Investigating the effect of message framing on parents’ engagement with advertisements promoting child physical activity

  • Jocelyn W. Jarvis
  • Heather L. Gainforth
  • Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
Original Article

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) messages are more or less effective depending on the gain, loss, mixed, or neutral frame of the information presented. Whether the frame of a message promoting children’s physical activity impacts parents’ support of their children’s PA is unknown. As a first step to addressing this research gap, this study examined parents’ evaluations of differently framed, publically available children’s PA video advertisements (ads). Moms (n = 84) and dads (n = 99) with at least one child aged 8–13 year viewed 4 ads. Following each ad they completed measures of ad engagement including message involvement, message believability, attitudes towards the message within the ad and attitudes towards the advertisements as a whole. Within-participant ANCOVAs with bonferroni post hocs indicated that parents considered the loss-framed ad less believable than all other ads (ps < 0.001). The gain-framed ad was considered more believable than the neutral-framed ad (p < 0.01). Additionally, participants’ attitudes towards the gain- and neutral-framed ads were more favourable compared to the loss- and mixed-framed advertisements (ps < 0.001). These findings suggest that parents consider gain- and neutral-framed messages more engaging than loss- and mixed-framed messages. Whether these perceptions translate into changes in parents’ perceptions and behaviours related to supporting their children’s PA remains to be determined.

Keywords

Message framing Physical activity Mass media Social marketing Social support 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Canadian Institute of Health Research for their funding support.

References

  1. Abhyankar, P., O’Connor, D. B., & Lawton, R. (2008). The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 13(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, A., Finegood, D. T., & Matsudo, V. (2009). International perspectives on the physical inactivity crisis—structural solutions over evidence generation? Preventive Medicine, 49, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calder, B. J., & Malthouse, E. C. (2008). Media engagement and advertising effectiveness. In B. J. Calder (Ed.), Kellogg on advertising and media, 1–36.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, C.-T. (2007). Health-care product advertising: the influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics. Psychology and Marketing, 24(2), 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, C.-T., & Lee, Y.-K. (2009). Framing charity advertising: influences of message framing image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2910–2935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Covey, J. (2012). The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0029305.Google Scholar
  7. Craig, C. L., Marshall, A. L., Sjöström, M., Bauman, A. E., Booth, M. L., Ainsworth, B. E., et al. (2003). International physical activity questionnaire 12-country validity and reliability. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, 35(8), 1381–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrell, K., Ferguson, E., James, V., & Lowe, K. C. (2001). Confidence in the safety of blood for transfusion: the effect of message framing. Transfusion, 41(11), 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Gainforth, H. L., Cao, W., & Latimer-Cheung, A. E. (2012). Message framing and parents’ intentions to have their children vaccinated against HPV. Public Health Nursing, 29(6), 542–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2011). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7.Google Scholar
  12. Gerend, M. A., & Shepherd, J. E. (2007). Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology, 26(6), 745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerend, M. A., Shepherd, J. E., & Monday, K. A. (2008). Behavioral frequency moderates the effects of message framing on HPV vaccine acceptability. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grier, S., & Bryant, C. (2005). Social marketing in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26(1), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallahan, K. (1999). Content class as a contextual cue in the cognitive processing of publicity versus advertising. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(4), 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huhman, M. E., Potter, L. D., Nolin, M. J., Piesse, A., Judkins, D. R., Banspach, S. W., et al. (2010). The influence of the VERB campaign on children’s physical activity in 2002 to 2006. American Journal of Public Health, 100(4), 638–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laczniak, R. N., Kempf, D. S., & Muehling, D. D. (1999). Advertising message involvement: the role of enduring and situational factors. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 21(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Latimer, A. E., Rench, T. A., Rivers, S. E., Katulak, N. A., Materese, S. A., Cadmus, L., et al. (2008). Promoting participation in physical activity using framed messages: an application of prospect theory. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 659–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915–1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Price, S. M., Huhman, M., & Potter, L. D. (2008). Influencing the parents of children aged 9–13 years: findings from the VERB™ campaign. American Journal of Preventative Medecine, 34(6S), S267–S274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rhodes, R. E., Berry, T., Craig, C. L., Faulkner, G., Latimer-Cheung, A., Spence, J. C., et al. (2013). Understanding parental support of child physical activity behavior. American Journal of Health Behavior, 37(4), 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Toll, B. A., O’Malley, S., Katulak, N. A., Wu, R., Dubin, J. A., Latimer, A. E., et al. (2007). Comparing gain- and loss-framed messages for smoking cessation with sustained-release bupropion: a randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 531–544.Google Scholar
  25. Treiber, F. A. (1986). A comparison of the positive and negative consequences approaches upon car restraint usage. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tremblay, M. S., Shield, M. S., Laviolette, M., Craig, C. L., Janssen, I., & Gorber, S. C. (2010). Fitness of Canadian children and youth: results from the 2007–2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Reports, 21(1), 1–14. In Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 82-003-X.Google Scholar
  27. Trost, S. G., Sallis, J. F., Pate, R. R., Freedson, P. S., Taylor, W. C., & Dowda, M. (2003). Evaluating a model of parental influence on youth physical activity. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 25(4), 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, A. (2006). Advertising engagement: a driver of message involvement on message effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(4), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waters, E., de Silva-Sanigorski, Hall, B. J., Brown, T., Campbell, K. J., Gao, Y., et al. (Updated September 22, 2010). Interventions for preventing obesity in children. [Cochrane Review]. In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(12). Retrieved April 20th, 2012, from The Cochrane Library, Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  31. Welk, G. J., Wood, K., & Morss, G. (2003). Parental influences on physical activity in children: an exploration of potential mechanisms. Pediatric Exercise Science, 15, 19–33.Google Scholar
  32. Wilson, D. K., Wallston, K. A., & King, J. E. (1990). Effects of contract framing, motivation to quit, and self-efficacy on smoking reduction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(7), 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zecevic, C. A., Tremblay, L., Lovsin, T., & Michel, L. (2010). Parental influence on young children’s physical activity. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2010, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jocelyn W. Jarvis
    • 1
  • Heather L. Gainforth
    • 1
  • Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Kinesiology and Health StudiesQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations