Advertisement

Exploring the communication effects of message framing of smoking cessation advertising on smokers’ mental processes

  • Dong Jenn Yang
Original Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The communication effectiveness of a negatively framed message (fear appeal) has been an important focus in smoking cessation research. Inspired by marketing ethics, this research aims to provide an advanced understanding of smoking cessation advertising by comparing the communication effects of positively and negatively framed messages on the mental processes of smokers. Questionnaires with two framed messages (positive and negative) were randomly distributed to adult smokers. Using linear structural equation modeling, the results from 230 valid responses (105 were positive and 125 were negative) revealed that message framing could provoke different drive sources and mental processes, and effective communication is greatly dependent on agency thinking. Finally, this study found that a positively framed message was more persuasive in prompting smoking cessation than a negatively framed message.

Keywords

Message framing Communication effects Smoking cessation Non-profit marketing Social marketing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan for financial support (NSC 101-2410-H-214-009-SSS), Chiu-Ping Chen and Shu-Wan Yang for their assistance in data collection and statistical analysis of the project, Dr. Tsung-Kuang E. Ma for English writing consultant and anonymous reviewers for their improved suggstions.

References

  1. Adhikari, B., Kahende, J., Malarcher, A., Pechacek, T., & Tong, V. (2009). Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses --United States, 2000-2004. JAMA, 301(6), 593.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.301.6.593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer, P. U. (1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 184–206.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399272005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1999). A sociocognitive analysis of substance abuse: An agentic perspective. Psychological Science, 10(3), 214–217.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, T. R., & Carson, V. (2010). Ease of imagination, message framing and physical activity messages. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(1), 197–211.  https://doi.org/10.1348/135910709X447811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan, L., & Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 140–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, K. N., van der Deen, F. S., Wilson, N., & Blakely, T. (2012). Smoking uptake is associated with increased psychological distress: Results of a national longitudinal study. Tobacco Control, 23(1), 33–38.  https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, T. F., & Cox, M. A. A. (2001). Multidimensional scaling. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Dickinson, S., & Holmes, M. (2008). Understanding the emotional and coping responses of adolescent individuals exposed to threat appeals. International Journal of Advertising, 27(2), 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dillard, J. P., & Anderson, J. W. (2004). The role of fear in persuasion. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 909–926.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallopel-Morvan, K., Gabriel, P., Le Gall-Ely, M., Rieunier, S., & Urien, B. (2011). The use of visual warnings in social marketing: The case of tobacco. Journal of Business Research, 64(1), 7–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2008). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gwaltney, C. J., Shiffman, S., Balabanis, M. H., & Paty, J. A. (2005). Dynamic self-efficacy and outcome expectancies: Prediction of smoking lapse and relapse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(4), 661–675.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gwaltney, C. J., Metrik, J., Kahler, C. W., & Shiffman, S. (2009). Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., McDonald, P. W., Brown, K. S., & Cameron, R. (2004). Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: Evidence from Canadian smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 94(8), 1442–1445.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.8.1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hastings, G., Stead, M., & Webb, J. (2004). Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 961–986.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henthorne, T. L., LaTour, M. S., & Nataraajan, R. (1993). Fear appeals in print advertising-an analysis of arousal and ad response. Journal of Advertising, 22, 59–69.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1993.10673404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollenbeck, J. R., & Brief, A. P. (1987). The effects of individual differences and goal origin on goal setting and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40(3), 392–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90023-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu, M. L. (1999). Hopes and care in the AIDS era: A study on audiences’ reception of public service announcements. Mass Communication Research, 61(3), 31–72.Google Scholar
  21. Janis, I. L. (1967). Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 166–224). New York: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60344-5.
  22. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later. Health Education & Behavior, 11(1): 1–47.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981840110010.
  23. Jones, L. W., Sinclair, R. C., & Courneya, K. S. (2003). The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jung, W. S., & Villegas, J. (2011). The effects of message framing, involvement, and nicotine dependence on anti-smoking public service announcements. Health Marketing Quarterly, 28(3), 219–231.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2011.595641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kotler, P. (2005). The role played by the broadening of marketing movement in the history of marketing thought. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(1), 114–116.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.24.1.114.63903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 3–12.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1249783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krugman, D. M., Fox, R. J., & Fischer, P. M. (1999). Do cigarette warnings warn? Understanding what it will take to develop more effective warnings. Journal of Health Communication, 4(2), 95–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/108107399126986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leung, J., Gartner, C., & Dobson, A. (2011). Psychological distress is associated with tobacco smoking and quitting behaviour in the Australian population: Evidence from national cross-sectional surveys. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45(2), 170–178.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2010.534070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 119–186). New York: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60091-X.Google Scholar
  31. Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(2), 157–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, G. R. (1963). Studies on the use of fear appeals: a summary and analysis. Central States Speech Journal, 14(2), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mowen, J. C. (1995). Consumer behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  34. O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory & Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Parkin, D. M. (2011). Tobacco-attributable cancer burden in the UK in 2010. British Journal of Cancer, 105(Dec.), S6–S13.  https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.3.380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ray, M. L., & Wilkie, W. (1970). Fear: The potential of an appeal neglected by marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 54–62.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1250296.Google Scholar
  38. Reardon, J., & Miller, C. (2008). Smoking prevention messages for adolescents: How intensity, valence, and recipient of consequences affect attitude toward the ad and intent to smoke. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 16(1), 67–77.  https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679160105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reed II, A., Wooten, D. B., & Bolton, L. E. (2002). The temporary construction of consumer attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 375–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(16)30088-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roberto, M., Cruz, M., Bajo, M., Siggins, G. R., Parsons, L. H., & Schweitzer, P. (2010). The endocannabinoid system tonically regulates inhibitory transmission and depresses the effect of ethanol in central amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(9), 1962–1972.  https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodgers, W. M., & Gauvin, L. (1998). Heterogeneity of incentives for physical activity and self-efficacy in highly active and moderately active women exercisers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(11), 1016–1029.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01665.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological process in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. Cacioppo & R. Petty (Eds.), Social Psychology: A Source Book (pp. 153–176). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rogers, R. W., & Deckner, C. W. (1975). Effects of fear appeals and physiological arousal upon emotion, attitudes, and cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 222–230.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5(3), 161–200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rossiter, J. R., & Thornton, J. (2004). Fear-pattern analysis supports the fear-drive model for antispeeding road-safety TV Ads. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 945–960.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(5), 408–433.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1993.1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gainand loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), 202–220.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruiter, R. A. C., Kok, G., Verplanken, B., & Van Eersel, G. (2003). Strengthening the persuasive impact of fear appeal: The role of action framing. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(3), 397–400.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Pallonen, U., Mundorf, N., Smith, N. F., & Steward, W. T. (2001). Visuals and auditory message framing effects on tobacco smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 667–682.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01407.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sherman, D. K., Mann, T., & Updegraff, J. A. (2006). Approach avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 165–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9001-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shiffman, S., Balabanis, M. H., Paty, J. A., et al. (2000). Dynamic effects of self-efficacy on smoking lapse and relapse. Health Psychology, 19(4), 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shorey, H. S., Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., Hockemeyer, J. R., & Feldman, D. B. (2002). Somewhere over the rainbow: Hope theory weathers its first decade. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 322–331.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Siegel, M., & Biener, S. L. (2000). The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: Results of a longitudinal youth study. American Journal of Public Health, 90(3), 380–386.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.90.3.380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Snyder, C. R. (1994). The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. New York: Free press. Cited in Snyder, C.R. (2000). Hypothesis: There is hope. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of hope theory, measures and applications (pp. 3–21). San Diego: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012654050-5/50003-8.Google Scholar
  56. Snyder, C. R. (2000). Handbook of hope. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., & Sigmon, S. T. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strong, J. T., & Dubas, K. M. (1993). The optimal level of fear-arousal in advertising: An empirical study. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 15(Fall), 93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.1993.10505006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Troutman, C. S., Burke, K. G., & Beeler, J. D. (2011). The effects of self-efficacy, assertiveness, stress, and gender on intention to turnover in public accounting. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 16(3), 63–74.  https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v16i3.2043.Google Scholar
  61. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014). The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: A report of the surgeon general. Retrieved from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/full-report.pdf.
  63. Umphrey, L. R. (2003). The effects of message framing and message processing on testicular self-examination attitudes and perceived susceptibility. Communication Research Reports, 20(2), 97–105.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q., & de Vries, H. (2008). The influence of self-efficacy on the effects of framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 800–809.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615.  https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang, D. J. (2013). The communication effects of audience situation and message framing on smoking cessation. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Science, 2(4), 252–264.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2368006.Google Scholar
  68. Yzer, M. C., Fisher, J. D., Siero, F. W., Bakker, A. B., & Misovich, S. J. (1998). The effects of information about AIDS risk and self-efficacy on women's intentions to engage in AIDS preventive behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(20), 1837–1852.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01348.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Administration Department of I-Shou UniversityKaohsiung CityRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations