Rendiconti Lincei

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 247–258 | Cite as

Neuroaesthetics: themes from the past, current issues, and challenges for the future

  • Marcos Nadal
  • Albert Flexas
  • Álex Gálvez
  • Camilo José Cela-Conde
Interplay of the Two Cultures: Neuroaesthetics

Abstract

Neuroaesthetics is a growing field of research concerned with the biological foundations of aesthetic experiences and artistic activities. In this paper we trace the major milestones in the history of neuroaesthetics, from British Empiricism to current neuroimaging studies, emphasizing the continuity of certain basic assumptions and controversies. Thereafter we turn to an issue that has received attention only recently: differences between men and women in the neural underpinnings of aesthetic preference. We argue that the combination of neuroimaging techniques and evolutionary reasoning affords the possibility of an integral understanding of the biological foundations of aesthetic experiences. Finally, we summarize some challenges neuroaesthetics will have to face in the future.

Keywords

Neuroaesthetics Aesthetic appreciation Beauty Sex-related differences 

References

  1. Alajouanine T (1948) Aphasia and artistic realization. Brain 71:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen G (1877) Physiological aesthetics. Henry S. King & Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrose SH (2001) Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science 291:1748–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amunts K, Armstrong E, Malikovic A, Hömke L, Mohlberg H, Schleicher A, Zilles K (2007) Gender-specific left–right asymmetries in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 27:1356–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson RL (1989) Art in small-scale societies, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  6. Appenzeller T (1998) Art: evolution or revolution? Science 282:1451–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azim E, Mobbs D, Jo B, Menon V, Reiss AL (2005) Sex differences in brain activation elicited by humor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16496–16501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baciu M, Koenig O, Vernier M-P, Bedoin N, Rubin C, Segebarth C (1999) Categorical and coordinate spatial relations: fMRI evidence for hemispheric specialization. NeuroReport 10:1373–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bar M, Neta M (2007) Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia 45:2191–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barton RA (2006) Primate brain evolution: integrating comparative, neurophysiological, and ethological data. Evol Anthropol 15:224–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bar-Yosef Mayer DE, Vandermeersch B, Bar-Yosef O (2009) Shells and ochre in Middle Paleolithic Qafzeh Cave, Israel: indications for modern behavior. J Hum Evol 56:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bäzner H, Hennerici M (2006) Stroke in painters. In: Rose FC (ed) The neurobiology of painting. Int Rev Neurobiol, vol 74. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 165–191Google Scholar
  13. Bednarik RG (1995) Concept-mediated marking in the lower paleolithic. Curr Anthropol 36:605–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bednarik RG (2003) A figurine from the African Acheulian. Curr Anthropol 44:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bell EC, Willson MC, Wilman AH, Dave S, Silverstone PH (2006) Males and females differ in brain activation during cognitive tasks. Neuroimage 30:529–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berlyne DE (1963) Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Can J Psychol 17:274–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berlyne DE (1970) Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Percept Psychophys 8:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Berlyne DE, Ogilvie JC, Parham LCC (1968) The dimensionality of visual complexity, interestingness, and pleasingness. Can J Psychol 22:376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Berry JW (1968) Ecology, perceptual development and the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Brit J Psychol 59:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ (2001) Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11818–11823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ, Bermudez P, Evans AC (1999) Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions. Nat Neurosci 2:382–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Boghi A, Rasetti R, Avidano F, Manzone C, Orsi L, D’Agata F, Caroppo P, Bergui M, Rocca P, Pulvirenti L, Bradac GB, Bogetto F, Mutani R, Mortara P (2006) The effect of gender on planning: an fMRI study using the Tower of London task. Neuroimage 33:999–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bogousslavsky J (2005) Artistic creativity, style and brain disorders. Eur Neurol 54:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bogousslavsky J, Boller F (eds) (2005) Neurological disorders in famous artists. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience, vol 19. Krager, BaselGoogle Scholar
  26. Bouzouggar A, Barton N, Vanhaeren M, d’Errico F, Collcutt S, Higham T, Hodge E, Parfitt S, Rhodes E, Schwenninger J-L, Stringer C, Turner E, Ward S, Moutmir A, Stambouli A (2007) 82,000-year-old shell beads from North Africa and implications for the origins of modern human behaviour. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9964–9969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bromberger B, Sternschein R, Widick P, Smith W II, Chatterjee A (2011) The right hemisphere in esthetic perception. Front Hum Neurosci 5:109. doi:110.3389/fnhum.2011.00109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Brown S, Martinez MJ, Parsons LM (2004) Passive music listening spontaneously engages limbic and paralimbic systems. NeuroReport 15:2033–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bruner J (1983) In search of mind. Essays in autobiography. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Bruner E, Manzi G, Arsuaga JL (2003) Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo: evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15335–15340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Burke E (1757) A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and the beautiful. Dodsley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Cahill L (2006) Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Calvo-Merino B, Jola C, Glaser DE, Haggard P (2008) Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Conscious Cogn 17:911–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Calvo-Merino B, Urgesi C, Orgs G, Aglioti SM, Haggard P (2010) Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli. Exp Brain Res 204:447–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Carroll N (2008) Aesthetic experience, art and artists. In: Shusterman R, Tomlin A (eds) Aesthetic experience. Routledge, New York, pp 145–165Google Scholar
  36. Cela-Conde CJ, Ayala FJ (2007) Human evolution. Trails from the past. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Cela-Conde CJ, Marty G, Maestú F, Ortiz T, Munar E, Fernández A, Roca M, Rosselló J, Quesney F (2004) Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6321–6325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cela-Conde CJ, Ayala FJ, Munar E, Maestú F, Nadal M, Capó MA, del Río D, López-Ibor JJ, Ortiz T, Mirasso C, Marty G (2009) Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:3847–3852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Cela-Conde CJ, Agnati L, Huston JP, Mora F, Nadal M (2011) The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Prog Neurobiol 94:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Chabris CF, Kosslyn SM (1998) How do the cerebral hemispheres contribute to encoding spatial relations? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 7:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Changeux J-P (1994) Art and neuroscience. Leonardo 27:189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Chatterjee A (2004a) Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bull Psychol Arts 4:55–60Google Scholar
  43. Chatterjee A (2004b) The neuropsychology of visual artistic production. Neuropsychologia 42:1568–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Chatterjee A (2006) The neuropsychology of visual art: conferring capacity. Int Rev Neurobiol 74:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Chatterjee A (2011) Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. J Cogn Neurosci 23:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Chatterjee A, Widick P, Sternschein R, Smith WB II, Bromberger B (2010) The assessment of art attributes. Emp Stud Arts 28:207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Chatterjee A, Bromberger B, Smith WB II, Sternschein R, Widick P (2011) Artistic production following brain damage: a study of three artists. Leonardo 55:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Cupchik GC (1986) A decade after Berlyne. New directions in experimental aesthetics. Poetics 15:345–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Cupchik GC, Vartanian O, Crawley A, Mikulis DJ (2009) Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain Cogn 70:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. d’Errico F, Henshilwood C, Vanhaerend M, van Niekerk K (2005) Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age. J Hum Evol 48:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Davis CM (1970) Education and susceptibility to the Muller-Lyer illusion among the Banyankole. J Soc Psychol 82:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Dewey J (1934) Art as experience. Minton, Balch and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Di Dio C, Macaluso E, Rizzolatti G (2007) The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE 11:e1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Dupré E, Nathan M (1911) Le langage musical: Étude médico-psychologique. Maisons Félix Alcan et Guillaumin Réunies, ParisGoogle Scholar
  55. Fechner GT (1865) Über die Frage des golden Schnitts. Archiv für die zeichnenden Künste 11:100–112Google Scholar
  56. Fechner GT (1876) Vorschule der Ästhetik. Breitkopf und Härtel, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  57. Frumkin RM (1963) Sex, familiarity, and dogmatism as factors in painting preferences. Percept Motor Skill 17:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Furnham A, Walker J (2001) The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference. Pers Indiv Differ 31:997–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gabora L (2005) Mind: What archaeology can tell us about the origins of human cognition. In: Bentley A, Maschner H (eds) Handbook of theories and methods in archaeology. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp 283–296Google Scholar
  60. Gosselin N, Peretz I, Johnsen E, Adolphs R (2007) Amygdala damage impairs emotion recognition from music. Neuropsychologia 45:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gourevitch G (1967) Un aphasique s’exprime par le dessin. Encephale 56:52–68Google Scholar
  62. Green CD (1995) All that glitters: a review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section. Perception 24:937–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Haier RJ, Jung RE, Yeo RA, Head K, Alkire MT (2005) The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters. Neuroimage 25:320–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hugdahl K, Thomsen T, Ersland L (2006) Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: an fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia 44:1575–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Humphrey NK (1973) The illusion of beauty. Perception 2:429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jacobsen T, Schubotz RI, Höfel L, von Cramon DY (2006) Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage 29:276–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jager J, Postma A (2003) On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia 41:504–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kant I (1790/1892) Critique of judgment. Macmillan and Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Kawabata H, Zeki S (2004) Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol 91:1699–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kirk U, Skov M, Christensen MS, Nygaard N (2009a) Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study. Brain Cogn 69:306–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kirk U, Skov M, Hulme O, Christensen MS, Zeki S (2009b) Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 44:1125–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Koelsch S, Fritz T, von Cramon DY, Müller K, Friederici AD (2006) Investigating emotion with music: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 27:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Koffka K (1940) Problems in the psychology of art. In: Art: A Bryn Mawr symposium. Bryn Mawr Notes and monographs IX. Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA, pp 179–273Google Scholar
  74. Kosslyn SM (1987) Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemisphere: a computational approach. Psychol Rev 94:148–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kosslyn SM, Alpert NM, Thompson WL, Chabris CF, Rauch SL, Anderson AK (1994) Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation. Brain 117:1055–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, Augustin D (2004) A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br J Psychol 95:489–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lengger PG, Fischmeister FPS, Leder H, Bauer H (2007) Functional neuroanatomy of the perception of modern art: a DC-EEG study on the influence of stylistic information on aesthetic experience. Brain Res 1158:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lewis EO (1908) The effect of practice on the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Br J Psychol 2:294–306Google Scholar
  79. Luria AR, Tsvetkova LS, Futer DS (1965) Aphasia in a composer (V. G. Shebalin). J Neurol Sci 2:288–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Marshack A (1996) A middle paleolithic symbolic composition from the Golan Heights: the earliest known depictive image. Curr Anthropol 37:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Marshall HR (1892) The field of aesthetics psychologically considered II: the differentiation of aesthetics from hedonics. Mind 1:453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Marshall HR (1893) Hedonic aesthetics. Mind 2:15–41Google Scholar
  83. Mellars P (2006) Why did modern human populations disperse from Africa ca. 60,000 years ago? A new model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9381–9386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Miller G (2000) The mating mind. How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Doubleday, LondonGoogle Scholar
  85. Miller GF (2001) Aesthetic fitness: how sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bull Psychol Arts 2:20–25Google Scholar
  86. Miller BL, Hou CE (2004) Portraits of artists. Emergence of visual creativity in dementia. Arch Neurol 61:842–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mitterschiffthaler MT, Fu CHY, Dalton JA, Andrew CM, Williams SCR (2007) A functional MRI study of happy and sad affective states induced by classical music. Hum Brain Mapp 28:1150–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Moore G (2002) Art and evolution: nietzsche’s physiological aesthetics. Br J Hist Phil 10:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mountjoy PT (1958) Effects of exposure time and intertrial interval upon decrement to the Müller-Lyer illusion. J Exp Psychol 56:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nadal M, Pearce MT (2011) The copenhagen neuroaesthetics conference: prospects and pitfalls for an emerging field. Brain Cogn 76:172–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  92. Okubo M, Michimata C (2004) The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1576–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Orban GA, Van Essen D, Vanduffel W (2004) Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends Cogn Sci 8:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Padovan R (1999) Proportion: science, philosophy, architecture. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  95. Pedersen DM, Wheeler J (1983) The Müller-Lyer illusion among Navajos. J Soc Psychol 121:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Piefke M, Weiss PH, Markowitsch HJ, Fink GR (2005) Gender differences in the functional neuroanatomy of emotional episodic autobiographical memory. Hum Brain Mapp 24:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pinter R, Anderson MM (1916) The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. J Exp Psychol 1:200–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Polzella DJ (2000) Differences in reactions to paintings by male and female college students. Percept Motor Skill 91:251–258Google Scholar
  99. Preuss TM, Coleman GQ (2002) Human-specific organization of primary visual cortex: alternating compartments of dense Cat-301 and calbindin immunoreactivity in layer 4A. Cereb Cortex 12:671–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Price U (1810) Essays on the picturesque, as compared with the sublime and the beautiful; and, on the use of studying pictures, for the purpose of improving real landscape, vol 1. J. Mawman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  101. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1999) The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. J Conscious Stud 6:15–51Google Scholar
  102. Salimpoor VN, Benovoy M, Larcher K, Dagher A, Zatorre RJ (2011) Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nat Neurosci (in press). doi:10.1038/nn.2726
  103. Schiano DJ, Jordan K (1990) Mueller-Lyer decrement: practice or prolonged inspection? Perception 19:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Segall M, Campbell D, Herskovits MJ (1966) The influence of culture on visual perception. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  105. Shiner L (2001) The invention of art: a cultural history. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  106. Shusterman R, Tomlin A (eds) (2008) Aesthetic experience. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  107. Silverman I, Eals M (1992) Sex differences in spatial abilities: evolutionary theory and data. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford Univ Press, New York, pp 487–503Google Scholar
  108. Silverman I, Choi J, Mackewn A, Fisher M, Moro J, Olshansky E (2000) Evolved mechanisms underlying way finding: further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. Evol Hum Behav 21:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Silverman I, Choi J, Peters M (2007) The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: data from 40 countries. Arch Sex Behav 36:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Skov M, Vartanian O (2009) Introduction: what is neuroaesthetics. In: Skov M, Vartanian O (eds) neuroaesthetics. Baywood, Amityville, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  111. Souques A, Baruk H (1930) Autopsie d’un cas d’amusie (avec aphasie) chez un professeur de piano. Rev Neurol 1:545–556Google Scholar
  112. Tatarkiewicz W (1963) Objectivity and subjectivity in the history of aesthetics. Phil Phenom Res 24:157–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Terhune KP, Liu GT, Modestino EJ, Miki A, Sheth KN, Liu C-SJ, Bonhomme GR, Haselgrove JC (2005) Recognition of objects in non-canonical views: a functional MRI study. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 25:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Texier P-J, Porraz G, Parkington J, Rigaud J-P, Poggenpoel C, Miller C, Tribolo C, Cartwright C, Coudenneau A, Klein R, Steele T, Verna C (2010) A Howiesons Poort tradition of engraving ostrich eggshell containers dated to 60,000 years ago at Diepkloof Rock Shelter, South Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:6180–6185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Van Damme W (1996) Beauty in context. Towards an anthropological approach to aesthetics. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  116. Vartanian O, Goel V (2004) Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. NeuroReport 15:893–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Webb D (1769) Observations on the correspondence between poetry and music. J. Williams, DublinGoogle Scholar
  118. Wertheimer M (1923) Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II. Psychol Forsch 4:301–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Yue X, Vessel EA, Biederman I (2007) The neural basis of scene preferences. NeuroReport 18:525–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zaidel DW (2005) Neuropsychology of art: neurological, cognitive, and evolutionary perspectives. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
  121. Zaidel DW (2010) Art and brain: insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution. J Anat 216:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zaimov K, Kitov D, Kolev N (1969) Aphasie chez un peintre. Encephale 58:377–417Google Scholar
  123. Zeising A (1854) Neue Lehre von den Proportionen des menschlichen Körpers. Rudolf Weigel, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  124. Zeising A (1855) Aesthetische Forschungen. Meidinger Gohn and Comp, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  125. Zeki S (1999) Inner vision. An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  126. Zeki S (2001) Artistic creativity and the brain. Science 293:51–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Zeki S (2004) The neurology of ambiguity. Conscious Cogn 13:173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Zeki S, Marini L (1998) Three cortical stages of colour processing in the human brain. Brain 121:1669–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcos Nadal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Albert Flexas
    • 1
  • Álex Gálvez
    • 1
  • Camilo José Cela-Conde
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Human Evolution and Cognition Research Group (IFISC-CSIC)University of the Balearic IslandsPalma de MallorcaSpain
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of the Balearic IslandsPalma de MallorcaSpain
  3. 3.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of the Balearic IslandsPalma de MallorcaSpain

Personalised recommendations