Peanut-Like Hematite Prepared by a New Facile Hydrothermal Process for Removal of As(V)
- 214 Downloads
Abstract
Peanut-like hematite has been prepared by a new facile hydrothermal method and applied in the adsorption removal of As(V). The structural features of the as-prepared hematite were characterized systematically by X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Results showed that the morphologies of hematite could be tuned to spindle-like, oval-like, and cantaloupe-like shapes by adjusting the hydrothermal conditions. The peanut-like hematite formation followed a five-step route. At pH = 3, the adsorption amount of As(V) over peanut-like hematite reached 13.84 mg/g, and the adsorption kinetic process corresponded to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The peanut-like hematite also showed partial selectivity over As(V) in the hydrosphere. This method can be a reference for the preparation of other architectural metal oxide materials.
Keywords
Peanut-like hematite Arsenic adsorbent NanoparticleIntroduction
Arsenic contamination has led to serious environmental problems because of its severe toxicity and risk to human health [1]. Thus, removing arsenic from aqueous environment is of critical importance. Recently, significant efforts have been devoted to removing arsenic pollutants from water systems by various strategies, including coagulation, adsorption, and reverse osmosis [2]. Among these strategies, adsorption is the simplest and most effective method for arsenic removal. Adsorption efficiency is highly dependent on adsorbent characteristics. Hence, high-efficient adsorbents must be urgently developed.
Hematite is an attractive and environment friendly adsorbent owing to its chemical stability, easy fabrication, and unique optical and electric properties; it is widely applied in adsorption, chemical catalysts, lithium-ion batteries, gas sensors, and electrode materials [3]. Given the specific interactions between hematite and oxyanions of arsenic species, hematite can be used as an adsorbent to remove arsenic [4]. Adsorption efficiency is related to the specific surface area, morphology, and surface groups of adsorbents [5]. Different hematite morphologies, such as dots [6], rods [7], wires [8], arrays [9], tubes [10], belts [11], disks [12], rings [13], and flower-like shapes [14], have been obtained. Sugimoto et al. [15] have synthesized hematite particles by the sol–gel method. Jia et al. [16] have synthesized hematite with a controllable size. However, the synthesis processes are tedious, and the adsorptive efficiency of arsenic remains unsatisfactory [17, 18]. Thus, a facile method must be developed to synthesize diverse hematite nanostructures.
In this study, we report for the first time a new facile hydrothermal process using 5-sulfoisophthalate acid sodium salt (5-SSIPA) to synthesize peanut-like hematite and remove As(V). The possible formation process of such peanut-like hematite was put forward, and the efficiency and selectivity for the As(V) removal of the peanut-like hematite were also studied.
Experimental
All procured chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Typically, 0.02 mol FeCl3·6H2O and 0.02 mol 5-SSIPA were dissolved in 60 mL deionized water in a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 190 °C for 6 h. Afterward, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature naturally, and a reddish brown powder was obtained by centrifugation and washed at least thrice with deionized water. Then, the reddish brown powder was dried by a freeze dryer and stored in a glass vial.
The morphology and distribution of oxygen and iron elements were demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The valence states of Fe were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The crystal morphology was demonstrated by transmission electron microscopy. The phase reflection was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with CuKα (λ = 0.15406 nm) radiation. The infrared optical properties were demonstrated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and pore size distribution were analyzed by N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm.
The peanut-like hematite with a concentration of 1 g/L was equilibrated in 30 mL NaCl solution with concentration of 0.1 mol/L for 2 h. Then, As(V) and HCl (0.1 mol/L) were added into the solution with an initial concentration and pH of 5100 mg/L and 3.0, respectively. The solutions were placed in a water bath shaker at 160 r/min and 25 °C. A total of 1 mL filtrate was obtained from the initial solutions at concentrations of 5 and 100 mg/L after a regular time (5, 10, 15, 25, and 35 min) and 12 h, respectively. As(V) concentrations were tested by atomic fluorescence spectrometry (Rayleigh, China) as referred to the work of Liu et al. [19].
Results and Discussion
a XRD, b XPS of Fe2p, and c N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (inset picture is pore size distribution) of the as-obtained products
a, b SEM, c HRTEM, and EDX mapping of d O and e Fe of peanut-like hematite
SEM images of samples with different components (a, zero 5-SSIPA, b 0.005 mol 5-SSIPA, c 0.03 mol Fe3+, and d 0.05 mol Fe3+)
SEM images (a 130 °C and b 160 °C) and c XRD patterns of the samples at different hydrothermal temperatures
a XRD patterns and SEM images of samples for different hydrothermal times (b 1, c 1.5, d 2, e 3, and f 6 h) and the formation process of peanut-like hematite
Combining the XRD patterns in Fig. 5a and SEM images in Fig. 5b–f, we proposed and simulated the process of a five-step route consisting of nucleation, aggregation, phase transition, anisotropic growth, and ripening. Small green rust seeds (Fe(OHCl)2.55) were generated by nucleation and crystal growth (step 1, Fig. 5b, 1 h). These seeds aggregated to form larger rod-like structures and transformed into iron hydroxide, goethite, and iron oxide hydroxide (step 2, Fig. 5c, 1.5 h) and then continuously aggregated and partly transformed into oval-like hematite (step 3, Fig. 5d, 2 h). At the same time, the proceeding phase transition led to the generation and deposition of hematite. As the interfacial energy between the nanoparticles and solution was higher than that between the nanoparticles and oval-like structure, the oval-like product would continuously grow anisotropically, and cantaloupe-like hematite was formed (step 4, Fig. 5e, 3 h) [22]. With prolonged time, the cantaloupe-like hematite continuously ripened and finally formed peanut-like hematite (step 5, Fig. 5f, 6 h). From the appearance of hematite reflection peaks at 2 h, peak intensity gradually increased, indicating the higher crystallinity of peanut-like hematite compared with other hematite types. Apart from the factors mentioned above, the attraction of crystallographic plane, hydrophobic interaction, and van der Waals forces can also affect the morphology [23]. Thus, additional studies are still needed to reveal the process and evolutionary mechanism of peanut-like hematite.
FT-IR spectra of the samples with different morphologies and synthesized with different component contents (a Fe3+ fixed at 0.02 mol; b 5-SSIPA fixed at 0.02 mol)
a Adsorbed amount and b plots of pseudo-second-order kinetics of As(V) adsorption over peanut-like hematite
Selective removal of As(V) by peanut-like hematite through the effects of anions at different concentrations
Conclusions
In summary, a new one-pot hydrothermal approach to obtain peanut-like hematite with a large BET surface area was developed in this study. The results showed that peanut-like hematite was formed by a five-step route consisting of nucleation, aggregation, phase transition, anisotropic growth, and ripening. Hematite with different morphologies can be obtained by properly controlling the hydrothermal conditions. The peanut-like hematite showed good preference and performance for As(V) removal, and the process was in accordance with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. This study does not only serve as a reference for the synthesis of other hierarchical metal oxides or hydroxides, but also provide an opportunity to study the catalytic and electromagnetic performances of materials with different morphologies.
Notes
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41373114); and the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. B06006).
References
- 1.Xie X, Wang Y, Pi K et al (2015) In situ treatment of arsenic contaminated groundwater by aquifer iron coating: experimental study. Sci Total Environ 527–528:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Pontoni L, Fabbricino M (2012) Use of chitosan and chitosan-derivatives to remove arsenic from aqueous solutions—a mini review. Carbohyd Res 356:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kay A, Cesar I, Graetzel M (2006) New benchmark for water photooxidation by nanostructured α-Fe2O3 films. J Am Chem Soc 128(49):15714–15721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Dixit S, Hering JG (2003) Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol 37(18):4182–4189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Chang Q, Lin W, Ying WC (2010) Preparation of iron-impregnated granular activated carbon for arsenic removal from drinking water. J Hazard Mater 184(1–3):515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Liang X, Wang X, Zhuang J et al (2006) Synthesis of nearly monodisperse iron oxide and oxyhydroxide nanocrystals. Adv Funct Mater 16(14):1805–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Wu C, Yin P, Zhu X et al (2006) Synthesis of hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanorods: diameter-size and shape effects on their applications in magnetism, lithium ion battery, and gas sensors. J Phys Chem B 110(36):17806–17812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Suber L, Imperatori P, Ausanio G et al (2005) Synthesis, morphology, and