Advertisement

Understanding university image: a structural equation model approach

  • Paulo O. Duarte
  • Helena B. Alves
  • Mário B. Raposo
Original Article

Abstract

Over the last years, institutional image management has become a critical element to the competitiveness of higher education institutions. The aims of this study are to review the organizational image construct; explore the process of image formation and analyze the impact of the different source factors on university’s image. A sample of 1024 university student was surveyed to test a conceptual model of university image formation trough structural equations. The results show that, nevertheless all factors being significant to image formation, the university social life atmosphere and employment opportunities are the most important predictors. As a result, this study is important for researchers and practitioners, as it presents a different approach to image measurement, it provides a new framework to assess university image formation and, at the same time, helps managers to understand that educational related factors aren’t the only ones where they should focus to successful differentiate their institutions and remain competitive.

Keywords

Institutional image University image Image sources Higher education Marketing strategies 

References

  1. Abratt R (1989) A new approach to the Corporate image management process. J Mark Manag 5:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessandri S (2001) Modeling Corp identity: a concept explication and theoretical explanation. Corp Commun Int J 6(4):173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali-Choudhury R, Bennet R, Savani S (2009) University mark directors’ views on the components of a university brand. Int Rev on Public and Nonprofit Mark 6(1):11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson J, Gerbing D (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A Review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arpan L, Raney A, Zivnuska S (2003) A cognitive approach to understanding university image. Corp Commun Int J 8(2):97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagozzi R, Burnkrant R (1985) Attitude organization and the attitude- behavior relation: a replay to Dillon and Kumar. J Pers Soc Psychol 49(1):47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baloglu S, Brinberg D (1997) Affective Images of Tourism Destinations. J Travel Res 35(4):11–15Google Scholar
  8. Barclay D, Thompson R, Higgins C (1995) The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Tech Stud 2(2):285–309Google Scholar
  9. Barich H, Kotler P (1991) A framework for marketing image management. Sloan Manage Rev 32(2):94–104Google Scholar
  10. Belanger C, Mount J, Wilson M (2002) Institutional image and retention. Tertiary Education & Management 8(3):217–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Binsardi A, Ekwulugo F (2003) International marketing of British education: research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration. Market Intell Plann 21(5):318–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bok D (1992) Reclaiming the public trust. Change 24(4):13–19Google Scholar
  13. Carlivati P (1990) Measuring your image. Assoc Manage 42:49–52Google Scholar
  14. Chin Wynne (1998) The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides G (ed) Modern Methods for Business Research. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 295–336Google Scholar
  15. Dichter E (1985) What’s in an image. J Consum Market 2(1):75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobni D, Zinkhan G (1990) In Search of Brand Image: a Foundation Analysis. Adv Consum Res 17:110–119Google Scholar
  17. Donnellan J (2002) The impact of marketer controlled factors on college-choice decisions by students at a public research university, Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst. UMI number: 3039350.Google Scholar
  18. Duarte P, Raposo M (2009) A PLS Model To Study Brand Preference: An Application to a product class. In: Vinzi VE, Chin W, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of Partial Least Square — Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields. Springer, Berlin In pressGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornell C, Larcker D (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J Market Res 18:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fram E (1982) Maintaining and enhancing a college or a university, Twenty-second Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, (16–19 May): ERIC Reports, ED 220 044.Google Scholar
  21. Gose K (1994–1995) Strategic planning: the commission on school’s final report. NCA Q 69(2–3):332–334Google Scholar
  22. Gotsi M, Wilson A (2001) Corporate Reputation: Seeking a Definition. Corp Comm Int J 6(1):24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray B, Fam K, Llanes V (2003) Branding universities in Asian markets. J Prod Brand Manag 12(2):108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gregory J (1999) Marketing Corporate Image — The Company As Your Number One Product, 2nd edn. Illinois, NTC Business Books, LincolnwoodGoogle Scholar
