Magnetic reconnection and impulsive instabilities in tokamak plasmas: Some analogies with astrophysical flares

  • Paolo BurattiEmail author
A Decade of AGILE
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. A Decade of AGILE: Results, Challenges and Prospects of Gamma-Ray Astrophysics


Four kinds of tokamak plasma dynamical processes are described, which could be of interest for a comparative study with events such as solar and astrophysical flares. The first two processes are related to instabilities with different mechanism and different spatial location (violation of the Kruskal–Shafranov limit around the plasma center in one case and violation of a pressure gradient limit at the plasma edge in the other case); nevertheless, both result in similar cycles of slow accumulation and rapid release of energy. The third process is related to a kinetic instability of the electron momentum distribution: beamed electrons can destabilize plasma waves, which in turn transfer energy to electron motion perpendicular to the magnetic field, resulting in enhanced synchrotron emission. Cycles with slow accumulation and rapid release are observed here too. The fourth kind of event consists in the disruption of a current channel, during which a substantial fraction of the stored magnetic energy is transferred to a population of relativistic electrons.


Magnetic reconnection Runaway electrons Disruption Tokamak 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

The authors declare that the manuscript has been prepared following the rules of good scientific practice.


  1. Boozer AH (2017) Runaway electrons and ITER. Nucl Fusion 57:056018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buratti P, Giovannozzi E, Tudisco O (2003) Purely growing precursors and sawtooth trigger mechanisms. Plasma Phys Control Fusion 45:L9–L16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cassak PA, Shay MA, Drake JF (2005) Catastrophe model for fast magnetic reconnection onset. Phys Rev Lett 95:235002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Causa F, Buratti P, FTU Team (2019) Analysis of runaway electron expulsion during tokamak instabilities detected by a single-channel Cherenkov probe in FTU. Nucl Fusion 59:046013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowley SC, Cowley B, Henneberg SA, Wilson HR (2015) Explosive instability and erupting flux tubes in a magnetized plasma. Proc R Soc A 471:2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freethy SJ, McClements KG, Chapman SC, Dendy RO, Lai WN, Pamela SJP, Shevchenko VF, Vann RGL (2015) Electron kinetics inferred from observations of microwave bursts during edge localized modes in the mega-amp spherical tokamak. Phys Rev Lett 114:125004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kadomtsev BB (1975) Disruptive instability in tokamaks. Sov J Plasma Phys 1:89Google Scholar
  8. Loureiro NF, Schekochihin AA, Uzdensky DA (2013) Plasmoid and Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities in Sweet–Parker current sheets. Phys Rev E 87:013102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pucci F, Velli M, Tenerani A, Del Sarto D (2018) Onset of fast “ideal” tearing in thin current sheets: dependence on the equilibrium current profile. Phys Plasmas 25:032113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yamada M, Yoo J, Jara-Almonte J, Ji H, Kulsrud RM, Myers CE (2014) Conversion of magnetic energy in the magnetic reconnection layer of a laboratory plasma. Nat Commun 5:4474CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ENEA, Fusion and Nuclear Safety DepartmentC. R. FrascatiFrascatiItaly

Personalised recommendations