Advertisement

Journal of Micro-Bio Robotics

, Volume 10, Issue 1–4, pp 55–67 | Cite as

“A versatile perching mechanism employing shape memory wires and Bio-inspired adhesives”

  • Amirpasha Peyvandi
  • Parviz Soroushian
  • Jue Lu
Research Paper
  • 265 Downloads

Abstract

Shape memory wires were integratedwith bio-inspired adhesives to produce abird-like perching actionwhichenables versatile landing and eventually locomotion of micro air vehicles on different surfaces. Theshapememory wires undergomotions which render the bird-like perching effect. Integration of bio-inspired adhesives with this perching mechanism enables reliable and versatile adherence to diverse surfaces irrespective of their type, roughness and curvature. The new perching system comprises four toes made of shape memory alloys (SMAs). They assume bent and straight configurations to produce perching and release effects, respectively. The perching action in animals is effective against rough or curved surfaces. In order to enable the perching system function against relatively smooth and flat surfaces (which are commonly found in indoor environments), it was provided with bio-inspired adhesives.

Keyword

Perching Bio-inspired Adhesive Biomimetics Shape Memory Landing 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge support of the U.S. Air Force (Contract FA8651-07-C-0,092) for the project reported herein.

References

  1. 1.
    Ehrhard TP (2010) Air force UAVs the secret history. Mitchell Institute PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson M, Mees E, Carter C, Johnson W, VanBaren M, Wright III S, et al. (2008) Micro Aerial Vehicle (MAV) mission life extension through perching. AUVSI Unmanned Systems North America Conference Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International. p. 519–33Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirose S, Umetani Y (1978) The development of soft gripper for the versatile robot hand. Mech Mach Theory 13:351–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crisman JD, Kanojia C, Zeid I (1996) Graspar: A flexible, easily controllable robotic hand. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 3:32–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cho C, Lee Y, Kim M (2009) Underactuated hand with passive adaptation. IEEE Int Symp Ind Electron. p. 995–1000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dollar AM, Howe RD (2010) The highly adaptive SDM hand: Design and performance evaluation. Int J Robot Res 29:585–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doyle CE, Bird JJ, Isom TA, Kallman JC, Bareiss DF, Dunlop DJ, et al. (2012) An avian-inspired passive mechanism for quadrotor perching. IEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramos AM, Gravagne IA, Walker ID (1999) Goldfinger: A nonanthropomorphic, dextrous robot hand. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. p. 913–9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramos AM, Walker ID (1998) Raptors-inroads to multifingered grasping. IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Robots Syst. p. 467–75.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hawkes EW, Christensen DL, Eason EV, Estrada MA, Heverly M, Hilgemann E, et al. (2013) Dynamic surface grasping with directional adhesion. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on: IEEE. p. 5487–93.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Danko TW, Kellas A, Oh PY (2005) Robotic rotorcraft and perch-andstare: Sensing landing zones and handling obscurants. IEEE Int Conf, Adv Robot, pp 296–302Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wickenheiser AM, Garcia E (2008) Optimization of perching maneuvers through vehicle morphing. J Guid Control Dyn 31:815–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asbeck AT, Kim S, Cutkosky MR (2006) Scaling hard vertical surfaces with compliant microspine arrays. Int J Robot Res 25:1165–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Desbiens AL, Asbeck AT, Cutkosky MR (2011) Landing, perching and taking off from vertical surfaces. Int J Robot Res 30:355–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kovaˇc M, Germann J, H¨urzeler C, Siegwart RY, Floreano D (2010) A perching mechanism for micro aerial vehicles. J Micro-Nano Mechatronics 5:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim H, Kim D, Yang H, Lee K, Seo K, Chang D, et al. (2006) A wall climbing robot with vacuum caterpillar wheel system operated by mechanical valve. International Conference on Climbing andWalking Robots (CLAWAR). p. 28–33.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saboori P, Morris W, Xiao J, Sadegh A (2007) Aerodynamic analysis of city-climber robots. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Sanya, China. p. 1855–860Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang W, Wang Y, Wang K, Zhang H, Zhang J (2008) Analysis of the kinematics of module climbing caterpillar robots. IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. p. 84–9Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wanli L, Xinghua Q, Yonggang Y (2007) Design and motion analysis of wheel-legged climbing robot. Chinese Control Conference. Zhangjiajie, Hunan, China. p. 149–53Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu T, Liu R, Wang XD, Wang K (2006) Principle and application of vibrating suction method. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Kunming, China. p. 491–5Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berengueres J, Tadakuma K, Kamoi T, Kratz R (2007) Compliant distributed magnetic adhesion device for wall climbing. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Rome, Italy. p. 1256–61Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fei Y, Zhao X, Wan J (2006) Motion analysis of a modular inspection robot with magnetic wheels. The Sixth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Dalian, China. p. 21–3Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kalra LP, Gu J, Meng M (2006) A wall climbing robot for oil tank inspection. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Brussels, Belgium. p. 1523–8Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shen W, Gu J, Shen Y (2005) Proposed wall climbing robot with permanent magnetic tracks for inspecting oil tanks. IEEE International Conferenceon Mechatronics and Automation. Niagara Falls, Canada. p. 2072–7Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    DelCampo A, Greiner C, Arzt E (2007) Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. Langmuir 23:10235–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Murphy MP, Aksak B, Sitti M (2009) Gecko-inspired directional and controllable adhesiondirectional and controllable adhesion. Small 5:170–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yurdumakan B, Raravikar NR, Ajayan PM, Dhinojwala A (2005) Synthetic gecko foot-hairs from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chem Commun 30:3799–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Daler L, Klaptocz A, Briod A, Sitti M, Floreano D (2013) A perching mechanism for flying robots using a fibre-based adhesive. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 I.E. International Conference on: IEEE. p. 4433–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Asbeck A, Dastoor S, Parness A, Fullerton L, Esparza N, Soto D, et al. (2009) Climbing rough vertical surfaces with hierarchical directional adhesion. International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Kobe, Japan. p. 2675–80Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim S, Spenko M, Trujillo S, Heyneman B, Santos D, Cutkosky MR (2008) Smooth vertical surface climbing with directional adhesion. IEEE Trans Robot 24:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Murphy MP, Kute C, Mengüç Y, Sitti M (2011) Waalbot II: Adhesion recovery and improved performance of a climbing robot using fibrillar adhesives. Int J Robot Res 30:118–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stockel D (1992) status and Trends in Shape-Mempry Technology. Nitiol Development Corporation. p. 79–84.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wayman CM, Duerig TW (1990) An Intruduction to Martensite and Shape Memory. Butterworth-Heinemann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aksak B, Murphy MP, Sitti M (2007) Adhesion of biologically inspired vertical and angled polymer microfiber arrays. Langmuir 23(6):3322–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Varenberg M, Peressadko A, Gorb S, Arzt E (2006) Effect of real contact geometry on adhesion. Appl Phys Lett 89(12):121905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Murphy MP, Aksak B, Sitti M (2007) Adhesion and anisotropic friction enhancements of angled heterogeneous micro-fiber arrays with spherical and spatula tips. J Adhes Sci Technol 21(12–13):1281–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kuang P, Lee J, Kim CH, Ho KM, Constant K (2010) Improved Surface Wettability of Polyurethane Films by Ultraviolet Ozone Treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 16(5):3024–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W (2008) Diversity of structure, morphology and wetting of plant surfaces. Soft Matter 4(10):1943–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bocka WJ (1999) Functional and evolutionary morphology of woodpeckers. Ostrich. J Afr Ornithol 70:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Timoshenko S (1976) Strength of Materials Pt. 1 : Elementary Theory and Problems: Krieger Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Qing-Chao T, Jiang-Sheng WU (2000) Characteristic of specific heat capacity of NiTi all oy phases. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc;10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bridge Department, HNTB CorporationBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringMichigan State UniversityLansingUSA
  3. 3.Senior Scientist, Technova CorporationOkemosUSA

Personalised recommendations