  25. Gutman J, Miaoulis G (2003) Communicating a quality position in service delivery: an application in higher education. Manag Serv Qual 13(2):105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall International, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Holdswoth D, Nind D (2005) Choice Modelling New Zealand High School Seniors’ Preferences for University Education. J Market High Educ 15(2):81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Immerwahr J, Harvey J (1995) Goodwill and growing worry: public perceptions of American higher education. Publications GGW, American Council on Education, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Ivy J (2001) Higher education institution image: a correspondence analysis approach. Int J Educ Manag 15(6):276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins N (1991) The Business of Image: Visualising the Corp Message. Kogan Page Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Kallio R (1995) Factors influencing the college choice decisions of graduate students. Res High Educ 36(1):109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kazoleas D, Kim Y, Moffitt M (2001) Institutional image: A case study. Corp Comm Int J 6(4):205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keaveney S, Hunt K (1992) Conceptualization and Operationalization of Retail Store Image: A Case of Rival Middle-Level Theories. J Acad Market Sci 20(2):165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kennedy S (1977) Nurturing Corporate images. Eur J Market 11(3):120–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kotler P, Fox K (1995) Strategic Markeking for Educational Institutions, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  36. Landrum R, Turrisi R, Harless C (1998) University image: the benefits of assessment and modeling. J Market High Educ 9(1):53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. LeBlanc G, Nguyen N (1995) Cues used by customers evaluating Corporate image in service firms: An empirical study in financial institutions. Int J Serv Ind Manag 7(2):45–56Google Scholar
  38. Leister D, MacLahlan D (1975) Organizational Self-Perception and Environmental Image Measurement. Acad Manag J 18(2):205–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin L (1997) What are student education and educational related needs? Market Res Today 25(3):199–212Google Scholar
  40. Litten L (1980) Mark higher education: Benefits and risks for the American academic system. J High Educ 51(1):40–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Luque-Martínez T, Barrio-García S (2009) Modelling university image: the teaching staff viewpoint. Publ Relat Rev 35(3):325–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marginson S (2006) Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. High Educ 52(1):1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McPherson M, Shapiro M (1988) The student aid game. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  44. Nguyen N, LeBlanc G (2001) Image and reputation of higher education institutions in students’ retention decisions. Int J Educ Manag 15(6):303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nunnaly J, Bernstein I (1994) Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Mahony G, McWilliams A, Whitelaw P (2001) Why students choose a hospitality degree program: an Australian case study. Cornell Hotel Restaur Adm Q 42(1):92–96Google Scholar
  47. Palacio A, Meneses G, Pérez P (2002) The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students. J Educ Admin 40(5):486–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parameswaran R, Glowacka A (1995) University image: An information processing perspective. J Market High Educ 6(2):41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Phair J (1992) 1992 education report card: educational institutions, newly vulnerable, confront issues of economy and public trust. Publ Relat J 48:22–24Google Scholar
  50. Price I, Matzdorf F, Smith L, Agahi H (2003) The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities 21(10):212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith C (2001) ‘Same Old’ Attitude Is No Way to Find Corp Identity. Marketing February 2001:21Google Scholar
  52. Smith L, Cavusgil T (1984) Marketing planning for colleges and universities. Long Range Planning 17(6):104–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Soutar G, Turner J (2002) Students' preferences for university: a conjoint analysis. Int J Educ Manag 16(1):40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sung M, Yang S (2008) Toward the model of university image: the influence of brand personality, external prestige, and reputation. J Publ Relat Res 20(4):357–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stern E, Krakover S (1993) The Formation of a Composite Urban Image. Geogr Anal 25(2):130–146Google Scholar
  56. Terkla D, Pagano M (1993) Understanding Institutional Image. Res High Educ 34(1):11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Theus K (1993) Academic reputations: The process of formation and decay. Publ Relat Rev 19(3):277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Treadwell D, Harrison T (1994) Conceptualizing and assessing organizational image: Model images, commitment and communication. Comm Monogr 61(1):63–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weissman J (1990) Institutional image assessment and modification in colleges and universities. J High Educ Manag 6(1):65–75Google Scholar
  60. Williams S, Moffitt M (1997) Corporate image as an impression formation process: prioritizing personal, organizational, and environmental audience factors. J Publ Relat Res 9(4):237–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson A (1999) Strategic imaging in academe: A study of college and university images as perceived by prospective college students. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Dissertation submitted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy DegreeGoogle Scholar
  62. Yost M, Tucker S (1995) Tangible evidence in marketing a service: The value of a campus visit in choosing a college. J Market High Educ 6(1):47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yugo J, Reeve C (2007) Understanding students’ university educational image and its role in college choice. Psi Chi J for Undergraduate Research in Psychology 12(1):9–17Google Scholar
  64. Vaughn R, Pitlik J, Hansotia B (1978) Understanding University Choice: A Multi-Attribute Approach. Adv Consum Res 05:26–31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paulo O. Duarte
    • 1
  • Helena B. Alves
    • 1
  • Mário B. Raposo
    • 1
  1. 1.NECE—Research Unit in Business Sciences, Business and Economics DepartmentUniversity of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal

Personalised recommendations