zero-stiffness. J Sound Vib 322(4):707–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kovacic I, Brennan M, Waters T (2008) A study of a nonlinear vibration isolator with a quasi-zero stiffness characteristic. J Sound Vib 315(3):700–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carrella A, Brennan M, Waters T, Shin K (2008) On the design of a high-static–low-dynamic stiffness isolator using linear mechanical springs and magnets. J Sound Vib 315(3):712–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou N, Liu K (2010) A tunable high-static–low-dynamic stiffness vibration isolator. J Sound Vib 329(9):1254–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pham H-T, Wang D-A (2011) A constant-force bistable mechanism for force regulation and overload protection. Mech Mach Theory 46(7):899–909CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen G, Chang H, Li G (2016) Design of constant-force compliant Sarrus mechanism considering stiffness nonlinearity of compliant joints. In: Advances in reconfigurable mechanisms and robots II. Springer, pp 107–116Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang D-A, Chen J-H., Pham H-T (2013) A constant-force bistable micromechanism. Sensors Actuators A Phys 189:481–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geng R-R, Mills JK, Yao Z-Y (2016) Design and analysis of a novel 3-dof spatial parallel microgripper driven by LUMs. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 42:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duc TC, Lau G-K, Sarro PM (2008) Polymeric thermal microactuator with embedded silicon skeleton: Part II-fabrication, characterization, and application for 2-DOF microgripper. J Microelectromech Syst 17(4):823–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen W, Qu J, Chen W, Zhang J (2017) A compliant dual-axis gripper with integrated position and force sensing. Mechatronics 47:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang X, Xu Q (in press) Design and testing of a novel 2-dof compound constant-force parallel gripper. Precision EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang P, Xu Q (2017) Design of a flexure-based constant-force xy precision positioning stage. Mech Mach Theory 108:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang X, Xu Q (2018) Design and analysis of a compound constant-force mechanism for compliant gripper. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on manipulation, automation and robotics at small scales (MARSS2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu Q (2017) Design of a large-stroke bistable mechanism for the application in constant-force micropositioning stage. J Mech Robot 9(1):011006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu Y-Q, Howell L, Lusk C, Yue Y, He M-G (2005) Dynamic modeling of compliant mechanisms based on the pseudo-rigid-body model. J Mech Des 127(4):760–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electromechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of MacauMacauChina

Personalised recommendations