Advertisement

Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners

  • Elena Kossmann
  • Mónica Gómez-Suárez
Original Article

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to explore the practitioners’ questions for the marketing of ethical products. The increased interest of civil society and academia in sustainability and ethical consumption has led to ample academic research on the decision-making processes behind purchase decisions. Ethical consumption has been growing in most developed countries and has become a main item in the agenda of government and local authorities for its promise of a brighter future, not just for those in the consuming end of the supply-chain, but also for those on the production end. Further to our research, there has been no attempt to link the research needs of the business society with the research agendas of academics. This paper presents the results from semi-structured interviews with top and mid-level marketing managers working for Fairtrade. After the analysis of the interviews in ATLAS.ti, a research agenda is proposed aiming to create the basis for future academic research based on the needs of practitioners, therefore ensuring that there is increased relevance for them.

Keywords

Ethical consumerism Semi-structured interviews Relevance gap Academic-practitioner divide ATLAS.ti 

References

  1. Adams, M., & Raisborough, J. (2010). Making a difference: Ethical consumption. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 256–274  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01312.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andorfer, V. a., & Liebe, U. (2012). Research on fair trade consumption-a review. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 415–435  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1008-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 281–304  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022212816261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016). Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 229–247  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, C., Cafaro, P., & Newholm, T. (2005). Philosophy and Ethical Consumption. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The Ethical Consumer (pp. 11–24). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk, R. W. (1974). An exploratory assessment of situational effects in buyer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 156–163  https://doi.org/10.2307/3150553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belk, R. W. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 157  https://doi.org/10.1086/208627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, J. (2014). Time to take control? How to manage your own marketing resource allocation. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 16(2), 80–85.  https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2014.56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breger Bush, S. (2012). Derivatives and development: a political economy of global finance, farming, and poverty (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunk, K. H. (2010). Exploring origins of ethical company/brand perceptions — A consumer perspective of corporate ethics. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 255–262  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21(1), 97–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00095-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burke, P. F., Eckert, C., & Davis, S. (2014). Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2237–2261.  https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2013-0294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrier, J. G. (2010). Protecting the environment the natural way: Ethical consumption and commodity fetishism. Antipode, 42(3), 672–689  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00768.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrigan, M., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2009). Will ethical consumers sustain their values in the global credit crunch? International Marketing Review, 26(6), 674–687  https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330911001341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention-behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2759–2767  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carrington, M. J., Zwick, D., & Neville, B. (2016). The ideology of the ethical consumption gap. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593115595674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caruana, R., Carrington, M. J., & Chatzidakis, A. (2015). “Beyond the attitude-behaviour gap: Novel perspectives in consumer ethics”: Introduction to the thematic symposium. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 215–218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2444-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 89–100  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9222-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chatzidakis, A., Kastanakis, M., & Stathopoulou, A. (2016). Socio-cognitive determinants of consumers’ support for the fair trade movement. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 95–109  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2347-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Villanueva, M. L. (2013). Situational variables in online versus offline channel choice. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(5), 347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cornelissen, J. P. (2002). Academic and practitioner theories of marketing. Marketing Theory, 2(1), 133–143  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593102002001647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Crane, A. (2001). Unpacking the ethical product. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 361–373  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010793013027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2007). A model for fair trade buying behaviour: The role of perceived quantity and quality of information and of product-specific attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 361–380  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9259-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00019.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Defra (2015). Food statistics pocketbook 2015. Department for Enviroment Food and Rural Affairs, 15. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/423616/foodpocketbook-2014report-23apr15.pdf
  28. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465–480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dickson, M. (2005). Identifying and Profiling Apparel Label Users. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The Ethical Consumer (pp. 155–172). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doane, D. (2001). Taking flight: The rapid growth of ethical consumerism. New Economics Foundation, (October), 1–16. Retrieved from http://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/dcca99d756562385f9_xtm6i6233.pdf
  31. Doran, C. J. (2009). The role of personal values in fair trade consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 549–563  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9724-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fairtrade International. (2015). Fairtrade International (FLO): History of Fairtrade. Retrieved February 28, 2016, from http://www.fairtrade.net/about-fairtrade/history-of-fairtrade.html
  33. Galletta, A. (2012). Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond. New York: New York University Press (NYU Press).Google Scholar
  34. Hartley, B., & Pickton, D. (2010). Integrated marketing communications requires a new way of thinking. Journal of Marketing Communications, 5(2), 97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/135272699345699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D. (2016). Who says there is an intention-behaviour gap? Assessing the empirical evidence of an intention-behaviour gap in ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 219–236  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2440-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holbrook, M. B. (1985). Why business is bad for consumer research: The three bears revisited. Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 145–156.Google Scholar
  37. Ipsos. (2014). To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement “I try to buy products from companies that try to act in an ethical way, even if it means spending more”? Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/319512/buying-from-ethical-retailers-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/.
  38. Jacoby, J. (1985). Serving two masters: perspectives on consulting, 42(2003).Google Scholar
  39. Jarratt, D. G. (1996). A comparison of two alternative interviewing techniques used within an integrated research design: A case study in outshopping using semi-structured and non-directed interviewing techniques. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(6), 6–15  https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509610131108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kumar, V. (2017). Integrating theory and practice in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 81(2), 1–7  https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.80.2.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lamiell, J. T. (2013). ‘Nomothetic’and ‘Idiographic’: Contrasting Windelband’s understanding with contemporary usage. In S. L. Schneider (Ed.), Experimental design in the behavioral and social sciences (Volume I, 1st ed., pp. 103–118). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Littrell, M. A., & Dickson, M. A. (1999). Social Responsibility in the Global Market: fair trade of cultural products. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Long, M. a., & Murray, D. L. (2013). Ethical consumption, values convergence/divergence and community development. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(2), 351–375  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9384-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loureiro, M. L., & Lotade, J. (2005). Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecological Economics, 53(1), 129–138  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 253–270  https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parker, S. (2002). Ethical shopping. http://www.icmresearch.co.uk/reviews/2002/retail-week-ethicalshopping.htm. Accessed 6 Dec 2006.
  49. Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt-free: The role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104–119.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pereira Heath, M. T., & Chatzidakis, A. (2012). “Blame it on marketing”: Consumers’ views on unsustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(6), 656–667  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01043.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & Mceachern, M. G. (2009). The conscious consumer: Taking a flexible approach to ethical behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 224–231  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00750.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. UNCED. (1992). Earth summit‘92. The UN conference on environment and development. In Reproduction (Vol. Rio de Jan, p. 351).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-008-9208-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Usunier, J.-C. (2006). Relevance in business research: The case of country-of-origin research in marketing. European Management Review, 3(1), 60–73  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson, C. (2014). Semi-Structured Interviews. In Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners (pp. 23–41).  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410393-1.00002-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dpto. Financiación e Investigación Comercial, Facultad CC. EmpresarialesUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations