Advertisement

Rendiconti Lincei

, Volume 25, Supplement 1, pp 97–105 | Cite as

Cosmic ray physics in space: from fundamental physics to applications

  • Roberto BattistonEmail author
COSMIC RADIATION: Sino-Italian Cooperation
  • 172 Downloads

Abstract

One hundred years after their discovery by Victor Hess, cosmic rays are nowadays subject of intense research from space-based detectors, able to perform for the first time high precision measurement of their composition and spectra as well as of isotropy and time variability. On May 2011, the alpha magnetic spectrometer (AMS-02) has been installed on the International Space Station, to measure with high accuracy the cosmic ray properties searching for rare events which could be an indication of the nature of dark matter or presence of nuclear antimatter. AMS-02 is the result of nearly two decades of effort of an international collaboration, involving in particular Chinese and Italian scientists, to design and build a state of the art detector capable to perform high precision cosmic rays measurement. In this paper, I will briefly report on the first results of AMS-02 as well as about two cosmic rays researches related researches which are spinoffs of the AMS technology development: utilization of superconductivity in space to develop magnetic shields capable to protect the astronauts from the intense dose of radiation collected during an interplanetary mission and study of the lithospheric–magnetospheric interactions linking seismology to cosmic rays in the context of the Sino-Italian collaboration on the China seismo-electromagnetic satellite.

Keywords

Cosmic rays Space research Dark matter Anti matter Superconductivity Seismology Van Allen Belts 

References

  1. Ackermann M et al (2012) Measurement of separate cosmic-ray electron and positron spectra with the fermi large area telescope. Phys Rev Lett 108:011103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adriani O et al (2009) An anomalous positron abundance in cosmic rays with energies 1.5–100 GeV. Nature 458:607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adriani O et al (2010) A statistical procedure for the identification of positrons in the PAMELA experiment. Astropart Phys 34:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aguilar M et al (2002) The alpha magnetic spectrometer (AMS) on the International Space Station: part I—results from the test flight on the space shuttle. Phys Rep 366:331–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aguilar M et al (2007) Cosmic-ray positron fraction measurement from 1 to 30 GeV with AMS-01. Phys Lett B 646:145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aguilar M et al (2013) First result from the alpha magnetic spectrometer on the International Space Station: precision measurement of the positron fraction in primary cosmic rays of 0.5–350 GeV. Phys Rev Lett 110:141102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aleksandrin SY et al (2003) High-energy charged particle bursts in the near-earth space as earthquake precursors. Ann Geophys 21:597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asaoka Y et al (2002) Measurements of cosmic-ray low-energy antiproton and proton spectra in a transient period of solar field reversal. Phys Rev Lett 88–5:051101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bakaldin AV et al (2007) Satellite experiment ARINA for studying seismic effects in the high-energy particle fluxes in the earth’s magnetosphere. Cosmic Res 45:445BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker DN et al (2004) An extreme distortion of the Van Allen belt arising from the ‘Halloween’ solar storm in 2003. Nature 432:878–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Battiston R (2008) The antimatter spectrometer (AMS-02): a particle physics detector in space. Nucl Instrum Method A588:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Battiston R, Burger WJ, Ostaptchouk A, Schael S (2010) Aiglon, a magnetic spectrometer for low energy electrons. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Assoc Equipment. 617(1):467–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Battiston R et al (2011) Superconductive magnet for radiation shielding of human spacecraft, final report ESTEC Contract N 4200023087/10/NL/AF, arXiv: 1209.1907Google Scholar
  14. Battiston R, Vitale V (2013) First evidence for correlations between electron fluxes measured by NOAA-POES satellites and large seismic events. Nuclear Physics B (Proc Suppl) 243–244:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beatty JJ et al (2004) New measurement of the cosmic-ray positron fraction from 5 to 15 GeV. Phys Rev Lett 93:241102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bertucci B, AMS Collaboration (2013) Precision measurement of the e+ + e spectrum with AMS, Proceedings 33rd ICRC, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  17. Boezio M et al (2001) Measurements of cosmic-ray electrons and positrons by the wizard/caprice collaboration. Adv Sp Res 27–4:669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Casaus J, AMS Collaboration (2013) Precision measurement of the cosmic ray boron-to-carbon ratio with AMS, Proceedings 33rd ICRC, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  19. Choutko V, AMS Collaboration (2013) Precision measurement of the cosmic ray helium flux with AMS experiment, Proceedings 33rd ICRC, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  20. Choutko V, Hofer H, Ting SCC (2004) The AMS experiment and magnet Faraday cage for human space exploration. NASA Active Radiation Shielding Workshop, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  21. Delahaye T et al (2009) Galactic secondary positron flux at the Earth. Astron Astrophys 501:821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DuVernois MA et al (2001) Cosmic-ray electrons and positrons from 1 to 100 GeV: measurements with HEAT and their interpretation. Astrophys J 559:296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans DS, Greer MS (2000) Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellite Space Environment Monitor-2: Instrument Descriptions and Archive Data Documentation. NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR SEC-93, Boulder COGoogle Scholar
  24. Golden R et al (1996) Measurement of the positron to electron ratio in the cosmic rays above 5 GeV. Astrophys J 457:L103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guo X et al (2010) Variation charcteristics of OLR for the Wenchuan earthquake. Chin J GeoPhys 53(6):980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haino S, AMS Collaboration (2013) Precision measurement of the proton flux with AMS, Proceedings 33rd ICRC, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffman J, Fisher P, Batishchev O (2005) Use of superconducting magnet technology for astronauts radiation protection, NIAC Phase 1 Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  28. Imhof WL, Reagan JB, Gaines EE, Anderson RR (1981) High-resolution spectral features observed in the inner radiation belt trapped electron population. J Geophys Res 86:11225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Imhof WL, Reagan JB, Voss HD et al (1983) Direct observation of radiation belt electrons precipitation by the controlled injection of VLF signals from a ground-based transmitter. Geophys Res Lett 10:361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mauk BH, Fox NJ, Kanekal SG, Kessel RL, Sibeck DG, Ukhorskiy A (2012) Science objectives and rationale for the radiation belt storm probes mission. Space Sci. RevGoogle Scholar
  31. Meinke RB, Ball MJ, Goodzeit CL (2003) Superconducting double-helix accelerator Magnets, IEEE Proceedings of PAC 03, Vol. 3, 1996Google Scholar
  32. Millan RM, Thorne RM (2007) Review of radiation belt relativistic electron losses. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 69:362–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moskalenko I, Strong A (1998) Production and propagation of cosmic-ray positrons and electrons. Astrophys J 493:697–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nemec F et al (2008) Spacecraft observation of electromagnetic perturbations connected with seismic ativity. Geophys Res Lett 35:L05109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oliva A, AMS Collaboration (2013) Precision measurement of the cosmic ray boron-to-carbon ratio with AMS, Proceedings 33rd ICRC, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  36. Ouzounov D et al (2011) Atmosphere-ionosphere response to the M9 Tohoku earthquake revealed by joined satellite and ground observations. Preliminary results, arXiv: 1105.2841Google Scholar
  37. Parrot M et al (2002) The micro-satelitte DEMETER. J Geodyn 33:535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pisa D et al (2012) Attenuation of electromagnetic waves at the frequency ~1.7 kHz in the upper ionosphere observed by the DEMETER satellite in the vicinity of earthquakes. Ann Geophys 55:1Google Scholar
  39. Schael S, AMS Collaboration (2013) Precision measurements of the electron spectrum and the positron spectrum with AMS, Proceedings 33rd ICRC, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  40. Serpico PD (2012) Astrophysical models for the origin of the positron ‘excess’. Astropart Phys 39–40:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sgrigna V et al (2005) Correlations between earthquakes and anomalous particle bursts from SAMPEX, PET satellite observations. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 67:1448SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spillantini P (2010) Active shielding for long duration interplanetary manned missions. Adv Space Res 43:900–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner DL et al (2012) Explaining sudden losses of outer radiation belt electrons during geomagnetic storms. Nat Phys 8:208–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Usoskin I et al (2011) Solar modulation parameter for cosmic rays since 1936 reconstructed from ground-based neutron monitors and ionization chambers. J Geophys Res 116:A02104Google Scholar
  45. von Braun W (1969) Will mighty magnets protect voyagers to planets? Popular Sci 194(1):98–100Google Scholar
  46. Westover SC, Meinke RB, Battiston R, Burger WJ, Van Sciver S Washburn S (2012) Magnet architectures and active radiation shield study, NIAC phase 1 final reportGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang L, Shen X, Yuan S, Zhang Y, Yan R (2011) The progress report of China electromagnetic satellite Plan. Satell Appl 20(6):481–490Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità di Trento e INFN-TIFPAPovoItaly

Personalised recommendations