magnetic characterization of iron oxide nanowires and nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 109(15):7103–7109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Vayssieres L, Sathe C, Butorin SM et al (2005) One-dimensional quantum-confinement effect in α-Fe2O3 ultrafine nanorod arrays. Adv Mater 17(19):2320–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Chen J, Xu L, Li W et al (2005) α-Fe2O3 nanotubes in gas sensor and lithium-ion battery applications. Adv Mater 17(5):582–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Zhao YM, Li YH, Ma RZ et al (2006) Growth and characterization of iron oxide nanorods/nanobelts prepared by a simple iron–water reaction. Small 2(3):422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Chen D, Gao L (2004) A facile route for high-throughput formation of single-crystal α-Fe2O3 nanodisks in aqueous solutions of Tween 80 and triblock copolymer. Chem Phys Lett 395(4–6):316–320MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hu X, Yu JC, Gong J et al (2007) α-Fe2O3 nanorings prepared by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal process and their sensing properties. Adv Mater 19(17):2324–2329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Atabaev TS (2015) Facile hydrothermal synthesis of flower-like hematite microstructure with high photocatalytic properties. J Adv Ceram 4(1):61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Sugimoto T, Sakata K, Muramatsu A (1993) Formation mechanism of monodisperse pseudocubic α-Fe2O3 particles from condensed ferric hydroxide gel. J Colloid Interface Sci 159(2):372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Jia CJ, Sun LD, Luo F et al (2008) Large-scale synthesis of single-crystalline iron oxide magnetic nanorings. J Am Chem Soc 130(50):16968–16977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Zhong LS, Hu JS, Liang HP et al (2006) Self-assembled 3D flowerlike iron oxide nanostructures and their application in water treatment. Adv Mater 18(18):2426–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cao CY, Qu J, Yan WS et al (2012) Low-cost synthesis of flowerlike α-Fe2O3 nanostructures for heavy metal ion removal: adsorption property and mechanism. Langmuir 28(9):4573–4579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Liu ZM, Wu SH, Jia SY et al (2014) Novel hematite nanorods and magnetite nanoparticles prepared from MIL-100 (Fe) template for the removal of As(V). Mater Lett 132:8–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.McIntyre NS, Zetaruk DG (1977) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of iron oxides. Anal Chem 49(11):1521–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Du Y, Jing Y, Qi M et al (2012) Fabrication and excellent conductive performance of antimony-doped tin oxide-coated diatomite with porous structure. Mater Chem Phys 133(2–3):907–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Vayssieres L, Beermann N, Lindquist SE et al (2001) Controlled aqueous chemical growth of oriented three-dimensional crystalline nanorod arrays: application to iron (III) oxides. Chem Mater 13(2):233–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Politi Y, Arad T, Klein E et al (2004) Sea urchin spine calcite forms via a transient amorphous calcium carbonate phase. Science 306(5699):1161–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hu X, Yu JC (2008) Continuous aspect-ratio tuning and fine shape control of monodisperse α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals by a programmed microwave-hydrothermal method. Adv Funct Mater 18(6):880–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Eggleston CM, Khare N, Lovelace DM (2006) Cytochrome c interaction with hematite (α-Fe2O3) surfaces. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 150(2–3):220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Hameed BH, Rahman AA (2008) Removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from biomass material. J Hazard Mater 160(2–3):576–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Catalano JG, Park C, Fenter P et al (2008) Simultaneous inner- and outer-sphere arsenate adsorption on corundum and hematite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72(8):1986–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Liu Z, Chen J, Wu Y et al (2018) Synthesis of magnetic orderly mesoporous ɑ-Fe2O3 nanocluster derived from MIL-100(Fe) for rapid and efficient arsenic(III, V) removal. J Hazard Mater 343:304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Qin FX, Jia SY, Liu Y et al (2013) Metal-organic framework as a template for synthesis of magnetic CoFe2O4 nanocomposites for phenol degradation. Mater Lett 101:93–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Fufa F, Alemayehu E, Lennartz B (2014) Sorptive removal of arsenate using termite mound. J Environ Manag 132:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Jain A, Loeppert RH (2000) Effect of competing anions on the adsorption of arsenate and arsenite by ferrihydrite. J Environ Qual 29(5):1422–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.