Advertisement

Reactivity, relaxation and dissociation of vibrationally excited molecules in low-temperature plasma modeling

  • Fabrizio EspositoEmail author
Classical and Quantum Plasmas
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Classical and quantum plasmas: matter under extreme conditions

Abstract

Accurate modeling of low-temperature plasmas requires molecular collision input data, including the detail over the whole ladder of vibrational states. Obtaining this kind of detailed data is a big challenge, both theoretically and experimentally. These data can be calculated with the aid of simple models (for inelastic processes essentially based on forced harmonic oscillator mechanism), or with molecular dynamics at various levels, namely quasiclassical (QCT), semiclassical (SC), approximate and exact quantum mechanical methods, with computational cost rapidly increasing with accuracy. However, while accurate methods can become unfeasible when applied to the wide total energy ranges typically required in plasma modeling, more approximate semiclassical methods rapidly become efficient and accurate for increasing total energy, as shown in the literature. The best strategy is to study the limits of application of less accurate methods, to use them as a seamless continuation of accurate calculations on the total energy axis. In this sense, it is the current development about inelastic processes treated by QCT and SC methods. The aspect of special interest is the indication of a criterion for easily extracting the reliable QCT contribution to the inelastic process, treating the missing contributions by other SC methods in a restricted range. This procedure allows to optimize the use of different methods to maintain both a high level of accuracy and a high computational efficiency. As a consequence of the study about inelastic processes, a better comprehension and possible treatment of the dissociation mechanisms are obtained, with an indication of reliability of QCT results about this kind of process.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Reactivity Relaxation Dissociation Quasiclassical method Vibrational kinetics Plasma modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The computational time was supplied by CINECA (Bologna) under ISCRA project N. HP10CGTAHE.

