How proof of previous donations influences compliance with a donation request: three field experiments

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The purpose of these three experiments was to determine whether the visibility of previous donations to a humanitarian cause influences people’s donation to the same cause. In Study 1, conducted in bakeries, a donation box was placed near the cash register with a message soliciting donations for a humanitarian project. The moneybox was transparent or not. Results show that more donations were placed in the transparent moneybox. Study 2 replicated these findings using face-to-face interaction. In Study 3, participants were solicited at home for a clothing donation, and the research assistant held a bag containing several items of clothing or none. It was reported that more participants donated when they saw several garments in the bag. Social proof is used to explain the results reported, and the practical interest of making visible people’s donations in humanitarian fundraising solicitation is discussed.

Keywords

Social proof Donation Fundraising 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bégin, G. (1978). Sex makes a difference: 1. Evidence from a modeling study conducted in a natural setting. Psychological Reports, 43, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choukas-Bradley, S., Giletta, M., Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Peer influence, peer status, and prosocial behavior: an experimental investigation of peer socialization of adolescents' intentions to volunteer. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 44, 2197–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Influence: science and practice. New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Cialdini, R., Demaine, L., Sagarin, B., Barrett, D., Rhoads, K., & Winter, P. (2006). Managing norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darlington, R. B., & Macker, C. E. (1966). Displacement of guilt-produced altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 442–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer, P., Krueger, J., Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmüller, A., Vogrincic, C., Frey, D., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guéguen, N. (2007). The effect of modeling on tipping behavior. Studia Psychologica, 49, 275–282.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, M. B., & Samerotte, G. C. (1976). The effects of actual and attempted theft, need, and a previous favor on altruism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lerner. (1980). The belief in a just world: a fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pandey, J., & Griffitt, W. (1977). Benefactor's sex and nurturance need, recipient's dependency, and the effect of number of potential helpers on helping behavior. Journal of Personality, 45, 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Phillips, D. P. (1974). The influence of suggestion on suicide: substantive and theoretical implications of the Werther effect. American Sociological Review, 39, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Regan, J. W. (1971). Guilt, perceived injustice, and altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Regan, D. T., Williams, M., & Sparling, S. (1972). Voluntary expiation of guilt: a field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 42–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ross, A. S. (1970). The effect of observing a helpful model on helping behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 81, 131–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Salmon, S. J., De Vet, E., Adriaanse, M. A., Fennis, B. M., Veltkamp, M., & De Ridder, D. (2015). Social proof in the supermarket: promoting healthy choices under low self-control conditions. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stack, S. (2000). Media impacts on suicide: a quantitative review of 293 findings. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 957–971.Google Scholar
  19. Zener-Solomon, L., & Grota, P. (1976). Imitation of a helpful model: the effect of level of emergency. The Journal of Social Psychology, 99, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de Bretagne-SudVannesFrance

Personalised recommendations