References

  1. Aoiz FJ, Bañares Luis, Herrero VJ (1998) Recent results from quasiclassical trajectory computations of elementary chemical reactions. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 94:2483–2500.  https://doi.org/10.1039/a803469i CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan N, Vieira M, Babb J, Dalgarno A, Forrey R, Lepp S (1999) Rate coefficients for ro-vibrational transitions in H2 due to collisions with He. Astrophys J 524:1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billing GD (1999) Time-dependent quantum dynamics in a Gauss-Hermite basis. J Chem Phys 110:5526–5537.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blais NC, Truhlar DG (1978) Ab initio calculation of the vibrational energy transfer rate of H2 in Ar using Monte Carlo classical trajectories and the forced quantum oscillator model. J Chem Phys 69:846.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.436600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnet L (2008) The method of Gaussian weighted trajectories. III. An adiabaticity correction proposal. J Chem Phys 128:044109.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2827134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnet L, Rayez J-C (2004) Gaussian weighting in the quasiclassical trajectory method. Chem Phys Lett 397:106–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.08.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capitelli M (1986) Nonequilibrium vibrational kinetics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capitelli M, Ferreira CM, Gordiets B, Osipov AI (2000) Plasma kinetics in atmospheric gases. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capitelli M, Cacciatore M, Celiberto R, De Pascale O, Diomede P, Esposito F, Gicquel A, Gorse C, Hassouni K, Laricchiuta A, Longo S, Pagano D, Rutigliano M (2006) Vibrational kinetics, electron dynamics and elementary processes in H2 and D2 plasmas for negative ion production: modelling aspects. Nucl Fusion 46:S260–S274.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/46/6/506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capitelli M, Celiberto R, Colonna G, D’Ammando G, De Pascale O, Diomede P, Esposito F, Gorse C, Laricchiuta A, Longo S et al (2011) Plasma kinetics in molecular plasmas and modeling of reentry plasmas. Plasma Phys Control Fusion 53:124007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Capitelli M, Bruno D, Catalfamo C, Celiberto R, Colonna G, Coppola CM, D’Ammando G, De Pascale O, Diomede P, Esposito F, Gorse C, Laricchiuta A, Longo S, Taccogna F (2014) Elementary processes, thermodynamics and transport of H2 plasmas. Atomic and plasma-material interaction data for fusion. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 24–36Google Scholar
  12. Capitelli M, Celiberto R, Colonna G, Esposito F, Gorse C, Hassouni K, Laricchiuta A, Longo S (2016a) Fundamental aspects of plasma chemical physics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Capitelli M, Celiberto R, Colonna G, Esposito F, Gorse C, Hassouni K, Laricchiuta A, Longo S (2016b) Reactivity and relaxation of vibrationally/rotationally excited molecules with open shell atoms. Fundamental aspects of plasma chemical physics. Springer, New York, pp 31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Celiberto R, Armenise I, Cacciatore M, Capitelli M, Esposito F, Gamallo P, Janev RK, Laganà A, Laporta V, Laricchiuta A, Lombardi A, Rutigliano M, Sayós R, Tennyson J, Wadehra JM (2016) Atomic and molecular data for spacecraft re-entry plasmas. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 25:033004.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/25/3/033004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Celiberto R, Capitelli M, Colonna G, D’Ammando G, Esposito F, Janev R, Laporta V, Laricchiuta A, Pietanza L, Rutigliano M, Wadehra J (2017) Elementary processes and kinetic modeling for hydrogen and helium plasmas. Atoms 5:18.  https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms5020018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coppola CM, Mizzi G, Bruno D, Esposito F, Galli D, Palla F, Longo S (2016) State-to-state vibrational kinetics of H2 and H2 + in a post-shock cooling gas with primordial composition. Mon Not R Astron Soc 457:3732–3742.  https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dalgarno A (2005) Molecular processes in the early Universe. J Phys Conf Ser 4:10–16.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/4/1/002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalgarno A (2006) Introductory Lecture: the growth of molecular complexity in the Universe. Faraday Discuss 133:9.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b605715b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Fazio D (2014) The H + HeH+ → He + H2 + reaction from the ultra-cold regime to the three-body breakup: exact quantum mechanical integral cross sections and rate constants. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:11662–11672.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp00502c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dove JE, Mandy ME, Sathyamurthy N, Joseph T (1986) On the origin of the dynamical threshold for collision-induced dissociation processes. Chem Phys Lett 127:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(86)80199-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Esposito F, Armenise I (2017) Reactive, inelastic, and dissociation processes in collisions of atomic oxygen with molecular nitrogen. J Phys Chem A 121:6211–6219.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b04442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esposito F, Capitelli M (2009) Selective vibrational pumping of molecular hydrogen via gas phase atomic recombination. J Phys Chem A 113:15307–15314.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9061829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Esposito F, Gorse C, Capitelli M (1999) Quasi-classical dynamics calculations and state-selected rate coefficients for H + H2(v, j)– > 3H processes: application to the global dissociation rate under thermal conditions. Chem Phys Lett 303:636–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Esposito F, Coppola CM, De Fazio D (2015) Complementarity between quantum and classical mechanics in chemical modeling. The H + HeH+ → H2+ + He reaction: a rigorous test for reaction dynamics methods. J Phys Chem A 119:12615–12626.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b09660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esposito F, Macdonald R, Boyd ID, Neitzel K, Andrienko DA (2019) Heavy particle elementary processes in hypersonic flows. Hypersonic meteoroid entry physics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Forrey RC (2013) Sturmian theory of three-body recombination: application to the formation of H2 in primordial gas. Phys Rev A 88:052709.  https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.88.052709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fridman A (2008) Plasma chemistry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galli D, Palla F (2013) The Dawn of Chemistry. Ann Rev Astron Astrophys 51:163–206.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia E, Saracibar A, Gómez-Carrasco S, Laganà A (2008) Modeling the global potential energy surface of the N + N2 reaction from ab initio data. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:2552.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b800593a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giese CF, Gentry WR (1974) Classical trajectory treatment of inelastic scattering in collisions of H+ with H2, HD, and D2. Phys Rev A 10:2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. International Atomic Energy Agency V (Austria) (2001) Atomic and plasma-material interaction data for fusion, vol 9. IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), ViennaGoogle Scholar
  32. Kozák T, Bogaerts A (2014) Splitting of CO2 by vibrational excitation in non-equilibrium plasmas: a reaction kinetics model. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 23:045004.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/23/4/045004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar S, Sathyamurthy N, Ramaswamy R (1995) Overcoming the zero-point dilemma in quasiclassical trajectories: (He, H2 +) as a test case. J Chem Phys 103:6021–6028.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kustova EV, Nagnibeda EA, Armenise I (2014) Vibrational-chemical kinetics in mars entry problems. Open Plasma Phys J 7:76–87.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1876534301407010076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laganà A, Lombardi A, Pirani F, Gamallo P, Sayós R, Armenise I, Cacciatore M, Esposito F, Rutigliano M (2014) Molecular physics of elementary processes relevant to hypersonics: atom-molecule, molecule-molecule and atoms-surface processes. Open Plasma Phys J 7:48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lebouvier A, Iwarere SA, d’Argenlieu P, Ramjugernath D, Fulcheri L (2013) Assessment of carbon dioxide dissociation as a new route for syngas production: a comparative review and potential of plasma-based technologies. Energy Fuels 27:2712–2722.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301991d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leforestier C (1986) Competition between dissociation and exchange processes in a collinear A + BC collision: comparison of quantum and classical results. Chem Phys Lett 125:373–377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(86)85175-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lino da Silva M, Guerra V, Loureiro J (2009) A review of non-equilibrium dissociation rates and models for atmospheric entry studies. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 18:034023.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/18/3/034023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lombardi A, Faginas-Lago N, Pacifici L, Grossi G (2015) Energy transfer upon collision of selectively excited CO2 molecules: state-to-state cross sections and probabilities for modeling of atmospheres and gaseous flows. J Chem Phys 143:034307.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4926880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Macdonald RL, Jaffe RL, Schwenke DW, Panesi M (2018) Construction of a coarse-grain quasi-classical trajectory method. I. Theory and application to N2–N2 system. J Chem Phys 148:054309.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Macheret SO, Adamovich IV (2000) Semiclassical modeling of state-specific dissociation rates in diatomic gases. J Chem Phys 113:7351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller WH (1970) The classical S-matrix: a more detailed study of classically forbidden transitions in inelastic collisions. Chem Phys Lett 7:431–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(70)80326-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morales JA, Diz AC, Deumens E, Öhrn Y (1995) Molecular vibrational state distributions in collisions. Chem Phys Lett 233:392–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(94)01472-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nagnibeda E, Kustova E (2009) Non-equilibrium reacting gas flows. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Palmieri P, Puzzarini C, Aquilanti V, Capecchi G, Cavalli S, De Fazio D, Aguilar A, Giménez X, Lucas J (2000) Ab initio dynamics of the He + H2+ → HeH+ + H reaction: a new potential energy surface and quantum mechanical cross-sections. Mol Phys 98:1835–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pietanza LD, Colonna G, D’Ammando G, Laricchiuta A, Capitelli M (2015) Vibrational excitation and dissociation mechanisms of CO2 under non-equilibrium discharge and post-discharge conditions. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 24:042002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/24/4/042002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pomerantz AE, Ausfelder F, Zare RN, Juanes-Marcos JC, Althorpe SC, Sáez Rábanos V, Aoiz FJ, Bañares L, Castillo JF (2004) Rovibrational product state distribution for inelastic H + D2 collisions. J Chem Phys 121:6587.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1804940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith IW (1977) Reaction and relaxation of vibrationally excited molecules: a classical trajectory study of Br + HCl(v′) and Br + DCl(v′) collisions. Chem Phys 20:437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tang XN, Xu H, Zhang T, Hou Y, Chang C, Ng CY, Chiu Y, Dressler RA, Levandier DJ (2005) A pulsed-field ionization photoelectron secondary ion coincidence study of the H2 +(X, υ+ = 0–15, N+ = 1) + He proton transfer reaction. J Chem Phys 122:164301.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1883169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Treanor CE (1965) Vibrational energy transfer in high-energy collisions. J Chem Phys 43:532.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1696777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.P.Las.M.I.Lab@Nanotec-C.N.RBariItaly

Personalised recommendations